NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Monday, November 10, 2025
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Copyright 2025- All Right Reserved Norway News
Racism in Norway

A relentless quest to find biological parents

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 22, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

This is the story of Priyangika Samanthie who is originally a Sri Lankan but was adopted by a Norwegian couple and was taken to Oslo. She helps individuals get reunited with their biological parents who were made victims of a sinister ‘adoption lobby’ running in Sri Lanka. And, her own story of reuniting with her biological mother is worth a read.

Priyangika was three when she stumbled upon the fact that she was an adopted child. When asked about how she got to know the reality, she revealed, “Before I answer this, I would like to tell you that some of the articles that are online are misleading; some of the information is not correct. I tried to make them change it but it is poor journalism. So, when I was three, I got to know about my adoption because I started having questions when my family and I went to the stores or anywhere else. I could tell that everyone has a relationship with their biological parents because they looked alike. And, I could sense that something was odd about our situation. And it got me thinking after which my adoptive parents started speaking to me about I having a second mom; which they did from an early age.”

She continued, “They always used to talk about me having three parents because they knew only about my biological mother and not my father. I specifically remember one instance when we went to the store, and I was lost because I went away from my adoptive mother. Then the cashier came over to me and asked me whether I needed some help. I had then asked her to help me find my mother. But after she took me back to my adoptive mother, I had started asking for my real mother. And, I had stated that I felt like I had been kidnapped. I used to shout on the streets saying that my adoptive parents stole me and this was something I used to say all through the years I grew up in. And I felt I was not supposed to be in Norway and that I wanted to go back home.”

Priyangika continued to narrate her tale, “We found mom in 2013, and then I had gone to Sri Lanka on Independence Day in 2014. But I had been searching for her since I was seven. So, I searched for over 12 years before I could meet her. The adoption law in Europe is that the adoptive parents are not allowed to assist the adoptees to reunite with their biological parents. And hence the adoptees have to find their families on their own. They can only give the adoptees the documents from the time they were adopted. But they may not reveal any kind of information about the whereabouts of the biological families or any tip-off which could help the adoptees to reunite with their actual parents. I am trying to get this changed now. By the age of five, my adoptive parents used to tell me about my adoption in detail because I always had a lot of questions on my mind regarding the documents and my situation. We used to sit and talk about my family in Sri Lanka and the legal process required to be followed.”

“Listening to my follow-up questions, my parents fathomed I was keener to know about my adoption as compared to my adoptive brother. Both of us are not biologically related; we were adopted from Sri Lanka. Then my adoptive parents showed me the documents such as birth certificates and films from the time they spent in Sri Lanka. But it was not enough information about my biological mother. So, at seven, I went to my adoptive father’s office, and I asked him to help me write to the Government to get access to my documents. My father could only help me write a letter to the reunification programme authorities but my application was declined, and I was told that one has to be at least 16 to begin looking out for biological parents. And the Government told me that I could not look into their files until I was 18. This was a huge problem,” mentioned Priyangika.

Taking a stroll down memory lane, she let us know, “I remember we had waited for a year to receive the authorities’ response and were shocked to know about the minimum age threshold. We used to wait near the mailbox every single day. Realising that my plea was declined, I went into severe depression. I became suicidal by the age of eight. At school, I used to go to the library and ask for books about Sri Lanka. I began writing letters to the authors asking them to help me find my mom. We had a lot of family friends who were Tamil; but as my brother and I were Sinhalese, they were skeptical to talk to us as it was the time of war in Sri Lanka. But they still contacted people in Sri Lanka but nobody could really find anything concrete. By the age of 13, everyone started telling me it seemed impossible for me to meet my mom.”

Remembering how she started helping other individuals to reunite with their families, she told us, “While I was looking for my mother, one biological mother contacted me as she thought I had been helping others to meet their families. In real, I was just helping myself. She mentioned her child was stolen and taken to Europe. At that point, I thought that something was odd. Nevertheless, we were lucky enough to find her daughter. Rumours about I helping others to get reunited continues to spread, and that is how I started doing that for real.”

It was while reuniting others and getting to know more Sri Lankans that Priyangika got to know about the hospital she was born in and the adoption centre in Colombo where she was kept. But the adoption centre was reluctant to give away any information regarding her mother. Even after striving hard, nothing could make her find her mother out and she had almost given up but carried on to help others to reunite. During her quest, she got to know about things like ‘baby farms’, acting mothers, and child kidnapping. But she continued to reckon that she was legally adopted as her adoptive parents had always told her of the court proceedings in her case. By the age of 18, she had assisted 100 reunions but still could not find her mom.

It was in 2012 that she had already given birth to a son, Nishant and she said that this was her first biological relationship. After it had been over 10 years of her trying to meet her mother, she had completely given up but yet she tried one last time. Priyangika turned to private sleuths in Sri Lanka and they could track her mother down.

Describing her reunion with mom, she divulged, “Even though I knew that something was odd about my adoption, I had thought that it would be extremely joyous to meet my mother. But to my surprise, she was reluctant even to look at me and felt shameful. Even though I kept on asking her innumerable questions, she was not ready to answer them. All she told me was that my father had passed away. She was traumatised. We spent a lot of time together over the next three weeks. She did not tell me much about my past but all she said was that I was not supposed to be taken away. I moved to Sri Lanka the next year.”

Revealing information about the ‘adoption lobby’, she let us know, “Adoption organisations in Europe have links to the birth countries of the children. Norway still has three such organisations. These organisations charge millions of rupees to finalise the adoption. They have contacts with individuals in the countries of birth who tell them about orphanages. Baby farms, kidnapping children from families, hospitals, or streets, babies found at the orphanages’ doorstep or given to them without the consent of the biological parents facilitate the illegal adoption lobby. Sometimes, parents are paid money and are falsely assured that the adoption is for a short time period so that they can stabilise their lives with the money but their children are never returned to them. Also, parents are deceived to believe that these orphanages are places where you can leave your kids and later pick them up again and meanwhile, those kids are given away.”

She also revealed, “The Government officials and lawyers can also be part of this lobby and stealthily make the adoptive parents believe that the adoption is legal. It is tough to understand this lobby if you do not see it on your own. Therefore, I have also worked in orphanages in Sri Lanka. Women are even paid to become ‘acting mothers’ and give away someone else’s child for adoption. These women are poor and are told that they can give a new life to the child by making them move to Europe to experience a better life, get access to better education to come back and help their own families. Babies are even swapped at hospitals to meet the needs of adoptive parents sometimes. Children are even claimed to be born dead.”

Explaining her own case, she said, “During her pregnancy, my mother was forced to live alone because of extremely traumatising circumstances with my father, his family, and their community. One of her family friends then fooled her to live with her. She had also persuaded my mother to give me away for adoption, but she did not give in even though she was poor. Right after my birth, the doctor asked her to give me away, but she was not ready. She took me home and asked my father to accept us, but he did not do so. That was when the ‘family friend’ came in again and she lied to my mother about ‘temporary adoptions’. She was told that she will be paid many lakhs of Rupees to hand me over to white parents and will stay in touch with me. And, when my adoptive parents showed her the images from Norway, she thought they were structures made by colonisers in Sri Lanka itself. And, my adoptive parents could not know that the lobby translator kept on referring to ‘temporary adoption’. And, such illegal cases are handled by ‘acting courts’ and hence, both biological and adoptive parents are fooled. Illegal documents are made as well. The fact that I left Sri Lanka is mentioned nowhere. Even the European governments are not obliged to scrutinise the documents closely.”

Priyangika also mentioned that she would now begin with legal action. She will be filing lawsuits against such orphanages in Sri Lanka either this or the next year; which depends on circumstances created by the pandemic. She will also file a lawsuit against the Norwegian Government later. She told us that while Sri Lanka has accepted the existence of this lobby, nobody from the Government has confessed to their role.

She has reunited people from different European countries, the USA, Australia to their families in Brazil, Colombia, and India in the past but mainly focuses on Sri Lanka now to dig deeper into one system. As per Priyangika, an industry based on children should not thrive. The Government should be responsible for its own children. And, the adoption racket has still not ended in Sri Lanka. New ways have been devised to continue to send children to foreign lands.

“The fraud has only changed its form; it has not ended,” she said. (Goa Chronicle) 

( Daily news .lk )

April 22, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Media Freedom

Norway and the EU to establish air ambulance in Tromsø

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 21, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

As part of the EU’s civil protection mechanism known as RescEU, plans have been announced to establish an air ambulance with a permanent base in Tromsø. This aircraft will be used to transport patients with serious infectious diseases across the entire EU and EEA. The aircraft will strengthen both Norwegian and European levels of preparedness as the aircraft will be incorporated into the National Air Ambulance Services of Norway when not deployed on European assignments.

‘The Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated how important the EU is to Norway. We are working together closely to manage the pandemic, as well as to build important preparedness capabilities that will serve us in future.

I am delighted that Norway can lend its expertise by providing an air ambulance for the transportation of patients with serious infectious diseases. This aircraft will enhance preparedness in Norway when it is not on deployment in Europe, and will be a welcome boost to the air ambulance service offered in Northern Norway’, says Bent Høie, Minister of Health and Care Services.

The aircraft will be in place by the end of 2021 and will be part of the Norwegian involvement in the EU Civil Protection Mechanism. The scheme enables Norwegian bodies involved in preparedness to cooperate with the EU across a range of areas in civic safety and preparedness, and the air ambulance is part of this civilian protection mechanism known as RescEU (see fact panel).

This agreement strengthens preparedness in both Norway as well as throughout the EU and EEA. Norway possesses valuable expertise in relation to the transportation of high risk infectious patients, especially thanks to the National CBNRE Centre of Medicine at Oslo University Hospital.

The CBNRE Centre has responsibility for preparedness in relation to personal injuries caused by particularly hazardous substances, toxic smoke, radiation and biological contaminants that may cause issues such as high risk disease.

The agreement signed with the EU will see them provide full funding for the initiative for the period 2021-2026.

RescEU and the National Air Ambulance Services of Norway

RescEU

RescEU is part of the EU’s Civil Protection Mechanism and is intended to strengthen protections for citizens from disasters, while also dealing with new risks that emerge. This includes a fleet of firefighting aircraft and helicopters, medical evacuation aircraft, as well as stockpiles of medical equipment and field hospitals that can be used in medical emergencies, and in the event of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear incidents.

Source: EU Civil Protection Mechanism

April 21, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diplomatic relations

Norway signs Supplementary Defense Cooperation Agreement with the United States

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 20, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

“The United States of America is Norway’s most important ally, and we have shared more than 70 years of close, constructive defence cooperation. The Agreement both updates and further develops the agreements and cooperation already in place between Norway and the U. S. The Agreement will play a vital role in ensuring Norwegian security within the framework of NATO”, said Minister of Defence Frank Bakke-Jensen.

The Supplementary Defense Cooperation Agreement (SDCA) updates and regulates practical aspects of U.S. military activity in Norway, and supplements existing agreements between Norway and the U.S. The Agreement was signed today by Norway’s Minister of Defence. The Agreement must be submitted to the Storting (Norwegian parliament) for consent before it can enter into force.

Minister of Defence Frank Bakke-Jensen sign an agreement between Norway and USA
Minister of Defence Frank Bakke-Jensen sign an agreement between Norway and USA Credit: Torbjørn Kjosvold, Norwegian Armed FOrces

Download picture


‘Our cooperation with our Allies is under continuous development. The Agreement reaffirms Norway’s close relationship with the U.S. and confirms Norway’s key position on the northern flank of NATO. To ensure that Norway and our Allies can operate together in a crisis situation under difficult conditions, we must be able to hold exercises and train regularly here in Norway. The Agreement does not entail any changes to key Norwegian security policy principles. Our policies regarding the stationing of foreign forces on Norwegian territory, the stockpiling or deployment of nuclear weapons and port visits remain unchanged,’ said Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide. 

Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide on a press conference after a signing an agreement between Norway and USA
Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide on a press conference after a signing an agreement between Norway and USA Credit: Torbjørn Kjosvold

‘Norway’s defence rests on three main elements: the national defence capability, collective defence through NATO, and bilateral reinforcement plans with close allies. The ongoing development of defence cooperation with the US complements our own efforts to strengthen the capacity of the Norwegian Armed Forces,’ said Mr Bakke-Jensen.

The U.S. has entered into similar agreements with several Allied countries in Europe, to promote more predictable development of defence cooperation and ensure a robust and practical framework for providing reinforcements in the event of war or crisis.    

The Agreement establishes and regulates Agreed Facilities and Areas, which are specified locations that may be used for military purposes. Under the Agreement, US forces will have unimpeded access to and use of these facilities and areas. All U.S. activities shall be conducted with full respect for the sovereignty, laws, and international legal obligations of Norway. This is how the Allied presence in Norway has been organised since the end of the Second World War. Any US military activity carried out in Norway will continue to be subject to close coordination between Norway and the US.

Under the Agreement, Agreed Facilities and Areas will be established at Rygge Military Air Station and Airfield, Sola Military Air Station and Airfield, Evenes Military Air Station and Airfield and Ramsund Naval Station. These locations have been selected with the aim of strengthening cooperation with the U.S. in the air defence and maritime domains in years to come. Infrastructure investments may be made at all four locations. Projects within Agreed Facilities and Areas will be developed in consultation with the U.S., but funding must be allocated under the U.S. defence budget before projects can be initiated. As a result, it will take some time before any planned projects are completed. Additional Agreed Facilities and Areas may be established at a later date if Norway and the U.S. agree. This will also require the approval of the Norwegian Government and the consent of the Storting.

The Agreement will be presented to the Storting in two propositions: one to request consent to ratify the Agreement and the other to propose necessary legislation to implement it in Norwegian law. Both propositions will be submitted to the Storting during the autumn 2021 session. The draft legislation and the Agreement will be circulated to the public in spring 2021, with a three-month deadline.

Minister of Defence Frank Bakke-Jensen and  Chargé d’Affaires ad interim Richard Riley during a signing an agreement between Norway and USA
Minister of Defence Frank Bakke-Jensen and Chargé d’Affaires ad interim Richard Riley during a signing an agreement between Norway and USA Credit: Torbjørn Kjosvold, Norwegian Armed Forces

Facts about the Agreement:

The SDCA provides the basis for further developing Norway’s longstanding defence cooperation with the U.S. The Agreement supplements existing bilateral agreements with the U.S., as well as NATO’s Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty Regarding the Status of Their Forces (NATO SOFA).

The Agreement regulates and facilitates U.S. presence, training and exercises in Norway, thus facilitating rapid U.S. reinforcement of Norway in the event of crisis or war.

The Agreement covers a wide range of rules that are important for regulating practical aspects of the activities of U.S. forces, such as entry and exit, jurisdiction, exemptions from taxes and duties, the use of contractors and welfare services, and prospective investments in infrastructure.

The Agreement provides a framework for close cooperation and consultations between Norwegian and U.S. authorities regarding activities and operational and security issues. The text explicitly states that ‘nothing in this Agreement alters Norwegian policies with regard to the stationing of foreign forces on Norwegian territory, and the stockpiling or deployment of nuclear weapons on Norwegian territory.’   

The Agreement introduces the concept of Agreed Facilities and Areas, which are defined as locations that are central to the development of practical defence cooperation. Agreed Facilities and Areas will be established at Rygge Military Air Station and Airfield, Sola Military Air Station and Airfield, Evenes Military Air Station and Airfield and Ramsund Naval Station. This primarily encompasses military areas, with the addition of airfield facilities such as runways and taxiways. These areas will be used jointly by Norwegian, U.S. and other Allied forces, and the U.S. may decide to provide infrastructure investments at these locations.

An extensive dialogue will be conducted with the U.S. regarding the use of Agreed Facilities and Areas, and prospective activities to be carried out there. Buildings and other infrastructure constructed and financed by the U.S. at these locations in the future will become the property of Norway, while the U.S. will have right of unimpeded access and use. It is too early to predict the costs that the Agreement will entail for Norway, but these may include costs for security measures and the hire of private land for exercises. If activities under the Agreement lead to an increase in Norwegian expenditure, this will be dealt with as part of the normal budget process.

In principle, the Agreement is open-ended, but after an initial term of ten years, it may be terminated with one year’s notice.

(MFA Norway)

April 20, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diplomatic relations

Increased funding for humanitarian efforts highlighting protection and food security

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 19, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

‘Norway is increasing its support for efforts to protect civilians, improve food security and provide humanitarian assistance to displaced people in countries affected by crisis and conflict, and is providing a record-high NOK 6.3 billion in humanitarian funding,’ said Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide.

Most of Norway’s 2021 humanitarian budget is being channelled through the UN, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and Norwegian humanitarian organisations. 

‘Today, many countries are experiencing complex crises. The humanitarian situation can change very quickly. The combined impacts of armed conflict, the coronavirus pandemic, climate change and extreme poverty are exacerbating humanitarian crises. It is vital for Norway to work with flexible humanitarian organisations that understand the local conditions,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide. 

The number of people in need of humanitarian aid and protection worldwide is higher than ever before. According to UN estimates, some 235 million people will need humanitarian assistance in 2021. This is an increase of 40 % from last year.

‘An increasing number of people do not have enough food. Some 270 million people in 79 countries are now on the brink of or are already facing a hunger crisis, and armed conflict is the primary cause. At the same time, more and more people are being forced to flee their homes, either across national borders or within their own country. Increased core funding to humanitarian organisations provides both predictability and flexibility for our partners and helps to promote a more effective humanitarian response,’ Ms Eriksen Søreide said.

This year, Norway has increased its core support to the World Food Programme (WFP) to NOK 800 million and to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) to NOK 680 million. These are extraordinary increases in funding, allocated in response to growing needs arising from food insecurity and increased displacement as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

So far this year, Norway has provided NOK 420 million in funding to the UN’s Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF). Norway is one of CERF’s largest donors. CERF ensures that humanitarian assistance reaches people in need quickly when crises emerge or escalate, and provides funding for underfunded emergencies. In 2021, the funds have been allocated to provide food assistance in Nigeria, South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo.  

Norway also supports the work being done by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to protect and assist people living in conflict-affected countries. Norway has provided NOK 163 million to the ICRC, among other things to support the organisation’s efforts to combat sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV).  

Food security and protection of civilians are the most pressing humanitarian issues in Syria, Yemen and South Sudan. These are the countries that have received the most humanitarian support from Norway in 2021, as in recent years. So far this year, Norway has allocated NOK 700 million to humanitarian efforts in Syria, NOK 200 million in Yemen and NOK 166 million in South Sudan. This funding are being channelled through the UN, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and Norwegian humanitarian organisations. Norway will provide further support to the humanitarian response in these countries during the course of the year.    

Lockdowns during the coronavirus pandemic have increased the risk of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV). This year, Norway will provide at least NOK 310 million to efforts to enhance protection against SGBV and access to sexual and reproductive health services in humanitarian crises.  

Protection of civilians against landmines and other explosives is another important priority for Norway. This year, Norway will provide at least NOK 300 million to global mine action.

‘Norway will continue to play a leading role in global humanitarian efforts both as a donor country and as a humanitarian actor. Our overall aim is to save lives, alleviate suffering and protect human dignity in conflict and crisis situations. At the same time, we will continue to promote innovation and an integrated approach in order to achieve better results with existing resources and counter the negative trend we are seeing in which more and more people are trapped in protracted humanitarian crises,’ Ms Eriksen Søreide said.

Facts

  • 235 million people will need humanitarian assistance in 2021. This is 40 % more than in 2020.
  • Worldwide, there are over 26 million refugees and more than 45 million people are internally displaced.
  • Norway is providing a record-high NOK 6.3 billion in humanitarian support, to be used, among other things, to protect civilians, improve food security and provide assistance to displaced people in countries affected by crisis and conflict.
  • Protection of civilians is a key focus area for Norway. It is also one of Norway’s priority thematic areas in the UN Security Council, where we currently chair the Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict.

Source: UN and Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs

April 19, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economics

Responsible long-term management of the Government Pension Fund

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 18, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The Ministry of Finance today published the white paper The Government Pension Fund 2021. The white paper addresses the Government efforts in further developing the investment strategy and strengthening of the responsible investment framework. The performance of the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) and the Government Pension Fund Norway (GPFN) is also presented.

– The Government has adopted comprehensive measures to limit the negative impact of the coronavirus pandemic. We intend, in line with the fiscal policy guidelines, to scale back petroleum revenue spending when the economic situation is normalised. Along with responsible long-term investment management, this will ensure that the petroleum wealth may also benefit future generations, says Minister of Finance Jan Tore Sanner (Conservative Party).

Strong performance of both the GPFG and the GPFN

– We must be prepared for financial market volatility and for considerable fluctuations in the year-on-year value of the Fund. We are, however, well placed to withstand such market turbulence. A long-term investment strategy will serve us well over time, says the Minister of Finance.

Climate risk in the GPFG

Climate change will affect companies and global economic developments in coming years. Company earnings may be affected by changes in stakeholder preferences upon the transition to a low-carbon economy, physical changes resulting from climate change, as well as climate policy and technological developments. This entails financial risk, which needs to be managed by investors. The Ministry has therefore launched an initiative to further expand knowledge of how climate change, climate policy and the Green Shift may affect investors like the GPFG.

An expert group has been commissioned to prepare a report on the implications of financial climate risk and climate-related investment opportunities, including discussion of alternative approaches to these issues in the investment management. The Ministry has concurrently request analyses and assessments from Norges Bank. The Ministry will present its assessments of climate risk and climate-related investment opportunities in the white paper on the Government Pension Fund in the spring of 2022.

– Assessments of financial climate risk form an integral part of Norges Bank’s risk management, investment decisions and active ownership. Climate is nonetheless a financial risk factor that we need to understand better. The initiative now launched by the Ministry will expand our knowledge on this matter, says the Minister of Finance.

GPFG tax and transparency initiatives

– Norway takes an active role in international efforts to increase transparency, exchange of information and achieve an appropriate allocation of taxation rights globally. Matters concerning closed tax jurisdictions, international tax avoidance and appropriate allocation of taxation rights globally should be addressed and resolved through international cooperation and consensus-based solutions, says the Minister of Finance.

Enforcement of existing tax rules, as well as the development of tax regulations in domestic law and through international standards, are government responsibilities.

Norges Bank supports the Fund’s long-term financial interests through responsible investment practices. As a long-term financial investor, the emphasis is placed on real, long-term company earnings, and not on any potential short-term gains resulting from aggressive tax planning.

– The Government is committed to transparency and ethical awareness in the management of the Government Pension Fund. It is positive that Norges Bank is highlighting its work on tax and transparency issues. Going forwards, I expect that the Bank, on an ongoing basis, considers how these efforts can be further strengthened, says Minister of Finance Jan Tore Sanner.

Norges Bank has prepared expectations documents on several topics, including tax and transparency. The documents are based on internationally recognised principles and are directed at the board of directors of investee companies. Expectations documents are, among other things, used as a basis for the Bank’s company dialogues. In the expectations document on tax and transparency, Norges Bank expresses an expectation that companies pursue appropriate, prudent and transparent tax practices.

April 18, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economics

Strengthening of the ethical framework for the Government Pension Fund Global

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 17, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The Government strengthens the ethical framework for the Government Pension Fund Global. The proposed modifications are largely in line with the recommendations of the Ethics Committee.

– The ethical framework for the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) has worked well. In response to developments in both the Fund and ethical norms over the last 15 years, we propose modifications to strengthen the framework in certain areas, says Minister of Finance Jan Tore Sanner (Conservative Party).

In April 2019, the Government appointed a Committee tasked with reviewing the ethical framework for the GPFG. The Ethics Committee submitted its report, the NOU 2020: 7 green paper; Values and Responsibility, on 15 June 2020. The Ministry of Finance received about 50 consultative comments on the report.

The general ethical framework

– The framework is based on two ethical obligations. The Fund shall be managed with a view to generate long-term wealth for current and future generations. We shall at the same time avoid investing in companies that contribute to or are   responsible for serious violations of ethical norms, says the Minister of Finance.

Observation, exclusion and active ownership will be maintained as tools under the ethically motivated guidelines. The tools shall be applied in a cohesive manner, and the threshold for exclusion shall remain high. The overarching objective is that the most appropriate tool is applied in each individual case. Active ownership may be effective in reducing the risk of violating ethical norms by influencing companies to change their conduct.

An objects clause is proposed added to the guideline provisions in order to highlight the purpose of the Guidelines for Observation and Exclusion.

Criteria for observation and exclusion of companies

– The Government proposes the introduction of a new criterion for the sale of weapons, and to expand the corruption criterion to include «other serious financial crime». A new criterion will be added to target producers of cannabis as a recreational drug, says the Minister of Finance.

A new criterion on the «sale of weapons to states in armed conflict using such weapons in ways that constitute serious and systematic violations of the international law of armed conflict» is also proposed. This is in accordance with the Committee’s proposal. It is also proposed to omit the examples currently listed under the human rights criterion, which is also in line with the Committee’s proposal.

The Ministry has attached importance to wording the criteria such as to enable application to new issues that may arise over time. The white paper does at the same time identify key issues that are intended to fall within the scope of the various criteria. It is emphasised, inter alia, that «other serious financial crime» shall encompass tax evasion, money laundering and the facilitation of such activities, and that the human rights criterion shall encompass both labour rights and the rights of indigenous populations.

The Government supports the Committee’s view that there are fundamentally problematic aspects of lethal autonomous weapons. However, there is no clear definition of lethal autonomous weapons as yet, and such weapons have according to the Committee not been entered into use thus far. The Government is to that end not proposing such a criterion at this time. The Ministry will continue to examine a potential criterion in this regard, in view of current international efforts to develop guidelines on the use of such weapons. As far as nuclear weapons are concerned, the Government is proposing that the guidelines shall apply also to platforms produced exclusively for the delivery of nuclear weapons.

In proposing to introduce a criterion targeting producers of cannabis as a recreational drug, the Government attaches weight to the production of this product being prohibited in Norway, as well as to Norway having ratified the international drug control conventions. The Government also supports the Committee’s view that there is no broad consensus in Norwegian society that would justify exclusion of gaming companies, producers of alcohol or producers of weapons in general.

Investments in countries posing elevated ethical risk

– When making investments in countries and industries posing elevated ethical risk, extra vigilance with regard to potential norm violations will be required in the management of the Fund. We agree with the Committee’s assessment that company pre-screening would not be appropriate, says the Minister of Finance.

Norges Bank and the Council on Ethics should use information from multiple sources to identify matters that require attention, including information obtained from so-called ESG indices. The white paper does at the same time discuss why such indices are not suited for pre-screening of the Fund’s investment universe. Assessments of markets and companies should continue to be made by Norges Bank and the Council on Ethics, within the general framework defined by the Government and the Storting.

The management mandate requires Norges Bank to approve markets before investments are made. The Ministry proposes to specify that the Bank upon market approval shall pay heed to different types of risk, including country risk and political risk, and that it shall be feasible to adhere to responsible investment practices in the markets approved.

The Ministry intends to implement the Committee’s proposal to include the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP) in the management mandate of Norges Bank. This will serve to clarify the normative basis for the Bank’s responsible investment practices regarding human rights.

Responsible investment practices support the UN Sustainable Development Goals

– The GPFG has a clear financial objective. The Fund therefore cannot be a policy tool for attainment of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. However, the Fund’s ability to achieve satisfactory long-term return is considered to depend on sustainable development. The responsible investment practices promote sustainable long-term growth in the companies and markets in which the Fund is invested, and thereby support the Sustainable Development Goals, says the Minister of Finance.

Norges Bank uses a range of tools in its responsible management efforts, targeting both companies and standard setters. The Bank’s expectations documents which address, inter alia, climate change, ocean sustainability, children’s rights, human rights, etc., form the basis for much of the Bank’s responsible investment efforts. Moreover, the Bank has in separate publications advocated its views on corporate sustainability reporting and the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

Transparency and efficient information exchange between the Council on Ethics and Norges Bank

– Transparency is of key importance to the Fund’s legitimacy. Transparency is practised at present, and this needs to continue. Moreover, we must continue to facilitate smooth and efficient cooperation between Norges Bank and the Council on Ethics, says the Minister of Finance.

The Ministry is proposing to implement the Committee’s proposals on highlighting transparency and reporting requirements. The Ministry also supports the Committee’s proposals on clarifying the provisions in the guidelines to ensure efficient interaction between the Council on Ethics and Norges Bank. This will be carried out in a manner that preserves the independence of the Council on Ethics.

April 17, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economics

Simplification of the benchmark index for the Government Pension Fund Global

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 16, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

In the white paper Government Pension Fund 2021, the Government proposes that no additional markets are to be added to the GPFG equity benchmark at the present time. Concurrently, the smallest companies are to be omitted from the equity benchmark. This modification entails a reduction in number of equity benchmark constituents by 25-30 percent.

Emerging market equity sub-index

As part of a comprehensive review of the equity benchmark composition, the Government has assessed the framework and sub-index for emerging market equity investments.

The Fund’s equity benchmark is based on a broad global index from the index provider FTSE Russell. The index has been expanded over time as the index provider has included new markets.

The Government proposes that no additional markets are to be added to the GPFG equity benchmark at the present time. This implies that any new emerging markets that the index provider might decide to include in its indices not automatically will be included in the Fund benchmark index.

– The Fund’s equity benchmark currently contains a considerable number of markets, including all major economies. Including additional and generally small emerging markets is not assumed to contribute to  improvement of the benchmark risk-return, says Minister of Finance Jan Tore Sanner (Conservative Party).

The management mandate for the GPFG requires Norges Bank to approve all markets in which the fund capital is to be invested. This applies also for markets that make up the benchmark index set by the Ministry of Finance. The Ministry will, based on the recommendations of the Ethics Committee, be clarifying the mandate provisions on risk assessment and reporting in the context of the Bank’s approval of markets.

The number of companies in the equity benchmark

The number of markets and companies included in the GPFG equity benchmark has increased significantly over time. The benchmark currently comprises about 8,800 companies across 24 developed and 22 emerging markets. 

In the white paper, the Government proposes that the number of companies in the GPFG equity benchmark be reduced by omitting the 25–30 percent smallest companies from the benchmark. Such a modification will involve reducing the number of equity benchmark constituents by about 2,200 companies.

– Including a large number of companies and markets in the benchmark increases  complexity, and may add to costs. It may also make it more challenging to maintain the role as a responsible investor, says the Minister of Finance.

The smallest index companies account only for a very small proportion of the overall market value of the equity benchmark. This may be illustrated by the fact that a quarter of the number of companies accounts for no more than two percent of the aggregate benchmark market value. Consequently, the diversification gains from the very smallest companies are limited. Moreover, the costs of trading in small company stocks are higher than that of large companies.

The Ministry observes that less information is available on small companies than on large companies, and that the Council on Ethics has commented that a reduction in the number of companies in the Fund would have a positive effect on its efforts.

April 16, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diplomatic relations

Norway chairs the UN Security Council Sanctions Committee on the DPRK

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 15, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

As a member of the UN Security Council, Norway will chair the UN Security Council Sanctions Committee established pursuant to resolution 1718 (2006). Ambassador Mona Juul, Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations in New York, will chair the Committee.

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s (DPRK) nuclear programme and ballistic missile tests pose a challenge to the global regime of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and remain a threat to regional and international peace and stability. The Security Council has repeatedly expressed deep concern about the DPRK’s ongoing nuclear and ballistic missile-related activities, which have been destabilising for the region and beyond.

As Chair, Norway will adhere to a principled approach that upholds and advances the Committee’s mandate as outlined in resolution 1718 (2006) and subsequent resolutions. The work will be conducted in line with the Guidelines of the Committee, in collaboration with all Committee members, and supported by the Panel of Experts and the UN Secretariat.

Norway will work to maintain and advance consensus in the Committee’s efforts to fulfil its mandate to oversee the implementation of the measures adopted by the Security Council. As Chair, Norway will work to support states in implementing all relevant Security Council resolutions.

The Panel of Experts presents a list of recommendations to the Committee in its midterm and final reports. As Chair, Norway will work constructively with Committee members on how the Committee and Member States can follow up on these recommendations.

When examining requests for exemptions from the sanctions, the Committee should endeavour to ensure that UN sanctions do not have adverse humanitarian consequences for the civilian population of the DPRK, consistent with the objectives set out in the relevant resolutions of the Security Council. The Committee has established an accelerated exemption process for humanitarian assistance and exemptions for longer time frames. Norway will continue to focus on the exemption process in order to maintain and facilitate the Committee’s expedient and streamlined consideration of requests for exemptions for humanitarian assistance.

April 15, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

Norway’s first Poseidon enters final Assembly

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 14, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Boeing is preparing to commence final assembly of the Royal Norwegian Air Force’s (RNoAF’s) first P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft.

The US manufacturer announced on April 12 that the fuselage for the first RNoAF P-8A – line number 8796 – had arrived at the Boeing facilities in Renton, Washington, from Spirit AeroSystems in Wichita, Kansas, on April 9. This marked a major milestone in production of the first of five Poseidons for the RNoAF.

The fuselage of the Royal Norwegian Air Force’s first P-8A Poseidon after being moved on April 9 from a rail car through to the first step of the assembly process, the Fuselage Systems Installation tool, in Renton, Washington. 

As with all Poseidons, initial assembly will take place on Boeing Commercial Airplanes’ 737 production line, where the fuselage receives additional wiring and systems needed to support military components, equipment and operation. The aircraft is then delivered to Boeing’s Defense, Space & Security unit for the installation of military systems, testing and delivery to its military customer.

Boeing was awarded a production contract for the five RNoAF aircraft on January 25, 2019. Norway is expected to receive its first Poseidon later this year. The five P-8As will eventually replace the RNoAF’s current fleet of six P-3C/N Orions and three Dassault Falcon 20ECMs and will provide advanced capabilities to maintain situational awareness in neighbouring waters on and below the surface of the ocean.

To date, Boeing has delivered 104 P-8 aircraft to the US Navy and customers in Australia, India and the United Kingdom.

April 14, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Killing

A Norwegian citizen died in the Philippines

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 13, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

A Norwegian citizen has died in the Philippines, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed on Friday.

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is aware that a Norwegian citizen has died in the Philippines. 

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs can not comment on further individual details in an ongoing consular case,” communications manager Trude Måseide in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs wrote in an email to news bureau NTB.

According to the newspaper VG, local media write that the man was shot in his own home during a robbery.

April 13, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Myanmar’s CDM movement nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 29, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

A group of six professors in social science at the University of Oslo in Norway has nominated the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) of Myanmar for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2022.

Mizzima spoke with the spokesperson for the professors, Kristian Stokke, Professor of Human Geography at the University of Oslo. 

Stokke said he had been researching questions of popular movements and democratization for 25 to 30 years.

“For the last 10 years I’ve been following politics in Myanmar and the reason we are talking now is probably because I have nominated the Civil Disobedience Movement for the Nobel Peace Prize.

“The Nobel Peace Prize is generally recognized as a very visible, foremost peace prize internationally.

“It is first and foremost a recognition for individuals or organizations that have made a major contribution towards peace in one situation or another.

“The nomination is in recognition of the civil disobedience movement and their non-violent struggle for democracy in Myanmar. 

“And one reason that we nominated is that it’s an expression of support for the movement.

“So far, I think that the international community has made some important statements condemning the coup and the military’s brutal use of violence. 

“There have been fewer statements of support or recognition for the popular movement for democracy and peace, or against the coup essentially. So the nomination can also be seen as an international statement of support for the movement. 

“The Peace Prize has often been given to individuals, sometimes to organisation but then very formal organisations. It’s not so common to give the prize to a social movement, but that’s in our case a very deliberate choice to nominate the moment rather than to nominate a political leader or some formal organization.

“We do think that the question of the political future in Myanmar is very much dependent on the broad popular mobilization against the coup and for a return, but not just a return- to formal democracy, but to build a better, more real democracy. And a democracy that can also create true national unity and peace.

“So it is in the recognition that real democracy has something that goes beyond formal democracy, that has to rely on struggles, on movements, and CDM is a foremost example of that.  And it is also important in other settings, not just in Myanmar. They are also a foremost example of a popular movement for democracy in a time when democracy is under pressure – pressure globally – from authoritarian actors and agendas. 

“They should win the prize for their mass mobilization, the use of nonviolence for democracy and peace, for their contribution to building a broad movement across traditional divides for national unity, for real federal democracy, because it is an inspiration. An example of mass mobilization for democracy at the largest scale internationally. 

“They should win it because they deserve it but they should also win it because it will have political implications and send important signals.”

March 29, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

NATO F-35 Milestone: First F-35A for Denmark Takes Flight

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 28, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Earlier last week, L-001, Denmark’s first F-35 Lightning II production aircraft flew its inaugural flight. Denmark is the fifth European NATO nation to fly and operate an F-35, strengthening NATO’s 5th generation airpower foundation. Denmark is joining four other European nations who already operate the F-35: the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Norway and Italy.

Like the F-16 before it, the F-35 is spearheading NATO’s air power and ensuring strategic integration of allied combat airpower. The vital interoperability of the 5th Generation F-35 binds 13 allies and partners with the United States in air dominance and enabling critical joint capabilities. The F-35 will serve as a force multiplier for Denmark, allowing the Royal Danish Air Force to train and fight alongside NATO allies and create a strong deterrent.

Denmark’s first F-35 takes to the air for its first flight

“Achieving the first flight of Denmark’s first F-35 is major milestone for the Denmark F-35 program and a testament to the outstanding abilities of our dedicated and highly trained joint industry and government team,”  said Bill Brotherton, acting F-35 vice president and general manager. “This team’s focus on delivering the most effective, survivable and connected fighter in the world will ensure the sovereign protection of Denmark and strengthen allies and partners through the NATO F-35 coalition.”

L-001 is scheduled to be delivered to the Royal Danish Air Force in April and will be flown to Luke Air Force Base, Arizona, later this year for pilot and maintainer training. F-35s will arrive in Denmark in 2023 and be based at Royal Danish Air Force’s Fighter Wing Skrydstrup where it will safeguard the skies over Denmark and its NATO allies.

March 28, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Science

Norway ramps up support to combat non-communicable diseases (NCDs)

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 28, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway has signed a two-year agreement with World Health Organization (WHO) for an amount of 220 Million NOK (US$ 26 million) to support activities aiming at reducing mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, respiratory diseases, and mental health conditions in low- and middle-income countries.

The WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health is among the actions that will receive funding. It covers Bangladesh, Jordan, Paraguay, Philippines, the Ukraine, and Zimbabwe. Nepal will join as the seventh Special Initiative country.

The Flagship Initiative includes developing equitable pathways of care for non-communicable disease (NCD) in Ethiopia, Ghana, Myanmar, and Nepal, as well as activities related to NCD risk factor reduction, covering tobacco, alcohol, air pollution, unhealthy diets, and lack of physical activity. The Flagship Initiative supports the WHO Safer initiative on alcohol control, work on health taxes on tobacco, alcohol, and sugar.

“Health conditions in low- and middle-income countries are shifting, with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasing. However greater awareness of the changing burden of disease has not translated into significant shifts in resources globally. With the Flagship Initiative we hope to mitigate that,” Dag-Inge Ulstein, Norwegian Minister of International Development, said.

NCDs disproportionately affect people in low- and middle-income countries, where more than three quarters of global NCD deaths – 32 million – occur annually, including 12 million between the ages of 30 and 70. NCDs threaten progress towards the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which includes a target of reducing premature deaths from NCDs by one-third by 2030. According to WHO, only 17 countries in the world are on track to achieve this target.

“Poverty is closely linked with NCDs. As the world is restarting the global economy —moving from locking down societies to locking down the virus – the rapid rise in NCDs is predicted to impede poverty reduction initiatives in low-income countries, particularly by increasing household costs associated with health care,” Ulstein said.

“Covid-19 has exposed and exacerbated the global burden of NCDs and mental health conditions, and although the pandemic will recede, these leading causes of death will continue to cut short the lives of millions of people each year,” said WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

“Just as we have effective tools to prevent, diagnose and treat Covid-19, we have effective tools for preventing and managing NCDs and mental health conditions, but they need to be scaled up dramatically in all countries. We’re very grateful for Norway’s support, which will help to save lives, prevent needless suffering and generate massive social and economic benefits for countries.”

“Scaling up services that meet the health-care needs of people with NCDs and mental health conditions, and protect people against the spread of NCDs, are driving progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals for an equal future for everyone and for the benefit of everyone,” said Dr Ren Minghui, Assistant Director-General for Universal Health Coverage/Communicable and Noncommunicable Diseases at WHO.

Concerned with the large and rising number of deaths from non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries, Norway launched its strategy “Better health, Better Lives. Combating Non-Communicable Diseases in the Context of Norwegian Development Policy (2020-2024)” in November 2019.

“Norway is the first donor country in the world with an international development strategy on NCDs and mental health. With this strategy I hope Norway can play a leading role in expanding work on NCDs in international health and development policy as well as ensuring practical action in low-income countries,” said Ulstein.

Adding that WHO has a leadership and coordination role in promoting and monitoring global action against non-communicable diseases. “With this Flagship Initiative we seek to strengthen WHO’s work in this field and continue to be a reliable and strong supporter of the WHO.”

March 28, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
NATO and Norway

US Seeks Dialogue With Turkey through NATO

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 27, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The United States will continue discussions with Turkey bilaterally and through NATO on issues related to Ankara’s purchase of Russian-made S-400 air defense systems, US mission to NATO Charge d’Affaires Douglas Jones told reporters on Monday.

“The United States has been very clear about how we view Turkey’s purchase of the S-400. We oppose the purchase of the S-400,” Jones said during an online briefing. “We will continue to discuss with Turkey issues related to the S-400 both through our bilateral contacts with Turkey and here at NATO. And we will continue to work here at NATO together as we plot the way ahead.”

Jones reiterated the United States’ stance that the presence of “a large Russian weapon system such as the S-400” has no place in NATO.

“It also contravenes commitments that allies made to each other that we would wind off the dependency on Russian weapons systems,” he said.

Jones praised Turkey as “a very valued ally” in NATO and a strong supporter of the alliance and a major contributor to its operations.

The purchase of S-400 batteries has been a major flashpoint of tensions in the US-Turkey relations since 2019. The United States demands that Turkey abandon the deal in favor of US-made Patriot systems. It has suspended Turkey’s participation in the F-35 jet program and imposed sanctions on the Turkish Presidency of Defense Industries under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA).

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by Special Briefing via Telephone with Douglas Jones Chargé d’Affaires a.i., U.S. Permanent Representative to the  North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)

Mr. Jones: This week’s meeting of NATO foreign ministers is going to be an important first opportunity for Secretary of State Blinken to meet face to face with his NATO counterparts. President Biden has been very clear about the United States’ commitment to re-energizing and reinvigorating its alliances, starting with NATO. And Secretary Blinken is going to use his first meeting at NATO to do just that.

The foreign ministers will have a full agenda as they prepare for the NATO Summit sometime later this year, at which President Biden will reaffirm the United States’ strong commitment to NATO, to our commitment to consulting with allies, and to our ironclad commitment to NATO’s Article 5 mutual defense clause.

At the foreign ministerial, the ministers will also discuss Afghanistan and consult on the way ahead. While no decisions have been made yet on the ongoing review that the United States is conducting about the Taliban’s compliance with the U.S.-Taliban agreement, the consultations that the United States has had with allies have played an important and critical part of that review and that consultation will continue at the foreign ministerial this week.

Allies will also discuss NATO’s continuing adaptation to meet new security threats. Two items on the agenda that in particular highlight that adaptation are climate change and China.

Climate change, we believe, is one of the most important issues that allies are confronting, and the United States is committed to working also at NATO with our allies to address this crisis. As the world’s leading military alliance, NATO can and should look at the ways in which climate change is affecting the security environment, the ways in which NATO needs to adapt to those changes, and also how NATO can mitigate its own impact on the environment.

On China, NATO foreign ministers will discuss China’s assertive and coercive actions and the way in which they impact on our common security, on our prosperity, and on our values. The United States sees the relationship with China as the most important geopolitical test of the 21st century, and China’s actions also impact on Euro-Atlantic security and NATO.

Russia is also on the agenda. President Biden has been clear that the United States will act firmly when – in response to Russian actions that harm the United States or its allies, and NATO, for its part, is focused on maintaining a strong defense and deterrence against Russian aggression and also on building our resilience against threats such as cyber, hybrid, and others.

Question: Can you confirm that U.S. troops will not be withdrawn by May 1st? Afghan analysts believe Khalilzad’s peace mission failed. How optimistic are you that the Ankara summit could have a positive outcome? Where do you see the role of Afghan women in the peace meetings?

Mr. Jones: Thank you for that question. As you know, Secretary of Defense Austin was just in Afghanistan. As he made clear, the review that I mentioned is ongoing. The United States continues to look at its force posture going forward and the Taliban’s compliance with the agreement. No decisions have been made and all options remain viable; nothing has been taken off the table. And decisions on that review will be made by the President.

Consultations here at NATO with our allies are an important part of this review. We had an opportunity when the defense ministers met earlier this year to discuss this review, and those consultations will happen again during the foreign ministerial today. Allies have stood strongly together and united in Afghanistan for going on two decades, and the United States is committed to our belief that allies went into Afghanistan together; that we will adjust our posture together; and that, when the time is right, we will leave together. And to do that, we need to talk through this process as we make decisions jointly, together.

Allies are strongly supporting this new diplomatic push that the United States is leading, also with the support of other allies such as Turkey, which is hosting the Istanbul Conference. This new diplomatic initiative is critical and we’re urging the parties – the Afghan Government, the Taliban – to engage genuinely in this process, and also urging the Taliban to reduce levels of violence so that we can create a conducive environment for diplomatic progress.

Regarding the progress that had been made in Afghanistan, including the important progress for women and children, the United States and all allies are committed to ensuring that that progress is not lost and that it is maintained, and we are also equally committed to ensuring that Afghanistan never returns to a base for terrorism that can threaten the United States or any of its allies. And so that is also, I think, an important commitment to remember as we come upon the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

Question: How does the United States see the proposal set out by NATO’s secretary general on common funding for defense and deterrence in the eastern flank, including the Black Sea?

Mr. Jones: The NATO 2030 process, which allies will be discussing at the foreign ministerial, is an important process for NATO. This is about how NATO has to continue to adapt to address new and emerging security challenges, and we think NATO 2030 is an important opportunity for that. It’s important that we remember how this started. In 2019, the leaders of NATO asked the secretary general to lead a process to look at ways we could revitalize the political dimension of NATO. We’ve had a report from a group of outside experts that have made a series of recommendations, and the secretary general is taking those recommendations and other inputs and creating recommendations that he will give to NATO leaders at the summit later this year.

An important part of this will be the question of funding. We’ve asked the alliance to do more and more over the years, and it’s important that we resource the alliance adequately to meet the level of ambition that we’re setting for it. So we are still in the process. There are many different proposals out there regarding common funding and others, so I won’t go into the details of the specific proposals, but to say that it is important that NATO’s budgets reflect the – and properly resource this alliance so that it can continue to meet current and future threats.

Question: Does removing Turkey from the F-35 program or getting Russia the S-400 air defense system create a weakness for NATO?

Mr. Jones: First of all, Turkey is a very valued ally in NATO. Turkey is a major contributor to NATO operations and it is a strong supporter of the NATO alliance. The United States has been very clear about how we view Turkey’s purchase of the S-400. We opposed the purchase of the S-400. The presence of a large Russian weapons system such as the S-400 has no place in the NATO alliance, and it also contravenes commitments that allies made to each other that we would wean off of dependency on Russian weapons systems.

But NATO is a unique place where we have conversations every day on topics which we agree on and also difficult topics that we do not agree on, and we discuss even the most difficult issues here. So we will continue to discuss with Turkey issues related to the S-400, both through our bilateral contacts with Turkey and here at NATO, and we will continue to work here at NATO together as we plot a way ahead.

Question: I have a question about Georgia’s prospects for NATO integration and the role the U.S. can play in this process. How committed is the United States to help Georgia join the alliance despite the skepticism from Germany and France? Should Georgians expect any move forward on the NATO integration process out of the ongoing ministerial?

Mr. Jones: Well, the United States is a very strong supporter of NATO’s open-door policy. The open-door policy has been a historic success and achievement of this alliance, and it’s proven its viability in recent years through the admission of new members into the alliance. And so the United States and all NATO allies believe that it is the sovereign right of every nation to decide its own future, to decide which groupings and alliances it wants to join, and we do not accept that any other country has a veto or any say in those sovereign decisions of a nation on what it would join.

Georgia has been a very strong partner of the alliance and a longtime aspirant. It is a contributor to NATO operations, and it is an Enhanced Opportunity partner of the alliance. The alliance continues to look – and the United States continues to look – to Georgia to continue to implement reforms, to strengthen its democratic institutions, to build the rule of law, to increase the interoperability of its forces with NATO, and through that reform process to make itself a stronger candidate for NATO membership.

Question: Will Secretary Blinken hold bilateral meetings with his NATO partners, and if so, with whom?

Mr. Jones: So Secretary Blinken will be holding bilateral meetings, but we have not announced them yet. So those announcements will be forthcoming as part of the – as part of the schedule is released for the NATO Foreign Ministerial.

Question: You recently met with new Deputy Prime Minister of Montenegro Dritan Abazović. What did you talk about and did you get reassurances from Mr. Abazović that the Montenegrin government will fulfill its obligations regarding NATO membership?

Mr. Jones: Well, I did meet with the deputy prime minister last week. It was a pleasure to meet with him. I think it was important that he took the time to come to NATO headquarters so early in his tenure, as did Prime Minister Krivokapić earlier come to visit NATO, and we enjoyed hearing from him and appreciated the update that he gave us of the situation in Montenegro, and we also appreciated that he reiterated Montenegro’s commitment to upholding its commitments as a NATO ally. Montenegro is a valued ally here at NATO; it’s a capable ally that makes important contributions here to this alliance. And so we value its leadership also in the Western Balkans, where it plays an important role. So we’re looking forward to Montenegro’s continued engagement here at NATO, including at the foreign ministerial this week.

Question: How concerned is the United States about the UK’s plans to cut its army by around 10,000 soldiers as part of the defense command paper?

Mr. Jones: Well, it’s important that – to remember the UK remains a – is a leading ally here at NATO, a strong ally, and we appreciate that the UK has recently concluded a comprehensive defense review, which we have supported, and also that the UK has met its 2 percent commitment for defense spending as a percentage of GDP and is committed to increased defense spending out for the next four years. And that has sent an important signal of the UK’s commitment to this alliance and to a strong – and to a strong NATO. So here at NATO, we work out the different defense capacity targets that each ally is expected to meet, and the UK continues to meet their defense capability targets, and we’ll continue to work with the UK as we do with all the allies here to ensure that this increased defense spending and all of our defense spending is going to the most effective capabilities that we need to meet the threats that this alliance protects us from.

Question: Russia has a significant military presence in Libya. Should NATO address this issue, and how?

Mr. Jones: Well, I can say, from the United States’ perspective, the United States has been supporting the UN-led process in Libya. We’ve welcomed the ceasefire agreement that was signed there, and we welcome the creation of the new government there. The – it’s important that the – all the terms of that ceasefire agreement be complied with. That includes the commitment that all foreign fighters and mercenaries will leave Libya, and we call on all parties to comply with that – those terms. NATO keeps a close eye on Libya, naturally – it’s right on NATO’s southern flank – and we discuss the issue regularly, and NATO is going to continue to watch the situation in Libya and do everything that we can as an alliance to support that country as it seeks greater stability and security.

March 27, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Middle East and Norway

Still enormous humanitarian need in Syria 10 years after war began

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 18, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

‘Today marks 10 years since the start of the war in Syria. More than half a million Syrians have been killed. Over 13 million people are dependent on humanitarian aid. Some 12 million have been forced to flee their homes. That is why Norway is maintaining a high level of support and will contribute at least NOK 1.6 billion in 2021 towards alleviating the Syria crisis,’ said Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide.

Norway is one of the largest donors to humanitarian efforts in Syria and its neighbouring countries, and has contributed over NOK 15 billion during the ten years the conflict has lasted. This makes the Syria crisis Norway’s largest ever humanitarian effort.

By providing this support, Norway, in cooperation with its humanitarian partners, will help to save lives, alleviate suffering and protect vulnerable groups. Protecting civilians and aid workers, and ensuring that women’s rights are safeguarded in the humanitarian response are key concerns.

Norway’s support for education has helped to ensure schooling for 1.2 million children and young people in Syria and its neighbouring countries each year.

‘Ten years of war means ten years of limited schooling and lost opportunities for the children and young people of Syria. Norway therefore gives top priority to education and job creation in its efforts. Syria will need an educated population to succeed in rebuilding the country,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide. 

Most of Norway’s humanitarian aid is channelled through the UN, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and Norwegian humanitarian organisations. In addition to education and job creation, priority is given to support for protection and food and nutrition. The latest figures from the World Food Programme show that the number of people currently experiencing food insecurity has increased to 12.4 million, which represents a 40 % increase in a single year.

During its two-year period as an elected member of the UN Security Council, Norway, together with Ireland, has taken on special responsibility for humanitarian issues in the Syria crisis. 

‘In the Security Council, we are working to address the civil population’s need for humanitarian assistance and protection from violence and suffering. It is vital that humanitarian organisations are given full access to all parts of the country. The scale of need is enormous and large parts of the infrastructure for basic services have been destroyed. As much as 40 % of the schools and 50 % of the health institutions have been damaged or completely demolished. For millions of people in the north of Syria, the essential supplies that are brought across the border from Turkey are a lifeline, and it is crucial that this can continue for as long as it is needed,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide.

Norway also supports UN efforts to find an inclusive, political solution to the Syria crisis. 

‘The Syria crisis is one of the great tragedies of our time. The conflict can only be solved through political negotiations and all of the involved parties must be prepared to make difficult compromises. The work being done by UN Special Envoy Geir O. Pedersen to find an inclusive political solution is critical and has our full support,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide. 

March 18, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Media Freedom

Money alone can’t buy the rebuilding of Syria

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 17, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Article by Norway’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide and Simon Coveney, Ireland’s Minister for Foreign Affairs in The National, United Arab Emirates, 14 March.

Ten years after its onset, the war in Syria has become one of the worst humanitarian disasters of the 21st century. The human cost has been beyond measure. Disturbing moments are seared in our collective consciousness, ranging from shocking chemical weapons attacks to images of doctors working in bombed out hospitals, gross human rights violations and desperate civilians forced to flee their homes.

The sheer scale of the tragedy can overwhelm us. More than 13 million people are still in need of humanitarian assistance. Sixty per cent of the population are struggling to get enough food to eat, according to World Food Programme. More than 5 million Syrians are refugees and over 6 million are internally displaced. An entire generation is growing up with no or limited access to education, and has known only conflict. Human suffering will continue to traumatise new generations of Syrians unless the conflict is brought to an end.

The unresolved conflict continues to lead to immense suffering and increasing humanitarian needs. Even if it is in a less-intense phase than before and the situation on the ground is less unstable than it was, it still hinders development and the return of refugees. Syria, meanwhile, is still fertile ground for terrorist groups, such as ISIS.

As members of the UN Security Council and as facilitators for its work on the humanitarian situation in Syria, Norway and Ireland will continue to champion the people of Syria.

They must receive the support necessary to survive and rebuild their lives. The respective responses of Norway and Ireland to the Syrian conflict has been our largest ever to a single crisis. We will once again pledge our support at the upcoming “Brussels V” conference later this month.

Financial support on its own is not enough. We must also provide humanitarian workers with the safe, secure and unimpeded access they need to reach all the people in need. Hundreds of aid workers have been killed in the course of the conflict. Too often, efforts by aid workers to reach those in need have been frustrated by administrative impediments, or the calculus of geopolitical considerations.

We will continue to advocate tirelessly in the Security Council for humanitarian actors to be given full and unimpeded access to all the people in need in all parts of Syria.

While continued provision of humanitarian assistance and access is vital, only an end to conflict and an inclusive political settlement can bring stability to Syria and end the suffering. There is no military solution to the Syrian conflict. Security Council Resolution 2254 on a political settlement in Syria provides the framework for a Syrian-owned and Syrian-led political process, facilitated by UN Special Envoy Geir Pedersen and supported broadly by the international community, including with strong support from Norway and Ireland. The inclusion of women and civil society in the peace process is crucial for the best result for the whole population.

To date, we have seen little progress in the efforts to reach a political settlement. We need joint and intensified efforts to implement UN resolutions, first and foremost from the government in Syria and all the Syrian parties, but also from the international community and the countries involved in the country’s affairs. The people of Syria deserve nothing less. The region needs it, too.

As we face a second decade of instability, conflict and human suffering, we reiterate our appeal for a lasting, nationwide ceasefire and serious engagement in the political process in Syria, in the spirit of compromise and constructive engagement. Humanitarian aid must reach all the people in need. For the sake of this and future generations of Syrians, we call for an end to this catastrophe, and for everyone to work towards peace.

March 17, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Terrorist

U.S. Steps Up Counterterrorism in Mozambique and the DRC

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 16, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

U.S. counterterrorism officials are stepping up their activities in Africa, addressing the expansion of violent extremism on the continent.

Two previously unlisted insurgent groups identified as foreign terrorist organizations operating in Mozambique and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) have been slapped with sanctions along with their leaders.

John T. Godfrey, the acting coordinator for counterterrorism and acting special envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS at a recent teleconference meeting with African journalists, discussed a new State Department designation of the two groups as “Isis-Congo” and “Isis-Mozambique”.

“In addition to naming and shaming, these designations also seek to deny ISIS in the DRC and ISIS in Mozambique as well as their leaders, Seka Musa Baluku and Abu Yasir Hassan, the resources they need to fund their terrorist activities and carry out terrorist attacks.

The designations prevent travel by members to the United States, freeze any U.S.-related assets, ban Americans from doing business with them and make it a crime to provide support or resources to the movements.

Leaders of the groups are Seka Musa Baluku, reputed head of Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) in Congo founded by Uganda rebels, and Abu Yasir Hassan, head of Ahlu Sunnah Wa-Jama (ASWJ) in Mozambique.

Godfrey declined to discuss the classified information used to definitively tie these African groups to the larger Islamic State, which planted its roots in Iraq and Syria. But the evidence is incontrovertible, he insisted. And in Congo, he said the United States is “quite confident” of a link to ISIS headquarters.

Michael Gonzales, deputy assistant secretary of the Bureau of African Affairs, also spoke at the teleconference. He noted that the U.S. already supports the Congolese army against violent extremists by bolstering civil-military operations and capabilities, military engineering, strategic communications and English-language laboratories with the goal of empowering civilian leadership to promote structural reform and professionalization of the military.

“I think these are prime examples of how the United States is really running with the vision of the Biden administration and then the statements of Secretary [of State Antony] Blinken about emphasizing our partnerships with African partners and building local capacity,” Gonzales said.

“There certainly is a keen focus on the terrorist threat in Africa on the part of the Biden-Harris administration, but some of the lines of effort that we’re currently working on there are ones we’ve been formulating for a bit of time now,” he said.

But the new designations have worrying implications, according to the Washington-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies. “While a seemingly straightforward and measured policy response to ASWJ’s brutality and its international terrorist links, it risks impeding humanitarian efforts and hobbling potential disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration activities.

In addition, wrote the authors of a report titled “The Problem with Foreign Terrorist Organization Designations” it is unlikely to significantly advance U.S. counterterrorism and counterinsurgency efforts.”

Anita Powell, writing for the Voice of America, also questioned the open-ended strategy. “How long it might take to go from “naming and shaming” to actually defeating these groups,” she wondered. “That, officials did not say.”

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by Special Briefing via Telephone with John T. Godfrey, Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Acting Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, and Michael C. Gonzales, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of African Affairs.

Mr. Godfrey:  Great.  Secretary of State Blinken designated ISIS-Democratic Republic of the Congo and ISIS-Mozambique as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists, or SDGTs for short.  He also designated Seka Musa Baluku, the leader of ISIS-DRC, and Abu Yasir Hassan, the leader of ISIS-Mozambique, as SDGTs.

Before we dig into the substance and consequences of those designations, I’d first like to take a moment to discuss the larger context at play here, which is the expanded presence of ISIS in Africa.

2019 to 2020 saw an important evolution of the threat posed by ISIS, also known as Daesh.  While the fall of Baghouz in Syria in 2019 marked the end of the physical caliphate – which was a significant milestone and inflection point – it clearly did not signal the fall of ISIS itself.  Shortly after the fall of the caliphate, then-ISIS emir Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi pointed to the ISIS-inspired attacks in Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday in 2019, which killed more than 250 innocent victims, as an example of how ISIS branches and networks outside Iraq and Syria should conduct attacks going forward to be, and I’m quoting here, a “thorn in the chest of the crusaders.”

Baghdadi’s death during a U.S. military operation later that year, and his replacement by Amir Muhammad Sa’id Abdal Rahman Al-Mawla, came in the midst of an internal reorganization of the terrorist group that was designed to delegate decisions and resources to its branches and affiliates around the world.  While al-Mawla may not have Baghdadi’s profile or charisma, he has successfully carried out Baghdadi’s dangerous vision.  

And nowhere has this trend been as alarming as in Africa.  If we are committed to the enduring global defeat of ISIS, or Daesh – and we are – then we have to confront it in Africa.  We are doing so through national actions such as these designations that Secretary Blinken announced yesterday, and through multilateral efforts, of which the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS is a key line of effort.

The 83-member D-ISIS Coalition is one of the most effective multilateral efforts in history and is an excellent example of how the United States can help lead a multilateral counterterrorism platform that leverages the tools and capabilities of countries around the globe against a common enemy.

And the D-ISIS Coalition  is now playing a role in countering ISIS activity and networks globally, including in Africa.  The coalition held its first meeting focused on West Africa and the Sahel in late 2020 to discuss potential lines of capacity-building efforts that could be undertaken there, and we anticipate expanding that focus to include other regions in Africa a bit later this year.

Returning to the terrorist designations announced yesterday, these designations put the international community on notice about these groups and individuals.  In addition to naming and shaming, these designations also seek to deny ISIS in the DRC and ISIS in Mozambique, as well as their leaders Seka Musa Baluku and Abu Yasir Hassan, the resources they need to fund their terrorist activities and carry out terrorist attacks.  Among other consequences of those designations, any property or interests in property of those designated and subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in any transactions with them.  It is a crime to knowingly provide material support or resources to ISIS in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or to ISIS in Mozambique or to attempt or conspire to do so.  Designations are one of the most important tools we have to disrupt the financial and other support networks that terrorist groups need to export violence and carry out attacks.

Today ISIS-DRC and ISIS-Mozambique should be on notice that the United States and our partners will take the steps needed to address security challenges in Africa to advance peace and security.

Question :  How would you assess the state of the cooperation between the U.S. and Africa regarding the fight against terror and money laundering tied to terrorism? 

Mr. Godfrey:  I think that I would say that overall, I would assess the state of cooperation to be very strong, in part because I think our partners in Africa are clearly seized with the fact that the terrorist threat – both ISIS-affiliated groups but also al-Qaida-affiliated groups – has, frankly, continued to grow the past several years, and frankly, the pace of that growth has increased.  So we cooperate with partners across the continent, across a range of counterterrorism activities, including those referenced in the question. 

Question:  Why is the focus on IS-Mozambique and not on the Tanzanian infrastructure that appears central to the command, to the logistics, and to its evolution?  And in addition to your response, can you share any updates on JCET for Mozambique and any linkages that may exist regarding this designation?  

Mr. Godfrey:  Let me take this – the last part of your question first and then I’ll address the other two pieces.  I think the linkage between this activity, the designations that were announced yesterday, and the other lines of effort you mentioned reflects the fact that we are taking a comprehensive approach to the terrorist threat in Mozambique, and that includes countering terrorism finance but also helping build counterterrorism capability on the part of the Mozambican Government.  I will defer to the Department of Defense to address your question about JCET.  That’s really not for me to say.  

I will say that your question – the part of your question that focuses on why the focus on ISIS-Mozambique and not on the Tanzanian infrastructure, I would say we are focused on Mozambique, first, because that is where the most dramatic manifestations of the ISIS threat in that region are, and so that’s reflected in the fact that you’ve had something like 2,000 civilian casualties and up to 670,000 internally displaced people in the Cabo Delgado region.  I would not dispute at all that there is a cross-border linkage to Tanzania, and indeed, I think we saw that reflected in a way in the cross-border attacks from northern Mozambique back into Tanzania in October of 2020.  So, certainly, we’re not ignoring the fact that this is a threat that spans across borders, and that phenomenon, I would note, is very prevalent in other areas of the continent where we’re dealing with both ISIS and al-Qaida terrorist threats.  

Question:  I just wanted to ask you, what do you plan to do, apart from the actions that you announced in your statement today, to counter the insurgency in Mozambique?  I guess it might have been the equivalent person coming to the continent, to Mozambique and announcing some law enforcement cooperation and also border patrol cooperation.  Could you perhaps give a broader picture of what actions you have in mind?  

Mr. Godfrey:  Thank you.  Yeah, indeed, that was my former boss, Coordinator Nathan Sales, who traveled to Mozambique and South Africa late last year.  And indeed, in addition to the designations announced by Secretary Blinken yesterday, we do have other lines of effort either underway or that we hope to soon be underway in Mozambique.  Those include some efforts to bolster the ability of the Mozambican Government to counter terrorism finance, and as I think most of the folks on this call today know, there’s a nexus between terrorism finance and narcotics trafficking in Mozambique that’s particularly problematic.  So we’re also looking at some counternarcotics lines of effort.  Those don’t fall within the remit of the State Department’s Counterterrorism Bureau; they fall under a different bureau in our organization, but there’s definitely a line of effort there.  We are looking at some border security measures, to go back to the earlier question from Pearl.  Some of that is because of the fact that we well understand that there’s a cross-border aspect of the ISIS threat in Cabo Delgado.  And then, finally, we’re also looking at some potential other lines of effort to help build the capacity of the Mozambican Government to interdict terrorist attacks and do crisis response in an effective way.

Question:  What is the evidence of links between ISIS and the insurgents in Mozambique beyond the reported pledges of allegiance made more than 18 months ago?  And a related question is:  What is the evidence that Abu Yasir Hassan is the leader of the group, and what precisely do you mean by leader?

Mr. Godfrey:  So, John, let me take an initial stab at that and then I’ll ask Deputy Assistant Secretary Mike Gonzales to weigh in as well.  One of the sort of truisms of doing counterterrorism work that unfortunately a lot of the information that we rely on to inform our assessments isn’t the kind of thing that we can discuss publicly, but I would say that the evidence of ties between the ISIS branch or network in Mozambique and the so-called ISIS-Core in Iraq and Syria is quite incontrovertible.  It’s something that we’re comfortable in assessing is real, and that is part of why the threat is particularly concerning for us.

Mike, let me turn to you and see if you had anything further you wanted to add.

Mr. Gonzales:  I would just add that beyond this specific designation and the more security-oriented response to the existing threat, U.S. support to Mozambique in responding to this is really representative of a holistic approach.  We recognize that there’s a critical law enforcement capability component related to this as well as impacts on development gains, economic potential of the region, regional stability.  And so our approach not only seeks to address the security side but also addressing the socioeconomic drivers of the threat, countering ISIS messaging, and providing greater economic opportunity and resilience of the community so that the attraction to violent extremism is lessened.

Question :  Some people attribute recurrent killings in Beni to terrorists.  Does the U.S. support the DRC armed forces’ fight against terrorism?

Mr. Godfrey:  So we absolutely support the DRC’s president and his administration’s commitment to countering armed and terrorist groups like ISIS-DRC, and we also are very supportive of efforts to bring peace to the regions of the DRC that have been afflicted with terrorist attacks and other violence.  That’s part of why we’ve been strong supporters of MONUSCO and their efforts to protect civilians and strengthen state institutions.

Mr. Gonzales:  I would echo John’s point of the United States’ strong support for President Tshisekedi and his administration in fighting the terrorist threat and bringing peace to eastern DRC.  We do support the FARDC in terms of their efforts against violent extremists with particularly four lines of effort – bolstering civil-military operations and capabilities; military engineering; strategic communications; and English-language laboratories – with the goal of empowering civilian leadership to promote structural reform and professionalization of the military.  And I think these are prime examples of how the United States is really running with the vision of the Biden administration and the statements of Secretary Blinken about emphasizing our partnerships with African partners and building local capacity, because it’s through that local capacity that there will be sustainable gains that are able to be realized through the future. 

Question :  The State Department has designated the ADF under the moniker ‘ISIS-DRC’ as a foreign terrorist organization, but whatever the relationship between some central members of the group and external ISIS groups, the ADF is a hybrid, locally embedded organization.  How will you decide where exactly ISIS-DRC begins and ends?

Mr. Godfrey:  The U.S. has looked hard at this and using all of our resources including sensitive information, and we’re quite confident about the facts that ADF is ISISDRC in some important aspects.  

ADF established ties with ISIS and was publicly recognized as an affiliate of ISIS in late 2018.  ISIS has claimed responsibility for ADF-attributed attacks since April of 2019 after an attack on an Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Base near Kamango.  And although some original ADF members broke away after the group pledged allegiance to ISIS, many original members – not just leadership but members of the rank and file – continue to be members of ADF as led by Baluku after ISIS publicly recognized the group as an affiliate.  

Question:  It’s no secret that there are private contractors, military contractors operating in Cabo Delgado.  And recently a report from Amnesty International did blame these contractors for some of the killings of civilians.  So my question is, how much concern is this?  And will the presence of these private contractors, be they from South Africa and Russia, affect your ability to have any significant, meaningful impact in your counterterrorism efforts? 

Mr. Godfrey:  We are concerned about the presence in Cabo Delgado of private contractors akin to those that you highlighted.  This is a phenomenon that we have seen in other areas of conflict as well.  And as in those other areas in Cabo Delgado, we assess that the presence of those entities has not demonstrably helped the government of Mozambique in countering the terrorist threat from ISIS-Mozambique that they face.  And indeed, that because those entities operate outside the strictures of normal international partnership, they have historically tended to be less responsible with respect to things like observing human rights and the law of armed conflict as they conduct their efforts.  So we’re mindful of that.  It’s frankly a feature of the landscape in Cabo Delgado that complicates rather than helps efforts to address the terror threat there. 

Question:  When you’re looking at the insurgents in Mozambique and ADF in eastern Congo, how concerned is the U.S. Government about the support networks in Tanzania? 

Mr. Godfrey:  The sort of prominence of ISIS in Mozambique definitely links back to southern Tanzania, and there is a cross-border aspect of this including the fact that we’ve now had – as I mentioned before – attacks from Cabo Delgado back into Tanzania.  I would say that the picture in terms of what that facilitation or ongoing support from one side of the border to the other looks like is not as clear as we would perhaps hope it to be.  That’s something that we continue to work on.  But certainly no question about the fact that there’s a cross-border element of this threat that is quite worrying, and that’s part of the reason that one of the issues we’ve been focused on is border security.  

Question :   ISIS has stopped making claims or statements about Cabo Delgado since November.  What is your opinion on what that means?  And is there any apparent reason for that?

Mr. Godfrey:  So one of the things that I would point to here that’s interesting about ISIS is because it’s a global network, when things happen in one part of the network, it has an impact on what the organization is able to do more broadly.  Without going into too much detail about things I can’t talk about unfortunately in an unclassified format, there’s been quite a lot of pressure on ISIS in the core in Iraq and Syria during the last several months.  And my sense is that the – the media wing of ISIS-Core has frankly been under pressure that has limited their ability to put out the kinds of statements that they normally do about the activities of ISIS-Mozambique and other branches and networks. 

Question :  Several years ago, the U.S. sent military experts to help DRC security forces fight against the LRA in the northern part of the country.  What’s the current U.S. contribution to the DRC’s efforts aimed at restoring peace to the country’s eastern provinces ravaged by illegal armed groups?

Mr. Gonzalez:  Sure, happy to do so.  So like I said earlier, in terms of our support on the security side are – we have four major lines of effort with the FARDC: civil-military operations; military engineering; strategic communications; English-language laboratories to build their capacity.  But beyond that, the United States has a rather robust foreign assistance program with the Government of the Democratic Republic of Congo recognizing the imperative of delivering services: health, education, food security, economic opportunity, as well as humanitarian assistance to the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo – all of this contributing to a comprehensive package of support that helps particularly in the past couple of years since the coming into office of President Tshisekedi to support him and his administration in bringing long-term, sustainable peace to eastern DRC.

Question :  I have a question about Nigeria.  The country has faced a decade-long insurgency in the northeast, but increasingly criminal gangs in the northwest have terrorized communities including kidnapping hundreds of school children.  How do you view this growing issue, and what efforts are being done in partnership with Nigeria to combat this?

Mr. Gonzalez:  Frankly, we’re disgusted by this pattern of mass abductions of school kids.  I can think of nothing more abhorrent.  And our condolences go out to the individuals affected and their families.  But as the questioner poses, this certainly appears by all indications to be a dynamic stemming from criminal gangs motivated by monetary and economic factors.  There’s no indication that terrorists, whether Boko Haram or ISIS-West Africa, are involved in these.  Although I would note that Boko Haram has opportunistically claimed credit for several of these kidnappings in the northwest in the past. 

So the United States is ready to provide appropriate support to the Nigerian government if requested to do so.  Longer term, we seek to help develop the capabilities of the Nigerian security services in order for them to adequately respond to the internal threats that the country faces.  Again, I think the challenges are many in Nigeria.  And we are encouraged by President Buhari’s recent replacement of all of the security-sector chiefs and looking forward to partnering with him and continuing to build the capacity of the Nigerian military in order to be able to better protect and defend their people.

Question:  Can you talk about the results of U.S. counterterrorism efforts on the continent over the last four years?  And would you say the situation in terms of terror threats in each region has gotten better, worse, or stayed the same?  

Mr. Godfrey:  We have been primarily focused over the last four years in West Africa Sahel and then over on the eastern side of the continent in Somalia, with an eye very much to the cross-border threat posed by al-Shabaab against Kenya and other regional neighbors.  I would say that we have actually made some progress in Somalia in blunting the effect of alShabaab to plan and execute attacks against Kenya, or inside Kenya I should say.  There are obviously some notable exceptions to that – the January 2020 attacks against the Manda Bay Air Base were terrible, and certainly that’s a sign that that threat remains persistent.  

On the west side of the continent, in West Africa Sahel space, we’ve partnered very closely with France and other partners and allies in what is a multilateral effort to address the drivers of instability there.  I think foremost among those is the fact that there have been issues with governments’ ability to project security and governance throughout that space, principally in Mali initially.  And obviously we’ve seen how that instability has – has since spilled across borders.  But we have been engaged, as Mike mentioned, with respect to DRC.  

The efforts we’ve made in West Africa Sahel space are certainly not limited to counterterrorism or military efforts, although those are certainly some of what we do.  It’s a more holistic effort than that which encompasses lines of effort under the U.S. Agency for International Development, other bureaus of the Department of State that do capacity building and assistance across a range of civilian lines of effort.  

The one thing I would highlight that the State Department’s Counterterrorism Bureau has done – and this is particularly so for the last couple of years – is an intensified focus on building the judicial capacity of partner countries.  That is the ability to investigate, arrest, prosecute, and incarcerate terrorists, the so-called judicial chain.  We’re quite heavily invested in a number of countries in trying to develop host governments’ abilities to have meaningful capacity at each link in that chain so that they’re able to effect civilian measures to address the terrorist threats in addition to the military efforts that are underway. 

Question :  Amnesty also accuses the Government of Mozambique or war crimes.  Does that have any impact on U.S. support for the Mozambican Government?

Mr. Godfrey:  It’s a good question, and the short answer is that we take seriously allegations of violations of human rights or violations of the law of armed conflict, particularly when they apply to countries with which we’re partnering on counterterrorism and other efforts.  I think as everybody on this call knows, we have a very rigorous process under the Leahy Law – Leahy vetting of units with which we would seek to partner that requires that the individuals and leaders of those units with which we would partner have a clean record with respect to any human rights or law of armed conflict violations.  

We take that very seriously, and there’s rigorous congressional oversight of that, such that if it’s determined that units that we have trained have individuals who don’t meet that standard, we either pause or suspend those lines of effort.  And that’s something we take very seriously.  It’s part of why it takes some time to stand up capacity-building lines of effort because that process of vetting requires time and effort to ensure that we get it right. 

Mr. Gonzalez:  I just appreciate everyone’s interest in this.  I certainly see these designations as the continuation of U.S. focus on addressing terrorism threats across the continent but recognizing that that is done as part of a holistic U.S. Government approach that addresses drivers, response, as well as the humanitarian effects – part of our ongoing commitment to the African continent and our partners there. 

March 16, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Farming

Infections from animals and the environment to humans − a growing problem

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 16, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

People can contract diseases caused by pathogens found in both animals and the environment. Pandemics seem to be getting more frequent. Why? Moreover, can new pandemics be avoided? These were some of the topics that the Norwegian Minister of Agriculture and Food, Olaug Bollestad heard about, and discussed, in a meeting with Carlos das Neves, Director of research and internationalization at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute and President of the Wildlife Disease Association (WDA), at a meeting on March 11th.

“It is important to understand the origin of this coronavirus. Most likely it came from an animal spreading thereafter to humans”, das Neves said. Credit: Ministry of Agriculture and Food

− It is important to be aware that human health is inextricably linked to animal and environmental health. The advance of new diseases often occurs at the interface between humans, animals, and the environment. Carlos das Neves is an international expert in this area, and it is useful to get an overview on the origins of pandemics and what can be done to limit them, says Minister of Agriculture and Food Olaug Bollestad (CDP).

Today, March 12th, one year has passed since Norway was shut-down due to Covid-19. Many people worldwide have died, and the pandemic has had enormous consequences at different levels, including in agriculture and food production. It is therefore worth dwelling on some of the experiences accumulated and how these can help us deal with new pandemics that will come. 

For it is far from the first time in history this has happened. Throughout the ages, people have experienced diseases with origins in animals that have toppled empires, triggered international crises and plunged entire communities into economic hardships. And now it looks as if pandemics are occurring more frequently.

How to limit and prevent pandemics?

It is known that more than 60% of emerging infectious diseases are so-called zoonoses, that is, diseases transmitted from animals to humans. Many of these originate in wild animals. At the same time, we lack an overview of the pathogens (infectious agents) the world should be especially wary of. Carlos das Neves, director of research and internationalization at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, has briefed the Norwegian Minister of Agriculture and Food Olaug Bollestad on the current covid-19 pandemic. Here he presented the ongoing investigation work into the origins of this pandemic, and how the world, through a “one health approach”, can work to predict, prevent, and be better prepared to face pandemics in the future.

Das Neves said that while it was perhaps surprising that the virus, Sars-Cov2-spread so quickly, it was widely known that viruses in the corona family were circulating in wild animals, and that this “species-jump” could happen. Despite this, many countries were not ready to deal with the spread of such a virus. This situation confirms, according to das Neves, how important it is to pay greater attention to biosecurity with good national monitoring of both animal and environmental health – at the same time as we focus on good human health.

On the hunt for the origin of the coronavirus

Das Neves is an international expert in the area of wildlife health and “One health”, and an important advocate for this holistic view, which should help shape future work and interventions. − It is through such a One Health approach that we may be able to better predict pandemic events, and perhaps prevent them from happening, das Neves said during the meeting with Minister Bollestad. 

In addition to his position at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Carlos das Neves holds other international roles. He is currently the president of the Wildlife Disease Association and a member of the Lancet One Health Commission. Das Neves is also a member of the Lancet Covid-19 Commission Task Force, which is a group working to recreate the timeline of the Covid-19 outbreak from as far back as the SARS outbreak in 2003 and up until the WHO’s declaration on the Covid-19 pandemic one year ago.

− It is important to understand the origins of this coronavirus. Most likely, it originated from an animal and spread thereafter to humans. The big question, however, is what happened to this virus in between and how it changed to become dangerous for humans. If we find out more about this, we may be better equipped to deal with similar problems in the future, he said.

Surveillance and international collaboration is important

− Major global changes are taking place in the way we use the land, such as deforestation, expanding and intensive agriculture, urbanization, and increasing trade in wild animals. These changes entail more contacts, and with it, more frequent transmission of pathogens between wild animals, domestic animals, and humans. If we stay on this course, more and more new infectious diseases will emerge, for which we may not have good defenses, said das Neves.

He refers to good animal health, which is often forgotten when it comes to the supply of food to the world’s population. “One Health” is also about how resources and ecosystems are used in the world. Among other things, Das Neves mentioned the importance of keeping food systems free of disease outbreaks, especially during the ongoing pandemic: − The last thing we need now is a major disease outbreak in food-producing animals. It would further complicate the difficult situation we already experience. This is part of One Health and is a priority area for us at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, he said.

The research director at NVI referred also to the fact that the world in general lacks good surveillance of viruses and other pathogens in wildlife species.

− While the next pandemic is unlikely to originate in Norway, we must remember that we are only a few hours’ flight away from what we consider “hot spots for emergence, such as some parts of Africa and Asia”, das Neves said. He also mentioned that Norway has a good animal health monitoring system and active preparedness against a number of health threats.

In addition, Norway has a very close and good cooperation between research, industry and government. Das Neves calling this the “Nordic model”, believes that −time and time again, this model has proved to have great advantages.

This knowledge and expertise are important for Norway to share with the world, because pandemics do not respect national borders. These are global problems that we must work on together, he added. Therefore, he also defends the importance of working with other countries to predict and prevent threats. The new EU Animal Health Regulation is an extremely good step in the right direction, and I hope more examples and initiatives will follow suit, das Neves concluded.

March 16, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

B-1 Bomber Shows ‘The Alliance is Working’

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 7, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The first-ever deployment of B-1 Lancer bombers to Norway is allowing U.S. airmen to train in Arctic conditions and NATO ally Norway to test its defences, “This is the first time we are generating flights in partnership with our close ally Norway, as well as operating from Norwegian soil,” Lt. Gen. Steven Basham, deputy commander of U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa, said during a telephone press briefing held with the chief of Norwegian Joint Headquarters, Lt. Gen. Yngve Odlo.

Working with the Americans helps Norway, which shares a 122-mile northeastern border with Russia and is a founding member of NATO, to “ensure our defense plans work,” Odlo said.

The U.S. bombers’ presence in Norway is not intended as a threat to Russia, but as a demonstration that “the alliance is working,” he said.

“Being a neighbour to Russia, I think Russia understands quite clearly what we are doing,” he said.

More than 200 Air Force personnel from Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, and four B-1B bombers deployed last month to Orland, a Norwegian air base some 300 miles south of the Arctic Circle out of which Norway operates F-35A Lightning II fighters.

The Americans are getting to know the “unique terrain and environment” of the High North region, Basham said, noting the bombers would remain in the region for several more weeks.

The training was timely, considering the security situation in Europe in recent years, Odlo said, referring to the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula and the invasion of eastern Ukraine by the Russians in 2014.

NATO has strengthened defenses along its eastern flank and stepped up multinational exercises in the past seven years.

Basham said the two NATO allies have been “extremely clear about the training we’re doing” and stressed that “the message we’re communicating is how two very close allies work together to not only learn in the air but learn on the ground.”

The bombers are training with the Norwegian navy, the country’s special forces and joint terminal air controllers, and flying with Norway’s F-35s.

They’ve dropped inert weapons on a training range in Norway, Basham said. They’ve also flown over the North and Baltic seas alongside combat aircraft from Denmark, Poland, Germany and Italy, the Air Force has said.

The bombers have held up well in the north European climate, said Basham, who began his career flying B-1s out of Grand Forks, N.D.

While “the aircraft doesn’t mind the cold,” the Norwegian military is helping the Dyess airmen adapt “to the rigors of the cold,” he said.

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by Special Briefing via Telephone with Lieutenant General Yngve Odlo Chief of the Norwegian Joint Headquarters  And Lieutenant General Steven Basham Deputy Commander, U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa.

Lieutenant General Odlo:  Thank you. It’s a special area, and our main intent is to keep this as stable as possible and also where the activity is regulated by intent and law.  For Norway, the recent defense policy are based on three fundamental rights: the national force structure, the bilateral cooperations, and the NATO membership. 

Norway has been a NATO member since the start in 1949, and for Norway, this alliance is highly important.  Within the alliance, the bilateral agreement and partnership, Norway is able to maintain a stable and robust defense culture and claim sovereign rights in our own territory.  To receive and host allied reinforcement to Norway, we must train to ensure that our defense plans work.  The host nation support concept has proven to be efficient, latest in the large scale at Trident Juncture in 2018, which was a big NATO exercise.  

However, we must continue to refine and maintain the high level to perform as planned when we need it.  The current training with the U.S. Bomber Task Force will increase the level of our own forces to integrate and operate with our nearest allies.  And during this period, we will exercise and train together with the forces from the Norwegian Navy, the Norwegian Air Force, the Norwegian Army, and the Norwegian Special Forces, and also link up with the Iceland Air Policing which we have deployed F-35 during this period. 

It’s natural for our forces to continuously train and exercise within the different warfighting domains.  This is not a new concept – in Afghanistan and Iraq, in which the forces operate closely with U.S. and allied bombers and other forces.  The effects achieved are based on long-term training and exercising, both internationally but also back in Norway with cold-weather climate over several years before. 

After this training period of Norway, the U.S., our allies, and the regional actors in the High North can experience that Norwegian and U.S. forces operate closely and safely together, this under conditions also challenged by COVID-19 virus.  Thank you. 

Lieutenant General Basham:  I’d like to start off by thanking General Odlo for the time he’s provided today as well and remarks, and not only the great support that has been provided to the Bomber Task Force.  This truly is a great opportunity for us to discuss the first-ever deployment of U.S. bombers to Norway as well as how our alliance allows us to jointly project power across not only this region but, as was just touched on, across the globe.  And again, I’d also like to again thank you and the Department of State for hosting this event and all those that have dialed in today. 

This Bomber Task Force rotation is truly historic, as I said.  While we have maintained a constant presence throughout Europe, over the past three years by flying primarily out of the United Kingdom, training really across all of Europe, certainly in the – from the Baltics to the Straits of Gibraltar, this is the first time that we are generating flights in partnership with our close ally, Norway, as well as operating from Norwegian soil.  As more countries are drawn to the Arctic region, some with competing interests, it’s imperative that we maintain free, fair access for all nations.  And we will continue to work diligently with our NATO allies and partners to ensure that stability. 

Our Norwegian friends have been working to maintain a safe and stable environment up in the High North for centuries, and their highly agile, expeditionary force[s] are experts at generating combat power in a short notice.  And it’s with great pride that we are – have an opportunity to learn from them, to familiarize our pilots with the region’s unique terrain as well as environment, our maintainers operating from new locations, new air fields, and certainly work to introduce new technology and capabilities to the collective defense effort. 

By introducing large-scale missions like the Bomber Task Force in Europe, we’ve become more interoperable with our allies and partners, ensuring that we are prepared for competition at any level.  Norway’s recent acquisition of the F-35 is just one more example of how our continued collaboration is allowing us to be more integrated than ever before. 

I’d also like to add that our focus on combined, joint all-domain command-and-control makes this level of integration possible by connecting sensors to shooters and leveraging our vast framework of air and space assets to stay ahead of potential threats, again training and operating with allies and partners, is essential to ensuring we can quickly respond to a variety of challenges.  Yet our main goal is always to preserve peace.  Our forward-deployed airmen stand watch 24/7 to honor our commitment to our friends in Europe, and our commitment is very tangible.  We are here training shoulder to shoulder with our allies to ensure stability and to send a clear message that we are poised and ready to ensure a stable region, to include the Arctic, for generations to come. 

In our current security environment, maybe one of the most diverse and uncertain we have faced in recent memory, during this Bomber Task Force deployment, our joint multinational team is becoming even more flexible, capable, and responsive to the shifting landscape.  Our ironclad commitment will ensure a stable, prosperous future. 

Question:  I just wanted to ask you about the B-1 operating in the cooler climate right now.  Have you had to make any adjustments or modifications to the airframe to sustain it in the cooler weather?  And just in general, how have the airframes been holding up? 

Lieutenant General Basham:  Jennifer, that’s a very good question and I’m a perfect person to ask that, having flown B-1s in my history.  I started out flying B-1s in Grand Forks, North Dakota, probably one of the coldest places in the United States.  These aircraft are actually out of Dyess Air Force Base, which is down in Texas.  So while the aircraft does just fine in the cold weather – as a matter of fact, I gained my greatest number of flying hours flying the B-1 out of North Dakota – the aircraft doesn’t mind.  It’s our great aviators and maintainers and support personnel who might not be as familiar with the rigors of the cold.  Our Norwegian partners are helping us along in that.  But I would offer to you, the aircraft has performed exceptionally well, and we’ve been able to operate in many different environments.  This just adds to the full list for the B-1.  

Question:  Firstly, for General Odlo, I wanted to ask why make the decision to host U.S. bombers now, for the first time?  Have there been any changes to the security situation that Norway faces that made this training more useful now?  And for General Basham, you mentioned the benefit of training and flying out of new locations.  Can you elaborate on that?  What’s the benefit of flying out of Ørland rather than just going to like Fairford again?  

Lieutenant General Odlo:  I think you have to understand, since 2014, the security situation in Europe has changed and NATO has made a decision to redefine the Article 5 and also to work out how do we defend our own territory, being abroad for decades.  So this is a natural part of that, to be able to operate and defend our own territory.  And then it’s, for the Norwegian Army or Norwegian defense forces, important to more regularly exercise and train together with our close allies.  The Bomber Task Force is an important asset to be able to conduct high intensity combined joint operations.  So to do this under Arctic conditions is timely and according to what has happened the last seven or eight years, I think.  Over.

Lieutenant General Basham:  I’ll expand on what I’m confident our aviators are learning right now.  And I’ll start with, of course, again, the ability to operate from a different airfield than you typically operate from.  There’s always something that’s just a little bit different, and under our newest concept of agile combat employment we have got to maintain the level of agility and flexibility to operate from many different places.   

We’re very good at Fairford as well as many other locations.  But operating from Norway gives a very unique opportunity to operate in a cold weather environment.  But I’m going to – and certainly the training that we’re able to conduct on a day-to-day basis with the joint terminal air controllers, the special forces in Norway, integrating probably a little bit more often than we might from other locations with their fighters, their navy.  I would offer that being on the ground with them before we operate and after we operate also creates a unique opportunity to learn from our Norwegian counterparts.  

So while the flying out of UK is great, if we don’t expand our horizon and look for other opportunities to  work with other allies, other partners, then we miss true training opportunities to continue to develop ourselves, and even more so, I would say, to learn from others.  Over. 

Question: What should Russia read into the deployment of B-1 bombers to Norway for the first time?

Lieutenant General Odlo:  I can start with that to give an answer, being a neighbor to Russia.  I think Russia understands quite clearly what we are doing.  What we are doing now and what they should read is that the alliance is working.  We are working quite closely together with our armed forces, and that’s natural, really.  Nation-states do that.  And I think we will make sure that we will not make any unreadable actions.  So I think what Russia will read out of this is a normal military activity between two close allies.  Over. 

Lieutenant General Basham:  No, I’ll just add a couple of comments here, and I think General Odlo said that very well.  There is no doubt that Russia probably looks at this as just what they would do.  As you’re looking to continue to improve your readiness, you want to make sure that you’re pushing to the limits of your capability, and in this particular case, to work so close but alongside an ally.  I think as professional militaries, we fully understand that this is a part of the competition that takes place every single day so that we can all continue to learn from each other.   So I imagine there is no surprise whatsoever.  And again, we appreciate the opportunity. 

Question:  I know Norway has pretty strict rules regulating foreign forces being based in Norway.  Is this the result of a new agreement between the two countries to allow U.S. forces to base in Norway?  And what do you get by basing bombers as opposed to F-16s or other fighter aircraft?

Lieutenant General Odlo:  Yes, we had since the end of World War II, we have always had our national policy, how do we operate being a neighbor to Russia.  And we have a quite good understanding of what we should do and what we not – should not do with regard to the – to being a neighbor to Russia both during the Cold War and also today.  So we try to be transparent, open, and also communicate what we do, and not operate too close to the border, not go into certain limits, but we behave.  And I think the most important part is that we are transparent and communicate whatever we do on a regular basis.  So that’s the most important part and it’s also a part of policy which I will not go into here.

What do we get out of basing the Bomber Task Force?  I think the Bomber Task Force is able, as mentioned by Basham, to operate in the Arctic conditions and also to operate out of Norwegian bases, and it is an important part making sure that both of us are able to do that.  For us, also the host nation support and also the integration because this is a strategic asset and it is highly important to both of us, both the armed forces but also as a joint headquarters, to be able to underwrite processes and to use this as important assets, if needed.  So I think it’s a lot of learning points doing this.  Over.

Lieutenant General Basham:  If I could just add a couple points, but I do think that was extremely well said by General Odlo.  The one thing I might add, and certainly this is – we never from a U.S. standpoint, we certainly never want to look at this as permanent basing.  It’s the ability to be able to operate from many different locations, and you have to be on the ground to understand some of the challenges that you might face.

But I would also offer – and I think that transparency is extremely important – but operating on the ground is really no different than operating in the air, and it’s the transparency that you provide by being respectful of established borders.  And certainly, professional militaries have a way – and we’ve done this for many years – a way to interact with each other, to operate with each other, and that’s on all sides.  In this particular case it gives us the opportunity to explore other areas in the short amount of time that we might be able to fly.  So I think that’s a very good question.  Thank you.

Question:  Norway is imposing certain limitations when the – when foreign forces operate from, or allied forces operate from Norwegian soil.  One of them is that allied planes should not operate east of the 24th longitude, which is in the Hammerfest region.  So I want to ask General Basham how easy it is to impose a clear message, as you said, when you’re not able to fly closer than hundreds of miles away from the Russian border ? 

Lieutenant General Odlo:  This is Lieutenant General Odlo.  Could you please say again the core of the questions?  I read you about the limitations, but it was a sentence which I missed.  Can you please say again?

Question:  How easy or how difficult it is to send a clear message, as General Basham indicated that was part of the purpose with flying in the far north ? how easy is it to send a clear message to Russia when having this limitation which is ,  which prohibits flying hundreds of miles away from the Russian border ?

Lieutenant General Basham:  Actually, I’m confident it doesn’t limit the training or the opportunity that we’ve been able to establish during this particular Bomber Task Force deployment.  The opportunity to be able to fly with Norway as well as, as you’re going to see over several weeks, we’ve flown with many other countries, so there’s – I wouldn’t say that it’s as the – limiting the message that we’re sending because the reality is the message that we’re communicating is how two very close allies work together to not only learn in the air but to learn on the ground.

So we look forward to more opportunities with other allies and partners inside the European theater.  And as was stated earlier, in the level of transparency it’s always important to make sure that we’re very clear about what we’re doing, and I think in this bomber task force we’ve been extremely clear about the training that we’re doing and the integration that’s actually occurring with a close ally.  Thank you.

Lieutenant General Odlo:  As you know, when we invite allies – close allies to operate or to exercise in Norway, it’s always – some reverberations from the political side of the house, which is normal.  And I think the most important part is that we are able to exercise and train together.  Obviously, it’s the perception, they say, it’s also communicated.  We try to be quite open and communicate what we do and our intent when we do it, so I think it’s not a reason to be offensive at all.  I think this is normal activity communicated quite well.  Over.

Question:  How long the deployment of the American bombers will last there in Norway?  And the second question is another follow-up question on Russia, because one of the first reactions when this became announced was that Russia said they could see that deployment could pose a security threat.  And based on your answers, I could say so Russia shouldn’t really see it like that.  What is your opinion? 

Lieutenant General Odlo:  I said before, this is military exercising and training to exercise the cohesion within the alliance and our ability to operate together if that’s needed.  So I think that’s what you should read out of this. 

I think also the communication is quite clear that this is what it is and it’s not an offensive operation at all; it’s normal military activity between two close allies.  The only special thing is that it’s the new asset being deployed to Norway, but it’s also a quite normal and important asset to be able to conduct high-intensity joint, combined operations, which we have done closely also in other areas of operation, like Afghanistan and Iraq.  So I think that’s the basic.  Over.

Lieutenant General Basham:  And this is Lieutenant General Basham.  I think one of the questions also was how long this would last, if I got that question right.  And we still have several weeks that we’re going to be operating in the theater.  It gives us a chance to spend time in other locations working with other allies.  And I would echo General Odlo’s comments to the – there should be no message of threat.  This is, once again, how professional militaries increase their level of expertise, their level of capability, and ultimately for the United States, this is one more opportunity for us to be able to operate from the United States, come into an environment that maybe we’ve not been there before and to be able to integrate with another country, and then ultimately be able to prove that we have the ability to be able to operate from many different environments, many different locations.

And I guess if someone were to take a message that you’re not restricted to one particular location, that would be a good message for them to perceive and we have been very clear about our agile combat employment.  The fact that we are now not just with our smaller aircraft, our fighter-type aircraft, but our bombers as well as our tankers, our airlift aircraft, our intelligence aircraft are going to be able to operate from many different locations just to increase our level of readiness and our understanding of the environments that we’re going to face.  

Question:  Can you specify a little bit more what the exercise program is?  is the plan, for example, to actually drop bombs with these bombers?  With Russia being Norway’s neighbor, what are you observing on the Kola Peninsula, and specifically that gives you pause, and which may or may not be in the back of your minds during this exercise? 

Lieutenant General Odlo:  I think I would leave the questions about the exercise program to Lieutenant General Basham, and I could start with the Russian area.  We are operating in the High North, I mean the North Atlantic, side by side by the Russian forces.  We are neighboring countries and operate in the same environment on a daily basis, and what we see is that they do this quite professionally.  They behave professionally and they do what they have to do and we do what we have to do, and that’s with huge, big respect from both nations. 

So it’s also important, I think, to understand that after 2014, we sanctioned the military operations of Russia and we – that’s quite clear.  At the same time, being a border nation to Russia, we have a quite good cooperation when it comes to the border control, to the search and rescue, and also the coast guard and resource management.  That’s working excellent.  And so – and we also have a bilateral agreement about how do we behave safely, how do we operate safely side by side.  So I think we have – the military cooperation is sanctioned politically, and at the same time we behave professionally as neighboring countries.  Over.

Lieutenant General Basham:  The great thing about the B-1 and our bomber force write large is they bring an opportunity for a large payload and they’re extremely fast in what they’re able to do.  And in this particular case, we did do some training on a range in Norway to drop some – we would call them “inert shapes.”  But it gives us the opportunity to work with joint terminal air controllers or special operations forces that are on the ground, and it allows that sensor on the ground to connect with the shooter and in this case the bombers to be able to practice dropping weapons in different environments.  And I can tell you as a B-1 pilot that not all terrain looks the same; it has a different look on radar.  And working with different individuals, there are always the unique challenges of accent or just the ability to make sure that we understand exactly what we’re doing. 

We recognize – and of course, that goes for working with naval forces as well as working with army or ground forces, as well as airmen.  And I would just offer that anytime you do training like this, the one thing you’re always thinking about if you’re ever required to employ in a location such as this, or the environment such as this, you typically don’t get a first chance to practice and then a second chance to succeed.  You have to succeed on your first opportunity.  And so that’s why it’s so important to exercise every aspect of, in this particular case, what our B-1s can do, and certainly not just with Norway but many other countries so that if ever called upon, our allies are assured that we will be on target, first time.  Over.

Lieutenant General Odlo:  I’d like to start with that.  I think – yes, you’re right about the Cold War ending.  That’s ended about 1989.  At the same time, the security situation has changed quite dramatically after 2014 and I will not try to explain what happened then.  I think everyone understands what happened.  And also NATO recognized that and said that we need to look into ourselves and how do we prepare for defending our own territories?

At the same time, the security perception has to double.  We have the terrorist organization, we have the hybrid warfare.  It’s totally different, so we are not going into a new Cold War, that’s for sure.  This is totally different now.  And I think this is more about the security policy and understanding what’s going on today. 

But for sure, we have some threats against our society and our population which we need to be able to defend our interests and our population against.  But you’re right, it’s not a Cold War; it’s totally different, but still the military force to be able to do that is very important both within the alliance, but also bilaterally.

Lieutenant General Basham:  I’ll just maybe capture a couple of points here.  There is no doubt – and I think I captured in my opening comments – our desire is actually for peace.  And as all professional countries have professional militaries, it’s our responsibility to be, if called on by the nations, to be prepared to defend not only our own nation, our own interests, but those that we have closely allied with.  

And once again, between professional militaries, that is our responsibility.  In the end, the dialogue that occurs between alliance countries and nations in many ways is certainly bolstered by the ability of those nations to work closely together and have a level of assurance that should crisis come, that the militaries will be able to respond.  But let’s make no mistake, the goal is always, always the peace, always peace and the avoidance of any type of crisis or conflict.  Thank you.

Lieutenant General Odlo:  This has been a quite interesting period.  We are looking forward to further operations with the U.S., and we do that on a daily basis both in Norway and other both NATO and coalition nations abroad.  So I think what we are doing now is fitting quite good into the whole perspective of what we are trying to achieve with our efforts.  Thank you. 

Lieutenant General Basham:  Certainly to General Odlo and to everyone that was able to join us today, we value the wonderful partnership we have with Norway and appreciate any opportunity to operate bombers out of Ørland Air Force Station, in this particular case, as well as future opportunities but with maybe other aircraft.

We look forward again to the opportunity to be able to integrate with allies and partners across Europe and allowing us to improve readiness, responsiveness, and to preserve the peace through our shared expertise.  So thank you very much.

March 7, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Science

Norwegian oil rig benefits from voice system to support critical helicopter flights

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 23, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Avinor Air Navigation Services, the Norwegian air navigation service provider will supply the Frequentis IP voice communication system (VCS) for a major oil field in the North Sea. The system allows safe control and coordination of all helicopter flights in the region, supporting the essential and timely provision of critical resources.

The oil rig in question is a vast complex of platforms and structures creating a transportation hub for surrounding oil fields. Frequentis has installed its VCS3020X for seven off-shore controller working positions in its control centre. Two additional remote on-shore positions are located at Stavanger, in Western Norway, connected via an undersea fibre optic cable, more than 100 kilometres away from the main off-shore VCS servers.

“The new VCS from Frequentis will be an important component in our delivery of critical infrastructure in the Norwegian airspace. We chose Frequentis due to their expertise in the VCS technology and we look forward to using their system in our operations,” says Ellen Lystad Executive Vice President of Technology Services in Avinor Air Navigation Services.

The Frequentis VCS3020X is a fully redundant IP VCS, with exceptionally high availability, flexibility, performance, and feature maturity. The system is easy to install, maintain and operate, while having the highest track record for reliability in the market, making it extremely suitable for safety-critical applications and remote locations such as oil rigs.

As well as being Avinor Air Navigation Services long-term partner for VCS systems in area control centres and towers, Frequentis is also a trusted long-term partner of Norwegian Public Safety network Nødnett, supporting all kinds of safety critical sea – land – air communications. A high level of interoperability between Frequentis communication platforms enables timely and efficient coordination of Nødnett blue light forces with Telenor Coastal Radio, ensuring joint rescue coordination missions, as well as safe integration of drones into the airspace. 

“Being the world market-leader in VCS deployments, Frequentis is pleased to support air transportation safety in the energy and oil industry, ensuring safe air traffic control services on an oil platform by enhancing its communication infrastructure.  Despite challenging conditions and COVID-19 restrictions, the system was successfully put into operation as planned.”, says Hannu Juurakko, Frequentis Vice President ATM Civil and Chairman of the ATM Executive team.

February 23, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Royal House

Private celebration for King Harald of Norway on 84th birthday

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 23, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Sunday marked Norwegian King Harald V’s 84th birthday, but no official events were planned for the monarch who is on sick leave after a recent knee operation.

The king will instead be feted in private, the royal palace said.

King of Norway Harald V (R) lights candles in the church of Gjerdrum. Photo: Lise Aaserud/dpa/file photo.

The king and Queen Sonja were at the Royal Lodge, Kongsseteren, on the outskirts of Oslo where Harald is continuing to recover following his January 30 operation on an injured tendon in his right knee. His sick leave is due to run until March 14.

Most public events in Norway have been curtailed due to the coronavirus pandemic. During most of 2020, the king and queen, 83, have had to self-isolate due to the pandemic.

They have both received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine.

During his period of recovery, his son, Crown Prince Haakon, has served as regent.

Haakon has chaired regular state council sessions with the Cabinet, for example.

Harald became king on January 17, 1991, following the death of his father, Olav V. The 30-year anniversary since the king and queen ascended to the throne also took place without official celebrations.

In October, the king took time off to recover after a heart procedure to replace a heart valve, although he did not need open-heart surgery. A probe was introduced through a vein in his groin to access his heart while he was under local anaesthetic.

(foreigner.fi )

February 23, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Norwegian Aid

Norway’s government grants over NOK 120 million compensation for festival sector

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 21, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Many European governments realised how seriously the cultural sector has been affected by the impact of the ongoing pandemic. Norway is part of this group, where The Royal Norwegian Ministry of Culture secured more than NOK 120 million (€11.7 million) as a compensation for festival organisers and subcontractors.

The amount is distributed by Norway’s cultural council (Kulturradet), which has so far paid approximately NOK 1.4 billion to more than 2,000 applicants through various compensation packages for 2020. The latest one covers the period of May to August 2020 for some of the biggest players in Norway’s festival sector. Live Nation Norway has been granted almost the entire amount of compensation they applied for, receiving NOK 24.7 million as an organiser. Nordic live entertainment powerhouse All Things Live will receive NOK 36.4 million for around 20 concerts that had to be cancelled in 2020; while Live Nation-owned Oslo festival Tons of Rock will benefit from NOK 36.1 million. Other applicants received compensation, including Kristiansand beach festival, Palmesus (NOK 27.1 million), organiser of Ålesund Live and Jugendfest, Momentium Live (NOK 8.4 million), and Fredrikstad-based festival, Idyll (NOK 8.7 million).

 Kristin Danielsen, the director of the cultural council said:

“The largest players in the sector are also large employers and an important part of the cultural sector’s business chain. Therefore, I would have liked to have had the application process completed earlier.At the same time, it has been important for us to process the applications thoroughly. These are community funds, and it is our responsibility to manage them in the best possible way.”

The scheme is designed to compensate organisers and subcontractors that were financially impacted by the Norwegian government’s ban on live events which was extended into late 2020, causing the cancellation of the country’s biggest festivals. Following the example of Germany, Belgium, Austria and the Netherlands, Norway’s ministry of culture also announced a NOK 350 million cancellation insurance fund for festivals earlier this month, allowing organisers to plan for this summer without the financial risk posed by a potential COVID-19 outbreak.

Image Credit: Daniel Lilleeng (via Facebook)

February 21, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

Norwegian Army adding 20 CV90s to its fleet

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 20, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

BAE Systems has received an order from the Norwegian Army for 20 additional CV90 Infantry Fighting Vehicles to increase the combat power of its existing fleet.

The Norwegian Defence Materiel Agency awarded the more than $50 million contract that will increase the Army’s fleet to 164 vehicles as part of its effort to grow and modernize in the face of evolving threats.

Norway is one of seven CV90 users and is the latest customer to enhance its fleet of combat-proven CV90s following significant life extension and mid-life upgrade contracts from Switzerland and the Netherlands. The new Norwegian order for 12 engineering and eight multi-carrier CV90 variants is scheduled for delivery in 2023.

“We look forward to fielding another 20 modern CV90 combat support vehicles into the Norwegian Army,” said Brigadier Øyvind Johan Kvalvik, Norwegian Defence Materiel Agency´s Land Systems Division. “These additional vehicles will provide the Norwegian Army with the room for maneuver and combat power that the Army needs to be able to complete its missions using the most modern IFV vehicles in the world.”

BAE Systems Hägglunds, the manufacturer of the CV90 based in Örnsköldsvik, Sweden, will deliver the new vehicles in cooperation with Ritek, an established Norwegian CV90 partner. With Ritek at the center of the local industrial cooperation hub, up to 30 potential Norwegian suppliers will be responsible for upgrading and repairing components, as well as delivering new subsystems and technology solutions as part of future upgrades for the Norwegian CV90 fleet.

“We have a strong track record of delivering on time, at cost, and high quality to the Norwegian Army. This follow-up order demonstrates the importance of successful relationships with in-country industry partners like Ritek,” said Tommy Gustafsson-Rask, managing director of BAE Systems Hägglunds. “As we work to enhance the Norwegian Army’s existing fleet of CV90s, deepening our existing relationships with local industry will naturally benefit our end users.”

BAE Systems has a successful history of industrial cooperation projects in Norway that have strengthened industry partnerships, transferred technical know-how, and exceeded customer expectations and requirements. During the latest CV90 procurement and upgrade contract, BAE Systems Hägglunds delivered 100 percent offset obligation five years ahead of schedule.

BAE Systems and Ritek look forward to strengthening their relationship through the successful execution of this contract. “Our cooperation with the Norwegian Armed Forces and BAE Systems Hägglunds is based on trust and experience between all parties involved. We are very pleased with this new agreement which brings a positive local employment effect for Ritek as we focus on delivering this critical capacity to the Norwegian Army in the form of more combat support vehicles,” said Hilmar Olsen, general manager at Ritek. “We also expect the project to provide long-term opportunities for several other Norwegian suppliers across the country.”

Norway is one of seven European users operating the CV90. The others are Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Switzerland, Sweden and the Netherlands. With close to 1,300 vehicles in service in multiple variants, the vehicle is combat-proven and designed to accommodate future growth to meet evolving missions.

February 20, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Terrorist

Norway arrests boy on suspicion of plotting ISIS terrorist attack

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 19, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

A teenager has been arrested in Norway on suspicion of planning a terrorist attack.

The Syrian youngster, who is believed to have sympathies with ISIS, was arrested in Oslo, Norway’s domestic security agency said on Friday.

The 16-year-old was detained on Thursday.

A person has been arrested in Norway on suspicion of planning a terror attack. Reuters

Head of the security service Hans Sverre Sjoevold told Norwegian broadcaster NRK that the youth was a Syrian national but declined to say whether the attack was planned to take place in Norway.

No details were given as to when the attack was to be carried out.

The boy arrived in Norway through a family reunification scheme.

The security agency said he was expected to appear in court in Oslo on Friday for a custody hearing which would be held behind closed doors.

Earlier on Friday, a 30-year-old Norwegian woman of Pakistani descent, who was repatriated to Norway last year from a refugee camp in north-eastern Syria, was charged with participation in extremist groups.

The woman, who was not identified, had travelled to Syria in June 2013, and is the first woman in Norway to be charged under the offence.

Prosecutor Geir Evanger told NTB that the woman had married three foreign fighters in Syria and had children with two of them.

The woman claimed she was held against her will and later stranded in Syria’s Al Hol, the largest camp housing people who once lived in areas controlled by ISIS in Syria and Iraq.

Terrorist attacks in Norway in recent years have mostly been carried out by right-wing extremists, most notably the 2011 massacre by Anders Behring Breivik, who killed 77 people in a bombing and shooting rampage.

Last year, Philip Manshaus, 22, was jailed for 21 years for killing his Chinese-born stepsister and then opening fire on an Oslo mosque in 2019.

February 19, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

British commandos undergo extreme survival training in Norway

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 19, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

British commandos have been put through their paces as they underwent extreme survival training Norwegian woodland where temperatures can drop to -30C (-22F).

Pilots and aircrew from the Joint Helicopter Command were challenged during Exercise Clockwork, a cold weather warfare course at the Norwegian air base at Bardufoss.

Before taking to the skies over the Arctic Circle, the aviators of the UK’s Joint Helicopter Command must complete the cold weather warfare course – a tradition which has been taking place for 52 years.

The exercise gives them vital insight into surviving and fighting in one of the planet’s most inhospitable environments, where the sun barely rises and temperatures can plummet to around -22F.

Specialist Royal Marines instructors of the Mountain Leader Cadre lead the fliers through this challenging training, which includes jumping into icy water to cope with cold shock and living out of survival shelters. 

The group of military personnel are also challenged to move on skis and snowshoes on long distance marches.

The raw and insightful series of pictures reveal the tough conditions they face during the course in blistering cold and snowy conditions. 

Overcoming some of the harshest weather conditions, the commandos battle with only a few hours of daylight and freezing temperatures as they train to survive in dangerous conditions. 

During the exercise, they take part in the infamous ice breaking drills which sees them stepping into freezing cold waters and submerging themselves.

The military personnel step into the hole cut out of a body of water covered in ice with their backpacks and must climb out unassisted with only ski poles to help them.

They also have to learn survival skills, building shelters in the snow covered woodland and living off the land around them. In the latest series of snaps, they can be seen huddling together around a fire they had made.  

Once completed, the fliers are ready to take to the skies and carry out their own specialist training in Arctic flying, engineering and refuelling and providing aerial support to Royal Marines on the ground – and hunting and destroying enemy targets over the mountainous terrain.

Naval Airman Matt Vickers, an aircraft handler from 845 Naval Air Squadron of the Commando Helicopter Force, is living out of a brushwood shelter in the Arctic wilderness during the cold weather course.

February 19, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Norwegian Nobel Prize 2024

101207 The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2024 to Japan’s Hiroshima bomb survivor group Nihon Hidankyo.

Special Interest

  • Africa and Norway
  • Asia and Norway
  • Asylum
  • China and Norway
  • Corruption in Norway
  • Crimes
  • Defence
  • Diplomatic relations
  • Economics
  • Environment
  • Farming
  • Killing
  • Media Freedom
  • Middle East and Norway
  • NATO and Norway
  • Nobel Peace Prize
  • Norwegian Aid
  • Norwegian American
  • Oil & Gas
  • Peace Talks
  • Politics
  • Racism in Norway
  • Religion
  • Russia and Norway
  • Royal House
  • Science
  • Sex scandal
  • Sports
  • Spy War
  • Srilanka and Norway
  • Svalbard
  • Terrorist
  • Taiwan and Norway
  • Video clips

Follow Us

Recent Posts

  • Indonesia’s Emission Reduction Efforts A Success

    November 9, 2025
  • Oslo hosts Azerbaijan’s Victory Day anniversary

    November 8, 2025
  • Norway lifts arms embargo against Cyprus

    November 8, 2025
  • Norwegian Foreign Minister visit China

    November 8, 2025
  • Chinese Buses Can Be Turned Off Remotely in Norway

    November 6, 2025
  • Russia’s Embassy in Norway Honors the 80th Anniversary of Victory

    November 1, 2025

Social Feed

Social Feed

Editors’ Picks

Norway opens market for Sri Lankan fish exports...

May 13, 2016

Sri Lanka – Nordic Business Council holds discussions...

May 15, 2016

Good governance to Sri Lanka

May 15, 2016

Shock and Joy in Sri Lanka – Erik...

May 15, 2016

Sri Lanka-Norway plenty of new opportunities for business–...

May 15, 2016

NORWAY NEWS is an online news site, written in English, dedicated to Norwegian affairs at home and abroad. Norway News.com is published online. It is a daily online newspaper in existence since May, 2003. The site is run by an Independent Journalist.

Facebook Twitter Youtube

Useful Links

    • Work With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Collaboration
    • Data Collection
    • Workplace
    • Adverstising
    • Privacy Policy
    • International Collab
    • Feedback
    • Terms of Use
    • About Our Ads
    • Help & Support
    • Entertainment
    • News Covering
    • Technology
    • Trending Now

Politics

Syrian, Norway to boost cooperation on mine clearance
Erna to step down as Conservative Party leader in 2026
Norwegian Labour Party on re-election win

Latest Articles

Indonesia’s Emission Reduction Efforts A Success
Oslo hosts Azerbaijan’s Victory Day anniversary
Norway lifts arms embargo against Cyprus
Norwegian Foreign Minister visit China

Norway News 2025 . All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News

  • Home
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us

Editor’s Picks

  • UN concern over Sri Lanka’s cases of enforced disappearances

    October 8, 2025
  • UN Human Rights Council Resolution on Sri Lanka’s Path to Reconciliation

    October 7, 2025
  • International should support Sri Lanka: Solheim

    October 4, 2024
  • Norwegian Meets Sri Lankan’s Challenges

    May 3, 2024
  • Norwegian Ambassador meets JVP in Sri Lanka

    May 2, 2024
  • “The man who didn’t run away” – Eric Solheim

    April 30, 2024

Newsletter

@2025 - All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News