NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Saturday, November 8, 2025
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Copyright 2025- All Right Reserved Norway News
Asylum

Necessary tightening of Norway’s asylum rules

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

file-20-9636317592236313The Norwegian parliament has adopted a number of legislative amendments to ensure a more sustainable asylum policy and strengthen border control. These were approved by the King in Council today. The Ministry is now considering the need for transitional rules and regulations for the period until the amendments come into force.

– The proposals that have been adopted will make us better equipped to deal with a new crisis involving the arrival of large numbers of asylum seekers. A strict but fair asylum policy is important if we are to succeed in integrating the applicants who are eligible for a residence permit and will be allowed to stay in Norway,’ said Minister of Immigration and Integration Sylvi Listhaug.

A record number of refugees and migrants arrived in Europe in 2015 and this created major challenges for both the EU and Norway. Just over 31 000 asylum seekers came to Norway, while Sweden received more than 162 000. It was against this background and the prospect of continued high numbers of asylum seekers that the Parliament reached agreement at the end of 2015 on a package of measures to significantly tighten Norway’s asylum rules.

– These amendments will enable us to deal with a situation where extraordinary numbers of asylum seekers are arriving at our borders. We are also in a stronger position to fight the use of false ID with wider authorisation of the use of fingerprinting and facial recognition technology, and the period biometric data can be stored has been extended. The Government considered it vital to introduce these measures to deal with possible new crises and the prospect of continued flows of migrants and refugees for many years ahead,’ said Ms Listhaug.

As a result of the introduction of border controls in several countries and the EU-Turkey action plan, there has been a reduction in the number of arrivals since autumn 2015.

– We saw last year that the number of arrivals can change very rapidly. The Government is maintaining a steady course in its immigration policy. We must take a long-term approach and ensure that we have a sustainable immigration policy that safeguards our welfare model for future generations,’ said Ms Listhaug.

The most important points in the legislative amendments adopted by the Storting are as follows:

It will now be possible to refuse entry to asylum seekers at the borders with other Nordic countries during a crisis with extraordinarily high numbers of arrivals.

Asylum seekers arriving in Norway from Russia or another Nordic country will no longer be entitled to enter the country without a visa during a crisis with extraordinarily high numbers of arrivals, if they belong to the category whose applications may be refused individual consideration. The cases to which this applies are regulated by new legislation.

The provision that it must be ‘not unreasonable’ to direct a foreign national to seek protection in another part of his or her country of origin will no longer apply. Foreign nationals do not have the right to international protection if they can obtain effective protection in another area of their home country other than the one from which they have fled (internal displacement). However, under the current provisions of the Immigration Act, foreign nationals may only be directed to internal displacement if this is ‘not unreasonable’.

The deadline for lodging an appeal following the rejection of an asylum application is to be reduced from three weeks to one week for asylum seekers who do not meet the conditions for being granted protection or are otherwise protected from return.

A decision to refuse individual consideration of an asylum application (for example because the asylum seeker has been granted asylum or protection in another country) may be implemented immediately if it is clear that there are grounds for this.
It is now possible to expel foreign nationals in cases where an asylum application is refused individual consideration and also represents misuse of the asylum system.

Amendments providing wider authorisation for the collection and storage of biometric personal data in the form of facial images and fingerprints in immigration cases have been adopted. The purpose is to improve checks of the identity of foreign nationals.

A new provision will make it possible to refuse certain applications for family reunification in cases where the sponsor has been granted subsidiary protection in Norway. Residence for family members may be refused if the family in question*** would be able to live safely in a third country with which the family’s overall connection is stronger than its connection with Norway. This provision does not apply if the sponsor has been granted permanent residence in Norway.

A requirement that both parties must be at least 24 years old is being introduced in family establishment cases. The purpose of this requirement is to combat forced marriage. Exemptions may be made from this requirement if it is clear that the marriage or cohabiting relationship has been entered into voluntarily.

New criteria to ensure integration are being introduced for permanent residence in Norway. One requirement is that the foreign national must have been self-supporting in the preceding twelve-month period. Applicants to whom the obligation to participate in Norwegian language and social studies tuition applies must also have a minimum level of spoken Norwegian and pass a test in social studies in a language they understand.

The obligation to participate in Norwegian language and social studies tuition is being extended to foreign nationals between 55 and 67 years of age, which means that this group must also take the tests when they have completed tuition.

The immigration authorities will be able to refuse an application for permanent residence if this would conflict with serious considerations relating to the regulation of immigration, for example if the foreign national in question has actively obstructed attempts to clarify his or her identity since arriving in Norway.

It has been decided that foreign nationals who are granted collective protection after a mass flight will not be eligible for permanent residence until they have been in Norway for six years. Until now they have been able to obtain permanent residence after four years.

(mfa)

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Corruption in Norway

Real estate indicted for aggravated fraud

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway-TodayPoliceThe police suspect one of Trondheim’s most prominent real estate companies of fraud for tens of million, according to the newspaper Adresseavisen.

The reason why the police opened an investigation of the company are that four firms have reported it, claiming it have been defrauding them.

– According to these firms, it has defrauded a significant amount, although I will get into the size of it. The investigation wants to ascertain what has happened, both in favor of and against the indictment, police lawyer Aage Sanders Midling Trøndelag Police says to Adresseavisen.

She confirms that one firm and two people at the top of the corporate hierarchy is charged with aggravated fraud, but will not specify what police believe are the offenses. According to the soruces of Adresseavisen it concern serious fraud for several million kroner and breaches of the laws of accounting.

– The charges are unfounded. The company and its management, in cooperation with police will work to refute allegations that we have broke the law or doing anything unethical, and expect the case eventually will be dropped, lawyer Halvard Helle, representing the defendants, writes.

The police in Trondheim has been assisted by Public Prosecutor in its investigation.

Source: NTB

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Peace Talks

Historic breakthrough in Colombian peace talks

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

BtDhojjCQAAEZGI‘I am very pleased that the parties to the conflict have now reached agreement on the key issue in the negotiations: laying down of arms and a definitive bilateral ceasefire and end of hostilities. After nearly four years of tough negotiations, we are now finally approaching an end to this conflict,’ Minister of Foreign Affairs Børge Brende said.

Juan Manuel Santos, President of Colombia, and Timoleón Jiménez, head of the guerrilla group Farc-EP, today announced a historic agreement to bring an end to the conflict in their country. Foreign Minister Børge Brende took part in the formal ceremony in Havana, together with UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and President Raúl Castro, among others.

‘For the people of Colombia, the end of the conflict is finally within reach. I hope the parties to the conflict will soon be able to sign a final peace agreement and start a new chapter in the history of their country,’ said Foreign Minister Brende.

The ceasefire and the end of hostilities will be monitored by the UN with a mandate from the Security Council, and a number of international observers are to take part in the operation. This agreement provides the conditions for enabling Farc to become a political actor rather than an armed group. It also contains security guarantees and a commitment to intensify its efforts to prevent attacks on human rights defenders and social leaders. It is hoped that a final peace agreement can be signed in the near future.

The peace talks were formally launched in Oslo in 2012. The remaining topics on the agenda to be negotiated are the reintegration of Farc and mechanisms to implement the agreement, as well as a referendum on the final peace agreement. Norway and Cuba are facilitating the negotiations in Havana.

The armed conflict in Colombia has lasted for more than 50 years. The humanitarian consequences are enormous, and the conflict has brought widespread suffering to the country’s population. Several hundred thousand people have been killed, and nearly seven million have been internally displaced. A large proportion of the victims are children and young people.

(MFA)

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Science

Norway’s BankID tests in-app authentication

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

2971Norway’s BankID is to begin a pilot programme to test in-app authentication and biometric logins for one-click access to financial services. Originally developed to simplify online banking access, BankID is now used by 80% of all adults in Norway to prove their identity to various organisations across Norway, including all government departments, and all of the country’s banks and mobile operators.

BankID currently uses a combination of hardware-based authentication (key fobs) and one-time-password generation for authentication. The company has contracted with local supplier Encap Security to test the vendor’s Smart Authentication platform that removes the need for key fobs by securely enabling authentication to take place inside an app.

A recent upgrade to Encap’s platform includes support for both Apple’s Touch ID and Android’s fingerprint API, making biometric authentication for many new devices possible.

Frode Beckmann Nilsen, head of development at BankID Norway, says: “We want to make sure we remain ahead of the curve by creating a new experience – dropping the need to carry around key fobs or copy and paste from another app – while also ensuring the highest security standards. Each bank will provide an app and introduce it to the customers in their own pace. Our purpose with this Encap-app has been to provide a useful showroom for our next future proof BankID-experience.”

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Africa and Norway

Nigeria, Norway Agree to Deepen Cooperation on Fisheries

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Muhammadu-Buhari3-696x464President Muhammadu Buhari yesterday in Abuja said Nigeria and Norway, a major fish exporting country, would work together to deepen their agricultural cooperation, particularly on fish farming and fisheries development.

A statement issued in Abuja by the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Mr. Garba Shehu, said Buhari spoke at a farewell audience with the outgoing Ambassador of Norway to Nigeria, Ambassador Rolf Ree.

Buhari said his administration would continue to promote agriculture as an alternative revenue earner for the country.

The president said he welcomed the humanitarian aid provided by Norway and some European Union member countries in support of Internally Displaced Persons in the country.

He reaffirmed the federal government’s commitment to explore opportunities to ensure the rehabilitation and safe return of affected persons to their communities.

The president, who also received the outgoing Ambassador of Mexico, Mr Anthonio Garcia Blanco, commended the cordial relations between both countries in the 40 years of their diplomatic relations.

Buhari congratulated both envoys for a successful completion of their tour of duty to Nigeria and wished them well in their future endeavours.

In his remarks, the Norwegian ambassador praised the Buhari administration for the clean-up of Ogoniland and other oil impacted communities in the Niger-Delta.

Also speaking, the Mexican ambassador underscored the historic and economic similarities between Nigeria and Mexico, stressing the need for deeper and more productive ties between both countries.

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Killing

Call to halt execution of 2 prisoners in western Iran

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 23, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

ncri-statement-400On Wednesday, June 22, coinciding with a visit by the Iranian regime’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif to France and the Netherlands, and simultaneous with the global conference against the death penalty with the participation of more than 90 countries in Oslo, officials of the mullahs’ regime in Iran have sent two prisoners by the names of Farzad Bizhani and Farhad Souri in Sanandaj Prison (western Iran) to solitary confinement in preparation for their executions.

On this very day the criminal public prosecutor in the city of Mashhad (northeastern Iran) requested hand amputation verdicts for three prisoners accused of robbery (state Tabnak website – June 22).

Continuous executions, torture and floggings even during the holy month of Ramadan, considered amongst Muslims in Iran and all Islamic countries as a month of tolerance, kindness and benevolence, brings an end to the myth of moderation within the religious, fascist regime ruling Iran that cannot even temporary halt these crimes for a few days to merely save face.

The Iranian Resistance calls for measures to save the lives of the two prisoners on the brink of execution and to prevent a verdict and implementation of hand amputation for the three inmates in Mashhad Prison. The Iranian Resistance also calls on all international humanitarian organizations to condemn these inhumane crimes. Furthermore, the international community is urged to condition its economic and political relations with this inhumane regime, being the source of all the devastations, pains and sufferings of the people of Iran and the entire region, on an improvement of human rights in Iran.

June 23, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Russia and Norway

Fences rise, but cooperation continues

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 23, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Medvedev_og-kong-Harald-2010-Foto-GAD-Wikimedia-Commons-800x475Cooperation in the North continues, but consequences of the conflicts are primarily noticeable on the political level and in military cooperation.

– I think the notion of “Arctic exceptionalism”, in that Arctic cooperation is isolated from conflict spill over from other regions is being challenged, but that it still holds, says fellow Tom Røseth at Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies, to High North News.

Most cooperation is affected

-Most Arctic cooperation is affected in some way or another, although the degree varies significantly. On one side, you have the same decision makers on the top in charge of a broad foreign- and security spectrum including Arctic policies, and these are not unaffected by the consequences of the Russia-West conflict over Ukraine, Røseth continues.

-On the other hand, solid institutions and bilateral networks are established, designed to handle political shifting winds, as was the case during the Cold War.

Røseths general impression is that although some work is affected and focus adjusted, such as in the Arctic Council case, cooperation continues. Consequences are primarily noticeable on the political level and in military cooperation.

Business as usual – almost

-But, he says, -further down to the individual and more practical issues, pragmatism and business as usual more or less prevail. We should keep in mind that it is in all the Arctic states’ interest that the Arctic remains calm and stable, and the many challenges in the region require common solutions.

Russia, in addition to Norway, has the most to lose from a militarization of the Arctic where commercial, environmental and security cooperation becomes unattainable. With the accession of Asian states as permanent observers in 2013, the Arctic is truly internationalized, and herein lies an expectation and obligation upon the Arctic states to manage the region responsibly and peacefully. A potential spillover to the Arctic instigated by Russia is not likely, as it would counter its strong regional interests, which are vested in a legitimate Arctic regime, prospecting economic opportunities and aspirations for a strategic trade route, Røseth says.

Less trust and goodwill

Senior research fellow at NUPI, Elana Wilson Rowe, agrees when it comes to the effect on a military level. She is, as many others, preoccupied by the effect on the weakening, or lack, of trust that the worsened geopolitical climate are creating.

-Apart from high-level military cooperation, like the CHOD meetings (Arctic Chiefs of Defence Staff), Arctic multilateral cooperation seems to go on well. By and large, the Arctic Council cooperation has been buffered from geopolitical tensions. However, although there still may be a lot of trust around the table amongst the diplomats and civil servants who are used to meeting each other regularly, there is certainly much less trust and goodwill between home capitols, Wilson Rowe points out.

“Cooperation? I think not”

-That is one of the key policy environments these individuals have to navigate, they might meet another reality when the return to their home capitols. It’s also difficult to know, even as regular cooperation continues, what more ambitious or groundbreaking policy efforts have had to be put on ice (for example, like the 2011 and 2013 binding agreements). Discussing revitalization of the Arctic Council at 20 years, what needs to change may be challenging, thinks Elana Wilson Rowe.

-But then they turn up in Washington, or Moscow, with plans, and might meet a reaction like; do we cooperate ambitiously with “them? I think not”…

Who is picking up the phone?

For Norway and Russia, bilateral military cooperation has been suspended. The northern commands still have their direct communications in place for urgent communication. But some of the openness and clarity of communication is likely reduced due to lack of face-to-face contact in other settings. It is not that the telephone line between the countries are not there anymore, but who is picking it up and do the “chatting”? How well do they know each other?, she asks rhetorically.

Wilson Roew is pointing out that personal relations across the Barents in many fields from military to civil society, actually is a heritage from Thorvald Stoltenberg’s time as Norway’s foreign minister and envisioned to serve the purpose of peace, certainly serves to facilitate effective communication.

-I think that this mutual and informal contact between the institutions and the people working there is suffering, she says.

Not a bragging matter

And she points out another aspect of the new situation:

-In our research, we have noted that, before the annexation of Crimea, Russian politicians used to highlight positively their contact with other Arctic states in mainstream Russian media.

Many photos of Lavrov meeting the Arctic foreign ministers. Now the same media coverage scarcely mentions the international Arctic and primarily focuses on Russian northern domestic issues or on military feats of strength in the region. One could argue the same in Norway, that cooperation with Russia is now no longer a great sell to voters.

The neighborhood is changed

Elana Wilson Rowe thinks that, in the Arctic, the cooperation will continue, but it will be a cooperation based on the overlapping political interests of the parties involved, not out of the pursuit of regional cohesion for its own sake.

-That means the ambitions of the significance of regional cooperation and the associated rhetoric changes. Neighbors, but not “without fences”.

—

Tom Røseth is Fellow at the Centre for Asian Security Studies, Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies.
Elana Wilson Rowe is a senior research fellow at NUPI and an adjunct professor at NORD University.

June 23, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Svalbard

The EU pledges to actively follow-up on its Arctic commitments

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 23, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

3477th-Foreign-Affairs-Council_1-800x475The Arctic remains high on the European Union’s foreign policy agenda after the Council of the European Union – the EU institution that represents the governments of the EU’s Member States – adopted its new Conclusions on the Arctic on Monday, 20 June 2016.

Almost two months after the European Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy published their Joint Communication on an integrated European Union policy for the Arctic (JOIN(2016) 21 final), the Council followed suit by expressing and re-stating its views on Arctic matters.

Such a quick reaction to a Communication is unprecedented in the history of the EU’s Arctic policy-making.
Third reflection on the Arctic

After related considerations in 2009 and 2014, the 2016 Conclusions are the third reflection of the Council on the Arctic region ever since the Union has become interested in the circumpolar North back in 2007/2008. In general, Council Conclusions express the unanimous political position of the EU’s Member States on a specific topic, country or event and often invite the Commission to make a proposal or take further action.

In 2014, the Council asked the Commission and the HR to develop an integrated policy on Arctic matters – a more coherent framework for EU action and funding programmes. A request that was met with the aforementioned Joint Communication, on which in turn the Council now expressed its view. It is believed that the European Parliament (EP) will publish a new Resolution and its position on the Joint Communication in November/December 2016.
What is the Council saying?

All in all, the Council discussed the future direction of the Union’s Arctic policy with a view to set out a coherent response to the environmental, economic and social challenges of the region. Eventually, the EU’s overall aim is to enhance both socio-economic as well as environmental resilience in the Arctic region.

An “ambitious cross-spectrum and well-coordinated Arctic policy” is considered key to the Union’s regional engagement and “important from a foreign and security policy point of view”. Based on the Joint Communication, the Council re-recognises the “primary responsibility of the Arctic states”. However, at the same time it is clearly emphasised that many issues affecting the region can only “effectively [be] addressed through regional or multilateral cooperation” with the EU being able to “make a significant contribution”.
Indigenous and local communities

This ‘substantial EU-Arctic impact’ relates to the Union’s continuous engagement with Arctic indigenous peoples and local communities, its commitment to contribute to global climate change mitigation and adaption or the EU’s central role in supporting regional sustainable development, innovation and infrastructure. Additionally, the Council reiterates the Joint Communication’s emphasis on sustainable economic development, including tourism, low-carbon and cold-climate technologies and telecommunication in the Arctic.

It is assumed that strengthened trade and business cooperation could essentially contribute to socio-economic development and resilience of local communities.

Furthermore, the Council specifically addresses questions related to the Central Arctic Ocean. First, it highlights the participation of the EU in the dialogue concerning the prevention of unregulated fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean. The negotiations commenced in December 2015 with a meeting in Washington, D.C., with also China, the EU, Iceland, Japan and South Korea being invited.
Secondly, the Conclusions also refer to the Union’s engagement in the work towards establishing marine protected areas.

Similarly to the Joint Communication, the Conclusions avoid taking up problematic topics such as extraction of raw materials and hydrocarbons, sealing and whaling. Further, the Conclusions do not answer the Joint Communication’s proposal of establishing a Working Party on Arctic matters and Northern Cooperation within the Council’s institutional structure. As a matter of fact, many Member States expressed limited added value of such a new institutional arrangement.
Is there anything new?

One of the more interesting statements included in the Conclusions is the “firm support for freedom of research in the Arctic region”. It is the first time that the “freedom of research” is clearly expressed in the Council or Commission’s Arctic policy documents. Interestingly, the Council repeats a position presented both in Germany’s 2013 Arctic policy Guidelines, where the Federal Government declares to be “working to guarantee the freedom of Arctic research”, as well as a similar Polish-inspired sentence in the 2014 European Parliament’s Resolution.

However, there is no such thing as freedom of conducting research within Arctic states’ territories, nor is it part of the 1920 Svalbard Treaty that regulates access to the Svalbard Archipelago. The right to conduct marine scientific research is pronounced by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, but coastal states’ may – under certain conditions – not give consent for research activities within the states’ exclusive economic zones or on their continental shelves. Therefore, unless it is understood as a call for “academic freedom”, the phrasing included in the 2016 Council Conclusions may meet limited enthusiasm among some non-EU Arctic states.

Most likely, the “freedom of research” statement alludes to the agreement on scientific cooperation, currently being negotiated under the auspices of the Arctic Council. Depending on the final outcome of the negotiations, this legally binding agreement may apply exclusively to researchers and institutions of the eight Arctic states, with unclear consequences for scientific activities conducted by other actors.
How to fund and where to go?

Similarly to the 2014 Conclusions, the Council also particularly calls for greater cooperation between the EU institutions and its Member States as regards to research efforts. Accordingly, it has been highlighted that the level of EU Arctic-relevant research funding is to be maintained, perhaps also after 2020.

What may strike the alert reader’s attention is the vague reference to “balanced regional funding”, which will be read in the EU’s northernmost regions in the context of current, increasingly vigorous discussion on the structure of the EU’s cohesion and cross-border funding within the EU multiannual budget starting from 2021.

In comparison to the two previous Conclusions, the Council does not directly ask the Commission and the HR for any further (Arctic policy) action. This goes in line with recent statements from the Commission, indicating that the 2016 Joint Communication will be the last one for years and should actually guide EU action for some time.
Consequently, also the Council ‘only’ invites both the Commission and the HR to “actively implement and follow-up on the [Union’s Arctic] commitments and (…) report to the Council regularly”.

In general, the Council’s Arctic update ‘captivates’ through its vague and brief nature; this, however, depicts a general characteristic of Council Conclusions, also from an Arctic context. Especially in the circumpolar arena, the Union’s institutions have learnt the hard way that any bold EU Arctic appearance or statement can easily result in Arctic frustration.

(highnorthnews)

June 23, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Middle East and Norway

Oslo pushes for abolishing death penalty in Lebanon

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 22, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

1466616163_Lebanon Minister of Justice, Ashraf Rifi, currently taking part in the 6th World Congress Against the Death Penalty at the Opera House of Oslo, Norway, delivered a speech in which he stressed that this penalty was not a deterrent to crime.

“The death penalty must be deleted from the Lebanese law in accordance with modern laws and in line with the international will to cancel this sanction,” Rifi said.

“The diligence of Lebanese courts shows that they are going to decrease the death penalty and replace it with that of hard labor for life,” he added.

Rifi also noted that Lebanon was permanently committed to respect for the dignity of man and his right to a decent life.

June 22, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Middle East and Norway

Norway troop to Syria

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 22, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

53d0834f-9d50-4883-95c9-068303647b83Norway’s parliament has authorized a government request for sending troops to Syria, a new sign that the pacifist Scandinavian country may become involved deeper in the conflict in the Arab country.

The government in Oslo said the parliament gave the go-ahead on Wednesday for a potential dispatch of troops to Syria.

“It is therefore more on the agenda that coalition forces should be able to train, advise and give operational support on Syrian territory in their battle against IS (Daesh),” Norwegian Defense Minister Ine Eriksen Soereide said in a statement, adding, “Local forces (in Syria) are making more progress than we could have expected.”

Norway has plans to dispatch some 60 troops to Jordan this summer with the alleged aim of training local forces battling the Takfiri Daesh terrorists. The government had earlier said it could consult the parliament in case a direct military presence in Syria becomes necessary.

The new contingent would consist of some 60 Norwegian soldiers, according to the approved government plans.

Oslo has already sent some 120 troops to Iraq to train and support Kurdish fighters against Daesh.

Western governments have been contributing for the past two years to a so-called US-led coalition of forces claiming to battle Daesh in Iraq and Syria.

The presence of foreign forces in Syria has drawn fierce criticism from the country’s government, with Damascus saying that the unauthorized deployment violates Syria’s territorial integrity.

June 22, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Killing

Foreign Minister Brende’s opening speech at World Congress against the death penalty in Oslo

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 22, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

13445713_10209934955199933_6479069328940583322_nForeign Minister Brende’s opening speech at Sixth World Congress against the death penalty in Oslo.

Complete and full text of speech.

Honoured guests, ladies and gentlemen, Welcome to Norway and to this sixth World Congress Against the Death Penalty.

I am pleased to see such an impressive gathering of representatives from civil society, academia, governments, parliaments and human rights institutions.

Even some Nobel laureates are present.

Among us we also have people who have been personally affected by capital punishment:

people who have been sentenced to death their family members and people who provided legal representation.

Thank you for coming to Oslo to share your experiences – to tell your stories.

The death penalty

2016-06-21 17.28.56At all times, we must remember that – contrary to what many people think – the death penalty is not exclusive to any particular region, political system, religion, culture or tradition.

The death penalty has been – and still is – being practised in all corners of the world.

On my way to the Opera House earlier today, I passed by Oslo Pride.

This reminded me that the death penalty is not only used for the most serious of crimes.

Even in 2016, people can be sentenced to death just because of whom they love.

The death penalty is used disproportionately against members of minority communities.

This is a serious obstacle in their efforts to seek recognition of their human rights.

When anyone is sentenced to death, that person’s inherent human dignity is undermined.

13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_nAs we have learned time and again, no justice system is perfect. There are numerous cases of innocent people serving time. Death row is no exception.

  • The death penalty is absolute.
    – The death penalty is irreversible.
    – The death penalty is irreparable.

 

There will always be a risk that an innocent person can be sentenced to death.

That is a risk we cannot accept.

As UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has stated, “We have a duty to prevent innocent people from paying the ultimate price for miscarriages of justice. The most sensible way is to end the death penalty.”

Norway and the death penalty

The Norwegian position on the death penalty stands firm: Norway opposes the death penalty under all circumstances.

This is a matter of principle.

The Norwegian constitution sets out that, “Every human being has a right to live. Nobody can be sentenced to death.”

The abolition of the death penalty in Norway – in times of peace and war – is reflected in our commitment to global abolition.
However, this has not always been the case. The death penalty was once an integral part of our penal system.

After World War II, 37 people were sentence to death and executed for treason and war crimes.

The last execution in Norway was carried out three years after the war ended.

Despite the long occupation and the brutal war, many people wanted to show mercy and compassion instead of vengeance.

13450095_10209934955159932_6081808617656917899_nSome 700 priests called for clemency.

The death sentence was carried out, but the cries for compassion were not ignored.

The execution in 1948 was Norway’s last.

Global trends and development

Much work remains to be done. Nonetheless there are reasons for optimism in our struggle towards global abolition.

Never before have so few countries practised the death penalty.

In 1945, only eight states had abolished the death penalty.

Then, as now, there were strong voices in favour of the death penalty. Many people believed that terrible crimes called for the ultimate punishment.

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, who is here today, recently said that, “We must not allow even the most atrocious acts to strip us of our fundamental humanity”.

As we move forward, we should not judge, but seek to understand.

This way, states with and without the death penalty can work together towards global abolition.

Previously, when policy-makers discussed the death penalty and its effect on crime, decisions were based on assumptions and beliefs, not knowledge and facts.

Thanks to ground-breaking research, we now know that the death penalty does not deter crime any more than long prison sentences.

13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_nTwenty-five years ago, only a quarter of UN Member States had abolished the death penalty.

Today, more than four out of five countries — some 160 Member States — have either abolished the death penalty or no longer use it.

Universal abolition is certainly within reach.

We have already come a long way.

This reflects greater international recognition of the sanctity of human rights.
Conclusion

Many of you here this evening know better than most how abolition can be achieved.

You have fought tirelessly against the death penalty for many years.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for all that you have done.

The most effective way to reduce the number of states, that still apply the death penalty is to bring people together and facilitate an open dialogue:

  • Based on respect
    – supported by facts
    – free of judgement and prejudice

13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_nIn an arena where we can meet each other with open minds.

The World Congress is just such an arena.

Let us embrace this opportunity. We need to make the most of the next three days.

The goal should be to take concrete steps towards the abolition of the death penalty.

Finally, allow me to express my gratitude to the conference organisers, Ensemble contre la peine de mort and the World Coalition against the Death Penalty.

I would also like to thank our fellow members of the Core Group of countries working against the death penalty.
Your tireless efforts are an inspiration for us all.

June 22, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Africa and Norway

Kenya to state position on death penalty at Oslo

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 22, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

13450095_10209934955159932_6081808617656917899_nKenya will present her position on the ongoing global debate on the death penalty in Oslo, Norway, on Wednesday.

This will be during the 6th World Congress Against the Death Penalty, whose theme for the year is ‘Abolition Now’.

The three-day summit that started on Monday, seeks to assist countries develop new strategies for universal abolition of the death penalty.

The annual congress brings together participants including government representatives, civil society, political representatives, lawyers and the media, who are keen on raising awareness on the death penalty.

13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_nSince inception on November 1, 2011, 4,500 death row inmates have had their death sentences commuted to life imprisonment.

The Kenyan delegation at the congress is under the leadership of the Power of Mercy Advisory Committee, established through Article 133 of the constitution.

Committee secretary Michael Kagika and Gerald Wandera, a director with the National Crime Research Centre, are leading the delegation.

The team is mandated with advising President Uhuru Kenyatta on exercising of the power of mercy.

Its nine members include the Attorney General who is the chairperson, the Cabinet Secretary responsible for Correctional Services and seven professional part time members.

13507040_10209934956799973_4543674041801265100_nIn addition to the constitutional mandate, Power of Mercy Act 2011 assigns the committee support functions including undertaking research and collecting data on matters related to power of mercy.

The team also educates people in correctional institutions on the power of mercy and application procedures.

The committee has partnered with the National Crime Research Centre to conduct a national public debate to solicit views on capital offences and punishments.

The objective is open dialogue on what Kenyans want for offenders and the management of capital offences.

Two plenary sessions, six round tables, six workshops and nine side events will take place over two days of debates.

June 22, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Media Freedom

Malaysia one step closer to amending death penalty

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 22, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

nancy shukri 3103

Malaysia is one step closer to amending the mandatory death sentence, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Nancy Shukri (pic) said.

Nancy told the World Congress Against The Death Penalty in Oslo, Norway, recently that a government-backed study on the death penalty had been completed and a paper is being readied by the Attorney General’s Chambers.

“There are positive signs in Malaysia and a steady momentum towards possible change in the death penalty legislation,” Nancy said.

The study was conducted by the International Centre For Law and Legal Studies (I-CeLLS). The consultant was then Professor Dr Roger Hood, Professor of Criminology and Emeritus Fellow of All Souls College Oxford.

Currently, in Malaysia, the death penalty is mandatory for 12 offences while 20 other offences are punishable with discretionary death penalty.

Murder, drug trafficking, and offences related to security are instances of offences which are punishable with death.

However, Nancy said empirical studies showed that the death penalty had not led to “the deterring effect that such a penalty was created”.

“Although Malaysia is generally in compliance with international standards in so far as the relevant safeguards (on capital punishment) are concerned, Malaysia’s position on death penalty has always been subjected to national and international criticisms.”

The global anti-death congress was the sixth edition. Nancy expressed her “deepest appreciation to Norway” for inviting Malaysia to participate.

June 22, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Srilanka and Norway

(full detail..) Sri Lankan’s foreign minister visits Norway to revive ties

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Sri Lankan’s foreign minister visits Norway to revive ties – full detail..

20.06.2016 – 12.20 PM from Dubai to Oslo, Sri Lankan foreign Minister dedications was received by Mr. Thorborn Gaustadsater ambassador to Norway in Sri Lanka, H. E. M. jayantha Palpane, Ambassador of Sri Lanka to Norway and Mrs. T. P. Dharmasena from the Embassy of Srilanka together with Ms. Maren Kyvi from protocol MFA.

21.06.2016

8.55 AM – meeting with Innovation Norway

During the visit, the Foreign Minister participated in a business seminar at ‘Innovation Norway’ in Oslo, attended by the Norwegian business community and potential investors with the objective of encouraging Norwegian businesses to invest in Sri Lanka.

johan-bjrkevoll-innovation-norway-4-728

11.00 AM –  Public lecture by Mangala Samaraweera at NUPI

Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera has said that the nature and structure of the Judicial Mechanism meant to try cases of war crimes will be decided only after consultations with the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) and the organizations representing the victims. Speaking at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs in Oslo, Samaraweera said: “There is a certain degree of controversy on how it should be set up and the level of international participation.

That will be decided after the consultations are over but all I can say now is whatever we decide upon, we will and must have the approval of the victims. This is not an exercise to please ourselves. So the final contours of the architecture of the courts we are hoping to set up will be in discussion especially with parties like the TNA or other groups which represent the victims.” On setting up a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), the Minister said:

“We have been working with the government of South Africa about their experiences in the setting up a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Of course, we aren’t guided by the South African model of the TRC because we feel that a model based on confession and forgiveness is not what Sri Lankans want. Many of them want justice. So we are working out the contours of not only the TRC but what should come afterwards, the setting up of the special courts.”

Samaraweera further said that Sri Lanka has ratified the Convention on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances and the enabling legislation will be presented to the cabinet the moment he returns to the island in July. “Hopefully that will confine to the pages of history, the white van culture of terror (through abductions), that we had earlier,” he added. –

Full text of Minister Samaraweera’s Speech at NUPI..

Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 00.13.41Mangala Samaraweera, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sri Lanka in Norway to attend the 6th World Congress against the Death Penalty.

He represents a government that, after entering power in 2015, have taken a new and constructive approach towards the country’s minorities.

Sri Lanka is currently making large efforts to reconcile Sinhaleses, Tamils and muslims in the aftermath of the civil war, which came to an end in 2009.

This work is anchored in the UN’s efforts for human rights. As part of his visit, Foreign Minister Samaraweera has given a talk on this important work.

Good evening everyone my name is Austin Latin

I’ll just like to say a few words before we start as you know Sri Lanka has a very important place in Norwegian history and consciousness. Norwegians feel very close to Sri Lanka even though it’s very far away.

It’s my pleasure to welcome the foreign minister of Sri Lanka the honorable Mr. Mongorat Sadabaya. The government after entering power in 2015 have taken a new constrictive approach to towards the country’s minorities. Sri Lanka is make very large efforts to unite the Sinhalese the Tamils and the Muslims in the aftermath of the civil war ended in 2009. And also this work in active in human rights and in the context of the conference on work against the death penalty that’s going on in Oslo this week.

It’s therefore very good to have the foreign minister Sadabaya who has been a member of parliament since 1989 so it is quite a bit of experience so talk on this subject. So I would like to welcome you.

Foreign Minister:

Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 00.13.41Thank you, thank you, Ladies and gentlemen and friends. It is indeed a great honor to be here today at the Norwegian Institute for International affairs.

And I would like to thank the management especially Mr. Wilsheim for giving me the opportunity to talk about recent developments in Sri Lanka.

Ladies and Gentlemen, in fact all of you are aware, that on the 08th of January last year in a historic election, in fact what the world calls the rainbow election of 2015, the people of Sri Lanka voted for change, and for democracy, reconciliation and development, the three pillars on which the Government of President Maithripala Sirisena and Ranil Wickremesinghe are taking the country forward today. In fact on that day, the people of Sri Lanka chose free and fair elections, good governance and the rule of law over authoritarianism and impunity; they chose stability, reconciliation and peace over the politics of fear and hate which had prevailed for many, many years previously. And they eschewed isolationist crony capitalism for openness to the world and a competitive, transparent rules-based economy.

FM06242016In fact, this victory in January was repeated again in August where extremist political parties on all sides of the divide were again decisively defeated and for the first time in Sri Lanka’s history, the two principle political parties which have governed Sri Lanka since independence chose to be on the same side leaving aside the bitterness of the past. And also for the first time, the leader of the TNA, the party which represents the Tamil community in Sri Lanka was chosen as the leader of the opposition and thus I feel a new window of opportunity was opened for Sri Lanka after many years to rectify the mistakes of the past and go forward towards a new future.

In fact as you all may be aware, when Sri Lanka gained independence in 1948; it was a country which the world believed will succeed in no time. I have seen an article written in the, I believe it was the London Times, the day after Sri Lanka gained independence from the British. The editorial in that paper says Ceylon, as it was called then, which gained independence will in no time become the Switzerland of the East because of its strategic location, because of its human and natural resources. Not only that, as recently as 1965, Lee Kuan Yew, the new Prime Minister of Singapore then having just broken away from the Malay Union presenting his first budget says that my ambition in 65 of course is to surpass the growth rate of Ceylon in the first five years meaning that we were way ahead of even Singapore at that time. But of course by 1983, Mr. Lee Kuan Yew went on to say that Sri Lanka is an example that no country should follow because we had all the opportunities, we had all the reasons to succeed but because we could not come to terms with our own diversity as a nation, what could have been easily solved at the early stages then became in to a bitter war and as a result, Sri Lanka again today has to I believe start, recommence that journey all over again, trying to catch up for lost opportunity.

FM06242016Because as I said, the new conjunctions have given Sri Lanka an opportunity it has never had for a long time. We have a Government which consists of the two principle parties. We have an opposition and a leader of opposition who represents the moderate aspirations of the Tamil people and other minorities of Sri Lanka and therefore we also have a Government which is indeed committed to the three pillars of governance as I mentioned earlier, that of democratization, of reconciliation and development.

In fact again as some of you may know, we have achieved a considerable amount, many victories, in a short period of time in the area of democratization. Within the first 100 days itself, President Sirisena pruned down many of his executive powers as much as he could without going through a referendum as the Supreme Court requested. He reintroduced term limits for the Presidency. He again took away all the institutions like the Judiciary and the Public Service Commissions, the Corruption Commissions all out of the grip of Presidential rule and independent commissions are now functioning again and also committed himself to a new Constitution, not merely Constitutional Amendments, a new Constitution.

FM06242016Once a new Government was formed after the General elections, which as I said took place last August and in Jan 09th of this year when the President was celebrating his first year in office, we converted the Sri Lankan Parliament to a Constituent Assembly tasked with the objectives of drafting a brand new Constitution for Sri Lanka. That was because we felt that the two Constitutions which were in place since independence, the two Republican Constitutions of 1972 and 1978 did not take into account the diversity of Sri Lanka as a nation.

As you know, Sri Lanka is a multi ethnic, multi religious, multi lingual, multi cultural nation. The Sinhalese and the Tamils have lived in Sri Lanka since history was written. The Muslim community came as traders and then lived there and had contributed immensely to the history of our country for the last 1000 odd years and we have other communities like the Burghers, the descendents of the Dutch and the Portuguese. We have the Malays and we even have indigenous Sri Lankans, the Veddas but unfortunately because the two earlier Constitutions were basically majoritarian in nature, we feel that paved the way for one of the most bitter civil wars Sri Lanka and the world in fact has ever seen and our Government, the non – recurrence being one of our primary objectives, first and foremost we must now create a Constitution which will celebrate the diversity of Sri Lanka and that is what we are doing now.

FM06242016In fact the first report of the consultations with the public was tabled last week in parliament. The work of the draft is going on very seriously and fairly quickly in parliament, in the Constituent Assembly. In fact we have told the people who are doing it that we would like to have the first white paper on the Constitution distributed sometime in September and hopefully before the budget of Sri Lanka which is usually presented in the late November.

We are hoping to present, the new Constitution to parliament for ratification by a two thirds majority, which most probably will have to be again followed in the New Year by a referendum. But of course with both the principle parties working together on this, we are confident of the two thirds majority as well as “Yes” at a referendum in the future.

Along with the new Constitution, we have also being bringing various new laws to strengthen the democratic framework. As I said the 19th Amendment which again freed all the legal mechanisms and the media, the Public Service Commission, and free media from interference from the government. In fact I won’t be there for the vote but tomorrow even the Right to Information bill, which has been something which Sri Lanka has been wanting for long time, will be presented in Parliament and passed.

FM06242016And of course the other area in which we have been concentrating is the area of reconciliation, because without reconciliation as I mentioned Sri Lanka cannot achieve the promise it has. So that is why the new government was elected on a very strong mandate for reconciliation and a mandate also gave us power to start a domestic mechanism to inquire into the various allegations of human rights violations, perhaps even war violations during the earlier period.

In fact, that is why Sri Lanka took the very bold step of co-sponsoring the resolution presented in Geneva by the United States initially. After discussions, we decided that co-sponsoring is the best way we can bring justice to those who need it in Sri Lanka.

In fact, some people like to say that, specially the extreme nationalist wings which are still very much alive and kicking in Sri Lanka, with hand in glove with one or two ghosts from the past. They like to say that we did it under International pressure. I like to say to you ladies and gentlemen, No! it was not the resolution, the decision to co-sponsor the resolution and to commit ourselves to a reconciliation process. A process which will basically take into account (that) our past was taken not because of the international community but we as a Government feel that it is the only way Sri Lanka can move forward. The only way that is come into terms with our past so that we can move forward as a united nation.

FM06242016So in order to do so, we talked about 4 possible mechanisms. The mechanism to seek the truth, the truth seeking mechanisms. And the second one was a mechanism for accountability, for justice. The third one was of course reparation and the fourth one is to ensure non-recurrence, to ensure that some of the tragedies which took place in our beautiful little island in the last so many years since independence do not ever, ever happen again.

So with that in mind, we have been working hard in the last several months, especially since the resolution was passed unanimously on the first of October last year. We have now in fact, the first of these mechanisms which we proposed, the Permanent Office for Missing Persons has now being finalized and also got unanimous approval by the Cabinet and the next step of publishing it as a government gazette was also completed two weeks ago in all three languages and the final step would be to present it in Parliament within the next month or so once the due time frames are completed. So the OMP or the Office for Missing Persons, I feel is a huge, massive step forward.

Then of course, we have also created what is called the SCRM, Secretariat for Coordinating Reconciliation Mechanisms and that is working with leading members of the civil society, conducting consultations on the other mechanisms now. Consultations with all the stakeholders, the victims of the war, members of the armed forces, wives of the missing and the different political parties etc. That process has already started.

FM06242016Meanwhile we have been working with the government of South Africa about their experiences in setting up a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Of course we aren’t guided by the South African model of the TRC because we feel that a model based on confession and forgiveness which I believe, if I am to simplify the South African process which is not as simple, but is not what Sri Lankans want. Many of them want justice. So we are working out the contours of not only the TRC but as I said what should come afterwards is the setting up of the special courts.

Of course there’s a certain degree of controversy on how it should be setup and the level of international participation. That too will be decided after the consultations are over but all I can say now is whatever we decide upon, will and must have the approval, not only ourselves but of the victims those who suffered. This is not an exercise to please ourselves. So the final contours of the architecture of the courts we are hoping to set up will be in discussion. Especially with parties like the TNA and other groups which represent the victims.

Along with that we have also taken certain steps to further kick start the process. As I said earlier, with the intention of de militarizing the North and the East immediately after coming into power, we appointed civilians, two highly respected civil servants as the Governors of the North. The demilitarizing process has started but of course not complete but we are now in the process of even giving back the land which has been taken over for military purposes over the years. In fact I know that during the course of this week another 700 acres will also be released. So far nearly 4000 acres but perhaps an equal amount of land remains to be released and that too we have told the military, that all must be released in a timeline going up to the end of 2018.

FM06242016Of course we did ratify the convention of enforced and involuntary disappearances for the first time and the enabling legislation will be presented to Cabinet, which is done by my Ministry, the moment I am back in Sri Lanka in July. Hopefully that will certainly confine the white van culture of terror we had earlier to the pages of history.

Today in Sri Lanka, two Marxist insurgencies or two JVP insurgencies and one 26 year old war later, Sri Lanka has started a new journey towards what I would like to call a new Sri Lanka. In fact, the legacy of this bitter past, I feel has united us in a collective determination to prevent, the torment of such violence from ever reoccurring in our country again. Of course when you try to wrestle with a past of this nature, you still have to deal with the ghosts of the past. As I said you still have to deal with the old mindset which sometimes are entrenched in certain sections of the bureaucracy and sometimes it’s very frustrating because it’s not happening as quickly as we would like it to happen, but all I can say is Sri Lanka does have the will, whatever the challenges are to overcome all these difficulties

And we have. In fact, again I don’t want it (to be) like the monkey praising his own tail, (to) go on about the achievements we have made but in the short period of time, we have made some remarkable achievements and we are continuing to do so. But I saw some of our friends in the international arena call what we have done in this time as ‘baby steps’ but to them I’d like to say that even though it may look like baby steps to some of you in the international community, I think if I may paraphrase Armstrong going to the moon, It’s a giant leap for Sri Lanka and we will move forward.

13515334_10157012962700133_227181738_nFrom here I go to Geneva next week where I will be making a statement on what we are doing now and also the fact that the Government is united in its determination to come to terms with what happened earlier. Again certain newspapers and social media like to say that the President has one view, the Prime Minister has another, the Foreign Minister yet another but it is not so. We are working unitedly. In fact, those of you who heard President Sirisena addressing the nation on the 4th of February during the independence day of Sri Lanka this year, he said “ It is now time for us to seize the current opportunity that is before us to implement the provisions of the Geneva resolution, not because of International pressure, but because as a nation, we must implement these provisions for the sake of restoring the dignity of our nation, our people and our military, in order for Sri Lanka to regain her due position as a strong democracy among the community of nations.” So we are moving ahead as I said with confidence and meeting the challenges head on.

But of course if democracy and reconciliation is to succeed, we feel that the third part of our pillar, which we are moving the country the pillar of development, must also succeed. The people of Sri Lanka must now feel that their pockets are fuller, that they are better off economically, their standards of living has risen because of our open policy to the world and our policy of coming to terms with our past. That is why I am here and this morning I had the opportunity, (which) the ambassador arranged, a meeting where we addressed many investors who are willing to come to Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka is a middle income country. We are no longer eligible for handouts or aid or grants. We must look after ourselves and in order to do so Foreign Direct Investment is of paramount importance in order to kick start the economy. Sri Lanka I would say has huge potential. In fact, Sri Lanka has been known as a paradise for tourists for a long, long time but now we also want to make Sri Lanka also a paradise for foreign investors. In fact we feel that it is strategically placed today. As the East or Asia grows in importance, we could be a strategic gateway to the Indian Ocean and to the Indian subcontinent.

We have, even though our own market is relatively small. 21 million is our population, but we have Free Trade Agreements with both India and Pakistan. We are now in the process of negotiating a Free Trade Agreement with China and Japan which I’m sure as I said earlier makes it an exciting gateway for investors from this part of the world to come there.

13487459_10157012962400133_1488151225_nWe have been getting a lot of support from the West since the new government came into power. There’s a tsunami of goodwill I’d like say but that good will must now transform itself into practical day to day realities and the best way you can help as I said is by choosing Sri Lanka as your destination of choice for investment for trade.

We have ended the previous government’s policy of self isolation and confrontation. Today we have embraced the world. We were totally dependent on China and China along for nearly 10 years but I’m happy to say that we have restored our relations with our neighbor and friend, India to a level of excellence after many years.

We have restored our ties with the European Union. In fact just last week the fishing ban imposed on Sri Lanka was restored unanimously in the European Parliament and yesterday we handed in our official application to have the GSP + concession restored. Earlier it was again taken away because we did not or we had violated many of the criteria, which was required to get it initially but now are ready to get it back again and offer and restore the thousands and thousands of jobs lost as a result of that. With the United States, we have raised our relations to a level we have never seen before and from this year we started the US – Sri Lanka partnership dialogue in Washington in February with Secretary John Kerry. With Japan, President Sirisena was the first leader to be invited to the Outreach Summit ever in its history and all the G7 countries have promised to help us.

13480037_10157012962350133_2014723040_nIf you want to know what kind of diplomacy Sri Lanka is following, I would like to go back to something Jawaharlal Nehru said in 1947. He said “Whatever policy you may lay down, the art of conducting foreign affairs of a country lies finding out what is most advantageous to the country.” So I think today it may sound very selfish but we aren’t ideologically driven but self interest is I would say is the driving force in our foreign policy. Because we want to ensure that the people of Sri Lanka, even at this late stage, get the future that they truly deserve.

Finally thank you again, thank you very much for giving me this opportunity to go through some of the developments and I would like to invite all of you, (as) today there are no restrictions in visiting any part of the country.

All the Norwegian people here, I’m sure many of you have come here because you have an interest in the country and you should come back and see for yourselves. Of course for the Sri Lankans who are here, the Sri Lanka Diaspora who are here also, we would like to invite you to please come back and see for yourself and become partners in the forward march of your country.

13.00 PM  – Meeting with Norwegian Prime Minister Ms Erna Solberg

Sri Lanka’s Foreign Affairs Minister Mangala Samaraweera paid a courtesy call on Prime Minister of Norway Erna Solberg on Tuesday, (21 June)

Sri Lanka’s Foreign Affairs Minister Mangala Samaraweera paid a courtesy call on Prime Minister of Norway Erna Solberg on Tuesday, (21 June), the Sri Lankan Foreign Affairs Ministry said.

Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg welcomed the progress in Sri Lanka in reconciliation, strengthening democracy, good governance and economic development policy, a media release issued by the Foreign Affairs Ministry said Thursday.

Prime Minister Solberg expressing her views during the meeting with Minister Samaraweera acknowledged the valuable contribution to Norway by the Sri Lankan community in the country and commended the Sri Lankan government’s efforts made to actively engage the Sri Lankan diaspora including in Norway in development efforts.

The Foreign Minister will hold bilateral talks with his counterpart, Foreign Minister Børge Brende today.

FM06222016
He will also deliver the opening address at the first plenary session of Sixth World Congress Against the Death Penalty on “Progress and set-backs in Asia: lessons to be learnt”.

This year’s Congress will focus on National institutions for human rights, and Progress and setbacks in Asia.

The Congress will attract 1300 participants from over 80 countries, including Mr.Tore Hattrem, State Secretary at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs , U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein , Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr Børge Brende , Sri Lankan Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mangala Samaraweera , Hon.Wijedasa Rajapaksha, Sri Lankan Minister of Justice and Labour Relations , ministers around the world, parliamentarians, academics, lawyers, and members of civil society.

14.30 PM  – Guided tour at Munch Museum.

17.00 PM – Opening of the 6th World Congress Against the Death Penalty.

13512222_10209934949799798_2408048860343464009_n

13494797_10209934951799848_7709895338270720549_n

13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_n

Foreign Minister Brende’s opening speech at World Congress against the death penalty in Oslo

Kenya to state position on death penalty at Oslo

Pope calls for world ‘free of the death penalty’

 

Oslo pushes for abolishing death penalty in Lebanon

 

22.06.2016

9.00 AM – Opening speech at The 6th World Congress Against the Death Penalty

Opening speech by Mangala Samaraweera, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sri Lanka in Norway at the 6th World Congress against the Death Penalty.

Full text of Minister Samaraweera’s Speech..6WCDP-FM

Despite its widespread use, for millennia the death penalty has caused lingering societal discomfort and unease. Fairly early on in history many enlightened leaders have found the death penalty degrading of human dignity. For example, in ancient Sri Lanka a number of kings – influenced by the Buddha’s teaching – abolished the death penalty. In fact, for much of the first, third, fourth and thirteenth centuries the death penalty was not employed in Sri Lanka.

This may help explain why for nearly a century there has been a consensus among the legislative leadership of my country that the death penalty ought to be abolished. This consensus was based both on moral grounds and on the ineffectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent. As far back as 1928 the Ceylon Legislative Assembly voted 19 to seven in favour of a resolution on abolishing the death penalty, which was moved by D.S. Senanayake, who became the first Prime Minister of Ceylon and founder of the United National Party – one of Sri Lanka’s two main political parties. In the end, abolition was only thwarted by the high-handedness of the colonial authorities of the time.

FM-WCDP-OpeningAddressIn 1956, a few years after Independence, my father, then the Parliamentary Secretary for Justice, proposed a bill ending capital punishment which was supported by S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike, the Prime Minister and founder of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party – our island’s other main political party. The bill passed but tragically the death penalty was resumed a few years later as result of Mr. Bandaranaike’s assassination until a de facto moratorium was instituted in 1976.

I daresay that even today the vast majority of my colleagues in Parliament find the death penalty morally repugnant and are aware of its inefficaciousness. However, as they fear the knee-jerk reaction of uninformed public opinion they have proved unwilling to take the courageous step the Government took in 1956. I believe that this fear is true not only of legislators and jurors in Sri Lanka, but of other Asian states where the death penalty is yet to be abolished.

Therefore, the common challenge facing us today is persuading our respective people and perhaps even more importantly having the collective courage to lead by acting.

FM06232016

However, changing public opinion is a time consuming and resource intensive process. And the evidence points out that, despite persistent advocacy, public opinion on the subject of the death penalty is relatively static in many countries. Therefore, overcoming this key challenge requires an act of political courage. Studies have shown that when people are asked to sit in mock judgement, rather than simply answer survey questions, no more than 30 percent of people support the death penalty, even in the most serious of cases. In France, although public opinion 1466616163_was overwhelmingly in favour of the death penalty in 1981, its abolition decided by the then President of France led to a change of public opinion. It is clear that the debate resulting from the process of abolishing the death penalty and the lack of change in crime rates after the death penalty has been abolished allays the public’s fears. As a result there have been very, very few cases of reversal once the death penalty is abolished.

Momentum is slowly building in Asia, where more executions take place than the rest of the world combined. In South-East Asia the number of executions has declined significantly, in South Asia there have been both short and long de facto moratoria. In 2007, twenty four Asian states voted against the UN Resolution on a Death Penalty Moratorium, in 2014 that number had declined to 18. There is further good news: Sri Lanka’s Minister of Justice, who will also be addressing a session at this Conference, has informed Parliament that Sri Lanka will return to its traditional position of voting in favour of this resolution as it did in 2007, 2008 and 2010 and, more importantly, continuing the four decades long de facto moratorium.

Allow me to conclude by saying that abolishing the death penalty requires persuasion and resolve but above all it requires leadership – the collective leadership of legislators, activists, editors, academics and jurors. As momentum towards critical mass develops, I am confident that the coming years will see the death of the death penalty in our region.

11.00 AM – Guided tour at the Opera House

11.00 AM – Departure from TBD for the (Storting ) Norwegian Parliament.

Minister Samaraweera welcomed with appreciation the offer by Norway to provide assistance on fish stock assessment and conduct an oceanographic survey in collaboration with National Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency (NARA). A request was also made from Norway for assistance in developing a National Policy framework for the Fisheries sector.

At the meeting with the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defense chaired by Anniken Huitfeldt of the Labor Party, responding to questions raised, Minister Samaraweera briefed the Members of the Committee on the progress and achievements of the Government as well as plans on Constitutional reform, reconciliation and development.

The Minister also briefed the Members of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence on the progress and achievements of the Government as well as plans on Constitutional reform, reconciliation and development.

Emphasising the need for greater interaction and engagement between the legislatures of the two countries, the Minister invited the Members of the Standing Committee to visit Sri Lanka at a mutually convenient time.

MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

12.45 PM – Meeting with the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence at Norwegian Parliament.

Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 12.37.14Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 12.37.143.00 PM – Meeting with the so call “diaspora Venu at Hotel Continental the meeting is not open to the media and real Sri Lankan Diaspora.

The meeting with Foreign Minister Samaraweera is for “invited only for loyal to former President Mahinda Rjapaksa” as is a closed meeting.

Around 14 000 Sri Lankans lives in Norway also 45 big diaspora Orgs working on Sri Lanka but none of them are invited including TNA or UNP supporters.

10

Embassy of Sri Lanka in Oslo arranged meeting with one Bus driver, one Tamil restaurant cook, two Tamil toilet cleaner, one Ticket Seller, Muslim Criminal street gang members, JVP Members and LTTE’s KP Group, POLTE linked Prof, as a closed meeting.

Renuka and Mohan with mangala,

Embassy of Sri Lanka in Oslo, Systematically prevented real Sri Lankan TNA, UNP, Upcountry Tamils, Second- and third-generation immigrants diaspora meeting with Foreign Minister to block his expanding political network with Norway.

renuka

17.30 PM – Meeting with Norwegian Foreign Minister Mr.Borge Brende at Government Guest House. (Moved to Morning)

Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 14.31.45

Norway supports IDPs in Sri Lanka – At a special meeting with Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera, Foreign Minister Brende said that Norway gives eight million kroner to IDPs in the Jaffna Peninsula and the eastern province of Sri Lanka.

– The Government of Sri Lanka has taken several important steps in efforts to promote reconciliation. In the meeting we discussed, including how Norway can assist with reconstruction in the Tamil areas in the north and east and the way forward for business cooperation between Norway and Sri Lanka, says Brende.

bb_samaraweera

I’m glad for the positive signals related to the abolition of the death penalty as Foreign Minister Samaraweera has made here in Oslo, and I hope that they will use the constitutional process to formally abolish the death penalty, says Brende.

18.00 PM – Dinner Hosted by Mr.Tore Hattrem, State Secretary at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs

hqdefault

23.06.2016

10.00 AM – Meeting with Mr.Tore Hattrem, State Secretary at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs at TBD

11.00  AM – Meeting with DNV GL, Loyd.

13.00 PM – Lunch with CEO DNV GL

17.00 PM Depature

(N.Sethurupan)

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

Norway has ratified the Paris Agreement

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

parisavtalen_vidarhelgesen-signerer

Norway has ratified the international Paris Agreement on climate change. We are amongst the first States that formally join the Paris Agreement.

Norway’s instrument of ratification is deposited securely in the UN headquarters in New York.

– We are aiming for joint fulfilment with the EU in order to achieve Norway’s climate goals for 2030. This will provide us with solid, binding and predictable European legislation to rely on in achieving our goal of 40 percent reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in 2030 compared with the 1990 level, says Vidar Helgesen, the Norwegian Minister of Climate and Environment.

Prevent climate change

The Paris Agreement strengthens global cooperation and States’ efforts in preventing dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. The agreement enters into force once at least 55 States – which together represent at least 55 percent of the total global greenhouse gas emissions – have deposited their instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval.

– Norway is pushing for other States to formally join the Paris Agreement as quickly as possible, in order for it to enter into force. An early entry into force will ensure that States can focus on implementing the agreement’s commitments, says Vidar Helgesen, the Norwegian Minister of Climate and Environment.
Large States will ratify later this year

The US, China and Brazil are amongst large emitters that are expected to ratify, accede or in other ways join the Paris Agreement this year. In addition, other States have also indicated that they will formally join the agreement. All together, these countries make up for a large part of the global greenhouse gas emissions.

– Despite being a small country, Norway is undertaking great efforts to reduce dangerous anthropogenic greenhouse gases. In particular, our efforts related to Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative, REDD+, receives a lot of attention internationally, says Vidar Helgesen.

The Paris Agreement

Adopted 12 December 2015. The objective is to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 degrees Celsius and pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

The agreement also aims to increase the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and make finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate resilience.

The agreement enters into force once at least 55 countries – which together represent at least 55 percent of the total global greenhouse gas emissions – have formally joined the agreement.

As of 21 June 2016, there are 177 signatories to the Paris Agreement. Of these, 18 States have now also deposited their instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval, accounting for 0.18 percent of the total global greenhouse gas emissions.

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Killing

Pope calls for world ‘free of the death penalty’

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

13512222_10209934949799798_2408048860343464009_nIn a message to a world conference against the death penalty in Oslo, Norway, Pope Francis says capital punishment “contradicts God’s plan for individuals and society, and his merciful justice” and says that growing opposition to the practice is a “sign of hope.”

Pope Francis called for a world “free of the death penalty” in a video message supporting the sixth World Congress against capital punishment, currently being held in Oslo, Norway. He said the practice brings no justice to victims, but instead fosters vengeance.

13509039_10209934949079780_8121724270681360440_n“Indeed, nowadays the death penalty is unacceptable, however grave the crime of the convicted person,” Francis said on the message released on Tuesday.

“It is an offence to the inviolability of life and to the dignity of the human person; it likewise contradicts God’s plan for individuals and society, and his merciful justice,” the pope said.

The pontiff defined growing opposition to the practice as a “sign of hope,” saying that it’s not “consonant with any purpose of punishment.”

13508862_10209934956839974_762267100253806018_n“It does not render justice to victims, but instead fosters vengeance,” Francis said in Spanish.

The congress is being organized by the French ONG Ensemble contre la peine de mort and the World Coalition Against Death Penalty. It began on Tuesday, and will continue until June 23.

According to the World Coalition’s website, the three-day gathering unites members of civil society, politicians, and legal experts to elaborate abolitionist strategies for the years to come at the national, regional, and international levels

13507040_10209934956799973_4543674041801265100_nIt also aims to send a message to the world: “Universal abolition is essential for a world where progress and justice must prevail.”

The previous congress was held in Madrid in 2013.

In the video, Francis also said that the commandment “Thou shalt not kill” applies both for the innocent and to the guilty, adding that the Jubilee of Mercy is an occasion for promoting more evolved forms of respect for the life of each person.

Earlier in the year, he had proposed Catholic government leaders “make a courageous and exemplary gesture by seeking a moratorium on executions during this Holy Year of Mercy.”

13494797_10209934951799848_7709895338270720549_nAs he has done several times before, the Argentine pontiff also called for an improvement of prison conditions so that they respect the dignity of does incarcerated. Rendering justice, he said, “does not mean seeking punishment for its own sake, but ensuring that the basic purpose of all punishment is the rehabilitation of the offender.”
According to Francis, the system of penal justice must allow the guilty party’s reinsertion in society, because “There’s no fitting punishment without hope!”

“Punishment for its own sake, without room for hope, is a form of torture, not of punishment,” he said.
Over 1,300 participants from 80 countries are participating in the congress, including the United Nations High 13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_nCommissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, and the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Thorbjørn Jagland.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that the traditional teaching of the Church “does not exclude” recourse to the death penalty when it is “the only practicable way to defend the lives of human beings effectively against the aggressor.” It adds, however, that today such cases are “very rare, if not practically non-existent.”

In 2015, at least 1,634 prisoners were executed across 25 countries, and 1,998 people were sentenced to death across 61 countries, a record for the past 25 years. In that landscape, the advance of the abolitionist trend still encounters great resistance across Asia and the Arab world.

13450095_10209934955159932_6081808617656917899_nStatistics show that Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran were responsible for 89 percent of the recorded executions last year, but these figures don’t take into account China, where information in this issue is classified as a state secret.
Of the 195 independent states recognized by the United Nations, 103 have abolished capital punishment for all crimes, six retain it for exceptional circumstances, such as crimes committed in wartime, 49 retain it but haven’t applied it in at least ten years, and 37 retain it both in law and practice.

The United States is one of two countries in the Americas where the death penalty is still practiced, with the other being St. Kitts & Nevis, a dual-island nation situated between the Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea.

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Africa and Norway

Kenya delegation in Oslo on meeting to end death penalty

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

width_650.height_300.mode_FillAreaWithCrop.pos_Default.color_WhiteA Kenyan delegation is in Oslo, Norway to attend the 6th World Congress against the Death Penalty.

The three day Congress, starting Tuesday, seeks to assist countries develop new strategies for universal abolition of the death penalty.

This year’s theme is Abolition Now! The Kenyan delegation, under the leadership of the Power of Mercy Advisory Committee (POMAC), is expected to present the Kenya position on the ongoing global debate on the death penalty.

POMAC is mandated to advice the President of the Republic of Kenya on the exercise of the power of mercy. It is a nine member Committee that includes the Attorney General, who is the Committee’s chairperson, the Cabinet Secretary responsible for Correctional Services, and seven professional part time members.

Michael Kagika the POMAC secretary and Gerald Wandera a director with the National Crime Research Centre (NCRC) are leading the Kenyan delegation into the meeting.

The annual event, now in its 5th year running, brings together Government Representatives, Members of the Civil Society, Political Representatives, Lawyers, media, and other key stakeholders keen on raising awareness on the death penalty.

The Power of Mercy Advisory Committee was established through Article 133 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.

Since its inception on Nov 1, 2011, 4,500 death row inmates have so far benefitted from the Power of Mercy after having their death sentences commuted into life. In addition to the constitutional mandate, The Power of Mercy Act, 2011 assigns the Committee with functions that support its work including to undertake or commission research and to collect data on matters relating to the power of mercy.

Currently, POMAC in partnership with the National Crime Research Centre is conducting a National Public debate to solicit views from the general public, on the subject of capital offences and capital punishment.

The objective of the debate is to provide an open dialogue on what Kenyans want in regard to the handling of capital offenders and the management of capital offences.

(standardmedia)

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Russia and Norway

Norwegian – Russian cooperation in the north

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

hattrem-udState Secretary Tore Hattrem’s speech at the 200th anniversary of the Office of the Auditor General of Norway.
Ladies and gentlemen,

It is a great pleasure for me to be here today for the 200th anniversary of the Office of the Auditor General of Norway.

The Office of the Auditor General is an important institution.

With its strong focus on transparency and accountability in public spending and performance, it plays an important role in building trust and contributes to good governance and democracy.

It is therefore very positive that the Office of the Auditor General cooperates with its sister organisations in other countries, many of which, I am aware, are present here today.

Conducting joint audits is one of the ways in which the Auditor General of Norway has cooperated, very successfully I must say, with its partners in the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation.

Over the last ten years, my ministry has been among the subjects of three such audits: on nuclear safety, on joint fisheries management, and on the Arctic Council.

These topics are all of great importance to both Norway and Russia. They reflect our shared commitment to sustainable, knowledge-based management of Arctic resources, based on the principles of international cooperation.

And these are the topics I am here to talk to you about today: the Arctic and our cooperation with Russia, with particular focus on the practical value of the joint audits of nuclear safety, fisheries management and the Arctic Council.

Let me start with a few words about why the Arctic is Norway’s most important foreign policy priority.
The Arctic – Norway’s most important foreign policy priority

We know that the Arctic is a region abundant with resources such as energy, minerals and fish. At the same time, the Arctic is a highly vulnerable natural environment, where the impacts of climate change can be clearly observed.

Climate change represents a challenge for us all, but it is also opening up new opportunities for economic activity in the Arctic. The potential for shorter trading routes across Arctic waters is currently being explored, as well as new possibilities for resource extraction.

To seize these opportunities while ensuring sustainable development of the Arctic, we need increased knowledge, responsible management and international cooperation.

Norway i cooperating closely with other countries and various organisations on how to ensure sustainable development of the region.

Today, the Arctic stands out as a region of cooperation and stability.

The overall goal of Norway’s Arctic policy is to ensure that it stays that way.

Norwegian–Russian cooperation in the Arctic – bilateral and regional cooperation

Norway has a long history of constructive neighbourly cooperation with Russia in the north.As early as 1974, we established the Joint Norwegian–Russian Fisheries Commission together with our Russian partners.

During the 1990s, our region saw the start of new forms of cooperation, such as the Council of the Baltic Sea States in 1992, the Barents Euro-Arctic Council in 1993, the Arctic Council in 1996 and the EU Northern Dimension in 1997.

All these structures have built confidence and enhanced integration in our region.

Significantly, Russia has been – and continues to be – an important partner in all these forums.

Results – examples of successful Norwegian–Russian cooperation in fields of common interest
Norway and Russia have identified a broad range of areas where cooperation is mutually beneficial and yields results.

The most important areas at the government level are: management of shared fish stocks, environmental protection, nuclear safety, maritime safety including search and rescue at sea, as well as Coast Guard and Border Guard activities more broadly.

This, along with the joint efforts of civil society organizations and the informal people-to-people contact in the north, have contributed much to facilitating and simplifying cross-border cooperation and strengthening the bonds between our two countries.

Pressing challenges in the Arctic, such as environmental degradation and sustainable management of shared resources, can only be solved in cooperation with Russia and the other Arctic states.

I am therefore very pleased that the Office of the Auditor General of Norway and their Russian partners decided to jointly audit key areas where our countries cooperate closely, namely nuclear safety, fisheries management and the

Arctic Council.

They are all vital for a sustainable future in the Arctic.

Let me say a few words about each of these areas.

Nuclear safety

Nuclear safety cooperation with Russia is a priority for this Government, and our activities are based on the Government’s nuclear action plan.

And it is a success story – as was confirmed in September last year when we established common procedures for notification of nuclear incidents.

Today we have transparency in nuclear issues and safety assessments that would have been unthinkable 20 years ago.

Trust and confidence have been built through this work, with ripple effects that go far beyond reducing nuclear challenges. Not least, the Norwegian–Russian collaboration has produced concrete and measurable results that have made life safer for the people on both sides of the border for the last 20 years. During this period, we have allocated 230 million Euros to projects in northwestern Russia, which have produced very good results.

Together we have reduced the threats from one of the world’s largest stocks of poorly secured fissile material. These efforts are ongoing, and in 2017 we will start removing spent fuels from 100 nuclear submarine reactors in Andreeva Bay, the former nuclear submarine service base for Russia’s Northern Fleet.

We have dismantled five nuclear submarines and have removed and secured highly radioactive sources from 251 lighthouses. We have also upgraded the Kola and Leningrad nuclear power plants. As a result, there has been a significant reduction in the number of safety related incidents at these plants in recent years.

Another area of crucial importance is investigating sunken nuclear submarines. We have carried out successful expeditions to sunken nuclear submarines in Arctic waters in 2012 and 2014. The preliminary conclusion was that radioactive contamination in the area was low.

We were glad that the joint audit reports on nuclear cooperation confirmed the effectiveness of these efforts and showed that our cooperation has contributed to a safer world.

The insights we gain and the expertise we develop through this work put us in a much better position to handle any undesirable situations that might arise.

This is not least due to the good contact we have developed with the Russian authorities.

We will keep up the good work in the time ahead.

Joint fisheries management

Joint fisheries management is another area where Norway and Russia have cooperated closely with excellent results. We have achieved sustainable and efficient management of a number of shared fish stocks in the Barents Sea.

Back in 1989, the Northeast Arctic cod stock was at an all-time low.

Today, we enjoy the world’s most abundant cod stock in the Barents Sea. This year, for example, we shared a quota of 894 000 tonnes.

This development would not have been possible without the close and constructive fisheries cooperation with Russia that we have developed over the years.

It is also positive to see how our cooperation in the Joint Norwegian–Russian Fisheries Commission is progressing and expanding, for example on a new species, the snow crab.

Robust mechanisms for cooperation are crucial if we are to harvest our shared marine resources in the Arctic in a sustainable manner.

Our joint fisheries management stands out as a prime example of the benefits of cross boarder cooperation on sustainable management.

Arctic Council

As we are celebrating the 200th anniversary of the Office of the Auditor General of Norway, it is worth noting that this year also marks the 20th anniversary of the Arctic Council.

The Arctic Council is the most important forum for multilateral cooperation in the Arctic. It plays a vital role in preserving the Arctic as a region of peaceful collaboration.

It is also a forum where Norway and Russia collaborate closely on a wide variety of topics.

Moreover, the work of the Arctic Council is producing tangible results.

Its comprehensive reports and studies of climate change in the Arctic have highlighted the speed at which climate change is taking place.

This has had substantial impact on international climate negotiations.

Last month, for example, the Executive Secretary of the UN’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, Ms Christiana Figueres, noted the significant contribution of the Arctic Council to the science of climate change, stating that the historical Paris agreement of December last year would not have been possible without the Council’s contribution.

The joint audits

The joint audits of issues that reach well into our respective national administrations is a testimony to the extent and depth of Norwegian–Russian cooperation.

On a general level, I think it must be appropriate to say that the audits have contributed to increased transparency and accountability.

The joint audits have also been a very useful tool for the whole government administration. We have gained greater awareness of how we are working with nuclear safety, joint fisheries management and the Arctic Council.

The joint audits have forced us – in a systematic and positive way I should add – to see our work through the eyes of others. This is always a useful exercise. And doing so with the help of an institution that has 200 years of experience is particularly valuable.

I think it is right to say that the Norwegian Government is now working more systematically in its preparations for and the follow up of efforts under the Arctic Council.

The joint audit of the Arctic Council has also increased awareness among the Arctic states of the Arctic Council’s structure.

As a result, the need for a more strategic approach is now being discussed in the Arctic Council. The Arctic states have also initiated a discussion about whether the current set-up of the Council will enable us to meet the priorities of the Arctic states in the best possible way in the future. All these discussions are inspired by issues raised by the audit institutions.

Conclusion

Before concluding, let me just reiterate that the Arctic is a region of stability and predictability, and that it is the Government’s overall goal that it remains this way.

The work of the Auditor Generals has improved our cooperation on nuclear safety, fisheries management and the Arctic Council in many practical ways.

The joint audits by our respective Auditor Generals are also an important contribution to the ongoing peaceful cooperation between Norway and Russia in the north.

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

Norway reveals P-3 replacement plans

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

yourfileNorway has revealed a proposed defence spending plan that allows for the acquisition of a new maritime patrol aircraft (MPA) to replace its six-strong fleet of Lockheed P-3 Orions.

Presented to parliament on 17 June, the white paper recommends a gradual rise in the nation’s defence budget over the 2017-2020 period to result in a NKr7.2 billion ($870 million) increase over 2016 levels.

A “substantial increase” of NKr165 billion is planned over the next 20 years to support a number of acquisitions, and is designed to counter previous under-investment and Russia’s rising threat.

“Years of underfunding, combined with a high operational tempo have also created shortfalls in training, maintenance and upgrades that are no longer acceptable in the face of emerging challenges,” the paper says. These must be addressed in order to improve short-term capabilities, and to prepare Norway for any future investments and challenges, it says.

“Norway will seek to replace its maritime patrol aircraft after the ageing P-3C Orion is withdrawn from service,” the ministry of defence says. “A credible defence posture relies heavily on situational awareness, intelligence and an ability to conduct crisis management.

“Maritime patrol aircraft are essential in this context, and the government will introduce a plan for the replacement of the P-3 Orion to the Norwegian parliament in due course.”

Potential candidates include the Boeing P-8 Poseidon, or modified transport aircraft including the Lockheed Martin C-130J Sea Hercules and Airbus Defence & Space C295.

In addition, Oslo has reiterated its commitment to a 52-unit acquisition of the Lockheed F-35.

“One such capability [being acquired] is the F-35 Lightning II with a weapons suite that includes the Norwegian-developed Joint Strike Missile,” the paper says. “The acquisition of up to 52 aircraft with all the necessary equipment and infrastructure will be an essential contribution to Norwegian and allied security.”

In order to make savings, a number of military facilities will be closed, including Andøya air station, home to the Royal Norwegian Air Force’s 333 Sqn, which operates the P-3s.

The new MPA will therefore be co-located with the F-35s at Evenes air station, the paper says.

“While every new generation of equipment and technology allows us to do much more than the previous one, that added capability comes at a price,” Ine Eriksen Søreide, Norwegian defence minister adds. “We can no longer accommodate that trend simply by buying fewer platforms or by internal efficiency savings.

“We cannot have security without sustainability. This plan aims to provide both.”

Following this initial phase, an additional funding increase is planned for 2021-2026, the defence ministry says, which will ensure the implementation of new investment programmes.

(flightglobal)

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

Norway And The US Sign An Agreement In Violation Of The Rio Declaration

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

US-AirwaysThe United States and Norway this week announced (1) they would offset the greenhouse gas emissions from their aviation industry by buying voluntary emission reduction credits from reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in tropical forests. The plan would violate the Rio Declaration in two ways.

The Declaration says that States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their own environmental and developmental policies, and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction.

By continuing to emit greenhouse gases from their aviation industry, Norway and the US are damaging the environment of other countries that are suffering temperature rise due to climate change. This is the first violation. And by planning to buy voluntary emission reduction credits from developing countries they are depriving those countries of the sovereign right to exploit their own resources, and are violating the Declaration a second time.

The joint statement by the Governments of Norway and the United States claims the plan is being made under the Paris Agreement. In fact neither Norway nor the US have signed yet. Only 17 out of 197 countries have signed that Agreement so far, and the emissions of those who have ratified cover just 0.4% of the total global greenhouse gas emissions.

Still, this does not stop the US and Norway claiming “Together, our efforts aim to help securing the multiple benefits forests provide for local communities, and for humanity as a whole.”

This humanity-as-a-whole talk is of course precisely what the Rio Declaration and the three Rio treaties were designed to outlaw. In international law there is no humanity as a whole, just like there is no global benefit. But western countries have not taken a blind scrap of notice.

Norway and the United States call their plan a form of support to developing countries to adopt a Global Market Based Measure that will in turn enable carbon neutral growth in international aviation from 2020.

Do these countries really believe that such a measure for aviation could catalyze incentives for reduced deforestation through demand for large-scale forest emissions reductions? Currently one tonne of carbon dioxide is trading at around 50 cents. They themselves have their doubts. They admit that their proposed International Civil Aviation Organisation’s emissions unit program will have to reflect relevant developments in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Haha. Could those developments possibly involve a refusal of the Group of 77 and China countries to participate in this farce?

Nonetheless, Norway and the US consider it worth a try.

Everyone and their uncle know by now that “offsetting” is a hilarious non-thing. It is a no-thing. Someone pollutes, and then claims they are paying for someone else to soak up the pollution. But if that person who is polluting were to stop polluting there would be twice as much benefit. There would be the avoided pollution in the western country on the western country’s tab and the sequestration in the developing country for the developing country’s benefit done by that country at their own cost and for their own advantage. So emission offsetting in the absence of legally binding emission reductions for both parties is no offset at all, rather there is a halving of the potential climate mitigation. If the Clean Development Mechanism experience is anything to go by, the developed countries will not be setting tough legally binding caps on greenhouse gas emissions under the Paris Agreement. Therefore there is an abundance of emissions they will permitting themselves to make, and there will not be an incentive to pay high prices for verified emissions reductions. Thus even on their own terms their plan to reduce emissions and enhance sinks by stealing other people’s resources will be ineffective because the prices will be too low to attract even the most corrupt dictator.

They further state that “forests may contribute up to one-third of the pre-2030 mitigation.” Yes, but for whom? There is no such thing as “global climate neutrality in the second half of this century”. The whole purpose of the Rio Summit was to ensure that States use their own resources for their own benefit and also avoid damage to other States.

Finally Norway and the US claim the offset arrangement will allow the western public to keep flying in order to contribute to a world where “economic growth and food security benefit from, and support, efforts to conserve and restore natural forests and reduce land-based emissions.” What a ridiculous elision of economic growth and food security into a single unity! The sentence is completely meaningless. Like much of environmental talk by western governments the phrase is a string of words held together by commas and a full stop.

Equally no one should hold their breath for these countries to enhance sinks on their own lands. The whole emphasis is on ”helping partners attract additional support for their efforts, including from the private sector.” It’s always used to be the developing countries that had to clean up the shit of western civilization. But not anymore. And now those western countries are imploding precisely because no one is giving them our resources anymore, and they sure cannot manage without them.

Anandi Sharan is an environmental historian and blogger based in Bangalore. She specialises in the global environmental treaties, especially the conventions on climate change and biodiversity. She currently serves as a Board member of the CBD Alliance, a global civil society platform. She can be contacted at sharan.anandi@gmail.com
References:

(1) http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2016/06/258502.htm

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economics

Ofgem approves a 354-mile power cable from UK to Norway

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

article0The UK energy regulator has granted a licence to a Norwegian consortium that plans to build a 345-mile power cable to bring renewable hydro power into Britain.

The NorthConnect project cleared its first hurdle on Tuesday after Ofgem granted an electricity interconnector licence to the developers, paving the way for the project to begin navigating a set of complex regulatory rules governing electricity transmission in Europe.

NorthConnect aims to transport Norway’s abundant hydro-power reserves in the south west of the country through a high voltage 1.4GW subsea cable to a substation at Peterhead in Aberdeenshire. Under current plans the project will begin powering homes by 2022.

There are currently four interconnectors to mainland UK, from France, the Netherlands, Ireland and Northern Ireland, with a combined capacity of 4GW. But ministers have said they would support a further 9GW of new interconnectors to help to improve security of supply by giving the UK access to power generated elsewhere.

NorthConnect says its power link could help the UK meet its renewable energy targets while providing extra capacity when domestic sources are stretched due to low wind speeds or unplanned outages at conventional power plants.

It could also allow the UK to export excess power at times of strong wind power output when demand is low, such as overnight. The exported power could be used in Norway’s hydropower reservoirs, known as the ‘green battery’. The reservoir operators use electricity to pump water up into the dam when power is cheap and later run the water back out of the dam over a power generation turbine to release energy back into the grid when it is needed.

A spokesman for Ofgem said that the next step for the NorthConnect developers is to decide whether to opt in to Ofgem’s ‘cap and floor’ regime, which regulates how much they can make from the project and requires compliance with various European rules. The scheme guarantees a minimum return for the developers, even if power prices are low, by topping up their revenue through consumer funds. But it also caps how much money they could make by returning excess profits to customers.

Last week Ukrainian entrepreneur Alexander Temerko said he would build a 2GW power link to France but would forego the security of Ofgem’s regime by seeking an exemption from various UK and EU rules around access to infrastructure.

The NorthConnect project doubles the UK’s planned electricity links with Norway, following the NSN Link, which is being developed by National Grid and Norway’s transmission operator Statnet. The project received its Ofgem licence three years ago and is expected to begin operating a year before NorthConnect in 2021.

NSN will offer the same capacity as NorthConnect over a 447-mile subsea cable between Norway and Blyth in the North East of England, which would make it the longest electricity interconnector in the world.

Other planned interconnector projects to the UK include extra links to France and Ireland as well as new connections with Belgium and Denmark.

The four Norwegian companies developing NorthConnect are Vattenfall, Agder Energi, E-CO, Lyse.

(telegraph)

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Norwegian American

American author releases book on forgotten Norwegian Viking princess

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Screen Shot 2016-06-21 at 23.03.28

American author Judith Martin has just released a picture book entitled “Saga of a Princess” about a forgotten Norwegian Viking princess named Efanda. Princess Efanda and her husband Prince Rurik founded the Rurikid dynasty in Russia during the Viking era.

Prince Rurik is often credited with the founding of the Russian nation by himself and a large monument was built to honor him in Novgorod, Russia. Efanda has not received any recognition, history has forgotten about her. The neglect of this brave Norwegian Viking princess who became the mother of the Russian state is what fueled Ms. Martin’s passion to write her picture book.

In the picture book, Prince Rurik is offered and accepts the throne of Novgorod, a city across the sea, but wants Princess Efanda to stay behind in Scandinavia. Efanda manages to sneak off and leaves for Novgorod. While on his way to Novgorod, Rurik runs into his wife and is shocked to know that she made the journey that he thought was too dangerous for her. In the end, Princess Efanda proves that she is just as brave and adventurous as her husband Prince Rurik.

Screen Shot 2016-06-21 at 23.12.48

Saga of a Princess is the second book in Ms. Martin’s Pantheon of Beauty series on beautiful and inspiring women from across the globe. Judith cites her love for fashion, geography and global cultures as the reason she writes her books. “I want to empower all the women and young girls of the world with each book,” said Judith.

Saga of a Princess is available for purchase at Amazon.com and Barnesandnoble.com. For more information on the book please visit www.sagaofaprincess.com. Additionally, Judith can be followed at www.facebook.com/sagaofaprincess
Contact Information:

Judith Martin
judith@thegoddessofbeauty.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBIndRFB2UQ

 

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Africa and Norway

Norway and South Africa co-operating on stopping illegal and unlawful fishing

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 20, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

fishing_in_SeychellesSouth Africa’s law enforcement efforts at sea, particularly as far as illegal fishing is concerned, have been boosted by Norway which is funding a fisheries law enforcement academy.

The academy is based at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU) in Port Elizabeth and will benefit from to the tune of R50 million over a five year period. The agreement was signed late last month by Norwegian ambassador Trine Skymoen and NMMU acting vice chancellor Dr Sibongile Muthwa during a Port Elizabeth conference on Operation Phakisa, government’s plan to tap into the blue economy and make it a bigger contributor to GDP as well as providing work.

Fishing crimes, which include illegal and unregulated fishing, as well as illegal harvesting of ocean produce and the trafficking of people, drugs and arms are some of the issues that will be tackled by the fisheries law enforcement academy, also known as FishFORCE.

The FishFORCE agreement is part of a broader partnership between Norway and South Africa developed in line with Operation Phakisa and the blue economy.

“Fisheries crime and the illegal harvesting, processing and trading of fish and seafood globally it is, in effect, a parallel economic system undermining sustainable economic growth,” Professor Hennie van As, director of NMMU’s Centre for Law in Action, is reported as saying at the official signing ceremony.

He also said FishFORCE’s main purpose was to combat sea fisheries crime and related criminal activities.

“We will be training fisheries control officers, police and prosecutors along the South African and east African coastlines as well as Namibia and plan to extend the training round the Indian Ocean rim to include countries like Indonesia.

Skymoen said sub-Saharan Africa was losing more than a billion US dollars to illegal and unregulated fishing. Illegal fisheries vessels, among others, under report catches and transfer catches from one vessel to another to escape official sanction as well as change flags to keep one step ahead of the authorities.

June 20, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
NATO and Norway

NATO launches anti-submarine warfare exercise in Norwegian Sea

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 20, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and the Minister of Defence of Norway, Ine Eriksen Soreide on board of the frigate Aquitaine

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and the Minister of Defence of Norway, Ine Eriksen Soreide on board of the frigate Aquitaine

Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg marked the launch of NATO’s anti-submarine warfare exercise “Dynamic Mongoose” in a visit to Trondheim, Norway on Monday (20 June 2016). The exercise, focused on detecting and defending against submarines, runs for ten days. Joined by Norwegian Defence Minister Ine Marie Eriksen Søreide, Mr. Stoltenberg addressed sailors aboard the Norwegian frigate HNoMS Fridtjof Nansen. Calling naval capabilities “as important as ever”, he noted that 70% of the earth is covered by water, and that 90% of world trade travels by sea. He stressed that NATO must be able to operate “on the sea, over the sea, and also under the sea.”

Three thousand sailors and aircrew from eight Allies (Canada, France, Germany, Norway, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States) are participating in the exercise. Four submarines from Canada, Germany, Norway and the United States are taking part, along with nine surface ships and four maritime patrol aircraft. The exercise takes places in the Norwegian Sea, in an area measuring 14,000 square nautical miles.

During the exercise, submarines will have to transit from one point to another, while surface vessels try to track them down and simulate an attack. Surface units will also have to transit between two points while under submarine threat. This is the fourth time Exercise Dynamic Mongoose has been conducted; it previously took place in 2012, 2014 and 2015.

(Nato)

June 20, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economics

Norwegian minister: ‘We have the same rights and duties as EU member states’

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 20, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Elisabeth-AspakerAlthough Norway is not an EU member, it has agreed on a voluntary contribution of €2.8 billion to promote economic and social cohesion in poorer Eastern European countries. “It’s a win-win situation,” explains Elisabeth Aspaker who adds: “It’s not a rule that we should get something back.”

Elisabeth Aspaker is Norway Minister for EEA and EU affairs.

Aspaker spoke to EurActiv.com’s Publisher and Editor, Frédéric Simon.

Norway recently sealed an agreement with the EU about grants it will offer to the least developed member states of the European Union. Why does Norway provide such grants? Is this an obligation under the EEA/EFTA treaties?

This is a voluntary contribution from Norway to support social and economic cohesion in Europe. It is linked to the EEA Agreement which include a common goal to work together to reduce social and economic disparities in Europe. To this end, we have created the EEA and Norway Grants.

Europe is our most important market. Almost 75% of our exports go to the European market. So what’s good for Europe is good for Norway. This is why we have this kind of partnership with the EU.

There are 15 recipient countries, most of them from Eastern Europe, but also Portugal and the Baltic countries. This mirrors the EU Cohesion Fund criteria which means that Spain has been phased out for the coming financial period (2014-2021).

Since 1994, our contribution has added up to about 30 billion Norwegian Kroner (NOK) (€3.27bn). For the next period (2014-2021), it is almost 26 billion NOK (€2.8bn).

So it’s quite a lot of money and it has increased significantly over the last decade.

You said these are voluntary grants. What was the rationale when the decision was taken?

As I said, this is a win-win situation. If the EU member countries are doing well, this is good for Norway because we are close partners when it comes to the economy or security issues.

Norway is not an EU member state, as you know, but we participate fully in the internal market via the incorporation of EU legislation in the EEA Agreement. So, in that regard, we have the same rights and duties as EU member states.

This is not a legal obligation, but we contribute because it is in our interest. We share a responsibility towards countries that have a weaker economy than ours. We want to contribute to their economic and social development, so that the internal market can function as well as possible throughout the EEA.

Also, when you compare the political agendas in Norway and in the EU, you will find that they are very similar. It’s about dealing with migration, better regulation for the single market, energy union, climate and follow up after Paris, etc.

So these grants offer opportunities for Norway to have a good dialogue with the EU and at the same time enhancing cooperation. Our grants both supplement and complement the EU funding for these 15 countries.

Norway indeed contributes to specific areas of the EU budget, depending on whether or not it participates in programmes or agencies. So these grants come separately?

Yes, they are separate contributions that we negotiate individually with each recipient country via a Memorandum of Understanding. So Poland, for example, knows in advance how much money they will get. We sit down at the table with the Poles and discuss how we’re going to spend this money.

And we have three main priorities for Norway in the next period: 1) Innovation, research and education; 2) Environment, energy and climate change; and 3) Justice and home affairs, including asylum and migration policy. And then there are two other priorities – about social inclusion youth employment and poverty reduction; and about civil society, good governance, fundamental rights and freedom.

So the grants cover a wide range of topics. What’s important is to focus on the areas we have selected but obviously, there is a partner on the other side of the table so we have to agree on what will be the priority for each country.

It’s about give and take but if you sum up, the priorities are very much aligned with what the countries themselves have prioritised. So we will have discussions with the beneficiary countries within the next 6-9 months, and then we hope to have the MoUs agreed with 15 countries.

You mentioned energy as one area covered by the grants. Does this mean Norwegian companies will benefit indirectly from the grants by gaining a foothold in these countries?

It’s more about partnership. Many Norwegian businesses will be involved but also government institutions like the migration service in Norway which has a partnership with its Greek equivalent. It’s about Norwegian entities, NGOs and businesses finding partners in areas like transport, energy, education, research, etc. on some specific projects.

So you don’t have a metric to measure some kind of return on investment for these projects?

No, no – it’s not a rule that we should get something back. Partnerships can involve trade unions, municipalities, schools, etc. So we’re not just looking for business partners, it’s broader than that.

Would these grants be smaller or bigger if Norway decided to join the EU one day? I know it’s not on the agenda but still…

Well, this is clearly not on the agenda. Did you see the opinion polls? They are worse than ever! If the question of EU membership was being asked now, about 75% would vote ‘No’.

This is the third time we have negotiated these EEA and Norway grants and they have become something of a normality in our relation with the EU. It is in our interest to contribute. Having the EEA agreement and being part of the EU Internal Market is a cornerstone of Norwegian policy.

What about a country like Britain? If it decided to leave the EU, would it also benefit from having a similar arrangement with the EU, contributing to cohesion in poorer European countries?

I won’t speculate on the arrangements for Britain if the Leave camp wins. From the Norwegian side, we really hope they stay. Britain is an important partner for Norway in many respects and we need them inside the EU. There is certainly a need for more cooperation these days, not split-ups – whether we’re talking about migration, security or the economy.

The point I was trying to make is that Britain is having a fierce debate about how much it is getting back from EU membership. And here we have a wealthy country – Norway – which thinks it is in its own interest to contribute to the EU programmes and member states even though it is not a member. This would seem completely absurd to a Brit!

Going back to what I said earlier, we believe this is in our interest to improve social and economic cohesion in Europe. If Europe is doing well, Norway will also be doing well. If Europe is doing poorly or is destabilised, this will have a negative impact on Norway and the Norwegian economy. So this is why we believe we should involve ourselves beyond what is required under the EEA agreement.

The main beneficiary countries for these grants are Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, which are all relatively far away from Norway. How much business does Norway make with these countries? Do the grants help expand business there?

Poland is a very important country when it comes to fish exports for example. I don’t have the figures for all the sectors but when it comes to energy, a lot of business is done with different European countries which may or may not be grant beneficiaries.

We don’t consider things in terms of ‘one kroner out, one kroner in for Norway’. But of course we consider these grants as a good investment and it encourages Norwegian businesses to look for opportunities outside Norway. And there are good examples that this has been a success.

Can you cite examples?

We have good examples in different sectors.

There is Tomra, a leading Norwegian company in recycling, which has been able to introduce their technologies in Poland and Romania through projects funded under the Grants. Another example is Stokke, a producer of children’s furniture and equipment, which has a Green Innovation programme in Romania. A Norwegian-Estonian partnership under the Grants is underway with commercialising ground-breaking technology for detecting oil spill at sea.

But remember, the aim of the grants is twofold, it shall also strengthen bilateral relations between donors and recipient countries.

Take Poland, where the EEA has generally served both Norwegian and Polish industry well. In Poland, they process large amounts of Norwegian salmon because the tariffs there are so much lower than in Norway, you can’t compete. So this is why you have such a huge salmon processing industry now in Poland.

One of the areas covered by the grants includes support in the area of justice and home affairs. Do you expect the contribution to slow down the flow of immigrants or refugees to Norway or other EU countries?

First of all, we want to continue the cooperation we have with the Greek government. It’s about sending experts and NGOs, providing equipment, reception centres, etc. The purpose is to establish well-functioning asylum systems through capacity building and making sure that the right to seek asylum is safeguarded. Probably there will be more countries in the next period that will benefit from these programmes. If these grants can help more countries take their share of refugees, it’s a good thing.

Is Norway itself taking part in the EU burden sharing agreement?

Yes we are, voluntarily. We are supporting the EU trust fund and we are very much aligned with the EU when it comes to the migration crisis.

How many refugees has Norway agreed to take?

We have agreed to take 3,500 Syrian refugees. 500 were offered resettlement in 2015, and the remaining 3,000 will be offered in 2016,

We are also taking part in the EU’s one-to-one agreement with Turkey on refugees and are involved in the EU’s efforts to stabilise countries where migrants come from.

In development aid cooperation?

Yes, we cooperate quite closely with the EU on humanitarian aid. Norway played a central role in the donor conference for Syria in London, we were present at the Valletta conference last year and we have two vessels in the Mediterranean Sea – one offshore vessel between Italy and Libya and a smaller vessel from a Norwegian NGO in Lesbos.

Norway is a member of the Schengen area for passport-free travel in Europe. In November last year, Oslo decided to reintroduce temporary controls at the border with other Schengen countries – namely Denmark, Sweden and Germany. When will these border controls be lifted?

We have aligned ourselves on this question with EU countries which have these kinds of border arrangements these days. On the EU side, there is now an additional 6-month period – until November – when there may be national border controls. In that period, I think we all hope that the external Schengen border control can be reinforced

Of course, we have this problem on the Northern border with Russia, which is our external border. Suddenly, there were 5,000 people coming! But that is now solved hopefully.

They were coming by bicycle, strangely enough.

Yes, because it’s prohibited – you cannot just walk through this border so you have to use something with wheels and they chose to use bicycles. But I think in the next half year, there will be a new discussion on whether the external border is sufficiently well monitored. And I think we all want to return to normal as soon as possible.

Some in Norway have been calling for your country to abandon its membership of the Schengen area altogether. Will this be inevitable? Some even within the EU say Schengen has already ceased to exist, effectively…

Only a small minority in Norway are saying we should leave Schengen. It’s obvious that there are many positives of being a member of Schengen. If you consider our border with Sweden for example, if that was an external border, it would cost a lot to monitor. And it’s also about as we as persons can move around Europe without using our passports. We’re used to doing so within the Nordic countries since the 1950’s. And when the other Nordic countries entered the EU and became members of Schengen, there was a discussion about Norway. And we could simply not miss out on the positives of being able to move around freely without a passport. So we agreed to be members of Schengen.

Then it’s also about our fish exports: if you leave Schengen, you need special arrangements for exports. And the number of border controls need to be as few as possible for our fish to remain fresh when reach the European market. That’s another reason why the Schengen area is excellent for Norway – we are exporting a huge amount of fresh fish.

Regarding the migration issue at the border with Russia, is this now stabilised?

The numbers are now down to zero. It has been zero since December, when we reached an agreement in our dialogue with Russia. This is an incident that should not happen again. You have to realise this is a very sensitive area for the Russians, where they have military bases, submarines with nuclear weapons. It was really surprising that this could ever happen.

Was it not intentional?

I don’t know.

June 20, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Norwegian Nobel Prize 2024

101207 The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2024 to Japan’s Hiroshima bomb survivor group Nihon Hidankyo.

Special Interest

  • Africa and Norway
  • Asia and Norway
  • Asylum
  • China and Norway
  • Corruption in Norway
  • Crimes
  • Defence
  • Diplomatic relations
  • Economics
  • Environment
  • Farming
  • Killing
  • Media Freedom
  • Middle East and Norway
  • NATO and Norway
  • Nobel Peace Prize
  • Norwegian Aid
  • Norwegian American
  • Oil & Gas
  • Peace Talks
  • Politics
  • Racism in Norway
  • Religion
  • Russia and Norway
  • Royal House
  • Science
  • Sex scandal
  • Sports
  • Spy War
  • Srilanka and Norway
  • Svalbard
  • Terrorist
  • Taiwan and Norway
  • Video clips

Follow Us

Recent Posts

  • Oslo hosts Azerbaijan’s Victory Day anniversary

    November 8, 2025
  • Norway lifts arms embargo against Cyprus

    November 8, 2025
  • Norwegian Foreign Minister visit China

    November 8, 2025
  • Chinese Buses Can Be Turned Off Remotely in Norway

    November 6, 2025
  • Russia’s Embassy in Norway Honors the 80th Anniversary of Victory

    November 1, 2025
  • 120 Years: Russia Was the First to Recognize Norwegian Independence

    October 30, 2025

Social Feed

Social Feed

Editors’ Picks

Norway opens market for Sri Lankan fish exports...

May 13, 2016

Sri Lanka – Nordic Business Council holds discussions...

May 15, 2016

Good governance to Sri Lanka

May 15, 2016

Shock and Joy in Sri Lanka – Erik...

May 15, 2016

Sri Lanka-Norway plenty of new opportunities for business–...

May 15, 2016

NORWAY NEWS is an online news site, written in English, dedicated to Norwegian affairs at home and abroad. Norway News.com is published online. It is a daily online newspaper in existence since May, 2003. The site is run by an Independent Journalist.

Facebook Twitter Youtube

Useful Links

    • Work With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Collaboration
    • Data Collection
    • Workplace
    • Adverstising
    • Privacy Policy
    • International Collab
    • Feedback
    • Terms of Use
    • About Our Ads
    • Help & Support
    • Entertainment
    • News Covering
    • Technology
    • Trending Now

Politics

Syrian, Norway to boost cooperation on mine clearance
Erna to step down as Conservative Party leader in 2026
Norwegian Labour Party on re-election win

Latest Articles

Oslo hosts Azerbaijan’s Victory Day anniversary
Norway lifts arms embargo against Cyprus
Norwegian Foreign Minister visit China
Chinese Buses Can Be Turned Off Remotely in Norway

Norway News 2025 . All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News

  • Home
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us

Editor’s Picks

  • UN concern over Sri Lanka’s cases of enforced disappearances

    October 8, 2025
  • UN Human Rights Council Resolution on Sri Lanka’s Path to Reconciliation

    October 7, 2025
  • International should support Sri Lanka: Solheim

    October 4, 2024
  • Norwegian Meets Sri Lankan’s Challenges

    May 3, 2024
  • Norwegian Ambassador meets JVP in Sri Lanka

    May 2, 2024
  • “The man who didn’t run away” – Eric Solheim

    April 30, 2024

Newsletter

@2025 - All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News