NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Monday, February 16, 2026
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Copyright 2025- All Right Reserved Norway News
Norwegian Aid

IMF assessment of the Norwegian financial system

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 20, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

In a recent assessment, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) points out that the Norwegian financial system is resilient to shocks and subject to well-developed oversight. However, the IMF also emphasizes that there are vulnerabilities that requires vigilance, and highlights some areas where regulation and oversight may be strengthened. Stress tests conducted by the IMF indicate that Norwegian banks are resilient and can withstand significant losses resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic.

– The Norwegian financial system is well-functioning, but there are challenges to address. The IMF’s analysis of vulnerabilities related to property markets and the economic impact of the virus outbreak largely aligns with our own assessments. I am glad that the IMF recognizes Norwegian authorities’ efforts in recent years, and the new set of recommendations from the IMF is a valuable contribution to our forthcoming work, says Minister of Finance Jan Tore Sanner.

In its latest Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) of Norway, the IMF highlights that Norwegian authorities in recent years have raised regulatory capital requirements for banks, introduced a residential a mortgage regulation, introduced a new bank resolution framework and implemented a number of measures to mitigate the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the IMF supports the announced increase in the systemic risk buffer requirement intended to maintain banks’ capital requirements in real terms, and the Financial Supervisory Authority’s enhanced oversight of banks’ internal capital adequacy models.

The IMF recommends certain measures to further improve the policy framework, including further strengthening of macroprudential policy communication and coordination, consideration of new measures to address risks in the commercial real estate sector, make the borrower-based household measures permanent, and strengthen oversight of smaller banks and cybersecurity risk in payment systems.

Much of the work of the IMF experts was conducted prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, but the final FSSA report has been updated to reflect key developments and to include an extended stress test of Norwegian banks. The stress tests show that the banks collectively are resilient both in the face of increased losses that could result from the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as in an alternative market risk scenario. Additionally, an IMF analysis of climate-related transition risk suggests that sharp increases in carbon prices would have a significant but manageable impact on banks’ loan losses. Besides the effects of the pandemic, the IMF highlights a high level of uncertainty and that the most important risk factors in the Norwegian financial system remain the indebtedness of the household sector, high real estate prices and banks’ reliance on wholesale funding.

The IMF regularly reviews member states’ financial systems in order to assess weaknesses and strengths and to recommend measures that could contribute to more robust financial systems. The Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) is an important part of the IMF’s financial surveillance. Since 2010, it is mandatory for jurisdictions determined to have systemically important financial sectors to undergo assessments under the FSAP every five years. This includes Norway, and the previous assessment of the Norwegian financial system was conducted in 2014-2015. During the latest 2019-2020 assessment, experts from the IMF have had a series of meetings with Norwegian authorities, financial institutions and academic communities.

More:

  • Press release and reports on the IMF website
August 20, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Russia and Norway

US Envoy Says Ball ‘in Russia’s Court’ in Arms Talks

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 20, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

A U.S. arms envoy said Tuesday it is Russia’s turn to respond to U.S. terms to extend the landmark New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.

“Russia understands our position and what remains to be seen is if there is the political will in Moscow to get this deal done,” said Special Presidential Envoy for Arms Control Marshall Billingslea. “The ball is now in Russia’s court.”  

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by  Ambassador Marshall Billingslea U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Arms Control And Lt. Gen. Thomas Bussiere Deputy Commander of the U.S. Strategic Command.

Ambassador Billingslea:  We’ve just completed our second day of negotiations with the Russian Federation.  We came to Vienna based on the discussions held this past month between President Trump and President Putin.  And we are building on the substantive conversations our two leaders have held, and we are also capitalizing off of the work of our technical experts, who met here in Vienna two weeks ago.

The United States brought to Austria one of the most senior delegations in nuclear arms control history.  The Department of Defense team was led by General Bussiere, the Deputy Strategic Command Commander, who will offer some thoughts here in a moment.  And we’re relatively satisfied with the level of delegation that also came from Moscow and the seriousness that underscored the talks.  

Overall, I would summarize this week’s negotiations as having been valuable for both sides, for both the United States and the Russian Federation.  We certainly covered a broad range of national security issues.  They were, at times, intense.  They went deeply into certain matters, and we in fact covered some groundbreaking topics.  

We, the United States, have been clear that New START is a deeply flawed deal negotiated under the Obama-Biden administration, and it has significant verification deficiencies.  It also does nothing to address the most imminent problem of this decade, which is China’s secretive crash nuclear buildup.

There are some areas of convergence between Russia and the United States, but we do remain far apart on a number of key issues.  In other words, there is some agreement in principle, but an enormous amount of work will be required if we are to make progress.

We brought to Austria a very detailed set of proposals relating to our steadfast view that the next agreement must cover all warheads, all nuclear warheads.  And we’ve consistently said that we also need to have a better set of verification and transparency measures.

Finally, the framework that we could establish with Russia cannot be created as another exclusively bilateral, Cold War-style arrangement.  It must be built so that it can include China in due course.  

So we came to Vienna with a mandate from President Trump.  Russia understands our position, and what remains to be seen is if there is the political will in Moscow to get this deal done.  The ball is now in Russia’s court.  

Lt. Gen. Bussiere:  I’d like to give a few brief comments on the talks over the last few days, and the absolute importance of the U.S. military and the Russian general staff having the opportunity to have very candid discussions.

I made it very clear to the Russian delegation about the importance of these dialogues going forward to alleviate misperceptions and miscommunication.  We did raise several questions regarding Russian plans and intentions – the fact that the Russian nuclear threat is increasing.  In addition to modernizing its existing inventory, it’s also developing never-before-seen nuclear weapons capabilities.  We had some very candid discussions and some very direct questions on the intentions of that buildup.  

We also had some frank discussions on the fact that if we don’t arrive at an agreement to address our concerns that the U.S. force posture will have to be adjusted accordingly to this ever-increasing and threatening complex strategic environment.  

Additionally, we had some useful discussions on China and China’s exponential growth of their nuclear triad, where they are expected to at least double the size of their nuclear force stockpile in the next 10 years.  

Question:  Do you believe that there needs to be some kind of direct meeting between President Trump and Vladimir Putin to make that progress? 

Ambassador Billingslea:  I think that Ambassador O’Brien, the National Security Advisor, said it best the other day, which is that in – we would – the two presidents, I presume, would like to get together and that if we do have a good deal here, that that could be the focus of a meeting.  But again, we had a mandate and we’ve laid down what we need to see from the Russian Federation, and it’s now a question of whether they’re ready to walk down that path with us.

In terms of New START itself, we are not suggesting, too, that we would amend the New START Treaty to include China; rather, we are willing to contemplate an extension of New START but such an extension will only occur if we can arrive at a series of agreements that address significant concerns we have with the Russian buildup of its unconstrained capabilities, its various short- and medium-range nuclear weapons, and so on.  My point here on China is that we’re not going to negotiate another bilateral arms control treaty.  The next treaty will have to be multilateral, it will have to include China, and the framework that we are articulating together as two great powers, us and the Russians, will be the framework going forward that China will be expected to join.

Question:  Do I understand correctly that at this very moment, the U.S. is considering prolonging START but – but depending on whether China is ready on whether Russia is ready to sign up to the demands from the U.S. on other areas, on the ones that you mentioned?  So the question is: Is China put up for later for the moment?

Ambassador Billingslea:  So we’ve always made clear and actually, this is something that we, that the Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov and I, agree on and he’s said publicly, as have many senior Russian officials, that the next nuclear arms treaty must be multilateral.  And we have been clear that the next nuclear arms control treaty must include China.  So that’s clear.  

What we’ve said is that we view the New START Treaty as deeply flawed and that it is not particularly in the U.S. interest to simply extend that treaty.  We’ve got to address these unconstrained warheads that exist outside of the treaty, and to which the Russian Federation is systematically adding more and more and more.  One wonders how much is enough.  And that’s why our focus has been on an agreement that would be a politically binding agreement between our two presidents that addresses all warheads.

But, Elena, yes, in essence, if we are able to fix the verification problems, if we are able to arrive at such a politically binding agreement, we would be willing to propose to the President that New START be extended for some period of time. 

Question:  You said that the new mid-range, non-nuclear, ground-launched cruise missile under development in the U.S., you said exactly the kind of defensive capability that countries such as Japan will want and will need for the future.  How does the U.S. intend to convince Tokyo of this need?

Question:  You said – you’ve been quoted as saying that the new mid-range, non-nuclear, ground-launched cruise missile that’s under development in the U.S. is, quote, “exactly the kind of defensive capability that countries such as Japan will want and will need for the future.”  How does the U.S. intend to convince Tokyo of this need?

Ambassador Billingslea:  Japan has to look after itself for its own defensive requirements, so it’s a decision that only they can make.  What’s important is that we have moved swiftly to develop this capability.  It’s been roughly a year almost to the day that we conducted the first flight test of the – of a prototype system, and it’s very crucial for everyone to understand that for 33 years the United States faithfully abided by the INF Treaty.  China was never bound by that treaty, and so, unsurprisingly, China has built and deployed a wide range of systems that fall into that category.  Russia, which was bound by the treaty, cheated repeatedly and for more than a decade, in secret, developed multiple different kinds of violating missile systems and then proceeded to deploy.  And that’s ultimately why the United States elected to exercise the only remedy that we had, which was to withdraw legally from the treaty and to immediately begin building this defensive capability.  

So what’s important for us to do is to get this capability from prototype to a deployed – a deployed and deployable system, and then we will certainly want to have detailed discussions with all of our allies on the importance of being able to defend ourselves from threats and coercion and intimidation and the implied or actual use of force to try to drive unallowable outcomes.

Question:  Can you please tell from the military point of view, just answer this simple question: From the military point of view, is it – what is better, to extend or not to extend New START? 

Lt. Gen. Bussiere:  So specific to whether or not from a U.S. military perspective we need or want an extension of the New START Treaty is agnostic.  So we can perform our military missions with or without the New START Treaty.  We do believe, however, that it does provide increased international security.  But there’s a difference between the arms control protocols and the military necessity and operational utility.

Question:  In July, Fu Cong, head of the Chinese arms control department of Chinese foreign ministry, said that Chinese will agree to talks if U.S. come down to the Chinese level, current level of China.  The Chinese say that U.S. is stronger than Chinese 20 times in terms of nuclear power.  What do you comment on this in his statement of Fu Cong?

Ambassador Billingslea:  So that’s an excellent question, and I’m very glad to have a Vietnamese journalist on this call, because what we are addressing in here is a urgent and growing threat to the Asia Pacific region, which is the secretive and unconstrained Chinese nuclear buildup.  And that is a threat that faces not just the United States but all of the countries of Asia.  

As Vietnam knows perhaps better than most, China attempts to use force to redraw borders and boundaries.  One would remember that China invaded Vietnam and occupied several of the northern counties.  And we cannot agree to a situation where China builds up and achieves some form of rough nuclear parity with the United States and Russia, and then proceeds to use those nuclear weapons for blackmail and coercion.

And so our view is that China should stop what they’re doing.  They want the world to believe that they only have a few hundred nuclear weapons, and the question you have to ask them is: Why have they never admitted how many nuclear weapons they actually have today?  Right?  Fu Cong has said what you said.  My question is: Why don’t we start with you telling us how many weapons you have and how many you plan to build?

I will tell you, and we shared detailed intelligence with the Russian Federation on what China is doing both in our previous meeting and again today, but I will give you just one example of how alarming Chinese behavior is.  Last year, in 2019, China shot off more than 200 ballistic missiles.  Let me repeat that: In 2019, China shot off more than 200 ballistic missiles.  That is far more than the rest of the world combined.  That is why we are focused on ensuring that we maintain stability, that we maintain the strategic equilibrium that has existed to date, and that is why we believe that the next nuclear arms control treaty must include and must constrain China.

Question:  I just want to clarify an important point.  You have said that there could be a framework accord with Russia and that China might later be brought on into that process.  And I think in our conversation today you referred this to as a political commitment between the two Russian and American leaders.  Could you please explain what such a framework, what such a politically binding commitment between the U.S. and Russia might look like from the Trump administration’s point of view, and how that would be different from a full-fledged treaty that could take years to negotiate? And I take it from your remarks that if there was such a politically binding commitment this year that reaffirmed your points that all warheads be included and that there be tough verification, that would be a sufficient basis to agree to a temporary extension this year of New START?  

Ambassador Billingslea:  As you would imagine, I will not delve into the details of what an actual framework would contain other than to emphasize the high-level elements that have to be addressed, and those elements are, as you have noted, an agreement that covers all nuclear warheads.  

And so by this we mean the wide range of the short- and tactical-range weapons that Russia has been building completely unencumbered under the New START Treaty, by that, and it must fix – well, it also must contain verification measures that would be pertinent to a complete warhead arrangement, and we must fix the most glaring deficiencies in the verification regime of the New START Treaty, which has to do, for instance, with things such as telemetry, the exchange of telemetry missiles, has to do with the length of time that it takes for inspectors to arrive at an inspection site and the frequency of inspections.  

I think it’s important to note that under the Obama-Biden treaty, they basically gave away all meaningful telemetry data.  We’re not getting anything of value there.  The inspection timelines are nearly three times as long as they used to be under the original START Treaty.  And in effect, because of the cap on the number of inspections, a greatly reduced number of inspections, the United States is only able to visit in any given year half of the Russian sites, meaning that it’s just really not of great value to us. 

But if we can fix these things, and if we can address all warheads, and if we do so in a way that is extensible to China ultimately, then we would be prepared – again, it’s President Trump’s decision.  He’s – and we’re not going to take a bad deal back to him – but we would recommend that we consider – that he consider an extension of the New START Treaty this year.  

Question:  I’m a bit confused as to what exactly the conditions here are for extending the START Treaty, because at different points you’ve made it sound like there’s a – like the Chinese aspect would be separate to the conditions for extending START, and at other times you made it sound like they’re a necessary component of the extension, the ability to broaden this agreement to China.  Just to be clear, is that a condition for you of extending START, or is it a separate thing that you would then work on sort of in parallel, then, to extending START?

Ambassador Billingslea:  Well, I mean, ultimately one cannot compel China to sign anything.  The Chinese might like to compel others, but that is not what the United States is all about.  We, however, believe that ultimately it will be in China’s interest to join the future treaty arrangement.  They will derive a large number of benefits from doing so.

First of all, they, at that point, would be seen as a great power and as behaving responsibly as a greater power, which is certainly what Chairman Xi wants.  And what better way to be – to realize that status than to be included together with the United States and Russia in the architecture of strategic nuclear arms control and of nuclear arms control writ large?  And that would be a benefit.

Another benefit to China will be that the world can take some confidence that China had ceased its secretive behavior.  The Chinese understand that the world is incredibly upset with how it covered up and behaved on the virus, how it is covering up and behaving on all number of things, including its crash nuclear program, and some level of global reassurance would be restored regarding Chinese behavior.

But there are also very practical material benefits that China would receive.  Because of the many decades of work that we’ve done together with Russia and the Soviet Union before that, we have hotlines, we have nuclear risk reduction centers, we have transparency and confidence-building measures between our militaries, as General Bussiere has mentioned.  And these are things that we will also complete and conclude with the Chinese if they join.

Those are just a few examples of the benefits they will derive, but we are not going to compel them into this architecture.  We are going to frame it out with the Russians and then we’re going to see that the world continues to pressure China to stop its secretive behavior and join.  A number of countries have already called out the Chinese for their failure to negotiate with us in good faith, and that chorus of calls on the Chinese will only continue to grow and, in fact, I imagine would accelerate dramatically once we have created an architecture to control all nuclear weapons.  

Question:  You’ve referred several times to your interest in pursuing a multilateral arms control architecture that involves warheads with better verification.  And as you well know, the – so the history of U.S.-Russian arms control negotiations, the two sides have chosen to pursue limits on specific classes of nuclear weapons to date.  And can you clarify a little bit more what the conceptual framework is for a common framework that covers strategic nuclear weapons, sub-strategic nuclear weapons, intermediate range?  How would these be counted?  On a one-for-one basis, et cetera?  

Ambassador Billingslea:  So I won’t be able to get into the details the way you would wish at this stage.  It’s a bit premature.  But you’re absolutely right in the way you’re framing out the question.  We have in the past chosen to focus on the strategic delivery vehicles because from a national technical-means standpoint, very much, you have a better chance of verification.  Obviously, warheads are relatively small things and that has been a verification challenge that has bedeviled the arms control community for quite a long time.  And therefore, in the future, what we likely will see is a hybrid approach that would maintain limitations on the strategic systems but which would provide for a method of ensuring that the overall inventory of warheads writ large is static.  

I don’t want to go too much further into how we would do that, but what I would say is that it is appropriate for us to look at how the Threshold Test Ban Treaty ultimately achieved ratification, and that was through the establishment of a joint verification experiment between our respective nuclear enterprises, between the laboratories, that were able to identify and to develop the necessary technologies to handle that particular verification challenge at the time.  And so we think that a similar approach when it comes to warhead verification could have big dividends.  Moreover, we think that that would be a potentially very attractive activity in which China may wish to participate, and indeed, could have applicability in other, nonproliferation scenarios such as denuclearization of a non-nuclear-weapons state.  

Question:  I would like to put the question to Ambassador Billingslea.  China has been building up its presence in Western Balkans region in terms also of arms procurement, and Serbia stands out particularly in that way.  Can you please comment on latest Serbia’s procurement of Chinese drones, CH-92A, as well as Serbia’s intention to purchase FK-3 air defense missile system?  And if it’s not too much, can you also reflect on Serbia’s arms procurement from Russia in that in what way could all the above-mentioned be an issue from the U.S. perspective? 

Ambassador Billingslea:  I am going to keep the focus of today’s conversation on the recently concluded arms control negotiations with the Russian Federation and I’m not prepared to comment on those topics.

Ambassador Billingslea:  So I think the White House has made clear that at the moment there are no preparations for such an event, but, obviously, time will tell.  As I mentioned, the ball is now in the Russian court.  The previous discussion this past month between President Trump and President Putin showed us a path to a deal and the United States just walked down that path.  We’re hoping the Russians will join us.  It remains to be seen if they will, but I feel cautiously optimistic.  And again, time will only tell.

I will – because the question came from a Ukrainian reporter, I will also add that we took note and we, in fact, appreciate and support the foreign minister’s call on China to negotiate with the United States in good faith.  Ukraine speaks with a special moral authority when it comes to nuclear matters, having forsworn nuclear – the retention of Soviet nuclear weapons at the end of the Cold War.  And so we appreciate Ukraine making that statement and putting the pressure on the Chinese.  

I also note that a number of other non-aligned or neutral nations, such as Austria, have made that call.  In fact, I just met with the Austrian foreign minister here in Vienna and he has called out the Chinese on several occasions.  And so this in addition to a number of our friends and our allies around the world, and I expect that that pressure on China will continue to grow as the world realizes what China has been doing behind everybody’s back.

Question:  Just a short technical question.  I wanted to ask whether any future dates for future rounds of talks have been explored at all either between yourselves and Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov or at a technical level ?

Ambassador Billingslea:  So what I told the deputy foreign minister is that we stand ready.  But because the ball is in Russia’s court, we’ve signaled what we need to see and it’s incumbent upon them to come along with us.  We have a mandate from President Trump and it’s going to be important that the next meeting, the Russian delegation also have the same mandate.  I think our two leaders really have had all the necessary discussions to get there.  

So on the optimistic side it could be a couple of weeks; it might be longer.  Really, it’s up to Russia, right.  here are a little more than five months left in the New START Treaty, and if Russia would like to see that treaty extended, then it’s really on them to come back to us, and we stand ready to meet.

Question:  I’d like to know what happens if China, in the end, chooses not to join the negotiations.  Would it be useful to continue working with Russia, or we have to wait for China?

Ambassador Billingslea:  It’s an excellent question.  The United States and Russia are the great powers here, and we’re going to – we’re going to continue to talk to one another.  We’re not going to allow China to exercise a veto over our relationship with Russia.  That said, we also intend to negotiate with the Chinese when they’re ready in a bilateral mechanism, and we’re happy to do so as long as ultimately those two paths converge together in the form – again, as I said, in due course – in the form of a trilateral arms control treaty.

Just a concluding thought here with regard to China.  I’m actually very glad that at the National Zoo in Washington, the great panda, she appears to be pregnant and hopefully will give birth to a baby panda here in the coming days.  And if so, that might be the one bright spot in Sino-U.S. relations.  It would be wonderful if we could make a second bright spot be nuclear arms control negotiations with the Chinese Communist Party.  The world wants to see China cease being so secretive.  The world wants to see a reversal in the way China hides from plain sight what it’s doing.  And we expect that the world is going to call on the Chinese to join us in these talks.

Ambassador Billingslea:  We appreciate the chance to talk with journalists from around the world.  These are significant matters.  They are weighty matters.  And as I said, the discussion with the Russian delegation was intense.  We did, as I said, go deeply into a number of areas, and we did discuss some groundbreaking topics.  But we await to see the final decision in Moscow.  The ball is in Russia’s court.  Thanks again, and that will be it from our side.

August 20, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diplomatic relations

U.S. and Norway Strengthen Cooperation on Offshore Energy and Seabed Minerals

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 20, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

 Washington DC, the US Department of Interior (DOI) signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (MPE).

The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) is a framework for continued cooperation between DOI and MPE in the areas of  offshore oil and gas, offshore wind energy and seabed minerals.

Deputy Secretary of the Interior Katharine MacGregor and Norwegian Ambassador to the U.S., Mr. Kåre R. Aas signed the agreement during a ceremony in Washington, DC. Photos: Faith Vander Voort

– The MOU signed today will further strengthen the longstanding energy partnership between our two countries. I’m convinced that sharing of best practices and experience will be mutually beneficial, and contribute to sustainable resource management, said Mr. Tony C. Tiller, State Secretary at the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. 

Activities outlined in the MOU framework include the exchange of scientific and technical information, and cooperation regarding research and technological development. DOI and MPE will remain in regular contact and foster discussion of experiences, best practices, policy, and regulatory initiatives relevant to the development of offshore resources.

The U.S. and Norway are two of the world’s largest offshore energy producers and have decades of experience to draw upon in expanding discussions on oil and gas best practices. Deputy Secretary of the Interior Katharine MacGregor and Norwegian Ambassador to the U.S., Mr. Kåre R. Aas signed the agreement during a ceremony in Washington, DC.

Link to the U.S Department of Interior press release.

August 20, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

Norwegian extends cooperation with Lufthansa Technik

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 20, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA and Lufthansa Technik have extended their cooperation for the overhaul of the carrier’s 90-aircraft Boeing 737NG fleet by another five years. The services are performed at Lufthansa Technik’s location in Budapest, Hungary, within the framework of a Total Base Maintenance Support (TBS®) contract, with the first contract events planned for September 2020.

“Lufthansa Technik was winning this contract in a large extensive global tendering process, that was demanding both for Lufthansa Technik and Norwegian. The quality and reliability of past services provided by Lufthansa Technik have convinced us to continue to place our trust in our German partner for the overhaul of our Boeing 737NG fleet,” said Paul Salwik, Head of Technical Procurement at Norwegian.

“We are pleased that this new contract will continue a successful cooperation with Norwegian that reaches back to 2007. With our services, we want to play our part in ensuring the continued success of this innovative airline,” said Tanja Pustolla, responsible sales representative at Lufthansa Technik.

The main characteristics of Total Base Maintenance Support TBS® are the guaranteed availability of layovers and a commercial service package geared to individual customer needs. As one of a total of five Lufthansa Technik overhaul sites in Europe, Lufthansa Technik Budapest will provide services within the framework of the new contract. As a TBS® customer, Norwegian also has access to the entire overhaul network of Lufthansa Technik for additional or unplanned maintenance events.

Norwegian has been a Lufthansa Technik customer since 2007. The cooperation began with component supply within the framework of a contract for Total Component Support TCS®. Later, Lufthansa Technik also took on wheels and brakes maintenance and engine overhaul for engines of the CFM56-7B type. Since 2012, Lufthansa Technik has provided overhaul services for Boeing 737NG aircraft.

August 20, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Spy War

Suspected spy didn’t work on defense projects

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 19, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

A man who is in custody in Norway suspected of spying for Russia was heading an industry project on 3D printing and had no security clearance and didn’t work on projects for the defense industry, the Norwegian Armed Forces or other governmental agencies, his employer said.

Norway-based DNV GL, a major global classification society for ships, said in a statement the man had not had any line management responsibilities for a number of years.

“During his time with DNV GL he worked on a limited number of projects – primarily within materials technology,” said the company, which is also the largest technical consultancy to the global renewable energy and oil and gas industry.

“At the time of his arrest, he led a joint industry project on 3D printing,” it said Tuesday. It gave no further details.

DNV GL said it was “working closely” with the Norwegian Police Security Service. “Due to the sensitive nature of the investigation we cannot disclose any further information at this point,” the company said.

On Monday, the suspect was remanded in custody for four weeks.

The man was arrested Saturday as he met with an alleged Russian intelligence officer in an Oslo restaurant. He has not been identified beyond being a a Norwegian national in his 50s born abroad. Norwegian news agency NTB said he was born in India.

The man has admitted receiving money, with the judge who remanded him in custody saying it was a “not insignificant amount.”

He is suspected of violating a Norwegian law that carries a maximum prison term of 15 years.

(AP)

August 19, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
NATO and Norway

Reducing US Military Presence in Norway

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 19, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The news that the US Marine Corps is ending continuous troop rotations to Norway and effectively withdrawing 700 troops should be seen in conjunction with the more significant reduction in Germany (11 900) announced only a week earlier. Both weaken European security and the credibility of the United States. 

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg looks at a Tac 50 Mac Millan sniper riffle as he visits troops taking part in the Trident Juncture 2018, a NATO-led military exercise, on October 30, 2018 in Trondheim, Norway. – The Trident Juncture, the largest of its kind in Norway since the 1980s, runs until November 7, 2018. Around 50,000 participants from NATO and partner countries, some 250 aircraft, 65 ships and up to 10,000 vehicles take part in the exercise. The main goal of Trident Juncture is allegedly to train the NATO Response Force and to test the alliance’s defence capability. (Photo by Jonathan NACKSTRAND / AFP)

It weakens European security because US force levels are an indication of Washington’s commitment to Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. After decades of taking peace dividends, the European Allies are only just starting to spend more on defence and on modernising their capabilities. Of the two European nuclear Allies, the United Kingdom is struggling to maintain existing capabilities while France is focusing on the threats emanating from the south. Germany, meanwhile, has only started to rebuild a credible military force, but according to current plans it will still take more than 10 years to deliver this force even if the plans are fully funded. Norway, however, has a reputation of being one of the strongest proponents of the transatlantic link and has been a loyal US ally, deploying its forces to Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom and ISAF) and to Iraq. The Government of Norway recently presented a draft Long Term Defence Plan 2020 that is relatively ambitious in modernising the armed forces.

The US forces currently in Europe are among the few on the continent that are fully capable and at high readiness. The European Allies are not able to address today’s security challenges on their own, especially the threat from Russia. Europe’s non-NATO nations, with the exception of Finland, also lack the demonstrated will to address existing and foreseeable military threats. The reduction of forces in Norway and Germany thus has a negative impact on the security of many European Allies, especially the Baltic states.

Troop reductions in Norway and Germany also weaken the United States. These decisions and the confusing messages they convey add to the perception that the White House lacks stability and predictability, both vital for credible deterrence. The reductions appear to go against the 2018 National Defense Strategy (NDS), according to which DoD’s objectives include “maintaining favorable regional balances of power in the Indo-Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and the Western Hemisphere” as well as “deterring adversaries from aggression against US vital interests”. Punishing Germany for complacency might make sense if the purpose was to push Berlin to increase defence spending, but as a recent survey indicates, nearly half (47%) of the German respondents actually support the US decision to decrease troop numbers in the country. And why relocate some forces to Belgium and Italy, neither of which are committed to raising defence spending to 2% of GDP? Reducing the number of US forces in Norway and Germany harms and discourages mainly those US allies that border an aggressive Russia and that already spend at least 2% of GDP on defence or have concrete plans in place to do so.

According to the 2018 NDS, the US will be strategically predictable, but operationally unpredictable. Recent events indicate that the US may be taking another step towards being both strategically andoperationally unpredictable. Against this background, Europeans now have one more reason to follow the upcoming presidential election in order to see what the future may bring.

August 19, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Spy War

Norwagian Man Suspected of Spying for Russia

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 18, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway’s intelligence service said Monday its agents had arrested a Norwegian man suspected of passing sensitive information to Russia.

“The man is formally suspected of providing information to a foreign country that could damage fundamental national interests,” the PST intelligence agency wrote on Twitter.

A PST official later confirmed the country in question was Russia.

“The person arrested held meetings with an officer from the Russian intelligence agency,” Line Nyvoll Nygaard told TV2 Nyhetskanalen television.

Meanwhile, DNV GL, a company that provides certification for insurance purposes for the maritime, oil and gas and renewables industries, confirmed the suspect was one of its employees.

“Through his position (he) had access to information which, in our opinion, could be of great interest and significance to other countries and other actors,” Nyvoll Nygaard said.

The man, aged 50, was arrested on Saturday in an Oslo restaurant after having met the Russian officer, the PST said.

A judge on Monday ordered the man detained in custody for four weeks, the first two in isolation. 

According to his lawyer, he denies any wrongdoing. He risks up to 15 years in prison if found guilty of espionage.

Russia’s embassy in Oslo has not commented on the arrest.

In its annual report published in February, PST warned of the risk of espionage in several sectors of society — political, financial, defense and research circles, among others — singling out Russia, China and Iran as particular threats.

In recent decades several spy cases have marred ties between NATO member Norway and Russia, which share a border in the Arctic Circle.

(AFP)

August 18, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diplomatic relations

Nordic-Baltic Foreign Ministers on recent developments in Belarus

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 18, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

In a joint statement the Nordic-Baltic Foreign Ministers express their grave concern about the violence against post-election demonstrations in Belarus.

The Foreign Ministers of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden, in the context of the developments that are taking place in Belarus, express their grave concern about the violence against post-election demonstrations that have occurred in response to reports of widespread electoral fraud. We are very troubled by the reports of physical injuries inflicted on the demonstrators.

The presidential elections, which took place in Belarus on 9th August 2020, did not comply with the international commitments of Belarus and globally recognized standards of democracy and rule of law, and they were not free and fair.

We urge the Belarusian authorities to stop persecution of political opponents, to release all those unfairly detained immediately and to respect human rights and freedoms. We call upon the Belarusian government to immediately engage in a genuine political dialogue with the opposition in order to avoid further use of violence.

We remain committed to the people of Belarus and will continue to closely follow developments.

August 18, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Srilanka and Norway

Sri Lanka wins Norway deal for bulk carriers

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 18, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Sri Lanka’s Colombo Dockyard Plc said it is getting ready to build six 5,000 dead weight tonne bulk hybrid carriers for Norway based Misje Eco Bulk AS, who had also given an option for four other vessels.

The contracts were signed on March 14, 2020, but is “scheduled to come in to effect only in the month of September 2020 with Owners final board approval,” Dockyard said.

The first vessel should b delivered by Colombo Dockyard in 18 months and subsequent vessels at 4 month intervals. 

ECO CARRIER: Concept of Eco-bulk carriers to be built by Colombo Dockyard.

The vessels would be 89.95 meters long and has a hold with a capacity of 5,000DWT. 

“The type of cargo they could carry includes bulk cargo, grain, timber, unit loads and containers,” Dockyard said.

“Each vessel is powered by 4 stroke diesel engine with an Electric Hybrid system supplying additional power through a Battery system.”

As eco-friendly vessels, they have lower emissions compared to a conventional bulk carrier of the same size. The basic design was by Wartsila Ship Design Norway AS.

Dockyard said the deal was the result of marketing efforts of the firm despite a Coronavirus pandemic.

Dockyard says it has been targeting the European market to build eco-friendly bulk carriers, cable laying and service operation vessels. 

August 18, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Science

Norwegian demand self-quarantine from Polish

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 18, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The Norwegian government has included Poland in a group of countries coloured red on its map illustrating the epidemiological situation abroad, deciding the country’s policy on how to handle international travellers arriving in Norway. Poles will now have to self-quarantine after arrival, together with citizens of states such as the Netherlands, Iceland, and Cyprus.

The countries have been included on the map due to the rising number of coronavirus infections in those states. The criteria to be classified among the states coloured red is the detection of more than 20 new infections on average per 100,000 inhabitants over the course of the last two weeks. The formula has been developed by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

The new restrictions forcing citizens from states coloured red to self-quarantine will be introduced from Saturday. 

The Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg explained the decision as needed to avoid a new lockdown, saying “we are not against free travel, but we must react so that the situation which we had earlier this spring, with a complete lockdown, is not repeated again. We want students to be able to go back to school as normal.

In addition, the 10-day quarantine will also be applied to people travelling from certain Swedish regions: Oestergoetland, Oerebro, Blekinge, Uppsala and Dalarna. The Danish island of Zeeland (not including Copenhagen) and the central part of the Jutland Peninsula with the city of Aarhus have also been classified as red. 

States such as France, Monaco, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Luxembourg, Portugal, Romania and Spain have previously been included on the list of red countries. 

Norway has seen an increase in new cases of coronavirus for two weeks, leading the government to introduce new restrictions such as banning the sale of alcohol in restaurants and bars after midnight. The new outbreak has been traced back to a Norwegian cruise ship from which the virus spread to several dozen municipalities. 

The situation is deemed to be the worst in Oslo, where there are more than 20 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The city’s mayor, Raymont Johansen, told NTB’s Norwegian press agency that he does not rule out a complete lockdown of the capital city.

Last week saw 389 new infections, bringing the total up to 9,751 cases.

August 18, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diplomatic relations

Norway condemns use of force in Belarus

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 17, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

‘We condemn the security forces’ use of force against protesters following yesterday’s presidential election in Belarus. This use of violence is unacceptable. We call on the Belarusian authorities to release the arrested protesters and journalists immediately,’ said Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide.

The presidential election in Belarus yesterday was marred by violence against protesters in the hours after the polls closed. Belarusian security forces dealt harshly with protesters and journalists after the election, and several hundred people are believed to have been arrested.

‘It is also unacceptable that so many political activists, journalists and observers were arrested during the run-up to the election, and that there were far-reaching restrictions on basic human rights such as freedom of the media and freedom of assembly. This is incompatible with peaceful, free and fair elections,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide.

The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) announced in mid-July that it would not be deploying observers to the presidential election, as it had not received an invitation from the Belarusian authorities. Consequently, the OSCE has been unable to monitor important aspects of the electoral process or follow up previous recommendations to the Belarusian authorities.

‘It is regrettable that the OSCE has been unable to observe the presidential election in Belarus. The OSCE plays a key role in the democratisation process, not least through its contributions to improving national electoral processes. The worrying developments in Belarus, both before and after yesterday’s presidential election, highlight the importance of this work,’ the Foreign Minister said.

(MFA)

August 17, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Turning the tables – By Vinayak Surya Swami

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 16, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

As the country tackles the spread of COVID-19, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has advocated a push towards making India self-reliant through a series of measures and economic relief packages.

With the advent of the Novel Coronavirus pandemic, a new world economic order is emerging and nations are just coming to terms with it. Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi has been quick in this realisation and has accordingly altered existing policies and introduced several muti-sectoral initiatives to further the vision of a thriving economy for India. Reaffirming his belief, in a recent address, he said, “Howsoever big the crisis might be, India is determined to turn it into an opportunity.” He then called upon the nation for its support in this regard by making India “Aatma Nirbhar” or Self Reliant.  PM Modi also announced a relief package of INR 20 Trillion (equivalent to 10 per cent of India’s GDP) that will steer the country onto the path of rapid development and growth, and create a robust local supply chain. 

India’s plan for self-reliance is intended to be a two pronged approach. The first step will be the undertaking of interim measures such as liquidity infusion and direct cash transfers to migrant workers and daily-wage earners. The second facet would be long-term reforms in growth-critical sectors that will make them globally competitive and attractive.

According to the Prime Minister’s vision, a self-reliant India will stand on five pillars: ‘economy’, that introduces quantum jump; ‘infrastructure’ intune with the new India, a ‘system’ based on 21st century technology; India’s ‘vibrant demography’; and ‘demand’, which will utilise our requirement and supply chain to full capacity. 

Starting right 

PM Modi’s vision of a capable, efficient and self-reliant nation, has quickly been realised and introduced as the Aatmanirbhar Bharat (Self-reliant India) initiative. Some immediate reforms are now being factored into policy making decisions to bolster domestic capabilities and upscale production. 

The Aatmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan (ANBA) is focussed towards building entire value chains for domestic products that will enable local manufacturers to thrive and reduce the need for imports. The Department of Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade has already identified key sectors followed by measures to boost competitiveness, simplify procedures and encourage direct investments.

Holistic approach

The ANBA has identified the MSME (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises) sector, with its significant contributions to the GDP, exports and employment ratio as the core area for economic revival and competence.

As a start, a more inclusive definition has been announced to bring a larger group of small-scale industries under the purview of the beneficial reforms and extend the cover for existing businesses allowing them to grow under the same canopy.

Over 500 million entities will be empowered to restart operations and get back on their feet with momentous reforms for the MSME sector. These include the introduction of collateral free loans (total of INR 3,000 billion), INR 200 Billion in subordinate loans for reviving businesses and a significant infusion of almost INR 500 billion in the sector through several new funds being set up. 

Equal opportunities

With an aim to boost domestic production and expand quality exports, the MEIS (Merchandise Exports from India) scheme is poised to be replaced by the Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exports scheme (RDTEP), to offset infrastructural inefficiencies and costs associated with exporting goods produced in India. The government aims to extend these benefits to entities with a capability of generating employment in the country as well. 

The export sector and domestic production will also benefit from the proposed reenvisioning of the existing costs associated with manufacturing. The lowered taxes on exporting goods across borders in addition to the imposition of anti-dumping duties on imports will provide a level playing field to domestic manufacturers. A reform aimed towards increasing production potential locally and to ease the process of exports while simultaneously reducing the dependence on foreign products.  

The new vision

The start-up segment of the Indian space sector has been added as a direct beneficiary for the use of facilities and premier infrastructure of the ISRO (Indian Space Research Organisation), India’s state-run space agency. The move has come as an addition to ISRO’s ‘technology transfer’ initiative that provides new-age tech to private and state-run entities towards the betterment of Indian industry.   

The defense industry will also benefit from the freeing-up of the space sector. When it comes to innovative advances towards new-age technology, the pandemic, and the new reforms, will act as a catalyst for development. Moreover, this move will also allow for an opportunity for DSRO (Defence Space Research Organisation), India’s new defence oriented space agency, to become a nodal authority for positive outreach with space start-ups.

The government has also drawn up a new policy for privatisation of Public Sector Enterprise (PSEs) to boost public-private partnerships, which will soon be notified to the concerned sectors.

A stoic defence

In a major highlight, the ANBA has also been extended to India’s defence sector. The FDI (foreign direct investment) cap has been raised to 74% from the existing 49%. This will enable domestic manufacturers to source and utilise critical technologies that will help in the much needed modernisation and revamp of the production process. 

The OFB (Ordinance Factory Board), a 200-year-old organisation will undergo corporatisation to make manufacturing autonomous, boost efficiency and increase accountability. In this reconstruction, one or multiple corporations will be added into the 41 factories currently falling under the OFB. 

Back to basics 

Special attention has been paid to the agriculture sector with its position as India’s largest livelihood provider and a significant contributor to the country’s GDP.  In a first, the sector has been considered at par with the industries in India, and the government, under the ANBA has announced a stream of pioneering reforms aimed towards empowering farmers across India.

Going forward, there will be minimal hindrance arising from trade and licensing agreements, thereby allowing farmers to easily accomplish business transcending state lines. 

Millions of farmers will directly benefit from the INR 300 billion additional emergency working capital to stabilise production in these testing times. With a INR 100 billion capital infusion, Mirco Food Enterprises will now be provided technological benefits in clusters (mango in UP, saffron in J&K, bamboo shoots in the Northeast, chilli in Andhra Pradesh etc.) to standardised quality and production as per FASSAI norms. The products will then be marketed to promote an increase in demand.  

The list of reforms are also aimed towards utilising the surplus of agricultural commodities with amendments to the Essential Commodities Act, made to ensure adequate supply in times of scarcity. These amendments, by utilising the surplus and by providing a subsidy for the transport to deficient markets will create a secure supply/demand chain and protect the interest of Indian farmers.

PM Modi had very recently quoted Swami Vivekananda and urged Indians to use indigenous products and to promote Indian products in global markets, furthering his idea of ‘Vocal for Local’. 

India needs to simultaneously boost authentic exports in order to carve a niche out for itself in the emerging world order. An effort which will not only fast track our journey to become a USD 5 trillion economy, but will also ensure that Indian interests are safeguarded in the years to come. 


Immediate effect


To boost domestic production, the government has imposed an import ban on radial and pneumatic tyres used in two and four wheelers. 

Global tenders of upto INR 2 billion will be restricted to boost production through MSMEs.

INR 20 billion for fishermen through Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY). 

The Garib Kalyan Rojgar Yojana (PMGKRY), an INR 50 billion scheme to create jobs for the thousands of migrant workers affected due to the COVID-19 crisis. 

Restrictions on import of incense sticks, bamboo products and odoriferous preparations.

An import ban on specific lists of weapons/platforms to be notified on year-wise timelines to boost indigenisation and domestic production. 

The imposition of an anti-dumping duty on specific steel products to ensure cheap imports does not disrupt domestic production.

About the author: 

Vinayak Surya Swami is a Delhi-based journalist. He holds a degree in mechanical engineering and has worked as an apprentice Shipbuilder with the Indian Navy. A part-time writer since his teenage years, he switched to journalism to pursue his prurience for writing and travel.

August 16, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Conservation Without Borders – By Juhi Mirza

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 16, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

India has been restoring several ancient temples and monuments across South-East Asian countries as a part of its development partnership initiatives. The recent conservation projects of the Ministry of External Affairs in collaboration with the Archaeological Survey of India and partner countries has brought forth a rich cultural heritage.

The Southern Asiatic region has been historically heralded as Suvrnabhumi, or the golden land, in ancient Indian literature a title that is true for the immense wealth and more importantly for a vibrant and friendly mix of cultures that is evident in ancient monuments across the countries in this region. India has had an important role to play in preserving this shared cultural heritage. 

The recent discovery of a 9th-century monolithic sandstone Shiv Lingam (representation of Lord Shiva) was made by Archeological Survey of India (ASI) during the ongoing conservation project at Cham Temple Complex, a part of the UNESCO world heritage site, in the Quang Nam province of Vietnam. The project, part of the India’s development partnership with Vietnam though conservation of shared heritage, is being supported by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Government of India. India has been actively involved in large-scale restoration and conservation projects which have reaffirmed the existence of strong cultural connection that thrived throughout the region in ancient times.   

The conservation work of ASI is being carried out at several heritage sites beyond the national boundaries. India has been at the forefront of restoring heritage sites across South-East Asia, be it the Angkor Wat temples in Cambodia or the My Son monuments in Vietnam. These initiatives can be attributed to the country’s policy of promoting a healthy and mutually beneficial diplomatic outreach and bringing numerous facets of Indian cultural and civilizational heritage to the public at large.  

The projects, funded by the MEA with ASI acting as the execution agency, have reaffirmed the ancient albeit strong connections across Southern Asia. Here are a some of large-scale undertakings:

Angkor Wat, Cambodia 

Also known as funan in the ancient texts of India, this city reached its zenith under the leadership of Jayavarmana II. With the beliefs of Vaishnavism, Saivism and Mahayana Buddhism, the prominent archaeological site of Angkor Wat was built by king Suryavaramana II in the 12th century. It consists of magnificent temples dedicated to Lord Shiva, Vishnu and Brahma. The MEA with the ASI undertook its conservation on a grand scale in collaboration with the Government of Cambodia and have made tremendous efforts to preserve the beauty of these temples. In fact, in 1980, India was the first country to respond to an appeal made by Cambodia to the world community to come forward to help save the Angkor Wat, the centre of the Khmer kingdom for several centuries. The ASI team worked for seven years at the complex, restoring the northern embankment of a moat, a gateway, the grand Samudra Manthana Gallery, the northern library and the central tower of the Angkor Wat temple among other sections. The temples’ extraordinary bas reliefs, decorated panels of folklore and notable iconography have been restored to their former prime. 

Ta Prohm Temple, Cambodia

After Angkor Wat, ASI started restoration of the Ta Prohm temple located in the Angkor World Heritage Site. The temple of Ta Prohm was built by King Suryavaramana VII and is an epicentre of the teachings of Mahayana Buddhism. This particular temple is an ancient monastery and a university, this rajvihara (royal residence) was built by the king in memory of his beloved mother. With the passage of time, Ta Prohm encountered extensive growth of trees and bushes, which grew haphazardly threatening the original structure. The temple was also littered with excessive boulders and mounds that needed removal to form a clear passageway. The conservation project was taken partly under the expertise of ASI permitted by International Coordination Committee and Authority For The Protection And Management Of Angkor And The Region Of Siem Reap (APSARA). The ancient walls adorning the magnificent motifs of Buddhist beliefs and Bodhisattvas are in process of being restored to their original quality.

Ananda temple, Myanmar

The Ananda temple of Myanmar is considered to be one of the most beautiful temples preaching the teachings of Theravada Buddhism. Built by King Kyansittha of Pagan dynasty, this elegant pagoda style temple is an exquisite example of Mon architecture and houses four colossal figures of Lord Buddha. The wall plaques portray his early life forms, the jatakas and their enigmatic stories. The region was devastated by intense seismic activity and the temple frequently requires structural and chemical restoration. The ASI and the MEA with the local authorities of Bagan have taken the restoration responsibilities. 

Vat Phou Temple, Laos 

India shares a strong relationship with the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. The ASI has undertaken the project to restore Laos’ temple of Vat Phou. An ancient structure dating back to the 11th and 13th century, part of an important city of the Khmer empire, this temple is dedicated to Lord Shiva, which later was transformed into a Buddhist centre. The ASI has been working on structural and drainage analysis, restoration as well as documentation that needs to be done for the restoration work of the temple. 

The Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi also highlighted India’s historic and cultural links with Laos and expressed satisfaction at being involved in the restoration of the World Heritage Site at Vat Phou over a telephonic conversation with Dr Thongloun Sisoulith, Prime Minister of Laos in June this year. 

My Son Temple, Vietnam

One of the most prominent temples dedicated to the Bhadreswar form of Lord Shiva, this one-of-a-kind monument and its subsidiary shrines were constructed by the kings of Champa dynasty between the 4th and 14th century.

Archaeological Survey of India has been successfully carrying forward with the conservation work to restore this temple premises. An MoU has been signed between the two countries and with the MEA’s support. Currently, the restoration covers three prominent temple groups falling within the complex. 

Nepal, Indonesia and Sri Lanka

The ASI has been actively involved in the conservation of the Pashupatinath temple in Nepal; the Borobudur temple in Indonesia and the Thirukuteeshwara temple in Sri Lanka. Under ASI’s skillful expertise these temples are being conserved with immense care to their former glory.

As ASI’s experts keep restoring these ancient structures, not only is history being preserved but it is also aiding bilateral relations. It is showing how this cross-pollination of various culturally impacted beliefs, customs and rituals has become an integral part of India’s vision to promote global peace and prosperity. The ideology of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world is one family) seems fairly appropriate as these conservation projects have helped us take a united stand on a global platform, which is only growing stronger with time.

Conservation projects over the years

Bahrain

A team of ASI archaeologists excavated burial mounds in Bahrain in 1983. It excavated 70 graves, six Indus seals and a circular steatite seal with Indus script.

Angola

An ASI team restored and reorganised the Museum of the Armed Forces located inside the 17th century fortress of Sao Miguel in Luanda in 1988-89.

Nepal

In the early 1960s, ASI teams excavated Buddhist archaeological sites in Sidharthanagar, Kapilvastu, Tilaurakot and Lumbini. In the same decade, another team carried out an iconographical survey to discover rare images like Shiva as Ekpada-Trimurti, Chandra riding on a chariot of geese, Mahesha-samhara, etc.

AfgHanistan 

The ASI conserved and restored the 6th century Buddhas of Bamiyan and the 15th century mosque at Balkh of Sufi leader Khwaja Abu Nasr Parsa in the 1960s and explored Harappan, Buddhist and Asokan sites.

Maldives

ASI teams have excavated sites in Kuramathi, Todd and Nilandhe atolls that revealed Buddhist traits. 

Bhutan

The ASI teams carried out preservation of murals of Do de Drak, Nekhang-Lhakhange and Mithragpe-Lhakhang of Tongsa Dzong in the late 1980s. 

Egypt

In the early 1960s, an ASI team visited Nubia to explore, excavate and salvage any ancient artefacts around Afyeh and Tumus and discovered middle and late stone age tools in the process.
About the Author 

Juhi Mirza holds a master’s degree in Archaeology and is a keen enthusiast for all things ancient. The Lucknow-based writer has a deep interest in cultures and traditions of India and the world. She has travelled extensively to document ancient ruins and cultures across the world

August 16, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

India’s Response to Pandemic: Using Crisis as an Opportunity – By Manish Chand

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 16, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

A crisis can trigger ruin and catastrophe, but it also sometimes brings out the best in people and nations. More than any other country in the world, India has shown vividly how to creatively and resolutely harness challenges thrown by the ongoing coronavirus crisis to script its own resurgence as well as contribute to global recovery. Amid apocalyptic death, destruction and dislocation unleashed by a rampaging pandemic, India, the world’s fifth largest economy and an emerging global power, has managed to keep its recovery rate high as well as keep the fatality rate less than 2% – one of the lowest in the world. This has been achieved through multi-pronged efforts and initiatives by the Indian government, including a far-sighted initiative to order a nation-wide lockdown in the early stage of the pandemic when there were barely 600 cases in the country. 

World is one Family 

For a country of over 1.3 billion people, managing an epidemic that requires social distancing is an incredibly onerous task, but on balance, India has not only taken care of its own people infected by the virus, but has also complemented domestic efforts with timely international assistance to many countries. This trait of empathy and solidarity with friends and partners in the world is deeply embedded in India’s civilisational ethos of ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” and reflects the country’s rising reputation as a global care-giver and first responder in crises, in the exalted spirit of “the world is one family”. India has been prompt to provide essential drugs and medical items to over 150 countries. This medical assistance was provided quietly, without any fanfare, earning India heartfelt gratitude and admiration of countries, big and small. From US President Donald Trump to Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, leaders around the world have appreciated India’s timely assistance against a merciless pandemic. 

First Responder 

The pandemic-related assistance also reaffirmed India’s credentials as the first responder to humanitarian crises and a net security provider in the region. In a journey spanning over 7,500 nautical miles over 55 days, Indian Naval Ship Kesari travelled to the Maldives, Mauritius, Madagascar, Comoros and Seychelles and delivered assistance to India’s maritime neighbours. A part of Mission SAGAR, which crystalizes Prime Minister Modi’s vision of Security and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR),India’s humanitarian assistance included supplies of essential food items, medicines, Ayurvedic medicines and deployment of Medical Assistance Teams (MAT) to Mauritius and Comoros. India also sent medical teams to Maldives, Mauritius, Comoros and Kuwait to support them deal with the pandemic. 

Self-reliant India 

The Covid-19 crisis has sown the seeds of an economic renaissance pivoted around “Atmanirbhar Bharat” that promises to revolutionise domestic manufacturing, and make India the hub of global supply chains. The quest for self-reliance has produced tangible results, with India moving from being a net importer of Covid-19-related medical items to a net exporter. Currently, India is manufacturing over 500,000 personal protective equipment (PPE) kits and over 300,000 N-95 masks every day. India is playing the role as the pharmacy of the world during the Covid-19 pandemic with its vast experience and deep knowledge in medicine, setting the tone for many regional and global initiatives, observed the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Secretary-General Vladimir Norov. 

Diplomatic Outreach 

Given the transnational spread of the coronavirus pandemic, India launched an unprecedented diplomatic outreach to forge a coherent global response to the crisis. Prime Minister Modi displayed global leadership as he participated in various virtual multilateral summits and spoke to his counterparts from 61 countries. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar spoke to foreign ministers from 77 countries. Showcasing India’s Neighbourhood First policy, PM Modi hosted a virtual conference of the leaders of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and pledged $10 million SAARC Emergency Fund to combat the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in the region. At the first virtual G20 summit, PM Modi underlined the imperative for a new kind of humane globalization, which goes beyond economic and financial calculations. India’s advocacy for people-centric globalisation was reflected the G-20’s decision on debt service suspension for developing countries. 

India’s Positive Global Role 

The rising global stature of India has been recognised and reaffirmed by the international community in many ways, especially during the last few months of the pandemic. 

India has been elected as the chair of the executive board of the World Health Organisation (WHO) at a time when the world is rooting for reforming the global health body. Underlining India’s rising global stock, US President Donald Trump has proposed the expansion of the G7 grouping of the world’s wealthiest countries to include India, Australia, South Korea and Russia. To cap it all, India was overwhelmingly elected as a non-permanent member of the powerful UN Security Council for a two-year term on June 17. In a record of sorts, India won 184 of the 192 ballots cast in the elections for the five non-permanent UNSC seats. It was a vote of confidence in India’s capability to shape the global agenda. India’s two-year term as a non-permanent member of the UNSC will begin from January 1, 2021.

Setting the tone for the eighth stint of India in the UNSC, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar underscored that India “can play a positive global role,” in the extraordinary situation spawned by the pandemic and stressed that India seeks to move toward NORMS, a ‘New Orientation for a Reformed Multilateral System. Outlining India’s priorities in the UNSC, he said: “We have always been a voice of reason and a votary of international law. We advocate dialogue, consultation and fairness in our approach to global issues. And we emphasize global development, addressing climate change and eradicating of poverty as central to planet’s future.”

India’s work in the UNSC will be guided by 5Ss, in Prime Minister Modi’s words. This included Sammaan – Respect; Samwad – Dialogue; Sahyog – Cooperation; Shanti – Peace, to create conditions for universal;and Samriddhi (Prosperity). This 5S vision of India’s foreign policy, which can be called “The India Way” is finding an increasing global resonance as a Covid-afflicted world searches for lasting solutions to a range of cross-cutting problems and challenges. India is poised to shape a proactive and constructive agenda for global renewal and remapping the world order, in sync with shifting contemporary realities. 

(Manish Chand is CEO & Editor-in-Chief of India Writes Network and India and the World, a pioneering magazine focused on global affairs)

August 16, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Unveiling of Portrait of Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee ji at ICCR Headquarters

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 16, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The Embassy of India would like to inform that Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR) is organizing an event in the memory of late Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee ji, former Prime Minister of India on 16 August, 2020 by unveiling Shri Vajpayee’s portrait at ICCR premises. The event is being organized on Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee ji’s 2nd death anniversary remembering him and his contributions towards the building of Nation.

The event on 16 August will commence with the unveiling of Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee ji’s painting by Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon’ble President of India in a virtual mode in the presence of Shri V. Muraleedharan, Minister of State for External Affairs and Dr. Vinay Sahasrabuddhe, President of ICCR and Member of Parliament. The painting has been created in oil-on- canvas by Shri Vasudeo Kamath, an eminent and well-known painter in Mumbai, a gold medalist who has received several awards both nationally and internationally. 

Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee served as the ex-officio President of ICCR from March 1977 to August 1979 when he was Foreign Minister in the post-Emergency Janata government. During his tenure as Foreign Minister, Vajpayee ji became the first person in 1977 to deliver a speech to the United Nations General Assembly in Hindi. It was his vision and guidance which saw ICCR further expand and propagate Indian culture worldwide. As Member of Parliament, as Minister of External Affairs and finally as Prime Minister, Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee left a distinguishing and lasting impression on ICCR’s activities. 

ICCR was established on 9 April 1950 to actively participate in the formulation and implementation of policies and programmes pertaining to India’s external cultural relations; to foster and strengthen cultural relations and mutual understanding between India and other countries and to promote cultural exchanges with other foreign countries and people. ICCR has 19 Regional Offices in various states in India and 38 Cultural Centres abroad to implement its programme globally. Over the years, ICCR has grown in size and its activities, and is today the Cultural Diplomacy arm of the Ministry of External Affairs with a mandate to project India’s soft power abroad.  

August 16, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Science

Norway puts reopening on hold as COVID-19 cases rise

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 15, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway’s prime minister Erna Solberg said on Thursday the government will put its planned easing of coronavirus restrictions on hold, due to a rise in the number of COVID-19 infections.

“We need to slow down now to avoid a full stop down the road”, Solberg said, adding that the country will announce further measures on Friday.

Norway had some of the strictest travel restrictions in Europe in the early phase of the pandemic before gradually lifting them from June.

The government said it will reimpose a 10-day quarantine from Saturday for all travellers from France, Switzerland and the Czech Republic, as well as for people travelling from Monaco and from certain regions in neighbouring Sweden.

Norway’s spike in infections includes a recent outbreak on a cruise ship. Another cruise ship docked in a Norwegian harbor has also ordered to keep everyone on board, after a passenger from a previous trip tested positive for the virus.

August 15, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Science

Norway urges citizens to avoid all foreign travel

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 14, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norwegian Health Minister today urged the citizens of Norway to refrain from traveling abroad.

Minister Bent Høie said said that even the countries with few COVID-19 cases should be avoided.

“There is still little contamination in Norway but we see increased contamination in countries that used to have control over their situations,” Bent Hoie told reporters in Oslo.

While not a member of the European Union, Norway belongs to the passport-free Schengen travel area. It had some of the strictest travel restrictions in Europe in the early phase of the pandemic before gradually lifting them from June.

In another move, bars and restaurants may no longer serve alcohol after midnight, Høie said. Authorities would also issue fresh recommendations on wearing face masks on August 14.

Norway and other Nordic countries, unlike many other European nations, are not currently mandating masks in public spaces.

August 14, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Brian Hook Says Arms Embargo Against Iran To Be Extended ‘One Way Or Other’

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 14, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Brian Hook, the U.S. State Department Special Representative for Iran, said in a press conference on Thursday that the United States is going to ensure that the arms embargo on Iran is extended “one way or the other”.

The U.S. sent a revised version of the Iran arms embargo to the members of the U.N. Security Council on Thursday, with the embargo previously set to expire on October 18.

The proposed resolution is “a clean rollover of the existing arms embargo the Security Council put in place thirteen years ago [in 2007], and has voted to keep it in place several times since,” Hook told reporters, adding, “Our proposal’s main theme is an arms embargo for an indefinite period.”

“Letting the arms embargo expire was a big deficiency of the Iran nuclear deal,” Hook said, calling the new proposal “a compromise text” with the U.S. that includes provisions supported by all permanent members of the council. “Its expiration should never have been based on an artificial timeline of five years. It was an irresponsible concession.”

Should the proposed resolution fail to pass, the United States has threatened to invoke the “trigger mechanism” included in the Iran nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which would reinstate all sanctions on Iran if the embargo is lifted.

Hook also urged Security Council members to vote for the extension out of respect for the Middle East nations that “live in Iran’s dark shadow,” saying, “Abstaining may carry a certain appeal for those who want to have it both ways, to express concern without addressing the concern. But abstentions will not be forgotten by nations in the region who are counting on council members to vote yes.”

Below is a full rush transcript of the Briefing with Brian Hook Special Representative for Iran and Senior Advisor to the Secretary of State.

Mr. Hook:  Thanks very much, The United States has now circulated to Security Council members our resolution extending the Iran arms embargo, and we expect a vote very soon.  I want to make two points: the first on substance and the second on process. 

First, on substance.  The United States has tabled a clean rollover of the existing arms embargo.  The Security Council put this in place 13 years ago and has voted to keep it in place several times since.  Our proposal maintains the arms embargo for an indefinite period.  This was the case prior to the adoption of Resolution 2231.  The arms embargo should stay in place until Iran’s behavior changes.  Its expiration should never have been based on an artificial timeline of five years.

Taking a step back, letting the arms embargo expire was a big deficiency of the Iran nuclear deal.  It was an irresponsible concession.  We are doing our best to fix the mistake.

The resolution we have tabled is significantly different from the one we initially circulated in June.  We listened to the Security Council members and created a new text that is both reasonable and necessary.  So this is a compromise text.

What we are proposing enjoys ample precedent.  In fact, the Permanent Members of the Council have all supported the same provisions we are now proposing, and they have done it several times in the past.

It is not just the Trump administration and the U.S. Congress that supports extending the arms embargo.  Countries in the Middle East that live in Iran’s dark shadow strongly support our resolution.

In the last month, I traveled to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, and Bahrain to hear their views.  This weekend, this last weekend, the six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council, in the middle of a rift entering its fourth year, came together to firmly ask the Security Council to extend the arms embargo.  They want it extended until Iran is at peace with its neighbors.  These Middle East nations, more than anyone else on the Council, know firsthand the dangers of lifting the arms embargo.  Not only do they want it extended indefinitely, they asked the Council to impose new measures to stop Iran from proliferating weapons.  I want to quote a few sentences from the GCC letter dated August 8th:

“Iran has not demonstrated its commitment – Iran has not demonstrated its respect for international law…that would justify the lifting of current UN restrictions.  It has continued to proliferate weapons across the region as an integral part of its expansionist regional policy and longstanding interference in the internal affairs of Arab States, including GCC member states, in clear violation of the UN Charter.  We have stressed that Iran has been a state sponsor of terrorism in our region and has actively incubated, trained, equipped, and directed violent armed terrorists throughout the region…”

The letter also states that “UN restrictions are foundational to international efforts to block the supply of weapons to Iran and its proxies…We call on the members of the UN Security Council to uphold your mandate…and to act to maintain UN restrictions on Iran’s ability to purchase or provide arms.”

I also traveled to Israel in the last month.  Arab Nations and Israel have the same message to the international community: the Middle East needs fewer Iranian weapons, not more.  

So many nations around the world have had their own citizens killed by Iranian weapons.  This includes the United States.  In Iraq alone, 603 Americans were murdered with Iranian weapons and thousands were injured, many permanently.  Iran midwifed Hezbollah, a group that had killed more Americans than any other terrorist group before 9/11.  Who in 2015 thought it was a good idea to give Iran more weapons?

So the question today is this:  Will the Security Council listen to nations in the region?  Will it respect the wishes of those closest to the conflict – or will it ignore them?  This is a simple yes or no question when it comes time to vote.  Abstaining may carry a certain appeal for those who want to have it both ways, to express concern without addressing the concern.  But abstentions will not be forgotten by nations in the region who are counting on Council members to vote yes.

The second point I want to make relates to process.  The United States has been committed to a fair and open diplomatic process to fix the problem.

We have been transparent about our objectives while prioritizing dialogue and engagement at every step.  Secretary Pompeo first raised extending the arms embargo when he spoke at the Security Council in December of 2018.  It is now August of 2020.  We have heard the feedback of Security Council members and adjusted our approach accordingly – the text we have tabled underscores this. 

I make this second point about process because some have said we are rushing things.  State Department diplomats have spent 19 months engaging leaders around the world in discussions on the embargo.  It expires in 66 days.  We have given the time, and we are now short on time.    

When it comes to national security, this administration does not base its decisions on a whip count.  We also do not promote multilateralism for the sake of multilateralism.  We make decisions based on advancing the security of the American people and our allies and partners.  For those who see it the same way, there is no better friend than the United States.  For those who object to our proposal, we answer, “Please show us yours.”  It has been almost two years and only the United States has tabled a proposal to deal with the arms embargo expiring.

If the Security Council fails to uphold its mission and extend the embargo, then the United States will keep this process moving forward under the terms of 2231.  If geopolitical confusion and fear of Iranian retaliation paralyzes multilateralism, the Trump administration will do as we have always done and keep moving forward to advance peace and security. 

Question:  What is the mechanism that the U.S. will be using for dispersing this aid and how will it be spent?  Also, how does the Trump administration view resolving the crisis in Lebanon?  Do they see it as requiring government change or accountability?

Mr. Hook:  Well, this is a call to discuss the arms embargo on Iran.  What I can say is Secretary Pompeo has had a number of discussions about Lebanon.  He is committed to supporting the Lebanese people, who have not been well served by Hizballah.  I think the people of Lebanon are tired of the corruption, the lack of transparency, the lack of accountability.  And on specific questions of aid, I refer you to prior question – prior statements by the Secretary and people in NEA.

Question:  Bloomberg’s reporting that there are Iran is transferring new generations of advanced centrifuges into Natanz following the explosion there.  Can you confirm that? And on the Security Council, as you said, “Please show us yours.”  The Europeans, as you know, are working with the Chinese and Russians to get an extension of six months – obviously, that’s not what you want.  Would you support that if the rest of the Council supports that?  

Mr. Hook:  I can’t confirm that.  I haven’t taken a look at that story.  If it is true, it again demonstrates the problem of the Iran nuclear deal is that Iran retained most of its nuclear infrastructure.  And the fact that they are able to increase their purity and increase the stockpile is another example of how this problem fell well short of its – of how this plan fell well short of its goals.

On the second one, we have not received any proposal on addressing the expiration of the arms embargo.  And so I don’t have any comment on something that doesn’t exist.  

Question:  You said that the resolution you’re introducing is a compromise.  Could you talk a little bit about how it is a compromise?  Who did you reach out to to find a compromise?  Did you reach out to countries like – to members like Germany, and in what way did you take into account what those countries are proposing?  

Mr. Hook:  I remember making trips to the UN Security Council for private consultations back in November and December and had consultations with the E3 in – it was January or February.  I was in Paris for hours of discussions with the E3 political directors.  I’m in regular touch with my European counterparts.  There were concerns that the resolution that we had circulated, which had a very strong – very strong sort of structure for monitoring and enforcing sanctions compliance, and there were some concerns expressed that this text would make it harder and not easier to pass through the Council.  And so the – this text that we have put into blue yesterday is exactly four paragraphs long and it has ample precedent in the Security Council.  

This is a clean rollover of the existing arms embargo, which has served the international community well.  It was the right thing to do back in 2007 and we have not seen any change of heart by the Iranian regime to be at peace with its neighbors that would justify letting it expire.  And so we have presented a concrete and realistic proposal, and we hope others see it that – the same way.

Question:  You mentioned in the call that there’s a unanimous support from the GCC for the arms embargo extension, but a Qatari foreign ministry official told Al Jazeerathat Qatar does not think that Qatar did not necessarily support the GCC letter.  So I just wanted to see what your response to that would be ?

Mr. Hook:  I don’t know who the official is.  What I do know is that on a letter dated August 8th, in the first paragraph, it says that this letter is on behalf of the UAE, the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Sultanate of Oman, the State of Qatar, and the State of Kuwait.  They have formally approved this letter and that was the product of a lot of discussions in the region.  And this rift is entering its fourth year.  And I think when – I think this is the only significant political statement that the GCC has issued since – certainly since June of 2017 when the rift started.  And so I think it’s important for people to recognize the significance of this statement.  And I encourage people to read it, because it is a two-page, very detailed analysis and it is a correct analysis.  It describes exactly Iran’s threats to its neighbors in the region.

Question: How will the decision to extend the arms embargo affect Iran in light of Iran’s China agreement?  And relatedly, What efforts are you making to mobilize support for the decision to extend the arms embargo?

Mr. Hook:  Well, on the first question, I published an editorial in The Wall Street Journal about two weeks ago, maybe three, that analyzes the purported U.S. – the reported China-Iran partnership.  And so I’d refer you to my comments and my analysis in that op-ed. 

I think I explained in my opening remarks that it was in December of 2018 when Secretary Pompeo went to the Security Council.  I was there for that trip.  I remember him ringing the bell and sounding the alarm at the Security Council that the arms embargo on the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism was going to expire and we should start working on it now.  So I think we have taken all the necessary diplomatic steps.  Secretary Pompeo and I and others have been through the region and through Europe many times, and we are now 66 days away from this embargo expiring, so the time to take action is upon us. 

Question:  What do you think your successor, Elliott Abrams, is bound to bring to the table?

Mr. Hook:  Well, that’s probably a question for Elliott.  I don’t want to speak on his behalf.  Elliott’s an old friend, and he’s an able colleague.  So I’ll be turning over the file to him in the next week or two.  I think people are getting an upgrade.  He’s been working on Middle East issues for decades, very well known to the State Department, and also his service across many administrations.  So he will do a great job on this file. 

Question:  My question is about snapback and 2231.  What do you say to critics who say that the U.S. pulled out of the JCPOA and so are legally unable to trigger this mechanism? 

Mr. Hook:  Later today we’ll be circulating to Council members a six-page legal memo that would answer the question that you asked.  It will explain our rights under 2231.  It was prepared by the State Department’s Office of the Legal Advisor.  The State Department has some of the best legal minds in the world.  The arguments that we have seen on this question of standing are long on emotion and short on substance.

The memo that we are going to circulate is going to look at a number of issues.  Just to preview some of it, Resolution 2231 establishes a fixed term, “JCPOA participants.”  That expressly includes the United States in its definition.  Resolution 2231 places no other conditions on the eligibility of states that are among the named JCPOA participants.  Developments beyond the four corners of Resolution 2231 did not and could not change the United States’ right to initiate snapback.  I think this is probably more specific to the question you’ve answered.  

The JCPOA is a nonbinding political arrangement.  It is not a – it has no binding commitments.  There are nonbinding political commitments, but it is not an international agreement that imposes binding obligations.  And Resolution 2231 did not transform the JCPOA from a nonbinding political arrangement despite some of the claims that I think you’ve heard people make.  So we will be explaining this and how 2231 works.  Our reimposition of sanctions on Iran didn’t change our legal rights and obligation under 2231.  

One of the points I think it’s important for people to understand is, JCPOA participants are free to stop performing nonbinding political commitments at any time without violating international law.  Now, they still have to comply with international obligations that are independent of the Iran nuclear deal, and that includes their legal obligations under 2231.  The United States is in full compliance with its legal obligations under 2231, and specifically, that means the measures in Annex B to the resolution that the Council rendered legally binding through operative paragraph 7(b).  That places restrictions on nuclear- and missile-related transfers to Iran, and it established a target – a targeted asset freeze and travel ban. 

So those who argue that a state cannot avail itself of legal rights if it is in violation of corresponding legal obligations don’t know how to read 2231, or they are applying a reading of the text that has no basis in precedent.  If this issue about – I can just – I mention this because you mentioned about the legal piece.  You should take a look at operative paragraph 1 of 2231.  It makes it very clear that the 2231 endorses the Iran nuclear deal, but it does not make it legally binding.  

So it’s important for people to define their terms.  The Iran deal is a political arrangement consisting of nonbinding political commitments.  That was stated by the Obama administration itself.  So we’ll circulate our memo today, and that will be our statement on – on the – on the matter. 

Question:  If, this arms embargo resolution fails, as most people expect it to, how quickly then do you think we will move to snapback?  And if then there is opposition to the U.S. snapback move from Russia, China, and maybe Europeans, what will the U.S. do?  Will you simply declare that snapback has been activated and that it’s – declare it’s done?  How will it work from this point of view for you? 

Mr. Hook:  Well, we have always tried to take this one step at a time.  And right now we’re focused on the arms embargo and ensuring that it passes.  As I said earlier, national security is not a – it’s not a popularity contest.  We don’t make our decisions based on a whip count.  It is clear that letting the arms embargo expire would be very bad for promoting peace and security in the region and beyond the region.  Letting the arms embargo has consequences beyond the region because the Iranian regime has conducted terrorism across five continents.  And so I – and much of that has been in Europe. 

And so allowing the arms embargo to expire on a terrorist regime would be negligence.  It would be an act of gross irresponsibility.  So that’s how we see it.  We certainly made the case on the merits for why it needs to be extended, and we’ll see how the Council lines up.  But I remember I said this in a Wall Street Journal editorial a few months ago:  There are – one way or the other, we are going to ensure that the arms embargo is extended. 

Question:  Some reports in Washington say that the shakeup in the Iranian office at the State Department happened after the U.S. sanctions and strategy on Iran have failed.  Do you agree on that?  And why did you resign at this time?

Mr. Hook:  Well, we’ve run a very successful foreign policy.  We have been very effective.  There’s a great deal of pride in the results that we’ve been able to accomplish.  We’ve achieved historic results countering the Iranian regime.  And so anybody who is claiming what you quoted is, I think, motivated because they simply don’t like our strategy.  

In terms of my departure, as we say in Iowa, it’s time to rotate the crops.  I very much believe in public service, but I also enjoy life in the private sector.  I’ve served for three and a half years at State.  It’s been a great honor to be an American diplomat.  This is my second tour at the State Department.  I enjoy working with my colleagues.  I’ve enjoyed all of the work.  We’ve been, I think, very successful in the Iran Action Group because President Trump enforces his red lines, and he understands the importance of restoring and maintaining deterrence.  Secretary Pompeo has been a great boss.  And I’m turning the Iran file over to a very capable diplomat, Elliott Abrams.  And so that’s largely the background on my departure.

August 14, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

India is a constructive, dependable actor globally

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 14, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Covid-19 continues to exact a heavy toll worldwide. In India too, positive cases are rising. However, our effective domestic response has led to a significant improvement in our recovery rate, which is now 68.78%. The case fatality rate at 2.01% remains one of the lowest in the world.

High recovery and low-fatality outcomes can be attributed to proactive measures taken to deal with the outbreak from its early stages. We started screening Covid-19 cases a full 13 days before the first case was detected in India. We implemented full lockdown on the 55th day of the outbreak when we had only around 600 cases. Our public health response has been appreciated by the World Health Organization (WHO). The government took rapid steps to augment health infrastructure. As Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi noted, India now has over 11,000 Covid-19 facilities and 1.1 million isolation beds. We have ramped up testing to over half-a-million tests a day, to be scaled up to a million.

India’s response has not been confined to meeting our domestic requirements. We have been significantly engaged with the international community in providing the leadership that the global situation demanded. As a responsible stakeholder in global health supply chains, we ensured timely access to essential drugs and medical items for over 150 countries, while meeting our own domestic requirements. We reaffirmed our position as the first responder to humanitarian crises in the region by deploying medical teams to help Maldives, Mauritius, Comoros and Kuwait deal with the pandemic. India also dispatched naval assets to the Maldives, Mauritius, Madagascar, Comoros and Seychelles to deliver assistance. This demonstrated our strong commitment to the PM’s vision of Security and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR).

From being a net importer of Covid-19-related medical items, we have emerged as a net exporter. Today, we are manufacturing over 500,000 personal protective equipment (PPE) kits and over 300,000 N-95 masks every day. Our system has shown the necessary adaptability and agility to significantly ramp up production to go beyond our domestic requirements.

The repatriation of Indian nationals stranded abroad and the evacuation of foreigners from India to their home countries have been among the most successful aspects of our response. In the initial days, the ministry of external affairs had promptly set up a Covid cell and a 24×7 control room to assist Indian citizens abroad. The PM had also personally directed our heads of missions to extend all possible assistance to our nationals stranded abroad. Subsequently, the Vande Bharat mission, launched to repatriate our nationals stranded overseas, has been the largest exercise of its kind ever undertaken by the government and has demonstrated our capacity to effectively carry out complex humanitarian missions. Over one million Indians have returned under the Vande Bharat mission so far through flights, across land borders and on naval ships. We have been able to bring home Indian nationals from distant locations, and also facilitated the return of Bhutanese and Nepalese nationals stranded in third countries to their homes on Vande Bharat flights.

Rigorous screening of returnees by our diplomatic missions has ensured that the proportion of positive cases remains extremely small (less than 0.2%). Testing on arrival by the health ministry and state governments has helped detect these cases. The mission just doesn’t end with the arrival of our nationals. We are also mapping their skills on arrival to link them with companies for job opportunities.

There has also been no let-up in our diplomatic outreach during the pandemic. We have initiated and been part of several important conversations globally. Our Neighborhood First policy was on full display when the PM hosted a video conference of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc) leaders early in the crisis — our first such engagement on Covid-19. He announced a series of measures to deal with the pandemic, including the creation of a Covid-19 emergency fund with a commitment of $10 million from India. We have also called for a better multilateral response to global crises in the future. The PM has, on several occasions, including in the G-20 and Non-aligned Movement virtual summits, proposed the reform of multilateral cooperation by bringing people to the centre of our efforts. Our own initiatives such as the International Solar Alliance and the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure are prime examples of this approach. The decision of the G-20 on debt service suspension for developing countries, which India fully supported, reflects this people-centric approach. At the virtual Global Vaccine Summit, the PM highlighted how India’s contribution to the global response in terms of sharing medicines was guided by our philosophy of Vasudhaiva Kutumbkum. The PM also hosted the first virtual bilateral summit with Australia, which was followed by the India-European Union summit. In addition, the PM has spoken to his counterparts from 61 countries during this period. The external affairs minister has spoken to foreign ministers from 77 countries. We have kept open channels of virtual communication to strengthen partnerships and deal with situations that require diplomatic engagement.

We have been constantly adjusting, adapting and innovating to deal with the changed reality, particularly in our engagement with the world. And in the process, we have been successful in elevating India’s profile as a constructive and dependable actor on the global stage.

[Harsh Vardhan Shringla is Foreign Secretary, Government of India]

[The views expressed are personal]

August 14, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

India’s Soft Power as a pillar of Foreign Policy – By Ambassador Yogendra Kumar

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 14, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The expression “soft power” may be understood in terms of a usable national capacity to advance foreign policy objectives and priorities of a country by non-coercive means. Being an ability to shape a broader narrative in bilateral and multilateral diplomacy, it remains a vital instrument in foreign policy by itself or as a complement to the application of “hard power”, that is, military power or other types of compelling diplomacy. Constituting a wide spectrum, its key components range from economic to socio-cultural and, even, civilisational; messaging, its veritable core, is done through strategic communication in official dialogues and by means of a wider targeted public outreach using diverse media platforms available in our age of information saturation. 

A general “branding” about the “idea” of the country is fleshed out in different ways to lend weight to that country’s diplomacy; according to one study, countries package their soft power by emphasising the qualities of governance, culture, diplomacy, education, and business innovation. This packaging requires innovative use of public and private resources to subserve the larger national purpose. An effective leveraging of soft power diplomatic tools remains critical in the current geopolitical uncertainty. It is not an easy task given that social media today is being aggressively manipulated by malevolent actors and social groups through deployment of advanced technological tools. 

As a culturally diverse, democratic country with a large aspirational, extroversive population pursuing socio-economic mobility, India’s image is that of a benign country confident of its growing role in the international community in support of democracy, international cooperation, stability, and commitment to multilateralism as an effective way to meet our common global challenges. It is not that of an aggressive, revisionist power and its growing military strength is not seen as threatening by an overwhelming number of countries both near and afar. Its millennial civilisation and growth story within a democratic framework evokes considerable interest in practically all regions of the world as a wide range of countries experience raucous internal debates about the best policy tools for their own cohesive, inclusive progress. The civilisational depth and breadth make it possible for nearly all countries to find something in India to relate to and to find an easy comfort level. In the prevailing milieu of deepening strategic distrust among countries, this circumstance is a significant facilitator of a successful pursuit of our national strategic interests.

Articulating the Indian foreign policy for “unsettled times”, Prime Minister Modi prioritised its objectives in a public speech (January 2017) as connectivities with immediate and extended geographies, relationship networks based on economic priorities, human resource power connecting with global opportunities, global development partnerships, and reconfiguring global institutions along with India’s civilisational legacies. As manifest in this expansive vision of a stable and equitable global order, the pursuit of multi-alignment to advance the country’s strategic objectives in a period of geopolitical flux entails an indispensable role for soft power in enhancing this benign global image. 

The Ministry of External Affairs operates and coordinates with other government organisations extensive bilateral and multilateral programmes for economic cooperation, development projects, upgradation of skills, student exchanges and scholarships, people-to-people relations, training programmes, think tank activity, and cultural exchanges encompassing creative and performing arts, archaeology, study chairs, academic conclaves et cetera. It is also engaged in the promotion of media exchanges and in projecting India’s image abroad.

The other departments and agencies have their own collaborative programmes in their respective areas of activity such as science, information and broadcasting, tourism, sports, health, meteorology, shipping and transport, finance and banking, diverse connectivity infrastructure projects, et cetera. Two of India’s flagship multilateral initiatives are the International Solar Alliance and the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure. Even “hard core” agencies like the armed forces mount humanitarian and disaster response operations and evacuation of nationals of other countries marooned in disaster areas far from Indian shores. These activities cover the sectors prioritised by Prime Minister in his above-mentioned speech and more.

In sum, the projection of soft power would need to convey to the international community at large a narrative as to what makes India pulsate. It is about a poor, socially unequal country, at the time of its independence in 1947, charting a successful journey to become a major geopolitical and geo-economic actor today within the steady institutional framework of a constitutional democracy. It is about a people who are self-assured enough in their civilisational moorings not needing to be sequestered from “foreign” ideas. It is a holistic narrative underpinning India’s image which is to be leveraged to realise the foreign policy objectives set by the Prime Minister. 

August 14, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Transparent Taxation Honouring the Honest – Prime Minister Narendra Modi

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 14, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi launched a platform for “Transparent Taxation – Honouring the Honest” today through video conferencing.

Speaking on the occasion he said that the process of Structural Reforms in the country has reached new heights today. The Prime Minister said the platform of  “Transparent Taxation – Honouring the Honest, has been launched to meet the requirements of the 21st century taxation system. He elaborated that the platform has major reforms like Faceless Assessment, Faceless Appeal and Taxpayers Charter.

He said that Faceless Assessment and Taxpayers Charter have come into force from today while the facility of faceless appeal will be available for citizens across the country from 25th September i.e. Deen Dayal Upadhyay’s birth anniversary. The new platform apart from being faceless is also aimed at boosting the confidence of the taxpayer and making him/her fearless.

The PM said that the focus of the Government in the last six years has been “Banking the Unbanked, Securing the Unsecured and Funding the Unfunded” and that the platform of “Honouring the Honest” is in the similar direction.

The Prime Minister praised the role of honest taxpayers in nation building and said that making the lives of such taxpayers easy is the responsibility of the government. “When the life of an honest taxpayer of the country becomes easy, he moves forward and develops, then the country also develops and leaps forward,” PM added.

The Prime Minister said the new facilities launched today are a part of the Government’s resolve to provide maximum governance with minimum government. He said that every rule, law and policy are made with an emphasis of them being people centric, public friendly rather than power centric. He said that the use of the new governance model is yielding good results.

The Prime Minister said that an atmosphere is being created where primacy is being given to duty to execute all works. This is the result not because of force and fear of punishment but because of an understanding of the holistic approach that is being adopted. He said the reforms being launched by the Government are not in piecemeal but those aimed at delivering results with holistic perspective.

The Prime Minister said the country’s tax structure needed fundamental reforms as the earlier tax structure was developed from the one created during pre-independent times. Even the several changes made during the post-independent times did not alter its fundamental character, he said.

The Prime Minister said that the complexity of the earlier system made it difficult to conform. He said that simplified laws and procedures make it easy to comply. One such example is the GST, he said, which replaced dozens of taxes.

The Prime Minister said that the latest laws reduced the legal burden in the tax system where now the limit of filing cases in the High Court has been fixed at up to 1 crore rupees and up to 2 crores for filing in the Supreme Court. Initiatives like the ‘Vivaad Se Vishwas’ Scheme pave the way for most of the cases to be settled out of court.

Prime Minister said that the tax slabs have also been rationalised as a part of the ongoing reforms where there is zero tax upto an income of 5 lakh rupees, while the tax rate has reduced in the remaining slabs too. He said India is one of the countries with lowest Corporate Tax in the World.

The PM said the ongoing reforms aim at making the  tax system Seamless, Painless, Faceless. He said the Seamless system works to resolve the problems of a taxpayer instead of entangling him further. By being Painless he said, everything from technology to rules should be simple. Referring to the Faceless system he said there is no need for a direct contact between the Taxpayer and the Income Tax Officer in all matters of scrutiny, notice, survey or assessment.

Referring to the launch of Taxpayers Charter, the Prime Minister said that it is a significant step where the taxpayer is now assured of fair, courteous and rational behavior. He said the charter takes care of maintaining the dignity and sensitivity of the taxpayer and that is based on a trust factor and that the assessee cannot be merely doubted without a basis.

Referring to the reduction of the scrutiny of the cases by at least four times in the last six years from 0.94% in 2012-13 to 0.26% in 2018-19, Prime Minister said this itself is a reflection of the trust that the Government is laying on the returnees. He said in the last 6 years, India has seen a new model of governance evolving in tax administration. Amidst all these efforts, he said the number of people filing income tax returns has increased by about 2.5 crores in the last 6-7 years.

The Prime Minister however said that it can also not be denied that only 1.5 Crore people pay the taxes in a country of 130 crores. Shri Modi urged people to introspect themselves and come forward to pay the taxes due.

The Prime Minister said this would help in the making of a Self – Reliant India, AtmaNirbharBharat.

August 14, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Visionary Approach – By Ambassador Anil Wadhwa

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 14, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

India’s 74th Independence Day on August 15, 2020, is being celebrated as the world is in the grip of an unprecedented pandemic, which has disrupted every aspect of life. Former Ambassador Anil Wadhwa takes stock of the developments that make this a momentous occasion.

Ambassador Anil Wadhwa

India has not been spared when it comes to the spread of the COVID-19, but has demonstrated great resilience in fighting the impact of the pandemic with determination. It has pushed ahead with accelerated development and the creative energy for innovative and new policies as demanded by the times. This strength to face challenges derives from the Indian struggle for independence and is rooted in the concepts of political and socio – economic inclusion inherited from the nation’s founding fathers like Mahatma Gandhi, Babasaheb Ambedkar and Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel. 

The re-elected government of Prime Minister Modi has continued on the transformative course of India’s development through breakthroughs in governance, enacting historic legislations, expansion and strengthening of programmes, upgrading basic amenities to all citizens, providing economic assistance to the marginalised, and enhancing protection for women, children, and those with disabilities. During the pandemic, the government acted promptly to save lives, provide effective medical treatment and control the spread of the virus, by upgrading hospital infrastructure, and ramping up the manufacture of medical supplies and equipment to adequately deal with the medical exigency. Early preventive measures such as screening of international passengers started as early as January 2020 followed by restrictions on travel and a total nationwide lockdown imposed on March 24. These, along with a very effective mass health awareness campaign, helped India to stem the severity and spread of the virus, beating all predictions.

Though cases have crossed two million in the first week of August, both the high recovery rate and low fatality rate point to the success of the strategy to combat the pandemic, which has been accompanied by a slew of economic measures for the most vulnerable and to mitigate the deleterious effect on the national economy. 

Creating opportunity 

A total stimulus package of INR 20 trillion equaling 10 per cent of India’s GDP has been announced by the government so far. Besides containing a plethora of fiscal and monetary measures, the package covers almost every sector of economic activity including mining, defence production, power, industry, space, education etc. Prime Minister Modi, in summing up the package, in an address to the nation on May 12, said that it would focus on land, labour, liquidity and laws and seek to make India the lead player in the 21st century by focusing on self-reliance.

Cementing friendships 

Internationally, the past year has seen India’s global stature enhanced further as it exhibited a renewed confidence in leadership and the conduct of its foreign policy. PM Modi’s outreach in South Asia included visits to the Maldives, Sri Lanka, and hosting of PM Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh, highlighting the centrality of India’s neighborhood first policy. Despite the long-standing border dispute and the threat of terrorism, Prime Minister Modi took the initiative to launch a SAARC virtual Summit for regional cooperation in the fight against the pandemic. In keeping with the deepening multidimensional ties with the US, PM Modi paid a visit in September 2019, which was followed by a historic return visit by President Trump in February 2020. India’s election to the UN Security Council as a non – permanent member, the assumption of the Chair of the Executive Council of the WHO, and forthcoming Presidency of the G20 in 2022 gives it an opportunity to lead institutional reforms in multilateral organisations. In fact, the pandemic has not restrained India’s diplomatic engagements. In addition to the virtual summits with Australia and EU, PM Modi has spoken to his counterparts from 61 countries while the External Affairs minister Dr S Jaishankar has spoken with his counterparts from 77 countries thus elevating India’s profile as a constructive and reliable actor and partner on the global stage. They have also addressed important multilateral platforms such as the NAM (Non-Aligned Movement) and G20 Summits, and ECOSOC (Economic and Social Council at the UN). 

During the crisis, India has come forward to be a net provider of health security by supplying essential medicines, and equipment to almost 150 countries and sending medical assistance teams to friendly countries such as Kuwait, Mauritius, Maldives and Seychelles. 

India has continued to deepen economic relations with foreign partners, attracting USD 74 billion last year and commitments of USD 20 billion in Foreign Direct Investment even during the months of the pandemic. The Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan (self-reliant Indian mission) provides an opportunity for India to engage more closely with foreign partners to make Indian manufacturing globally competitive and integrate domestic consumption and production with global supply chains; promoting resilience, embracing both investment and technology.

India will celebrate its Independence Day with the usual enthusiasm, although special measures will need to be put in place given the pandemic. Celebrations in Delhi, including those at the Red Fort where the Prime Minister will address the nation, the states, as well as those organised by Indian missions abroad will avoid large congregations of people, ensure social distancing, practice sanitisation, protect the vulnerable and use virtual technology.

A renewed push will be given to the theme of “Atmanirbhar Bharat’.Hence, as India celebrates its 74th Independence Day, its citizens will reaffirm their enduring belief in democracy, which ensured a clear mandate for the current government  in 2019, and aspirations for a human – centric path of growth catalysed by open and responsive governance.

Celebrations this year 


–  Military bands from Indian armed forces have kick-started the Independence Day celebrations this year from August 1. The bands from the Indian Army, Navy, Air Force and police have performed at Porbandar, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Raipur, Amritsar, Guwahati, Allahabad, Kolkata,  Vishakhapatnam, Nagpur, Gwalior and Srinagar. These performances will continue till August 15 at several prominent locations across the country. 

  • These performances are intended as gestures of appreciation towards the efforts of Corona warriors amidst the battle with the global pandemic.
  • An essay competition is also being organised with the help of the National Council of Educational Research and Training for school students studying in Classes IX to XII on the topic: ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat-Swatantra Bharat (Self-reliant India-Independent India)’

About the author 

Ambassador Anil Wadhwa has served as Secretary (East) in the Ministry of External Affairs, and as the Indian ambassador to Poland, Oman, Thailand and Italy. He has also been posted to Indian missions in Hong Kong, China and Switzerland and worked for the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in The Hague.

August 14, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Russia and Norway

Norway calls on Russia to pull its forces out of Georgia

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 13, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Soreide has responded to the 12th anniversary of the Russia-Georgia  war, calling on Russia to comply with the 2008 ceasefire agreement and pull its forces out of Georgia.

The ceasefire agreement reached on 12 August 2008 included the requirement that Russian troops withdraw from the occupied regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Instead, Russia has gradually expanded and consolidated its military presence in both regions, has recognised  them as independent states, and has signed treaties that integrate them more closely into Russia’s governance structures”, says Eriksen Soreide.

Eriksen Soreide also mentions that even during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the administrative boundary line around the occupied regions is steadily expanding further into Georgian-controlled territory and becoming more consolidated.

Eriksen Soreide underlines that Georgia is an important and valued partner of Norway and that Norway fully supports Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

It is up to the Georgian people and their elected leaders to chart their own foreign policy course. So-called ‘spheres of influence’ have no place in the 21st century”, says Eriksen Soreide.

It was also mentioned in the official statement that Norway will continue to support Georgia’s reform efforts and integration into European and Euro-Atlantic cooperation.

During the Russia-Georgia war 412 were killed on the Georgian side, including three journalists. 1,747 people were wounded, 35,000 houses burnt and destroyed.

As a result of the war, 130,000 people became IDPs in Georgia. 

125 villages have been occupied by the Russian occupation forces since 2008.

August 13, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

Twelve years since the outbreak of the Russo-Georgian War

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 12, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Twelve years after the war in Georgia, Russian troops are still on Georgian soil and the conflict remains unresolved. ‘Once again we call on Russia to comply with the 2008 ceasefire agreement and pull its forces out of Georgia,’ said Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide.

On the night of 7-8 August 2008, hostilities broke out in the Georgian region of South Ossetia. Russian forces intervened on the side of the separatists and took control of the region, including areas beyond South Ossetia. The ceasefire agreement reached on 12 August 2008 included the requirement that Russian troops withdraw from the occupied regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Instead, Russia has gradually expanded and consolidated its military presence in both these regions, has recognised both of them as independent states, and has signed treaties that integrate them more closely into Russia’s governance structures.

The administrative boundary lines around the occupied regions are steadily expanding further into Georgian-controlled territory and becoming more consolidated, with wide-ranging ramifications for the area’s civilian population. This process has continued during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, often accompanied by attempts to circulate conspiracy theories that are undermining efforts to combat the spread of coronavirus.

‘International humanitarian actors and human rights institutions must be given unimpeded access to the two regions,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide.   

Since 2003, Georgia has implemented a number of important reforms. In 2014, the country concluded an Association Agreement with the EU committing it to further reforms. Georgia is also working actively to further develop its partnership with NATO, with membership as its ultimate goal.

‘Norway fully supports Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. It is up to the Georgian people and their elected leaders to chart their own foreign policy course. So-called ‘spheres of influence’ have no place in the 21st century,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide.

Norway established an embassy in Georgia last year following long-standing efforts to strengthen bilateral relations between the two countries. 

‘Georgia is an important and valued partner for Norway, and we will work to expand and enhance our relations. Norway will also continue to support Georgia’s reform efforts and integration into European and Euro-Atlantic cooperation. It is in the interests of Norway and Europe as a whole to promote a stable, democratic and prosperous Georgia,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide.

August 12, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economics

Changes in the travel advice for the Czech Republic, France, Monaco and Switzerland

by Nadarajah Sethurupan August 11, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is now advising against non-essential travel to the Czech Republic, France, Monaco and Switzerland. Changes are also being made to the travel advice for several regions in Sweden.

On the basis of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health’s assessment of the COVID-19 situation, the Government has decided to advise against non-essential travel to these countries. These countries are being changed from ‘green’ to ‘red’ on the map showing the status for quarantine on entry to Norway from Europe. From 8 August, anyone arriving in Norway from these four countries will be required to go into quarantine for 10 days.

Four new regions in Sweden are being excepted from the travel advice, but the regions of Skåne and Kronoberg are being changed from ‘green’ to ‘red’. As a result, anyone arriving from these two regions will once again be required to go into quarantine.

These changes will apply from midnight on Friday 7 August. See the website of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health for more information.

‘Unfortunately, the current trend in a number of European countries is moving in the wrong direction. This week, the Czech Republic, France, Monaco and Switzerland have all exceeded the threshold for level of infection, which has been set at 20 confirmed new COVID-19 cases per 100 000 inhabitants during the past two weeks. The requirement to go into quarantine is being reintroduced for these countries, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is updating its travel advice accordingly,’ said Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide.

‘These developments confirm what the Government has maintained all along: that the infection situation and local restrictions can both change very quickly. Anyone planning to travel abroad should consider all the potential ramifications beforehand and make sure they know what the situation is in the country they are planning to visit,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide.

‘People who have returned to Norway from a country that becomes ‘red’ after their return must monitor their health for symptoms of COVID-19. It is very important that they get themselves tested if they experience any symptoms, and that they practise good hand hygiene and maintain a distance of at least one metre from other people,’ said Minister of Health and Care Services Bent Høie. 

From 8 August, the global travel advice against all non-essential travel will apply to the following countries and regions in the Schengen area/EEA: Andorra, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Luxembourg, Monaco Portugal, Romania, Spain, Switzerland and certain regions in Sweden.

The Government is now excepting four new regions in Sweden from the advice against non-essential travel and the requirement to go into quarantine: Dalarna, Södermanland, Uppsala and Västerbotten. However, the trend for Skåne and Kronoberg has been reversed, and these two regions are being changed from ‘green’ back to ‘red’.

The following regions in Sweden are now ‘green’: Blekinge, Dalarna, Kalmar, Södermanland, Uppsala, Örebro, Östergötland, Värmland and Västerbotten.

The Institute of Public Health will update the list of countries and regions that satisfy the criteria set for infection levels at least once every two weeks. Updates may be made more frequently if the infection situation in a country or a region in a Nordic country deteriorates.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is maintaining its global advice against non-essential travel to all countries apart from those for which an exception has been made. This travel advice currently applies until 20 August.

For information about the countries in the Schengen area/EEA and the regions in the Nordic countries that are excepted from the travel advice, see the map on the Norwegian Institute of Public Health website and the Ministry’s travel information.  

More information is available on the government website.

August 11, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Norwegian Nobel Prize 2024

101207 The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2024 to Japan’s Hiroshima bomb survivor group Nihon Hidankyo.

Special Interest

  • Africa and Norway
  • Asia and Norway
  • Asylum
  • China and Norway
  • Corruption in Norway
  • Crimes
  • Defence
  • Diplomatic relations
  • Economics
  • Environment
  • Farming
  • Killing
  • Media Freedom
  • Middle East and Norway
  • NATO and Norway
  • Nobel Peace Prize
  • Norwegian Aid
  • Norwegian American
  • Oil & Gas
  • Peace Talks
  • Politics
  • Racism in Norway
  • Religion
  • Russia and Norway
  • Royal House
  • Science
  • Sex scandal
  • Sports
  • Spy War
  • Srilanka and Norway
  • Svalbard
  • Terrorist
  • Taiwan and Norway
  • Video clips

Follow Us

Recent Posts

  • Norway and Germany sign defence arrangement

    February 15, 2026
  • China hopes Norway will play a role in the Europe ties

    February 15, 2026
  • Norwegian cross-country skier breaks Olympic medal record

    February 15, 2026
  • Norway police search former PM’s properties in Epstein links probe

    February 12, 2026
  • Afghan National Killed in Norway

    February 11, 2026
  • Việt Nam strengthening cooperation with Norway: Việt Nam FM

    February 11, 2026

Social Feed

Social Feed

Editors’ Picks

Norway opens market for Sri Lankan fish exports...

May 13, 2016

Sri Lanka – Nordic Business Council holds discussions...

May 15, 2016

Good governance to Sri Lanka

May 15, 2016

Shock and Joy in Sri Lanka – Erik...

May 15, 2016

Sri Lanka-Norway plenty of new opportunities for business–...

May 15, 2016

NORWAY NEWS is an online news site, written in English, dedicated to Norwegian affairs at home and abroad. Norway News.com is published online. It is a daily online newspaper in existence since May, 2003. The site is run by an Independent Journalist.

Facebook Twitter Youtube

Useful Links

    • Work With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Collaboration
    • Data Collection
    • Workplace
    • Adverstising
    • Privacy Policy
    • International Collab
    • Feedback
    • Terms of Use
    • About Our Ads
    • Help & Support
    • Entertainment
    • News Covering
    • Technology
    • Trending Now

Politics

Syrian, Norway to boost cooperation on mine clearance
Erna to step down as Conservative Party leader in 2026
Norwegian Labour Party on re-election win

Latest Articles

Norway and Germany sign defence arrangement
China hopes Norway will play a role in the Europe ties
Norwegian cross-country skier breaks Olympic medal record
Norway police search former PM’s properties in Epstein links probe

Norway News 2025 . All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News

  • Home
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us

Editor’s Picks

  • UN concern over Sri Lanka’s cases of enforced disappearances

    October 8, 2025
  • UN Human Rights Council Resolution on Sri Lanka’s Path to Reconciliation

    October 7, 2025
  • International should support Sri Lanka: Solheim

    October 4, 2024
  • Norwegian Meets Sri Lankan’s Challenges

    May 3, 2024
  • Norwegian Ambassador meets JVP in Sri Lanka

    May 2, 2024
  • “The man who didn’t run away” – Eric Solheim

    April 30, 2024

Newsletter

@2025 - All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News