NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Copyright 2025- All Right Reserved Norway News
Environment

Former Norwegian Minister Erik Solheim Takes Reins at UN Environment Programme

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 27, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan
-Portrait of Erik Solheim, Chair of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC)

-Portrait of Erik Solheim, Chair of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC)

Erik Solheim, a former Minister of Environment and International Development in Norway, began his tenure today as Executive Director of the UN Environment Programme, with the concurrent position of UN Under-Secretary-General. Mr. Solheim assumes his new role as chief of the global authority on the environment after three years as head of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

In taking up office, Solheim pledged to work with countries around the world to tackle some of the most pressing environmental challenges of our time, including ocean and air pollution, the destruction of ecosystems, climate change and the relationship between the environment and conflict and migration.

He also promised to focus on environment issues close to people, such as damage to human health from air pollution.

Solheim said, “There is an urgent need to fight climate change, halt ecosystem destruction, and reduce pollution for the benefit of all peoples everywhere. By protecting our planet, we protect ourselves and in the process can help bring every last person out of poverty. We all have a stake in a healthy planet.”

He noted other urgent areas to address include the private sector investment needed for sustainable development, greening the finance sector and creating jobs and markets with clean and green technologies.

“Financing the preservation and rejuvenation of our planet cannot be the purview of governments alone. Private sector finance is both vital for sustainable development, and an opportunity for business. As never before, markets are rewarding investments in clean and green jobs and technologies.”

Solheim also underlined that issues like climate change and sustainable development are issues that no one country or organization can solve themselves, and that the world must come together to tackle environmental challenges.

“With successes like the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals, the world has achieved a lot in recent years when it comes to the environment. We can achieve a lot more. But the only way to do this is by working cooperatively. I look forward to working with member states and welcoming voices and efforts from all parts of society to tackle our common challenges.

“Our planet is vulnerable, but I’m optimistic we can resolve the environmental problems we face. There’s little we can’t achieve when we pull together with cooperation, collaboration and a can-do attitude.”

Solheim arrives after having served as Chair of the DAC of the OECD since 2013. Since that time, he has also served as UN Environment Programme’s Special Envoy for Environment, Conflict and Disaster. Known as the ‘green’ politician, he held the combined portfolio of Norway’s Minister of the Environment and International Development from 2007 to 2012, and served as Minister of International Development from 2005 to 2007.

Having spent most of his career fighting for the environment in national and global politics, including through non-governmental organizations and during his combined ministerial portfolio, Mr. Solheim has focused on the challenge of integrating environmental and developmental issues. During his ministerial tenure, Norway reached 1 per cent of its GDP for overseas development assistance and passed the unique Nature Diversity Act. He initiated the process leading to the global coalition to conserve and promote sustainable use of the world’s rainforests – the UN REDD – gaining invaluable diplomatic and organizational experience.

Holding an undergraduate degree in history and social studies from the University of Oslo, Mr. Solheim has received several awards for his work on climate and environment, including UN Environment Programme’s “Champion of the Earth” award, and contributed to a number of peace and reconciliation efforts, most notably as the chief negotiator of the peace process in Sri Lanka.

Born in 1955, he is married, with four children.

An extended biography of Erik Solheim can be found here.

For media interviews and press matters concerning the Executive Director, please contact:

UN Environment Programme Newsdesk

Nairobi, Kenya

Email: unepnewsdesk@unep.org

For other matters concerning the Executive Director, please contact:

Executive Office

United Nations Environment Programme

P.O. Box 47074 – Nairobi 00100 – Kenya

Phone: +254 (0)20 762 4148

Fax: +254-20-7624006/7624275

Email: executiveoffice@unep.org

June 27, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

Bottle letter from Norway found in Cambodia

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 27, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

6d66db5616eef84b79005bf6dfa9b82cIn the summer of 2013, the seven year old Mingus Lund threw at Coca Cola bottle with a postcard inside into the ocean by Geitskjæret on Nøtterøy near the town of Tønnsberg in Norway. The photo showed the famous cliff Prekestolen in Norway. On the other side of the card, Mingus wrote – with the help of his cousin:

“Hi, I am a seven year old boy. If you find this bottle, I hope you will reply to me.” And then the address of the hotel, where his family were staying and where they stay on vacation every summer.

Almost three years later, Mingus has now received a reply – from a bar owner on Serendipity Beach in Sihanoukville in Cambodia.

“Hi, My name is Cho Chum and I am 37 years old,” he writes – possible with the help of a tourist.

“I found your bottle while I was fishing outside Koh Rong. You card has been hanging in my bar since I found it. But some days ago, two Swedes translated it for me and told me where Norway is. The bottle has traveled a really long way. Yours Cho Chum and the address: Serendipity Beach, Sihanoukville, Cambodia.”

It is not known how long the postcard had been hanging on the wall in the bar in Sihanoukville before the two helpful Swedes noticed the famous cliff on the postcard.

Mingus mother is the Norwegian TV producer Marte Stokstad.

“There are so many coincidences in this story that it becomes quite magic,” says Marte Stokstad to the Norwegian daily, VG, who found the news as a post on Marte Stokstad’s Facebook timeline and followed up on the story.

The big question is, how the Coca Cola bottle canme from Tønnsberg to Sihanoukville. Was it transported by the ocean streams? Or did it at one time enter a ballast water tank on a ship?

Marte Stokstad told VG that she is considering producing a documentary about the bottle letter. She sees also an environmental perspective in the story.

“I have sent the name of the finder of the bottle to several bars on Serendipity beach,” she says.

“The aim is to go there with my son. Imagine walking into the bar in a surprise visit …”the bottle family from Norway”. It is almost absurd and would be great fun. We simply have to do this,” she laughs when she told VG about her plan.

Oceanographer Lars Asplin from the Norwegian Oceanographic Institute thinks the likelihood that the bottle should have traveled by the streams of the oceans up along the Norwegian West coast, through the North East passage and the Bering Strait into the Pacific Ocean, down along the coast of Japan, then East with the Kuroshio stream across the Pacific Ocean to North America, only to travel back West with the North Equatorial stream to finally enter the Gulf of Siam … is almost negligent.

He suspects the bottle went to Cambodia by air.

“You should never say never; the ways of the oceans are mysterious. But personally I believe a joker in Norway or Sweden found the bottle with the letter, then traveled on vacation to South East Asia and threw it into the ocean there,” Lars Asplin says to VG.

“But it is a good story,” he adds.

 

June 27, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Middle East and Norway

Egypt FM Shoukry discusses Palestine issue with Norway’s peace envoy

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 26, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

2016-636025366155816213-581Egyptian foreign minister Sameh Shoukry discussed with Norway’s Middle East peace envoy Tor Vinslad the recent Paris-based Israeli-Palestinian peace initiative, the ministry’s spokesperson Ahmed Abu Zeid said Sunday.

“The Norwegian peace envoy listened to the assessment of the foreign minister of the results of the meeting that took place earlier this month in Paris between different international foreign ministers to discuss the peace process,” Abu Zeid said in a statement.

The spokesperson added that the duo “discussed President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi and Egypt’s efforts to resume [stalled] negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis.”

Norway was instrumental in finalizing the Palestinian-Israeli peace accord signed in Oslo in 1993 that led to the formation of the Palestinian Authority in parts of the occupied territories.

Oslo has continued to play a key role in attempts to mediate negotiations between the two sides.

In May, President El-Sisi urged Israeli and Palestinian leaders to work for peace and a two-state solution, noting that peace is possible based on the Egyptian-Israeli experience of overcoming decades of war.

“I call on our Palestinian brothers to unite their various factions so as to be able to reach real reconciliation [and prepare for talks with Tel Aviv],” El-Sisi said.

The president also asked Israeli leaders to “seize the moment”, promising Tel Aviv a better future if it reaches a deal with the Palestinians.

June 26, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Norwegian takes part in International Day of Yoga

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 25, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

UN has declared 21st June as International Day of Yoga (IDY) in the year 2015. The resolution was moved by India at the UNGA, which was supported by 177 countries including Norway.

A letter from Indian Prime Minister thanking Norway’s support to the resolution was handed over to Norway’s Prime Minister in 2015.

As Yoga was a gift to the World from India, Embassy of India, Oslo organised celebration of the 2nd IDY on 24th June 2016(Friday), at Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, NIH, Sognsveien 220, Oslo from 1600-1900 hrs.
IMG_6013

A demo on simple postures of Yoga was taught by experienced Yoga teachers. About 600 participants, from both Indian and Norwegian background, performed Yoga simultaneously on the artificial synthetic surface inside Norwegian School of Sports Sciences. Apart from Norwegians/PIOs/NRIs, a few other nationalities also participated in the event.

DSCF0353-2

A renowned Ashtanga Yoga expert from Mysore, Mrs. Saraswathi Jois is currently on a visit to Norway at the invitation of “Puro Yoga”, a yoga school in Oslo. Mrs. Jois participated in IDY-16, who was honoured by Ambassador during IDY-16.

Two Norwegian Yoga teachers from Oslo Yoga School and Fri Yoga School led the Yoga performance with two other Yoga practitioners on stage, which was followed by participants. The Yoga teachers also explained about the benefits of Yoga in everyday life. About 25 Yoga schools from Oslo have also put up their stalls in Norwegian School of Sports Sciences on the day to promote Yoga. Entry was free for all the participants.

Norway’s Minister for Health and Culture have sent Greetings on the occasion of IDY-16. Apart from Yoga, a short film on Yoga, Flute and Tabla recital and Kathak dance of 5 minutes duration each were also performed.

IMG_6040

Message by Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi on Second International Day of Yoga

My dear friends from all over the world,

It gives me great pleasure to address you as we prepare for the 2nd International Day of Yoga – this unique occasion that brings all of us together to celebrate the invaluable gift of India’s ancient tradition. When I outlined a vision foran International Day of Yoga in September 2014 at the United Nations General Assembly, even I did not anticipate the enormous enthusiasm for the occasion from all corners of the world. Your support and participation last year, and once again now redeems our commitment to nurture and promote this ancient discipline, and reaffirms yoga as an exemplary manifestation of “VasudhaivaKutumbakam” – The world as one family.

I recall the iconic images from that momentous day last year. All the way from the Pacific Islands to Port of Spain, from Vladivostok to Vancouver and from Copenhagen to Cape Town, thousands gathered to unite the bodies and minds through the practice of Yoga. And the reverberations of their discipline found a natural home at the UN Headquarters in New York, where the journey had begun. I myself was fortunate to celebrate the event along with 36,000 of my fellow citizens and foreign guests in New Delhi.

As so many of you have already discovered, Yoga is much more than a physical exercise – it enables us to access a new dimension of the self, even while providing a holistic approach to preventive healthcare and wellbeing. Yoga helps us to restore our balance and furnishes us with a much needed sense of clarity. And through its unifying power, we seek completeness, and at the same time, a oneness with the world.

Today all of you are the Ambassadors of Yoga, taking forward India’s ancient message to the world. I thank you for your commitment and welcome you as sisters and brothers of India’s family.

IMG_6122

Message by External Affairs Minister of India, Mrs.Sushma Swaraj on 2nd International Day of Yoga

It is a matter of immense happinessthat at India’s initiative the United Nations declared 21 June as the International Day of Yoga. This is the second year when we celebrate the International Day of Yoga with great fervor both in India and abroad. Last year also this event was celebrated on a grand scale and it is our expectation that this time the celebrations will be on twice the scale and will see twice the participation.

I would like to emphasize that Yoga is not mere exercise. Yoga is a combination of exercise for the body as well as the soul. For this reason, while a person feels exhausted after exercising, after Yoga the person is not exhausted, rather feels a sense of inner peace. If you start Yoga by doing Pranayam and end it with YogNidra or Shavasan you will achieve release from stress and you will feel new energy and vitality flow through your body. On the one hand Yoga is a medium to fight chronic ailments, on the other it is also a means to attain spiritual energy.

Given the grand scale at which we are celebrating the International Day of Yoga, I invite each and every one of you to join hands with us. I would also like to convey my best wishes to those who are unable to participate this time but who would be inspired by you to take up Yoga afresh and participate next time.

All our Missions and Posts abroad have made intense preparations to celebrate the International Day of Yoga. Extensive arrangements have also been made to celebrate this event in India. My warmest wishes to all of you for the success of the 2nd International Day of Yoga.

IMG_6134

Millions stretch and bend for Yoga Day 

More than 191 countries are taking part in the celebration, including the UK Argentina , Australia and Norway.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi called yoga a “people’s mass movement” as he took to the mat Tuesday along with millions of others worldwide to celebrate the ancient practice.

“Do not wait, make yoga a part of your life,” Modi urged in a brief speech to mark the event, an idea he successfully asked the United Nations to adopt.

“This is a day linked with good health and now it has become a people’s mass movement,” the 65-year-old premier said.

IMG_4218

Modi took a short break to inspect the poses of his fellow yogis, who included students and soldiers, before returning to his spot.

Modi, who credits yoga for his ability to work long hours on little sleep, has been spearheading an initiative to reclaim the practice as an historic part of Indian culture after his Hindu nationalist government came to power in 2014.

Yoga is an ancient Indian meditation and exercise philosophy that has existed for centuries. Yogic poses are mentioned in the ancient Indian epic “The Mahabharata”.

Considering that the Mahabharata was written in about the 4-5 century BC, this exercise and meditation regimen has a very ancient past. Yoga has two aspects namely the spiritual and the physical.

In the end, both synthesize and help the body get rejuvenated. After the arrival of Narendra Modi as the prime minister, the Indian government decided to publicize this exercise and meditation philosophy to the entire world. The UN was enthusiastic and declared 21 June as World Yoga Day.

IMG_4569

World yoga day

Yoga has become extremely popular in the 21st century. Credit must go to many yogis who spread the message of yoga in the Asia, Africa Europe including in Norway.

The future of yoga

Yoga is a huge part of Norwegian lifestyle, Yoga is now accepted all over the world. Among foreigners Norwegians also the most consistent followers of Yoga and many practice meditation techniques as taught in this science. Advanced yogic poses and techniques are supposed to elevate the spirit of the human being to another realm, though no scientific research has been done on this. Yoga is extremely beneficial to women and helps in easier childbirth as well as regaining the elasticity of the body. In India yoga day was celebrated with great fanfare and the Prime Minister Narendra Modi led a session at Chandigarh.

IMG_6013

Benefits of Yoga

Improved wellbeing

Better life balance

Access to deep states of happiness

Reduced stress (helpful for Norwegian 🙂 )

Peace of mind

First International Day of Yoga at Jaffna

'Surya Namaskar', the sun salutation was demonstrated by 5,000 Jaffna Tamil school children at the stadium, to mark International Yoga Day

‘Surya Namaskar’, the sun salutation was demonstrated by 5,000 Jaffna Tamil school children at the stadium, to mark International Yoga Day

 

Stop traffic! Times Square in New York City, USA, comes to a standstill for a yoga session on summer solstice on Monday.

Stop traffic! Times Square in New York City, USA, comes to a standstill for a yoga session on summer solstice on Monday.

You can almost feel the quiet and calm in this photo of everybody practising their yoga breathing in Zhenjiang, China.

You can almost feel the quiet and calm in this photo of everybody practising their yoga breathing in Zhenjiang, China.

What a view! These guys do a bit of yoga at sunrise on top of the Sydney Harbour Bridge!

What a view! These guys do a bit of yoga at sunrise on top of the Sydney Harbour Bridge!

 

Yoga fans in Australia bend and flex in front of the world famous Sydney Harbour Bridge and Sydney Opera House.

Yoga fans in Australia bend and flex in front of the world famous Sydney Harbour Bridge and Sydney Opera House.

A group of yoga students form a beautiful and colourful shape in Ahmedabad, India, for International Yoga Day on Tuesday.

A group of yoga students form a beautiful and colourful shape in Ahmedabad, India, for International Yoga Day on Tuesday.

Times Square, New York City

Times Square, New York City

The Medeo skating rink in Almaty, Kazakhstan

The Medeo skating rink in Almaty, Kazakhstan

Participants perform yoga under the Eiffel Tower in Paris, France

Participants perform yoga under the Eiffel Tower in Paris, France

Seoul, South Korea

Seoul, South Korea

A Malaysian boy is seen playing during the International Day of Yoga festival in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

A Malaysian boy is seen playing during the International Day of Yoga festival in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Participants perform yoga under the Eiffel tower in Paris

Participants perform yoga under the Eiffel tower in Paris

Thousands of participants perform yoga on Rajpath in New Delhi. Prime Minister Narendra Modi hailed the first International Yoga Day as a 'new era of peace', moments before he surprised thousands in New Delhi by taking to a mat himself to celebrate the ancient Indian practice.

Thousands of participants perform yoga on Rajpath in New Delhi. Prime Minister Narendra Modi hailed the first International Yoga Day as a ‘new era of peace’, moments before he surprised thousands in New Delhi by taking to a mat himself to celebrate the ancient Indian practice.

June 25, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Farming

Agriculture and climate change

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

hvete-i-juli-foto-slfGreenhouse gas emissions have decreased by about 13 percent from 1990, and in 2013 amounted to just over 8 percent of the Norwegian greenhouse gas emissions. A Project Group reviewing agriculture challenges in the face of climate change has concluded that, including emissions from transport, construction and land, the further potential for emission reduction from today and until 2030 is estimated to be near 20 percent.

According to the Project Group there are two main strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector: lower consumption volume and a change in composition of food consumption, and reducing emissions within the same production volume.

Minister of Agriculture and Food Jon Georg Dale said that the Project Group report will be read with attention and is an important input for the government’s continued work on climate change:

– The agriculture sector has already made significant cuts in their emissions, an impressive 13 percent since 1990. Furthermore, the report concludes that industry, through various measures, can cut as much as 20 percent by 2030. Demanding, yes; but an important goal to reach for. It is necessary to maintain momentum in the climate debate in the years to come. This report, together with other documentation, provides a solid fact base for political choice, Jon Georg Dale says.

The Project Group is convinced that the general contours of Norwegian climate policy for the agricultural sector capture important initiatives and priority areas as described in the IPCC’s 5th Assessment Report. It is nevertheless clear that the current level of effort will fail to achieve the full potential for emission reductions and increased uptake rapidly enough. The measures listed in the report should be investigated further to find the cost of the measures, feasibility and relevant instruments. Once ready, more vigorous and targeted measures are required to ensure that Norwegian agriculture can continue to meet the Parliament’s goal of food production nationwide, while Norwegian agriculture contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions both in its own sector and in other sectors of society. When we include reductions of emissions from transport, buildings and land, the further potential for emission reduction is estimated to be near 20 percent from today until 2030.

The Project Group notes that Norwegian food production is a function of the national resource base, and that it is not possible to produce food without any greenhouse gas emissions. Biological processes in agriculture cannot be replaced in the same way as processes based on non-renewable raw materials and fossil-based production systems.

Climate Action

The Project Group identifies two main strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector:
Changed volume and composition of food consumption

Reduce emissions within the same production volume (optimize production)

In addition, efforts must be made to reduce CO2 emissions from the use of soil and fossil energy in agriculture, is another of the Project Group’s conclusions. Reduced production of red meat in Norway will reduce Norwegian emissions, but this could at the same time lead to increased emissions in other countries, if, presuming stable consumption, a national shortfall is compensated by imports.

The Project Group reviewed existing climate measures in Norwegian agriculture, and collected and assessed new knowledge.

The role of forests

skog-colourbox5891470Another great potential for national climate action is to exploit forest resources. In line with the recommendations of the IPCC, the Project Group believes that the role of forests as a carbon sink can be substantially improved by targeted reforestation and other measures that promote forest productivity. Renewable energy and raw materials from the forest can displace fossil fuel emissions in other sectors. The use of biofuels in the transport sector, the use of bioenergy and building materials in the building sector and the use of biochar as a reducing agent in the industry, are examples of this. Many of the scenarios that underlie IPCC low emission vectors assume negative emissions from approximately 2050, and photosynthesis remains the basis of all hitherto known carbon negative technologies.

Negative emissions can be achieved by large-scale reforestation, storage of biochar in the soil or by the use of bioenergy combined with capture and storage of CO2.

Adapting to a changed climate
The Project Group points out that climate change can provide new opportunities for production that farmers will exploit, but also that the change will result in great uncertainty. Climate change could also provide new opportunities for the forest production industry and society to exploit, but forestry will face tough challenges when production is to be adapted, not least because forestry by nature must aim at a long term economic cycle, as detailed in the report. Development of both adaptive technology, research-based and practical agronomy and forestry knowledge is a prerequisite for success in the face of increasing challenges. The Project Group considers that Norway probably yet is better equipped than most countries to cope with this, because we have wide access to resources, a solid knowledge base and a well-organized management.

Further research required
Climate challenges in the agricultural sector are complex, and the report identifies a considerable knowledge gap. The present development where new research, technology and knowledge is utilized is among the most important measures that can be implemented to reduce the climate impact of agriculture. The Project Group notes that in research which includes climate impacts and adaptations in primary industries, there should be special emphasis on the development of knowledge about issues such as carbon storage in soils, methane and nitrous oxide emissions, better economic calculations of costs of various climate measures in agriculture, while at the same time keeping in view the consequences that climate measures may have on food production.

The Project Group unanimously endorses the content of the report.

(mfa)

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asylum

Necessary tightening of Norway’s asylum rules

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

file-20-9636317592236313The Norwegian parliament has adopted a number of legislative amendments to ensure a more sustainable asylum policy and strengthen border control. These were approved by the King in Council today. The Ministry is now considering the need for transitional rules and regulations for the period until the amendments come into force.

– The proposals that have been adopted will make us better equipped to deal with a new crisis involving the arrival of large numbers of asylum seekers. A strict but fair asylum policy is important if we are to succeed in integrating the applicants who are eligible for a residence permit and will be allowed to stay in Norway,’ said Minister of Immigration and Integration Sylvi Listhaug.

A record number of refugees and migrants arrived in Europe in 2015 and this created major challenges for both the EU and Norway. Just over 31 000 asylum seekers came to Norway, while Sweden received more than 162 000. It was against this background and the prospect of continued high numbers of asylum seekers that the Parliament reached agreement at the end of 2015 on a package of measures to significantly tighten Norway’s asylum rules.

– These amendments will enable us to deal with a situation where extraordinary numbers of asylum seekers are arriving at our borders. We are also in a stronger position to fight the use of false ID with wider authorisation of the use of fingerprinting and facial recognition technology, and the period biometric data can be stored has been extended. The Government considered it vital to introduce these measures to deal with possible new crises and the prospect of continued flows of migrants and refugees for many years ahead,’ said Ms Listhaug.

As a result of the introduction of border controls in several countries and the EU-Turkey action plan, there has been a reduction in the number of arrivals since autumn 2015.

– We saw last year that the number of arrivals can change very rapidly. The Government is maintaining a steady course in its immigration policy. We must take a long-term approach and ensure that we have a sustainable immigration policy that safeguards our welfare model for future generations,’ said Ms Listhaug.

The most important points in the legislative amendments adopted by the Storting are as follows:

It will now be possible to refuse entry to asylum seekers at the borders with other Nordic countries during a crisis with extraordinarily high numbers of arrivals.

Asylum seekers arriving in Norway from Russia or another Nordic country will no longer be entitled to enter the country without a visa during a crisis with extraordinarily high numbers of arrivals, if they belong to the category whose applications may be refused individual consideration. The cases to which this applies are regulated by new legislation.

The provision that it must be ‘not unreasonable’ to direct a foreign national to seek protection in another part of his or her country of origin will no longer apply. Foreign nationals do not have the right to international protection if they can obtain effective protection in another area of their home country other than the one from which they have fled (internal displacement). However, under the current provisions of the Immigration Act, foreign nationals may only be directed to internal displacement if this is ‘not unreasonable’.

The deadline for lodging an appeal following the rejection of an asylum application is to be reduced from three weeks to one week for asylum seekers who do not meet the conditions for being granted protection or are otherwise protected from return.

A decision to refuse individual consideration of an asylum application (for example because the asylum seeker has been granted asylum or protection in another country) may be implemented immediately if it is clear that there are grounds for this.
It is now possible to expel foreign nationals in cases where an asylum application is refused individual consideration and also represents misuse of the asylum system.

Amendments providing wider authorisation for the collection and storage of biometric personal data in the form of facial images and fingerprints in immigration cases have been adopted. The purpose is to improve checks of the identity of foreign nationals.

A new provision will make it possible to refuse certain applications for family reunification in cases where the sponsor has been granted subsidiary protection in Norway. Residence for family members may be refused if the family in question*** would be able to live safely in a third country with which the family’s overall connection is stronger than its connection with Norway. This provision does not apply if the sponsor has been granted permanent residence in Norway.

A requirement that both parties must be at least 24 years old is being introduced in family establishment cases. The purpose of this requirement is to combat forced marriage. Exemptions may be made from this requirement if it is clear that the marriage or cohabiting relationship has been entered into voluntarily.

New criteria to ensure integration are being introduced for permanent residence in Norway. One requirement is that the foreign national must have been self-supporting in the preceding twelve-month period. Applicants to whom the obligation to participate in Norwegian language and social studies tuition applies must also have a minimum level of spoken Norwegian and pass a test in social studies in a language they understand.

The obligation to participate in Norwegian language and social studies tuition is being extended to foreign nationals between 55 and 67 years of age, which means that this group must also take the tests when they have completed tuition.

The immigration authorities will be able to refuse an application for permanent residence if this would conflict with serious considerations relating to the regulation of immigration, for example if the foreign national in question has actively obstructed attempts to clarify his or her identity since arriving in Norway.

It has been decided that foreign nationals who are granted collective protection after a mass flight will not be eligible for permanent residence until they have been in Norway for six years. Until now they have been able to obtain permanent residence after four years.

(mfa)

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Corruption in Norway

Real estate indicted for aggravated fraud

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway-TodayPoliceThe police suspect one of Trondheim’s most prominent real estate companies of fraud for tens of million, according to the newspaper Adresseavisen.

The reason why the police opened an investigation of the company are that four firms have reported it, claiming it have been defrauding them.

– According to these firms, it has defrauded a significant amount, although I will get into the size of it. The investigation wants to ascertain what has happened, both in favor of and against the indictment, police lawyer Aage Sanders Midling Trøndelag Police says to Adresseavisen.

She confirms that one firm and two people at the top of the corporate hierarchy is charged with aggravated fraud, but will not specify what police believe are the offenses. According to the soruces of Adresseavisen it concern serious fraud for several million kroner and breaches of the laws of accounting.

– The charges are unfounded. The company and its management, in cooperation with police will work to refute allegations that we have broke the law or doing anything unethical, and expect the case eventually will be dropped, lawyer Halvard Helle, representing the defendants, writes.

The police in Trondheim has been assisted by Public Prosecutor in its investigation.

Source: NTB

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Peace Talks

Historic breakthrough in Colombian peace talks

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

BtDhojjCQAAEZGI‘I am very pleased that the parties to the conflict have now reached agreement on the key issue in the negotiations: laying down of arms and a definitive bilateral ceasefire and end of hostilities. After nearly four years of tough negotiations, we are now finally approaching an end to this conflict,’ Minister of Foreign Affairs Børge Brende said.

Juan Manuel Santos, President of Colombia, and Timoleón Jiménez, head of the guerrilla group Farc-EP, today announced a historic agreement to bring an end to the conflict in their country. Foreign Minister Børge Brende took part in the formal ceremony in Havana, together with UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and President Raúl Castro, among others.

‘For the people of Colombia, the end of the conflict is finally within reach. I hope the parties to the conflict will soon be able to sign a final peace agreement and start a new chapter in the history of their country,’ said Foreign Minister Brende.

The ceasefire and the end of hostilities will be monitored by the UN with a mandate from the Security Council, and a number of international observers are to take part in the operation. This agreement provides the conditions for enabling Farc to become a political actor rather than an armed group. It also contains security guarantees and a commitment to intensify its efforts to prevent attacks on human rights defenders and social leaders. It is hoped that a final peace agreement can be signed in the near future.

The peace talks were formally launched in Oslo in 2012. The remaining topics on the agenda to be negotiated are the reintegration of Farc and mechanisms to implement the agreement, as well as a referendum on the final peace agreement. Norway and Cuba are facilitating the negotiations in Havana.

The armed conflict in Colombia has lasted for more than 50 years. The humanitarian consequences are enormous, and the conflict has brought widespread suffering to the country’s population. Several hundred thousand people have been killed, and nearly seven million have been internally displaced. A large proportion of the victims are children and young people.

(MFA)

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Science

Norway’s BankID tests in-app authentication

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

2971Norway’s BankID is to begin a pilot programme to test in-app authentication and biometric logins for one-click access to financial services. Originally developed to simplify online banking access, BankID is now used by 80% of all adults in Norway to prove their identity to various organisations across Norway, including all government departments, and all of the country’s banks and mobile operators.

BankID currently uses a combination of hardware-based authentication (key fobs) and one-time-password generation for authentication. The company has contracted with local supplier Encap Security to test the vendor’s Smart Authentication platform that removes the need for key fobs by securely enabling authentication to take place inside an app.

A recent upgrade to Encap’s platform includes support for both Apple’s Touch ID and Android’s fingerprint API, making biometric authentication for many new devices possible.

Frode Beckmann Nilsen, head of development at BankID Norway, says: “We want to make sure we remain ahead of the curve by creating a new experience – dropping the need to carry around key fobs or copy and paste from another app – while also ensuring the highest security standards. Each bank will provide an app and introduce it to the customers in their own pace. Our purpose with this Encap-app has been to provide a useful showroom for our next future proof BankID-experience.”

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Africa and Norway

Nigeria, Norway Agree to Deepen Cooperation on Fisheries

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 24, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Muhammadu-Buhari3-696x464President Muhammadu Buhari yesterday in Abuja said Nigeria and Norway, a major fish exporting country, would work together to deepen their agricultural cooperation, particularly on fish farming and fisheries development.

A statement issued in Abuja by the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Mr. Garba Shehu, said Buhari spoke at a farewell audience with the outgoing Ambassador of Norway to Nigeria, Ambassador Rolf Ree.

Buhari said his administration would continue to promote agriculture as an alternative revenue earner for the country.

The president said he welcomed the humanitarian aid provided by Norway and some European Union member countries in support of Internally Displaced Persons in the country.

He reaffirmed the federal government’s commitment to explore opportunities to ensure the rehabilitation and safe return of affected persons to their communities.

The president, who also received the outgoing Ambassador of Mexico, Mr Anthonio Garcia Blanco, commended the cordial relations between both countries in the 40 years of their diplomatic relations.

Buhari congratulated both envoys for a successful completion of their tour of duty to Nigeria and wished them well in their future endeavours.

In his remarks, the Norwegian ambassador praised the Buhari administration for the clean-up of Ogoniland and other oil impacted communities in the Niger-Delta.

Also speaking, the Mexican ambassador underscored the historic and economic similarities between Nigeria and Mexico, stressing the need for deeper and more productive ties between both countries.

June 24, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Killing

Call to halt execution of 2 prisoners in western Iran

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 23, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

ncri-statement-400On Wednesday, June 22, coinciding with a visit by the Iranian regime’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif to France and the Netherlands, and simultaneous with the global conference against the death penalty with the participation of more than 90 countries in Oslo, officials of the mullahs’ regime in Iran have sent two prisoners by the names of Farzad Bizhani and Farhad Souri in Sanandaj Prison (western Iran) to solitary confinement in preparation for their executions.

On this very day the criminal public prosecutor in the city of Mashhad (northeastern Iran) requested hand amputation verdicts for three prisoners accused of robbery (state Tabnak website – June 22).

Continuous executions, torture and floggings even during the holy month of Ramadan, considered amongst Muslims in Iran and all Islamic countries as a month of tolerance, kindness and benevolence, brings an end to the myth of moderation within the religious, fascist regime ruling Iran that cannot even temporary halt these crimes for a few days to merely save face.

The Iranian Resistance calls for measures to save the lives of the two prisoners on the brink of execution and to prevent a verdict and implementation of hand amputation for the three inmates in Mashhad Prison. The Iranian Resistance also calls on all international humanitarian organizations to condemn these inhumane crimes. Furthermore, the international community is urged to condition its economic and political relations with this inhumane regime, being the source of all the devastations, pains and sufferings of the people of Iran and the entire region, on an improvement of human rights in Iran.

June 23, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Russia and Norway

Fences rise, but cooperation continues

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 23, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Medvedev_og-kong-Harald-2010-Foto-GAD-Wikimedia-Commons-800x475Cooperation in the North continues, but consequences of the conflicts are primarily noticeable on the political level and in military cooperation.

– I think the notion of “Arctic exceptionalism”, in that Arctic cooperation is isolated from conflict spill over from other regions is being challenged, but that it still holds, says fellow Tom Røseth at Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies, to High North News.

Most cooperation is affected

-Most Arctic cooperation is affected in some way or another, although the degree varies significantly. On one side, you have the same decision makers on the top in charge of a broad foreign- and security spectrum including Arctic policies, and these are not unaffected by the consequences of the Russia-West conflict over Ukraine, Røseth continues.

-On the other hand, solid institutions and bilateral networks are established, designed to handle political shifting winds, as was the case during the Cold War.

Røseths general impression is that although some work is affected and focus adjusted, such as in the Arctic Council case, cooperation continues. Consequences are primarily noticeable on the political level and in military cooperation.

Business as usual – almost

-But, he says, -further down to the individual and more practical issues, pragmatism and business as usual more or less prevail. We should keep in mind that it is in all the Arctic states’ interest that the Arctic remains calm and stable, and the many challenges in the region require common solutions.

Russia, in addition to Norway, has the most to lose from a militarization of the Arctic where commercial, environmental and security cooperation becomes unattainable. With the accession of Asian states as permanent observers in 2013, the Arctic is truly internationalized, and herein lies an expectation and obligation upon the Arctic states to manage the region responsibly and peacefully. A potential spillover to the Arctic instigated by Russia is not likely, as it would counter its strong regional interests, which are vested in a legitimate Arctic regime, prospecting economic opportunities and aspirations for a strategic trade route, Røseth says.

Less trust and goodwill

Senior research fellow at NUPI, Elana Wilson Rowe, agrees when it comes to the effect on a military level. She is, as many others, preoccupied by the effect on the weakening, or lack, of trust that the worsened geopolitical climate are creating.

-Apart from high-level military cooperation, like the CHOD meetings (Arctic Chiefs of Defence Staff), Arctic multilateral cooperation seems to go on well. By and large, the Arctic Council cooperation has been buffered from geopolitical tensions. However, although there still may be a lot of trust around the table amongst the diplomats and civil servants who are used to meeting each other regularly, there is certainly much less trust and goodwill between home capitols, Wilson Rowe points out.

“Cooperation? I think not”

-That is one of the key policy environments these individuals have to navigate, they might meet another reality when the return to their home capitols. It’s also difficult to know, even as regular cooperation continues, what more ambitious or groundbreaking policy efforts have had to be put on ice (for example, like the 2011 and 2013 binding agreements). Discussing revitalization of the Arctic Council at 20 years, what needs to change may be challenging, thinks Elana Wilson Rowe.

-But then they turn up in Washington, or Moscow, with plans, and might meet a reaction like; do we cooperate ambitiously with “them? I think not”…

Who is picking up the phone?

For Norway and Russia, bilateral military cooperation has been suspended. The northern commands still have their direct communications in place for urgent communication. But some of the openness and clarity of communication is likely reduced due to lack of face-to-face contact in other settings. It is not that the telephone line between the countries are not there anymore, but who is picking it up and do the “chatting”? How well do they know each other?, she asks rhetorically.

Wilson Roew is pointing out that personal relations across the Barents in many fields from military to civil society, actually is a heritage from Thorvald Stoltenberg’s time as Norway’s foreign minister and envisioned to serve the purpose of peace, certainly serves to facilitate effective communication.

-I think that this mutual and informal contact between the institutions and the people working there is suffering, she says.

Not a bragging matter

And she points out another aspect of the new situation:

-In our research, we have noted that, before the annexation of Crimea, Russian politicians used to highlight positively their contact with other Arctic states in mainstream Russian media.

Many photos of Lavrov meeting the Arctic foreign ministers. Now the same media coverage scarcely mentions the international Arctic and primarily focuses on Russian northern domestic issues or on military feats of strength in the region. One could argue the same in Norway, that cooperation with Russia is now no longer a great sell to voters.

The neighborhood is changed

Elana Wilson Rowe thinks that, in the Arctic, the cooperation will continue, but it will be a cooperation based on the overlapping political interests of the parties involved, not out of the pursuit of regional cohesion for its own sake.

-That means the ambitions of the significance of regional cooperation and the associated rhetoric changes. Neighbors, but not “without fences”.

—

Tom Røseth is Fellow at the Centre for Asian Security Studies, Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies.
Elana Wilson Rowe is a senior research fellow at NUPI and an adjunct professor at NORD University.

June 23, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Svalbard

The EU pledges to actively follow-up on its Arctic commitments

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 23, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

3477th-Foreign-Affairs-Council_1-800x475The Arctic remains high on the European Union’s foreign policy agenda after the Council of the European Union – the EU institution that represents the governments of the EU’s Member States – adopted its new Conclusions on the Arctic on Monday, 20 June 2016.

Almost two months after the European Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy published their Joint Communication on an integrated European Union policy for the Arctic (JOIN(2016) 21 final), the Council followed suit by expressing and re-stating its views on Arctic matters.

Such a quick reaction to a Communication is unprecedented in the history of the EU’s Arctic policy-making.
Third reflection on the Arctic

After related considerations in 2009 and 2014, the 2016 Conclusions are the third reflection of the Council on the Arctic region ever since the Union has become interested in the circumpolar North back in 2007/2008. In general, Council Conclusions express the unanimous political position of the EU’s Member States on a specific topic, country or event and often invite the Commission to make a proposal or take further action.

In 2014, the Council asked the Commission and the HR to develop an integrated policy on Arctic matters – a more coherent framework for EU action and funding programmes. A request that was met with the aforementioned Joint Communication, on which in turn the Council now expressed its view. It is believed that the European Parliament (EP) will publish a new Resolution and its position on the Joint Communication in November/December 2016.
What is the Council saying?

All in all, the Council discussed the future direction of the Union’s Arctic policy with a view to set out a coherent response to the environmental, economic and social challenges of the region. Eventually, the EU’s overall aim is to enhance both socio-economic as well as environmental resilience in the Arctic region.

An “ambitious cross-spectrum and well-coordinated Arctic policy” is considered key to the Union’s regional engagement and “important from a foreign and security policy point of view”. Based on the Joint Communication, the Council re-recognises the “primary responsibility of the Arctic states”. However, at the same time it is clearly emphasised that many issues affecting the region can only “effectively [be] addressed through regional or multilateral cooperation” with the EU being able to “make a significant contribution”.
Indigenous and local communities

This ‘substantial EU-Arctic impact’ relates to the Union’s continuous engagement with Arctic indigenous peoples and local communities, its commitment to contribute to global climate change mitigation and adaption or the EU’s central role in supporting regional sustainable development, innovation and infrastructure. Additionally, the Council reiterates the Joint Communication’s emphasis on sustainable economic development, including tourism, low-carbon and cold-climate technologies and telecommunication in the Arctic.

It is assumed that strengthened trade and business cooperation could essentially contribute to socio-economic development and resilience of local communities.

Furthermore, the Council specifically addresses questions related to the Central Arctic Ocean. First, it highlights the participation of the EU in the dialogue concerning the prevention of unregulated fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean. The negotiations commenced in December 2015 with a meeting in Washington, D.C., with also China, the EU, Iceland, Japan and South Korea being invited.
Secondly, the Conclusions also refer to the Union’s engagement in the work towards establishing marine protected areas.

Similarly to the Joint Communication, the Conclusions avoid taking up problematic topics such as extraction of raw materials and hydrocarbons, sealing and whaling. Further, the Conclusions do not answer the Joint Communication’s proposal of establishing a Working Party on Arctic matters and Northern Cooperation within the Council’s institutional structure. As a matter of fact, many Member States expressed limited added value of such a new institutional arrangement.
Is there anything new?

One of the more interesting statements included in the Conclusions is the “firm support for freedom of research in the Arctic region”. It is the first time that the “freedom of research” is clearly expressed in the Council or Commission’s Arctic policy documents. Interestingly, the Council repeats a position presented both in Germany’s 2013 Arctic policy Guidelines, where the Federal Government declares to be “working to guarantee the freedom of Arctic research”, as well as a similar Polish-inspired sentence in the 2014 European Parliament’s Resolution.

However, there is no such thing as freedom of conducting research within Arctic states’ territories, nor is it part of the 1920 Svalbard Treaty that regulates access to the Svalbard Archipelago. The right to conduct marine scientific research is pronounced by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, but coastal states’ may – under certain conditions – not give consent for research activities within the states’ exclusive economic zones or on their continental shelves. Therefore, unless it is understood as a call for “academic freedom”, the phrasing included in the 2016 Council Conclusions may meet limited enthusiasm among some non-EU Arctic states.

Most likely, the “freedom of research” statement alludes to the agreement on scientific cooperation, currently being negotiated under the auspices of the Arctic Council. Depending on the final outcome of the negotiations, this legally binding agreement may apply exclusively to researchers and institutions of the eight Arctic states, with unclear consequences for scientific activities conducted by other actors.
How to fund and where to go?

Similarly to the 2014 Conclusions, the Council also particularly calls for greater cooperation between the EU institutions and its Member States as regards to research efforts. Accordingly, it has been highlighted that the level of EU Arctic-relevant research funding is to be maintained, perhaps also after 2020.

What may strike the alert reader’s attention is the vague reference to “balanced regional funding”, which will be read in the EU’s northernmost regions in the context of current, increasingly vigorous discussion on the structure of the EU’s cohesion and cross-border funding within the EU multiannual budget starting from 2021.

In comparison to the two previous Conclusions, the Council does not directly ask the Commission and the HR for any further (Arctic policy) action. This goes in line with recent statements from the Commission, indicating that the 2016 Joint Communication will be the last one for years and should actually guide EU action for some time.
Consequently, also the Council ‘only’ invites both the Commission and the HR to “actively implement and follow-up on the [Union’s Arctic] commitments and (…) report to the Council regularly”.

In general, the Council’s Arctic update ‘captivates’ through its vague and brief nature; this, however, depicts a general characteristic of Council Conclusions, also from an Arctic context. Especially in the circumpolar arena, the Union’s institutions have learnt the hard way that any bold EU Arctic appearance or statement can easily result in Arctic frustration.

(highnorthnews)

June 23, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Middle East and Norway

Oslo pushes for abolishing death penalty in Lebanon

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 22, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

1466616163_Lebanon Minister of Justice, Ashraf Rifi, currently taking part in the 6th World Congress Against the Death Penalty at the Opera House of Oslo, Norway, delivered a speech in which he stressed that this penalty was not a deterrent to crime.

“The death penalty must be deleted from the Lebanese law in accordance with modern laws and in line with the international will to cancel this sanction,” Rifi said.

“The diligence of Lebanese courts shows that they are going to decrease the death penalty and replace it with that of hard labor for life,” he added.

Rifi also noted that Lebanon was permanently committed to respect for the dignity of man and his right to a decent life.

June 22, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Middle East and Norway

Norway troop to Syria

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 22, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

53d0834f-9d50-4883-95c9-068303647b83Norway’s parliament has authorized a government request for sending troops to Syria, a new sign that the pacifist Scandinavian country may become involved deeper in the conflict in the Arab country.

The government in Oslo said the parliament gave the go-ahead on Wednesday for a potential dispatch of troops to Syria.

“It is therefore more on the agenda that coalition forces should be able to train, advise and give operational support on Syrian territory in their battle against IS (Daesh),” Norwegian Defense Minister Ine Eriksen Soereide said in a statement, adding, “Local forces (in Syria) are making more progress than we could have expected.”

Norway has plans to dispatch some 60 troops to Jordan this summer with the alleged aim of training local forces battling the Takfiri Daesh terrorists. The government had earlier said it could consult the parliament in case a direct military presence in Syria becomes necessary.

The new contingent would consist of some 60 Norwegian soldiers, according to the approved government plans.

Oslo has already sent some 120 troops to Iraq to train and support Kurdish fighters against Daesh.

Western governments have been contributing for the past two years to a so-called US-led coalition of forces claiming to battle Daesh in Iraq and Syria.

The presence of foreign forces in Syria has drawn fierce criticism from the country’s government, with Damascus saying that the unauthorized deployment violates Syria’s territorial integrity.

June 22, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Killing

Foreign Minister Brende’s opening speech at World Congress against the death penalty in Oslo

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 22, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

13445713_10209934955199933_6479069328940583322_nForeign Minister Brende’s opening speech at Sixth World Congress against the death penalty in Oslo.

Complete and full text of speech.

Honoured guests, ladies and gentlemen, Welcome to Norway and to this sixth World Congress Against the Death Penalty.

I am pleased to see such an impressive gathering of representatives from civil society, academia, governments, parliaments and human rights institutions.

Even some Nobel laureates are present.

Among us we also have people who have been personally affected by capital punishment:

people who have been sentenced to death their family members and people who provided legal representation.

Thank you for coming to Oslo to share your experiences – to tell your stories.

The death penalty

2016-06-21 17.28.56At all times, we must remember that – contrary to what many people think – the death penalty is not exclusive to any particular region, political system, religion, culture or tradition.

The death penalty has been – and still is – being practised in all corners of the world.

On my way to the Opera House earlier today, I passed by Oslo Pride.

This reminded me that the death penalty is not only used for the most serious of crimes.

Even in 2016, people can be sentenced to death just because of whom they love.

The death penalty is used disproportionately against members of minority communities.

This is a serious obstacle in their efforts to seek recognition of their human rights.

When anyone is sentenced to death, that person’s inherent human dignity is undermined.

13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_nAs we have learned time and again, no justice system is perfect. There are numerous cases of innocent people serving time. Death row is no exception.

  • The death penalty is absolute.
    – The death penalty is irreversible.
    – The death penalty is irreparable.

 

There will always be a risk that an innocent person can be sentenced to death.

That is a risk we cannot accept.

As UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has stated, “We have a duty to prevent innocent people from paying the ultimate price for miscarriages of justice. The most sensible way is to end the death penalty.”

Norway and the death penalty

The Norwegian position on the death penalty stands firm: Norway opposes the death penalty under all circumstances.

This is a matter of principle.

The Norwegian constitution sets out that, “Every human being has a right to live. Nobody can be sentenced to death.”

The abolition of the death penalty in Norway – in times of peace and war – is reflected in our commitment to global abolition.
However, this has not always been the case. The death penalty was once an integral part of our penal system.

After World War II, 37 people were sentence to death and executed for treason and war crimes.

The last execution in Norway was carried out three years after the war ended.

Despite the long occupation and the brutal war, many people wanted to show mercy and compassion instead of vengeance.

13450095_10209934955159932_6081808617656917899_nSome 700 priests called for clemency.

The death sentence was carried out, but the cries for compassion were not ignored.

The execution in 1948 was Norway’s last.

Global trends and development

Much work remains to be done. Nonetheless there are reasons for optimism in our struggle towards global abolition.

Never before have so few countries practised the death penalty.

In 1945, only eight states had abolished the death penalty.

Then, as now, there were strong voices in favour of the death penalty. Many people believed that terrible crimes called for the ultimate punishment.

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, who is here today, recently said that, “We must not allow even the most atrocious acts to strip us of our fundamental humanity”.

As we move forward, we should not judge, but seek to understand.

This way, states with and without the death penalty can work together towards global abolition.

Previously, when policy-makers discussed the death penalty and its effect on crime, decisions were based on assumptions and beliefs, not knowledge and facts.

Thanks to ground-breaking research, we now know that the death penalty does not deter crime any more than long prison sentences.

13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_nTwenty-five years ago, only a quarter of UN Member States had abolished the death penalty.

Today, more than four out of five countries — some 160 Member States — have either abolished the death penalty or no longer use it.

Universal abolition is certainly within reach.

We have already come a long way.

This reflects greater international recognition of the sanctity of human rights.
Conclusion

Many of you here this evening know better than most how abolition can be achieved.

You have fought tirelessly against the death penalty for many years.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for all that you have done.

The most effective way to reduce the number of states, that still apply the death penalty is to bring people together and facilitate an open dialogue:

  • Based on respect
    – supported by facts
    – free of judgement and prejudice

13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_nIn an arena where we can meet each other with open minds.

The World Congress is just such an arena.

Let us embrace this opportunity. We need to make the most of the next three days.

The goal should be to take concrete steps towards the abolition of the death penalty.

Finally, allow me to express my gratitude to the conference organisers, Ensemble contre la peine de mort and the World Coalition against the Death Penalty.

I would also like to thank our fellow members of the Core Group of countries working against the death penalty.
Your tireless efforts are an inspiration for us all.

June 22, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Africa and Norway

Kenya to state position on death penalty at Oslo

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 22, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

13450095_10209934955159932_6081808617656917899_nKenya will present her position on the ongoing global debate on the death penalty in Oslo, Norway, on Wednesday.

This will be during the 6th World Congress Against the Death Penalty, whose theme for the year is ‘Abolition Now’.

The three-day summit that started on Monday, seeks to assist countries develop new strategies for universal abolition of the death penalty.

The annual congress brings together participants including government representatives, civil society, political representatives, lawyers and the media, who are keen on raising awareness on the death penalty.

13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_nSince inception on November 1, 2011, 4,500 death row inmates have had their death sentences commuted to life imprisonment.

The Kenyan delegation at the congress is under the leadership of the Power of Mercy Advisory Committee, established through Article 133 of the constitution.

Committee secretary Michael Kagika and Gerald Wandera, a director with the National Crime Research Centre, are leading the delegation.

The team is mandated with advising President Uhuru Kenyatta on exercising of the power of mercy.

Its nine members include the Attorney General who is the chairperson, the Cabinet Secretary responsible for Correctional Services and seven professional part time members.

13507040_10209934956799973_4543674041801265100_nIn addition to the constitutional mandate, Power of Mercy Act 2011 assigns the committee support functions including undertaking research and collecting data on matters related to power of mercy.

The team also educates people in correctional institutions on the power of mercy and application procedures.

The committee has partnered with the National Crime Research Centre to conduct a national public debate to solicit views on capital offences and punishments.

The objective is open dialogue on what Kenyans want for offenders and the management of capital offences.

Two plenary sessions, six round tables, six workshops and nine side events will take place over two days of debates.

June 22, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Media Freedom

Malaysia one step closer to amending death penalty

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 22, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

nancy shukri 3103

Malaysia is one step closer to amending the mandatory death sentence, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Nancy Shukri (pic) said.

Nancy told the World Congress Against The Death Penalty in Oslo, Norway, recently that a government-backed study on the death penalty had been completed and a paper is being readied by the Attorney General’s Chambers.

“There are positive signs in Malaysia and a steady momentum towards possible change in the death penalty legislation,” Nancy said.

The study was conducted by the International Centre For Law and Legal Studies (I-CeLLS). The consultant was then Professor Dr Roger Hood, Professor of Criminology and Emeritus Fellow of All Souls College Oxford.

Currently, in Malaysia, the death penalty is mandatory for 12 offences while 20 other offences are punishable with discretionary death penalty.

Murder, drug trafficking, and offences related to security are instances of offences which are punishable with death.

However, Nancy said empirical studies showed that the death penalty had not led to “the deterring effect that such a penalty was created”.

“Although Malaysia is generally in compliance with international standards in so far as the relevant safeguards (on capital punishment) are concerned, Malaysia’s position on death penalty has always been subjected to national and international criticisms.”

The global anti-death congress was the sixth edition. Nancy expressed her “deepest appreciation to Norway” for inviting Malaysia to participate.

June 22, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Srilanka and Norway

(full detail..) Sri Lankan’s foreign minister visits Norway to revive ties

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Sri Lankan’s foreign minister visits Norway to revive ties – full detail..

20.06.2016 – 12.20 PM from Dubai to Oslo, Sri Lankan foreign Minister dedications was received by Mr. Thorborn Gaustadsater ambassador to Norway in Sri Lanka, H. E. M. jayantha Palpane, Ambassador of Sri Lanka to Norway and Mrs. T. P. Dharmasena from the Embassy of Srilanka together with Ms. Maren Kyvi from protocol MFA.

21.06.2016

8.55 AM – meeting with Innovation Norway

During the visit, the Foreign Minister participated in a business seminar at ‘Innovation Norway’ in Oslo, attended by the Norwegian business community and potential investors with the objective of encouraging Norwegian businesses to invest in Sri Lanka.

johan-bjrkevoll-innovation-norway-4-728

11.00 AM –  Public lecture by Mangala Samaraweera at NUPI

Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera has said that the nature and structure of the Judicial Mechanism meant to try cases of war crimes will be decided only after consultations with the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) and the organizations representing the victims. Speaking at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs in Oslo, Samaraweera said: “There is a certain degree of controversy on how it should be set up and the level of international participation.

That will be decided after the consultations are over but all I can say now is whatever we decide upon, we will and must have the approval of the victims. This is not an exercise to please ourselves. So the final contours of the architecture of the courts we are hoping to set up will be in discussion especially with parties like the TNA or other groups which represent the victims.” On setting up a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), the Minister said:

“We have been working with the government of South Africa about their experiences in the setting up a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Of course, we aren’t guided by the South African model of the TRC because we feel that a model based on confession and forgiveness is not what Sri Lankans want. Many of them want justice. So we are working out the contours of not only the TRC but what should come afterwards, the setting up of the special courts.”

Samaraweera further said that Sri Lanka has ratified the Convention on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances and the enabling legislation will be presented to the cabinet the moment he returns to the island in July. “Hopefully that will confine to the pages of history, the white van culture of terror (through abductions), that we had earlier,” he added. –

Full text of Minister Samaraweera’s Speech at NUPI..

Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 00.13.41Mangala Samaraweera, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sri Lanka in Norway to attend the 6th World Congress against the Death Penalty.

He represents a government that, after entering power in 2015, have taken a new and constructive approach towards the country’s minorities.

Sri Lanka is currently making large efforts to reconcile Sinhaleses, Tamils and muslims in the aftermath of the civil war, which came to an end in 2009.

This work is anchored in the UN’s efforts for human rights. As part of his visit, Foreign Minister Samaraweera has given a talk on this important work.

Good evening everyone my name is Austin Latin

I’ll just like to say a few words before we start as you know Sri Lanka has a very important place in Norwegian history and consciousness. Norwegians feel very close to Sri Lanka even though it’s very far away.

It’s my pleasure to welcome the foreign minister of Sri Lanka the honorable Mr. Mongorat Sadabaya. The government after entering power in 2015 have taken a new constrictive approach to towards the country’s minorities. Sri Lanka is make very large efforts to unite the Sinhalese the Tamils and the Muslims in the aftermath of the civil war ended in 2009. And also this work in active in human rights and in the context of the conference on work against the death penalty that’s going on in Oslo this week.

It’s therefore very good to have the foreign minister Sadabaya who has been a member of parliament since 1989 so it is quite a bit of experience so talk on this subject. So I would like to welcome you.

Foreign Minister:

Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 00.13.41Thank you, thank you, Ladies and gentlemen and friends. It is indeed a great honor to be here today at the Norwegian Institute for International affairs.

And I would like to thank the management especially Mr. Wilsheim for giving me the opportunity to talk about recent developments in Sri Lanka.

Ladies and Gentlemen, in fact all of you are aware, that on the 08th of January last year in a historic election, in fact what the world calls the rainbow election of 2015, the people of Sri Lanka voted for change, and for democracy, reconciliation and development, the three pillars on which the Government of President Maithripala Sirisena and Ranil Wickremesinghe are taking the country forward today. In fact on that day, the people of Sri Lanka chose free and fair elections, good governance and the rule of law over authoritarianism and impunity; they chose stability, reconciliation and peace over the politics of fear and hate which had prevailed for many, many years previously. And they eschewed isolationist crony capitalism for openness to the world and a competitive, transparent rules-based economy.

FM06242016In fact, this victory in January was repeated again in August where extremist political parties on all sides of the divide were again decisively defeated and for the first time in Sri Lanka’s history, the two principle political parties which have governed Sri Lanka since independence chose to be on the same side leaving aside the bitterness of the past. And also for the first time, the leader of the TNA, the party which represents the Tamil community in Sri Lanka was chosen as the leader of the opposition and thus I feel a new window of opportunity was opened for Sri Lanka after many years to rectify the mistakes of the past and go forward towards a new future.

In fact as you all may be aware, when Sri Lanka gained independence in 1948; it was a country which the world believed will succeed in no time. I have seen an article written in the, I believe it was the London Times, the day after Sri Lanka gained independence from the British. The editorial in that paper says Ceylon, as it was called then, which gained independence will in no time become the Switzerland of the East because of its strategic location, because of its human and natural resources. Not only that, as recently as 1965, Lee Kuan Yew, the new Prime Minister of Singapore then having just broken away from the Malay Union presenting his first budget says that my ambition in 65 of course is to surpass the growth rate of Ceylon in the first five years meaning that we were way ahead of even Singapore at that time. But of course by 1983, Mr. Lee Kuan Yew went on to say that Sri Lanka is an example that no country should follow because we had all the opportunities, we had all the reasons to succeed but because we could not come to terms with our own diversity as a nation, what could have been easily solved at the early stages then became in to a bitter war and as a result, Sri Lanka again today has to I believe start, recommence that journey all over again, trying to catch up for lost opportunity.

FM06242016Because as I said, the new conjunctions have given Sri Lanka an opportunity it has never had for a long time. We have a Government which consists of the two principle parties. We have an opposition and a leader of opposition who represents the moderate aspirations of the Tamil people and other minorities of Sri Lanka and therefore we also have a Government which is indeed committed to the three pillars of governance as I mentioned earlier, that of democratization, of reconciliation and development.

In fact again as some of you may know, we have achieved a considerable amount, many victories, in a short period of time in the area of democratization. Within the first 100 days itself, President Sirisena pruned down many of his executive powers as much as he could without going through a referendum as the Supreme Court requested. He reintroduced term limits for the Presidency. He again took away all the institutions like the Judiciary and the Public Service Commissions, the Corruption Commissions all out of the grip of Presidential rule and independent commissions are now functioning again and also committed himself to a new Constitution, not merely Constitutional Amendments, a new Constitution.

FM06242016Once a new Government was formed after the General elections, which as I said took place last August and in Jan 09th of this year when the President was celebrating his first year in office, we converted the Sri Lankan Parliament to a Constituent Assembly tasked with the objectives of drafting a brand new Constitution for Sri Lanka. That was because we felt that the two Constitutions which were in place since independence, the two Republican Constitutions of 1972 and 1978 did not take into account the diversity of Sri Lanka as a nation.

As you know, Sri Lanka is a multi ethnic, multi religious, multi lingual, multi cultural nation. The Sinhalese and the Tamils have lived in Sri Lanka since history was written. The Muslim community came as traders and then lived there and had contributed immensely to the history of our country for the last 1000 odd years and we have other communities like the Burghers, the descendents of the Dutch and the Portuguese. We have the Malays and we even have indigenous Sri Lankans, the Veddas but unfortunately because the two earlier Constitutions were basically majoritarian in nature, we feel that paved the way for one of the most bitter civil wars Sri Lanka and the world in fact has ever seen and our Government, the non – recurrence being one of our primary objectives, first and foremost we must now create a Constitution which will celebrate the diversity of Sri Lanka and that is what we are doing now.

FM06242016In fact the first report of the consultations with the public was tabled last week in parliament. The work of the draft is going on very seriously and fairly quickly in parliament, in the Constituent Assembly. In fact we have told the people who are doing it that we would like to have the first white paper on the Constitution distributed sometime in September and hopefully before the budget of Sri Lanka which is usually presented in the late November.

We are hoping to present, the new Constitution to parliament for ratification by a two thirds majority, which most probably will have to be again followed in the New Year by a referendum. But of course with both the principle parties working together on this, we are confident of the two thirds majority as well as “Yes” at a referendum in the future.

Along with the new Constitution, we have also being bringing various new laws to strengthen the democratic framework. As I said the 19th Amendment which again freed all the legal mechanisms and the media, the Public Service Commission, and free media from interference from the government. In fact I won’t be there for the vote but tomorrow even the Right to Information bill, which has been something which Sri Lanka has been wanting for long time, will be presented in Parliament and passed.

FM06242016And of course the other area in which we have been concentrating is the area of reconciliation, because without reconciliation as I mentioned Sri Lanka cannot achieve the promise it has. So that is why the new government was elected on a very strong mandate for reconciliation and a mandate also gave us power to start a domestic mechanism to inquire into the various allegations of human rights violations, perhaps even war violations during the earlier period.

In fact, that is why Sri Lanka took the very bold step of co-sponsoring the resolution presented in Geneva by the United States initially. After discussions, we decided that co-sponsoring is the best way we can bring justice to those who need it in Sri Lanka.

In fact, some people like to say that, specially the extreme nationalist wings which are still very much alive and kicking in Sri Lanka, with hand in glove with one or two ghosts from the past. They like to say that we did it under International pressure. I like to say to you ladies and gentlemen, No! it was not the resolution, the decision to co-sponsor the resolution and to commit ourselves to a reconciliation process. A process which will basically take into account (that) our past was taken not because of the international community but we as a Government feel that it is the only way Sri Lanka can move forward. The only way that is come into terms with our past so that we can move forward as a united nation.

FM06242016So in order to do so, we talked about 4 possible mechanisms. The mechanism to seek the truth, the truth seeking mechanisms. And the second one was a mechanism for accountability, for justice. The third one was of course reparation and the fourth one is to ensure non-recurrence, to ensure that some of the tragedies which took place in our beautiful little island in the last so many years since independence do not ever, ever happen again.

So with that in mind, we have been working hard in the last several months, especially since the resolution was passed unanimously on the first of October last year. We have now in fact, the first of these mechanisms which we proposed, the Permanent Office for Missing Persons has now being finalized and also got unanimous approval by the Cabinet and the next step of publishing it as a government gazette was also completed two weeks ago in all three languages and the final step would be to present it in Parliament within the next month or so once the due time frames are completed. So the OMP or the Office for Missing Persons, I feel is a huge, massive step forward.

Then of course, we have also created what is called the SCRM, Secretariat for Coordinating Reconciliation Mechanisms and that is working with leading members of the civil society, conducting consultations on the other mechanisms now. Consultations with all the stakeholders, the victims of the war, members of the armed forces, wives of the missing and the different political parties etc. That process has already started.

FM06242016Meanwhile we have been working with the government of South Africa about their experiences in setting up a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Of course we aren’t guided by the South African model of the TRC because we feel that a model based on confession and forgiveness which I believe, if I am to simplify the South African process which is not as simple, but is not what Sri Lankans want. Many of them want justice. So we are working out the contours of not only the TRC but as I said what should come afterwards is the setting up of the special courts.

Of course there’s a certain degree of controversy on how it should be setup and the level of international participation. That too will be decided after the consultations are over but all I can say now is whatever we decide upon, will and must have the approval, not only ourselves but of the victims those who suffered. This is not an exercise to please ourselves. So the final contours of the architecture of the courts we are hoping to set up will be in discussion. Especially with parties like the TNA and other groups which represent the victims.

Along with that we have also taken certain steps to further kick start the process. As I said earlier, with the intention of de militarizing the North and the East immediately after coming into power, we appointed civilians, two highly respected civil servants as the Governors of the North. The demilitarizing process has started but of course not complete but we are now in the process of even giving back the land which has been taken over for military purposes over the years. In fact I know that during the course of this week another 700 acres will also be released. So far nearly 4000 acres but perhaps an equal amount of land remains to be released and that too we have told the military, that all must be released in a timeline going up to the end of 2018.

FM06242016Of course we did ratify the convention of enforced and involuntary disappearances for the first time and the enabling legislation will be presented to Cabinet, which is done by my Ministry, the moment I am back in Sri Lanka in July. Hopefully that will certainly confine the white van culture of terror we had earlier to the pages of history.

Today in Sri Lanka, two Marxist insurgencies or two JVP insurgencies and one 26 year old war later, Sri Lanka has started a new journey towards what I would like to call a new Sri Lanka. In fact, the legacy of this bitter past, I feel has united us in a collective determination to prevent, the torment of such violence from ever reoccurring in our country again. Of course when you try to wrestle with a past of this nature, you still have to deal with the ghosts of the past. As I said you still have to deal with the old mindset which sometimes are entrenched in certain sections of the bureaucracy and sometimes it’s very frustrating because it’s not happening as quickly as we would like it to happen, but all I can say is Sri Lanka does have the will, whatever the challenges are to overcome all these difficulties

And we have. In fact, again I don’t want it (to be) like the monkey praising his own tail, (to) go on about the achievements we have made but in the short period of time, we have made some remarkable achievements and we are continuing to do so. But I saw some of our friends in the international arena call what we have done in this time as ‘baby steps’ but to them I’d like to say that even though it may look like baby steps to some of you in the international community, I think if I may paraphrase Armstrong going to the moon, It’s a giant leap for Sri Lanka and we will move forward.

13515334_10157012962700133_227181738_nFrom here I go to Geneva next week where I will be making a statement on what we are doing now and also the fact that the Government is united in its determination to come to terms with what happened earlier. Again certain newspapers and social media like to say that the President has one view, the Prime Minister has another, the Foreign Minister yet another but it is not so. We are working unitedly. In fact, those of you who heard President Sirisena addressing the nation on the 4th of February during the independence day of Sri Lanka this year, he said “ It is now time for us to seize the current opportunity that is before us to implement the provisions of the Geneva resolution, not because of International pressure, but because as a nation, we must implement these provisions for the sake of restoring the dignity of our nation, our people and our military, in order for Sri Lanka to regain her due position as a strong democracy among the community of nations.” So we are moving ahead as I said with confidence and meeting the challenges head on.

But of course if democracy and reconciliation is to succeed, we feel that the third part of our pillar, which we are moving the country the pillar of development, must also succeed. The people of Sri Lanka must now feel that their pockets are fuller, that they are better off economically, their standards of living has risen because of our open policy to the world and our policy of coming to terms with our past. That is why I am here and this morning I had the opportunity, (which) the ambassador arranged, a meeting where we addressed many investors who are willing to come to Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka is a middle income country. We are no longer eligible for handouts or aid or grants. We must look after ourselves and in order to do so Foreign Direct Investment is of paramount importance in order to kick start the economy. Sri Lanka I would say has huge potential. In fact, Sri Lanka has been known as a paradise for tourists for a long, long time but now we also want to make Sri Lanka also a paradise for foreign investors. In fact we feel that it is strategically placed today. As the East or Asia grows in importance, we could be a strategic gateway to the Indian Ocean and to the Indian subcontinent.

We have, even though our own market is relatively small. 21 million is our population, but we have Free Trade Agreements with both India and Pakistan. We are now in the process of negotiating a Free Trade Agreement with China and Japan which I’m sure as I said earlier makes it an exciting gateway for investors from this part of the world to come there.

13487459_10157012962400133_1488151225_nWe have been getting a lot of support from the West since the new government came into power. There’s a tsunami of goodwill I’d like say but that good will must now transform itself into practical day to day realities and the best way you can help as I said is by choosing Sri Lanka as your destination of choice for investment for trade.

We have ended the previous government’s policy of self isolation and confrontation. Today we have embraced the world. We were totally dependent on China and China along for nearly 10 years but I’m happy to say that we have restored our relations with our neighbor and friend, India to a level of excellence after many years.

We have restored our ties with the European Union. In fact just last week the fishing ban imposed on Sri Lanka was restored unanimously in the European Parliament and yesterday we handed in our official application to have the GSP + concession restored. Earlier it was again taken away because we did not or we had violated many of the criteria, which was required to get it initially but now are ready to get it back again and offer and restore the thousands and thousands of jobs lost as a result of that. With the United States, we have raised our relations to a level we have never seen before and from this year we started the US – Sri Lanka partnership dialogue in Washington in February with Secretary John Kerry. With Japan, President Sirisena was the first leader to be invited to the Outreach Summit ever in its history and all the G7 countries have promised to help us.

13480037_10157012962350133_2014723040_nIf you want to know what kind of diplomacy Sri Lanka is following, I would like to go back to something Jawaharlal Nehru said in 1947. He said “Whatever policy you may lay down, the art of conducting foreign affairs of a country lies finding out what is most advantageous to the country.” So I think today it may sound very selfish but we aren’t ideologically driven but self interest is I would say is the driving force in our foreign policy. Because we want to ensure that the people of Sri Lanka, even at this late stage, get the future that they truly deserve.

Finally thank you again, thank you very much for giving me this opportunity to go through some of the developments and I would like to invite all of you, (as) today there are no restrictions in visiting any part of the country.

All the Norwegian people here, I’m sure many of you have come here because you have an interest in the country and you should come back and see for yourselves. Of course for the Sri Lankans who are here, the Sri Lanka Diaspora who are here also, we would like to invite you to please come back and see for yourself and become partners in the forward march of your country.

13.00 PM  – Meeting with Norwegian Prime Minister Ms Erna Solberg

Sri Lanka’s Foreign Affairs Minister Mangala Samaraweera paid a courtesy call on Prime Minister of Norway Erna Solberg on Tuesday, (21 June)

Sri Lanka’s Foreign Affairs Minister Mangala Samaraweera paid a courtesy call on Prime Minister of Norway Erna Solberg on Tuesday, (21 June), the Sri Lankan Foreign Affairs Ministry said.

Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg welcomed the progress in Sri Lanka in reconciliation, strengthening democracy, good governance and economic development policy, a media release issued by the Foreign Affairs Ministry said Thursday.

Prime Minister Solberg expressing her views during the meeting with Minister Samaraweera acknowledged the valuable contribution to Norway by the Sri Lankan community in the country and commended the Sri Lankan government’s efforts made to actively engage the Sri Lankan diaspora including in Norway in development efforts.

The Foreign Minister will hold bilateral talks with his counterpart, Foreign Minister Børge Brende today.

FM06222016
He will also deliver the opening address at the first plenary session of Sixth World Congress Against the Death Penalty on “Progress and set-backs in Asia: lessons to be learnt”.

This year’s Congress will focus on National institutions for human rights, and Progress and setbacks in Asia.

The Congress will attract 1300 participants from over 80 countries, including Mr.Tore Hattrem, State Secretary at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs , U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein , Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr Børge Brende , Sri Lankan Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mangala Samaraweera , Hon.Wijedasa Rajapaksha, Sri Lankan Minister of Justice and Labour Relations , ministers around the world, parliamentarians, academics, lawyers, and members of civil society.

14.30 PM  – Guided tour at Munch Museum.

17.00 PM – Opening of the 6th World Congress Against the Death Penalty.

13512222_10209934949799798_2408048860343464009_n

13494797_10209934951799848_7709895338270720549_n

13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_n

Foreign Minister Brende’s opening speech at World Congress against the death penalty in Oslo

Kenya to state position on death penalty at Oslo

Pope calls for world ‘free of the death penalty’

 

Oslo pushes for abolishing death penalty in Lebanon

 

22.06.2016

9.00 AM – Opening speech at The 6th World Congress Against the Death Penalty

Opening speech by Mangala Samaraweera, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sri Lanka in Norway at the 6th World Congress against the Death Penalty.

Full text of Minister Samaraweera’s Speech..6WCDP-FM

Despite its widespread use, for millennia the death penalty has caused lingering societal discomfort and unease. Fairly early on in history many enlightened leaders have found the death penalty degrading of human dignity. For example, in ancient Sri Lanka a number of kings – influenced by the Buddha’s teaching – abolished the death penalty. In fact, for much of the first, third, fourth and thirteenth centuries the death penalty was not employed in Sri Lanka.

This may help explain why for nearly a century there has been a consensus among the legislative leadership of my country that the death penalty ought to be abolished. This consensus was based both on moral grounds and on the ineffectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent. As far back as 1928 the Ceylon Legislative Assembly voted 19 to seven in favour of a resolution on abolishing the death penalty, which was moved by D.S. Senanayake, who became the first Prime Minister of Ceylon and founder of the United National Party – one of Sri Lanka’s two main political parties. In the end, abolition was only thwarted by the high-handedness of the colonial authorities of the time.

FM-WCDP-OpeningAddressIn 1956, a few years after Independence, my father, then the Parliamentary Secretary for Justice, proposed a bill ending capital punishment which was supported by S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike, the Prime Minister and founder of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party – our island’s other main political party. The bill passed but tragically the death penalty was resumed a few years later as result of Mr. Bandaranaike’s assassination until a de facto moratorium was instituted in 1976.

I daresay that even today the vast majority of my colleagues in Parliament find the death penalty morally repugnant and are aware of its inefficaciousness. However, as they fear the knee-jerk reaction of uninformed public opinion they have proved unwilling to take the courageous step the Government took in 1956. I believe that this fear is true not only of legislators and jurors in Sri Lanka, but of other Asian states where the death penalty is yet to be abolished.

Therefore, the common challenge facing us today is persuading our respective people and perhaps even more importantly having the collective courage to lead by acting.

FM06232016

However, changing public opinion is a time consuming and resource intensive process. And the evidence points out that, despite persistent advocacy, public opinion on the subject of the death penalty is relatively static in many countries. Therefore, overcoming this key challenge requires an act of political courage. Studies have shown that when people are asked to sit in mock judgement, rather than simply answer survey questions, no more than 30 percent of people support the death penalty, even in the most serious of cases. In France, although public opinion 1466616163_was overwhelmingly in favour of the death penalty in 1981, its abolition decided by the then President of France led to a change of public opinion. It is clear that the debate resulting from the process of abolishing the death penalty and the lack of change in crime rates after the death penalty has been abolished allays the public’s fears. As a result there have been very, very few cases of reversal once the death penalty is abolished.

Momentum is slowly building in Asia, where more executions take place than the rest of the world combined. In South-East Asia the number of executions has declined significantly, in South Asia there have been both short and long de facto moratoria. In 2007, twenty four Asian states voted against the UN Resolution on a Death Penalty Moratorium, in 2014 that number had declined to 18. There is further good news: Sri Lanka’s Minister of Justice, who will also be addressing a session at this Conference, has informed Parliament that Sri Lanka will return to its traditional position of voting in favour of this resolution as it did in 2007, 2008 and 2010 and, more importantly, continuing the four decades long de facto moratorium.

Allow me to conclude by saying that abolishing the death penalty requires persuasion and resolve but above all it requires leadership – the collective leadership of legislators, activists, editors, academics and jurors. As momentum towards critical mass develops, I am confident that the coming years will see the death of the death penalty in our region.

11.00 AM – Guided tour at the Opera House

11.00 AM – Departure from TBD for the (Storting ) Norwegian Parliament.

Minister Samaraweera welcomed with appreciation the offer by Norway to provide assistance on fish stock assessment and conduct an oceanographic survey in collaboration with National Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency (NARA). A request was also made from Norway for assistance in developing a National Policy framework for the Fisheries sector.

At the meeting with the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defense chaired by Anniken Huitfeldt of the Labor Party, responding to questions raised, Minister Samaraweera briefed the Members of the Committee on the progress and achievements of the Government as well as plans on Constitutional reform, reconciliation and development.

The Minister also briefed the Members of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence on the progress and achievements of the Government as well as plans on Constitutional reform, reconciliation and development.

Emphasising the need for greater interaction and engagement between the legislatures of the two countries, the Minister invited the Members of the Standing Committee to visit Sri Lanka at a mutually convenient time.

MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

12.45 PM – Meeting with the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence at Norwegian Parliament.

Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 12.37.14Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 12.37.143.00 PM – Meeting with the so call “diaspora Venu at Hotel Continental the meeting is not open to the media and real Sri Lankan Diaspora.

The meeting with Foreign Minister Samaraweera is for “invited only for loyal to former President Mahinda Rjapaksa” as is a closed meeting.

Around 14 000 Sri Lankans lives in Norway also 45 big diaspora Orgs working on Sri Lanka but none of them are invited including TNA or UNP supporters.

10

Embassy of Sri Lanka in Oslo arranged meeting with one Bus driver, one Tamil restaurant cook, two Tamil toilet cleaner, one Ticket Seller, Muslim Criminal street gang members, JVP Members and LTTE’s KP Group, POLTE linked Prof, as a closed meeting.

Renuka and Mohan with mangala,

Embassy of Sri Lanka in Oslo, Systematically prevented real Sri Lankan TNA, UNP, Upcountry Tamils, Second- and third-generation immigrants diaspora meeting with Foreign Minister to block his expanding political network with Norway.

renuka

17.30 PM – Meeting with Norwegian Foreign Minister Mr.Borge Brende at Government Guest House. (Moved to Morning)

Screen Shot 2016-06-22 at 14.31.45

Norway supports IDPs in Sri Lanka – At a special meeting with Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera, Foreign Minister Brende said that Norway gives eight million kroner to IDPs in the Jaffna Peninsula and the eastern province of Sri Lanka.

– The Government of Sri Lanka has taken several important steps in efforts to promote reconciliation. In the meeting we discussed, including how Norway can assist with reconstruction in the Tamil areas in the north and east and the way forward for business cooperation between Norway and Sri Lanka, says Brende.

bb_samaraweera

I’m glad for the positive signals related to the abolition of the death penalty as Foreign Minister Samaraweera has made here in Oslo, and I hope that they will use the constitutional process to formally abolish the death penalty, says Brende.

18.00 PM – Dinner Hosted by Mr.Tore Hattrem, State Secretary at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs

hqdefault

23.06.2016

10.00 AM – Meeting with Mr.Tore Hattrem, State Secretary at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs at TBD

11.00  AM – Meeting with DNV GL, Loyd.

13.00 PM – Lunch with CEO DNV GL

17.00 PM Depature

(N.Sethurupan)

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

Norway has ratified the Paris Agreement

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

parisavtalen_vidarhelgesen-signerer

Norway has ratified the international Paris Agreement on climate change. We are amongst the first States that formally join the Paris Agreement.

Norway’s instrument of ratification is deposited securely in the UN headquarters in New York.

– We are aiming for joint fulfilment with the EU in order to achieve Norway’s climate goals for 2030. This will provide us with solid, binding and predictable European legislation to rely on in achieving our goal of 40 percent reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in 2030 compared with the 1990 level, says Vidar Helgesen, the Norwegian Minister of Climate and Environment.

Prevent climate change

The Paris Agreement strengthens global cooperation and States’ efforts in preventing dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. The agreement enters into force once at least 55 States – which together represent at least 55 percent of the total global greenhouse gas emissions – have deposited their instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval.

– Norway is pushing for other States to formally join the Paris Agreement as quickly as possible, in order for it to enter into force. An early entry into force will ensure that States can focus on implementing the agreement’s commitments, says Vidar Helgesen, the Norwegian Minister of Climate and Environment.
Large States will ratify later this year

The US, China and Brazil are amongst large emitters that are expected to ratify, accede or in other ways join the Paris Agreement this year. In addition, other States have also indicated that they will formally join the agreement. All together, these countries make up for a large part of the global greenhouse gas emissions.

– Despite being a small country, Norway is undertaking great efforts to reduce dangerous anthropogenic greenhouse gases. In particular, our efforts related to Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative, REDD+, receives a lot of attention internationally, says Vidar Helgesen.

The Paris Agreement

Adopted 12 December 2015. The objective is to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 degrees Celsius and pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

The agreement also aims to increase the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and make finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate resilience.

The agreement enters into force once at least 55 countries – which together represent at least 55 percent of the total global greenhouse gas emissions – have formally joined the agreement.

As of 21 June 2016, there are 177 signatories to the Paris Agreement. Of these, 18 States have now also deposited their instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval, accounting for 0.18 percent of the total global greenhouse gas emissions.

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Killing

Pope calls for world ‘free of the death penalty’

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

13512222_10209934949799798_2408048860343464009_nIn a message to a world conference against the death penalty in Oslo, Norway, Pope Francis says capital punishment “contradicts God’s plan for individuals and society, and his merciful justice” and says that growing opposition to the practice is a “sign of hope.”

Pope Francis called for a world “free of the death penalty” in a video message supporting the sixth World Congress against capital punishment, currently being held in Oslo, Norway. He said the practice brings no justice to victims, but instead fosters vengeance.

13509039_10209934949079780_8121724270681360440_n“Indeed, nowadays the death penalty is unacceptable, however grave the crime of the convicted person,” Francis said on the message released on Tuesday.

“It is an offence to the inviolability of life and to the dignity of the human person; it likewise contradicts God’s plan for individuals and society, and his merciful justice,” the pope said.

The pontiff defined growing opposition to the practice as a “sign of hope,” saying that it’s not “consonant with any purpose of punishment.”

13508862_10209934956839974_762267100253806018_n“It does not render justice to victims, but instead fosters vengeance,” Francis said in Spanish.

The congress is being organized by the French ONG Ensemble contre la peine de mort and the World Coalition Against Death Penalty. It began on Tuesday, and will continue until June 23.

According to the World Coalition’s website, the three-day gathering unites members of civil society, politicians, and legal experts to elaborate abolitionist strategies for the years to come at the national, regional, and international levels

13507040_10209934956799973_4543674041801265100_nIt also aims to send a message to the world: “Universal abolition is essential for a world where progress and justice must prevail.”

The previous congress was held in Madrid in 2013.

In the video, Francis also said that the commandment “Thou shalt not kill” applies both for the innocent and to the guilty, adding that the Jubilee of Mercy is an occasion for promoting more evolved forms of respect for the life of each person.

Earlier in the year, he had proposed Catholic government leaders “make a courageous and exemplary gesture by seeking a moratorium on executions during this Holy Year of Mercy.”

13494797_10209934951799848_7709895338270720549_nAs he has done several times before, the Argentine pontiff also called for an improvement of prison conditions so that they respect the dignity of does incarcerated. Rendering justice, he said, “does not mean seeking punishment for its own sake, but ensuring that the basic purpose of all punishment is the rehabilitation of the offender.”
According to Francis, the system of penal justice must allow the guilty party’s reinsertion in society, because “There’s no fitting punishment without hope!”

“Punishment for its own sake, without room for hope, is a form of torture, not of punishment,” he said.
Over 1,300 participants from 80 countries are participating in the congress, including the United Nations High 13466413_10209934956199958_8526856579539638689_nCommissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, and the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Thorbjørn Jagland.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that the traditional teaching of the Church “does not exclude” recourse to the death penalty when it is “the only practicable way to defend the lives of human beings effectively against the aggressor.” It adds, however, that today such cases are “very rare, if not practically non-existent.”

In 2015, at least 1,634 prisoners were executed across 25 countries, and 1,998 people were sentenced to death across 61 countries, a record for the past 25 years. In that landscape, the advance of the abolitionist trend still encounters great resistance across Asia and the Arab world.

13450095_10209934955159932_6081808617656917899_nStatistics show that Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran were responsible for 89 percent of the recorded executions last year, but these figures don’t take into account China, where information in this issue is classified as a state secret.
Of the 195 independent states recognized by the United Nations, 103 have abolished capital punishment for all crimes, six retain it for exceptional circumstances, such as crimes committed in wartime, 49 retain it but haven’t applied it in at least ten years, and 37 retain it both in law and practice.

The United States is one of two countries in the Americas where the death penalty is still practiced, with the other being St. Kitts & Nevis, a dual-island nation situated between the Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea.

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Africa and Norway

Kenya delegation in Oslo on meeting to end death penalty

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

width_650.height_300.mode_FillAreaWithCrop.pos_Default.color_WhiteA Kenyan delegation is in Oslo, Norway to attend the 6th World Congress against the Death Penalty.

The three day Congress, starting Tuesday, seeks to assist countries develop new strategies for universal abolition of the death penalty.

This year’s theme is Abolition Now! The Kenyan delegation, under the leadership of the Power of Mercy Advisory Committee (POMAC), is expected to present the Kenya position on the ongoing global debate on the death penalty.

POMAC is mandated to advice the President of the Republic of Kenya on the exercise of the power of mercy. It is a nine member Committee that includes the Attorney General, who is the Committee’s chairperson, the Cabinet Secretary responsible for Correctional Services, and seven professional part time members.

Michael Kagika the POMAC secretary and Gerald Wandera a director with the National Crime Research Centre (NCRC) are leading the Kenyan delegation into the meeting.

The annual event, now in its 5th year running, brings together Government Representatives, Members of the Civil Society, Political Representatives, Lawyers, media, and other key stakeholders keen on raising awareness on the death penalty.

The Power of Mercy Advisory Committee was established through Article 133 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.

Since its inception on Nov 1, 2011, 4,500 death row inmates have so far benefitted from the Power of Mercy after having their death sentences commuted into life. In addition to the constitutional mandate, The Power of Mercy Act, 2011 assigns the Committee with functions that support its work including to undertake or commission research and to collect data on matters relating to the power of mercy.

Currently, POMAC in partnership with the National Crime Research Centre is conducting a National Public debate to solicit views from the general public, on the subject of capital offences and capital punishment.

The objective of the debate is to provide an open dialogue on what Kenyans want in regard to the handling of capital offenders and the management of capital offences.

(standardmedia)

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Russia and Norway

Norwegian – Russian cooperation in the north

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

hattrem-udState Secretary Tore Hattrem’s speech at the 200th anniversary of the Office of the Auditor General of Norway.
Ladies and gentlemen,

It is a great pleasure for me to be here today for the 200th anniversary of the Office of the Auditor General of Norway.

The Office of the Auditor General is an important institution.

With its strong focus on transparency and accountability in public spending and performance, it plays an important role in building trust and contributes to good governance and democracy.

It is therefore very positive that the Office of the Auditor General cooperates with its sister organisations in other countries, many of which, I am aware, are present here today.

Conducting joint audits is one of the ways in which the Auditor General of Norway has cooperated, very successfully I must say, with its partners in the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation.

Over the last ten years, my ministry has been among the subjects of three such audits: on nuclear safety, on joint fisheries management, and on the Arctic Council.

These topics are all of great importance to both Norway and Russia. They reflect our shared commitment to sustainable, knowledge-based management of Arctic resources, based on the principles of international cooperation.

And these are the topics I am here to talk to you about today: the Arctic and our cooperation with Russia, with particular focus on the practical value of the joint audits of nuclear safety, fisheries management and the Arctic Council.

Let me start with a few words about why the Arctic is Norway’s most important foreign policy priority.
The Arctic – Norway’s most important foreign policy priority

We know that the Arctic is a region abundant with resources such as energy, minerals and fish. At the same time, the Arctic is a highly vulnerable natural environment, where the impacts of climate change can be clearly observed.

Climate change represents a challenge for us all, but it is also opening up new opportunities for economic activity in the Arctic. The potential for shorter trading routes across Arctic waters is currently being explored, as well as new possibilities for resource extraction.

To seize these opportunities while ensuring sustainable development of the Arctic, we need increased knowledge, responsible management and international cooperation.

Norway i cooperating closely with other countries and various organisations on how to ensure sustainable development of the region.

Today, the Arctic stands out as a region of cooperation and stability.

The overall goal of Norway’s Arctic policy is to ensure that it stays that way.

Norwegian–Russian cooperation in the Arctic – bilateral and regional cooperation

Norway has a long history of constructive neighbourly cooperation with Russia in the north.As early as 1974, we established the Joint Norwegian–Russian Fisheries Commission together with our Russian partners.

During the 1990s, our region saw the start of new forms of cooperation, such as the Council of the Baltic Sea States in 1992, the Barents Euro-Arctic Council in 1993, the Arctic Council in 1996 and the EU Northern Dimension in 1997.

All these structures have built confidence and enhanced integration in our region.

Significantly, Russia has been – and continues to be – an important partner in all these forums.

Results – examples of successful Norwegian–Russian cooperation in fields of common interest
Norway and Russia have identified a broad range of areas where cooperation is mutually beneficial and yields results.

The most important areas at the government level are: management of shared fish stocks, environmental protection, nuclear safety, maritime safety including search and rescue at sea, as well as Coast Guard and Border Guard activities more broadly.

This, along with the joint efforts of civil society organizations and the informal people-to-people contact in the north, have contributed much to facilitating and simplifying cross-border cooperation and strengthening the bonds between our two countries.

Pressing challenges in the Arctic, such as environmental degradation and sustainable management of shared resources, can only be solved in cooperation with Russia and the other Arctic states.

I am therefore very pleased that the Office of the Auditor General of Norway and their Russian partners decided to jointly audit key areas where our countries cooperate closely, namely nuclear safety, fisheries management and the

Arctic Council.

They are all vital for a sustainable future in the Arctic.

Let me say a few words about each of these areas.

Nuclear safety

Nuclear safety cooperation with Russia is a priority for this Government, and our activities are based on the Government’s nuclear action plan.

And it is a success story – as was confirmed in September last year when we established common procedures for notification of nuclear incidents.

Today we have transparency in nuclear issues and safety assessments that would have been unthinkable 20 years ago.

Trust and confidence have been built through this work, with ripple effects that go far beyond reducing nuclear challenges. Not least, the Norwegian–Russian collaboration has produced concrete and measurable results that have made life safer for the people on both sides of the border for the last 20 years. During this period, we have allocated 230 million Euros to projects in northwestern Russia, which have produced very good results.

Together we have reduced the threats from one of the world’s largest stocks of poorly secured fissile material. These efforts are ongoing, and in 2017 we will start removing spent fuels from 100 nuclear submarine reactors in Andreeva Bay, the former nuclear submarine service base for Russia’s Northern Fleet.

We have dismantled five nuclear submarines and have removed and secured highly radioactive sources from 251 lighthouses. We have also upgraded the Kola and Leningrad nuclear power plants. As a result, there has been a significant reduction in the number of safety related incidents at these plants in recent years.

Another area of crucial importance is investigating sunken nuclear submarines. We have carried out successful expeditions to sunken nuclear submarines in Arctic waters in 2012 and 2014. The preliminary conclusion was that radioactive contamination in the area was low.

We were glad that the joint audit reports on nuclear cooperation confirmed the effectiveness of these efforts and showed that our cooperation has contributed to a safer world.

The insights we gain and the expertise we develop through this work put us in a much better position to handle any undesirable situations that might arise.

This is not least due to the good contact we have developed with the Russian authorities.

We will keep up the good work in the time ahead.

Joint fisheries management

Joint fisheries management is another area where Norway and Russia have cooperated closely with excellent results. We have achieved sustainable and efficient management of a number of shared fish stocks in the Barents Sea.

Back in 1989, the Northeast Arctic cod stock was at an all-time low.

Today, we enjoy the world’s most abundant cod stock in the Barents Sea. This year, for example, we shared a quota of 894 000 tonnes.

This development would not have been possible without the close and constructive fisheries cooperation with Russia that we have developed over the years.

It is also positive to see how our cooperation in the Joint Norwegian–Russian Fisheries Commission is progressing and expanding, for example on a new species, the snow crab.

Robust mechanisms for cooperation are crucial if we are to harvest our shared marine resources in the Arctic in a sustainable manner.

Our joint fisheries management stands out as a prime example of the benefits of cross boarder cooperation on sustainable management.

Arctic Council

As we are celebrating the 200th anniversary of the Office of the Auditor General of Norway, it is worth noting that this year also marks the 20th anniversary of the Arctic Council.

The Arctic Council is the most important forum for multilateral cooperation in the Arctic. It plays a vital role in preserving the Arctic as a region of peaceful collaboration.

It is also a forum where Norway and Russia collaborate closely on a wide variety of topics.

Moreover, the work of the Arctic Council is producing tangible results.

Its comprehensive reports and studies of climate change in the Arctic have highlighted the speed at which climate change is taking place.

This has had substantial impact on international climate negotiations.

Last month, for example, the Executive Secretary of the UN’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, Ms Christiana Figueres, noted the significant contribution of the Arctic Council to the science of climate change, stating that the historical Paris agreement of December last year would not have been possible without the Council’s contribution.

The joint audits

The joint audits of issues that reach well into our respective national administrations is a testimony to the extent and depth of Norwegian–Russian cooperation.

On a general level, I think it must be appropriate to say that the audits have contributed to increased transparency and accountability.

The joint audits have also been a very useful tool for the whole government administration. We have gained greater awareness of how we are working with nuclear safety, joint fisheries management and the Arctic Council.

The joint audits have forced us – in a systematic and positive way I should add – to see our work through the eyes of others. This is always a useful exercise. And doing so with the help of an institution that has 200 years of experience is particularly valuable.

I think it is right to say that the Norwegian Government is now working more systematically in its preparations for and the follow up of efforts under the Arctic Council.

The joint audit of the Arctic Council has also increased awareness among the Arctic states of the Arctic Council’s structure.

As a result, the need for a more strategic approach is now being discussed in the Arctic Council. The Arctic states have also initiated a discussion about whether the current set-up of the Council will enable us to meet the priorities of the Arctic states in the best possible way in the future. All these discussions are inspired by issues raised by the audit institutions.

Conclusion

Before concluding, let me just reiterate that the Arctic is a region of stability and predictability, and that it is the Government’s overall goal that it remains this way.

The work of the Auditor Generals has improved our cooperation on nuclear safety, fisheries management and the Arctic Council in many practical ways.

The joint audits by our respective Auditor Generals are also an important contribution to the ongoing peaceful cooperation between Norway and Russia in the north.

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

Norway reveals P-3 replacement plans

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

yourfileNorway has revealed a proposed defence spending plan that allows for the acquisition of a new maritime patrol aircraft (MPA) to replace its six-strong fleet of Lockheed P-3 Orions.

Presented to parliament on 17 June, the white paper recommends a gradual rise in the nation’s defence budget over the 2017-2020 period to result in a NKr7.2 billion ($870 million) increase over 2016 levels.

A “substantial increase” of NKr165 billion is planned over the next 20 years to support a number of acquisitions, and is designed to counter previous under-investment and Russia’s rising threat.

“Years of underfunding, combined with a high operational tempo have also created shortfalls in training, maintenance and upgrades that are no longer acceptable in the face of emerging challenges,” the paper says. These must be addressed in order to improve short-term capabilities, and to prepare Norway for any future investments and challenges, it says.

“Norway will seek to replace its maritime patrol aircraft after the ageing P-3C Orion is withdrawn from service,” the ministry of defence says. “A credible defence posture relies heavily on situational awareness, intelligence and an ability to conduct crisis management.

“Maritime patrol aircraft are essential in this context, and the government will introduce a plan for the replacement of the P-3 Orion to the Norwegian parliament in due course.”

Potential candidates include the Boeing P-8 Poseidon, or modified transport aircraft including the Lockheed Martin C-130J Sea Hercules and Airbus Defence & Space C295.

In addition, Oslo has reiterated its commitment to a 52-unit acquisition of the Lockheed F-35.

“One such capability [being acquired] is the F-35 Lightning II with a weapons suite that includes the Norwegian-developed Joint Strike Missile,” the paper says. “The acquisition of up to 52 aircraft with all the necessary equipment and infrastructure will be an essential contribution to Norwegian and allied security.”

In order to make savings, a number of military facilities will be closed, including Andøya air station, home to the Royal Norwegian Air Force’s 333 Sqn, which operates the P-3s.

The new MPA will therefore be co-located with the F-35s at Evenes air station, the paper says.

“While every new generation of equipment and technology allows us to do much more than the previous one, that added capability comes at a price,” Ine Eriksen Søreide, Norwegian defence minister adds. “We can no longer accommodate that trend simply by buying fewer platforms or by internal efficiency savings.

“We cannot have security without sustainability. This plan aims to provide both.”

Following this initial phase, an additional funding increase is planned for 2021-2026, the defence ministry says, which will ensure the implementation of new investment programmes.

(flightglobal)

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

Norway And The US Sign An Agreement In Violation Of The Rio Declaration

by Nadarajah Sethurupan June 21, 2016
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

US-AirwaysThe United States and Norway this week announced (1) they would offset the greenhouse gas emissions from their aviation industry by buying voluntary emission reduction credits from reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in tropical forests. The plan would violate the Rio Declaration in two ways.

The Declaration says that States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their own environmental and developmental policies, and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction.

By continuing to emit greenhouse gases from their aviation industry, Norway and the US are damaging the environment of other countries that are suffering temperature rise due to climate change. This is the first violation. And by planning to buy voluntary emission reduction credits from developing countries they are depriving those countries of the sovereign right to exploit their own resources, and are violating the Declaration a second time.

The joint statement by the Governments of Norway and the United States claims the plan is being made under the Paris Agreement. In fact neither Norway nor the US have signed yet. Only 17 out of 197 countries have signed that Agreement so far, and the emissions of those who have ratified cover just 0.4% of the total global greenhouse gas emissions.

Still, this does not stop the US and Norway claiming “Together, our efforts aim to help securing the multiple benefits forests provide for local communities, and for humanity as a whole.”

This humanity-as-a-whole talk is of course precisely what the Rio Declaration and the three Rio treaties were designed to outlaw. In international law there is no humanity as a whole, just like there is no global benefit. But western countries have not taken a blind scrap of notice.

Norway and the United States call their plan a form of support to developing countries to adopt a Global Market Based Measure that will in turn enable carbon neutral growth in international aviation from 2020.

Do these countries really believe that such a measure for aviation could catalyze incentives for reduced deforestation through demand for large-scale forest emissions reductions? Currently one tonne of carbon dioxide is trading at around 50 cents. They themselves have their doubts. They admit that their proposed International Civil Aviation Organisation’s emissions unit program will have to reflect relevant developments in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Haha. Could those developments possibly involve a refusal of the Group of 77 and China countries to participate in this farce?

Nonetheless, Norway and the US consider it worth a try.

Everyone and their uncle know by now that “offsetting” is a hilarious non-thing. It is a no-thing. Someone pollutes, and then claims they are paying for someone else to soak up the pollution. But if that person who is polluting were to stop polluting there would be twice as much benefit. There would be the avoided pollution in the western country on the western country’s tab and the sequestration in the developing country for the developing country’s benefit done by that country at their own cost and for their own advantage. So emission offsetting in the absence of legally binding emission reductions for both parties is no offset at all, rather there is a halving of the potential climate mitigation. If the Clean Development Mechanism experience is anything to go by, the developed countries will not be setting tough legally binding caps on greenhouse gas emissions under the Paris Agreement. Therefore there is an abundance of emissions they will permitting themselves to make, and there will not be an incentive to pay high prices for verified emissions reductions. Thus even on their own terms their plan to reduce emissions and enhance sinks by stealing other people’s resources will be ineffective because the prices will be too low to attract even the most corrupt dictator.

They further state that “forests may contribute up to one-third of the pre-2030 mitigation.” Yes, but for whom? There is no such thing as “global climate neutrality in the second half of this century”. The whole purpose of the Rio Summit was to ensure that States use their own resources for their own benefit and also avoid damage to other States.

Finally Norway and the US claim the offset arrangement will allow the western public to keep flying in order to contribute to a world where “economic growth and food security benefit from, and support, efforts to conserve and restore natural forests and reduce land-based emissions.” What a ridiculous elision of economic growth and food security into a single unity! The sentence is completely meaningless. Like much of environmental talk by western governments the phrase is a string of words held together by commas and a full stop.

Equally no one should hold their breath for these countries to enhance sinks on their own lands. The whole emphasis is on ”helping partners attract additional support for their efforts, including from the private sector.” It’s always used to be the developing countries that had to clean up the shit of western civilization. But not anymore. And now those western countries are imploding precisely because no one is giving them our resources anymore, and they sure cannot manage without them.

Anandi Sharan is an environmental historian and blogger based in Bangalore. She specialises in the global environmental treaties, especially the conventions on climate change and biodiversity. She currently serves as a Board member of the CBD Alliance, a global civil society platform. She can be contacted at sharan.anandi@gmail.com
References:

(1) http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2016/06/258502.htm

June 21, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Norwegian Nobel Prize 2024

101207 The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2024 to Japan’s Hiroshima bomb survivor group Nihon Hidankyo.

Special Interest

  • Africa and Norway
  • Asia and Norway
  • Asylum
  • China and Norway
  • Corruption in Norway
  • Crimes
  • Defence
  • Diplomatic relations
  • Economics
  • Environment
  • Farming
  • Killing
  • Media Freedom
  • Middle East and Norway
  • NATO and Norway
  • Nobel Peace Prize
  • Norwegian Aid
  • Norwegian American
  • Oil & Gas
  • Peace Talks
  • Politics
  • Racism in Norway
  • Religion
  • Russia and Norway
  • Royal House
  • Science
  • Sex scandal
  • Sports
  • Spy War
  • Srilanka and Norway
  • Svalbard
  • Terrorist
  • Taiwan and Norway
  • Video clips

Follow Us

Recent Posts

  • Armenia, Norway hold political consultations in Oslo

    March 10, 2026
  • Police release images of suspect in U.S. embassy attack in Oslo

    March 10, 2026
  • Explosion reported outside US embassy in Oslo, police say

    March 8, 2026
  • Armenian envoy discusses cooperation with Norway

    March 6, 2026
  • Mongolia and Norway discuss issues of cooperation

    March 6, 2026
  • Norwegian FM: Israeli strike on Iran does not comply with international law

    February 28, 2026

Social Feed

Social Feed

Editors’ Picks

Norway opens market for Sri Lankan fish exports...

May 13, 2016

Sri Lanka – Nordic Business Council holds discussions...

May 15, 2016

Good governance to Sri Lanka

May 15, 2016

Shock and Joy in Sri Lanka – Erik...

May 15, 2016

Sri Lanka-Norway plenty of new opportunities for business–...

May 15, 2016

NORWAY NEWS is an online news site, written in English, dedicated to Norwegian affairs at home and abroad. Norway News.com is published online. It is a daily online newspaper in existence since May, 2003. The site is run by an Independent Journalist.

Facebook Twitter Youtube

Useful Links

    • Work With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Collaboration
    • Data Collection
    • Workplace
    • Adverstising
    • Privacy Policy
    • International Collab
    • Feedback
    • Terms of Use
    • About Our Ads
    • Help & Support
    • Entertainment
    • News Covering
    • Technology
    • Trending Now

Politics

Syrian, Norway to boost cooperation on mine clearance
Erna to step down as Conservative Party leader in 2026
Norwegian Labour Party on re-election win

Latest Articles

Armenia, Norway hold political consultations in Oslo
Police release images of suspect in U.S. embassy attack in Oslo
Explosion reported outside US embassy in Oslo, police say
Armenian envoy discusses cooperation with Norway

Norway News 2025 . All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News

  • Home
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us

Editor’s Picks

  • UN concern over Sri Lanka’s cases of enforced disappearances

    October 8, 2025
  • UN Human Rights Council Resolution on Sri Lanka’s Path to Reconciliation

    October 7, 2025
  • International should support Sri Lanka: Solheim

    October 4, 2024
  • Norwegian Meets Sri Lankan’s Challenges

    May 3, 2024
  • Norwegian Ambassador meets JVP in Sri Lanka

    May 2, 2024
  • “The man who didn’t run away” – Eric Solheim

    April 30, 2024

Newsletter

@2025 - All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News