NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Friday, December 26, 2025
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Copyright 2025- All Right Reserved Norway News
Defence

Norway’s first Poseidon enters final Assembly

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 14, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Boeing is preparing to commence final assembly of the Royal Norwegian Air Force’s (RNoAF’s) first P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft.

The US manufacturer announced on April 12 that the fuselage for the first RNoAF P-8A – line number 8796 – had arrived at the Boeing facilities in Renton, Washington, from Spirit AeroSystems in Wichita, Kansas, on April 9. This marked a major milestone in production of the first of five Poseidons for the RNoAF.

The fuselage of the Royal Norwegian Air Force’s first P-8A Poseidon after being moved on April 9 from a rail car through to the first step of the assembly process, the Fuselage Systems Installation tool, in Renton, Washington. 

As with all Poseidons, initial assembly will take place on Boeing Commercial Airplanes’ 737 production line, where the fuselage receives additional wiring and systems needed to support military components, equipment and operation. The aircraft is then delivered to Boeing’s Defense, Space & Security unit for the installation of military systems, testing and delivery to its military customer.

Boeing was awarded a production contract for the five RNoAF aircraft on January 25, 2019. Norway is expected to receive its first Poseidon later this year. The five P-8As will eventually replace the RNoAF’s current fleet of six P-3C/N Orions and three Dassault Falcon 20ECMs and will provide advanced capabilities to maintain situational awareness in neighbouring waters on and below the surface of the ocean.

To date, Boeing has delivered 104 P-8 aircraft to the US Navy and customers in Australia, India and the United Kingdom.

April 14, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Killing

A Norwegian citizen died in the Philippines

by Nadarajah Sethurupan April 13, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

A Norwegian citizen has died in the Philippines, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed on Friday.

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is aware that a Norwegian citizen has died in the Philippines. 

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs can not comment on further individual details in an ongoing consular case,” communications manager Trude Måseide in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs wrote in an email to news bureau NTB.

According to the newspaper VG, local media write that the man was shot in his own home during a robbery.

April 13, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Myanmar’s CDM movement nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 29, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

A group of six professors in social science at the University of Oslo in Norway has nominated the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) of Myanmar for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2022.

Mizzima spoke with the spokesperson for the professors, Kristian Stokke, Professor of Human Geography at the University of Oslo. 

Stokke said he had been researching questions of popular movements and democratization for 25 to 30 years.

“For the last 10 years I’ve been following politics in Myanmar and the reason we are talking now is probably because I have nominated the Civil Disobedience Movement for the Nobel Peace Prize.

“The Nobel Peace Prize is generally recognized as a very visible, foremost peace prize internationally.

“It is first and foremost a recognition for individuals or organizations that have made a major contribution towards peace in one situation or another.

“The nomination is in recognition of the civil disobedience movement and their non-violent struggle for democracy in Myanmar. 

“And one reason that we nominated is that it’s an expression of support for the movement.

“So far, I think that the international community has made some important statements condemning the coup and the military’s brutal use of violence. 

“There have been fewer statements of support or recognition for the popular movement for democracy and peace, or against the coup essentially. So the nomination can also be seen as an international statement of support for the movement. 

“The Peace Prize has often been given to individuals, sometimes to organisation but then very formal organisations. It’s not so common to give the prize to a social movement, but that’s in our case a very deliberate choice to nominate the moment rather than to nominate a political leader or some formal organization.

“We do think that the question of the political future in Myanmar is very much dependent on the broad popular mobilization against the coup and for a return, but not just a return- to formal democracy, but to build a better, more real democracy. And a democracy that can also create true national unity and peace.

“So it is in the recognition that real democracy has something that goes beyond formal democracy, that has to rely on struggles, on movements, and CDM is a foremost example of that.  And it is also important in other settings, not just in Myanmar. They are also a foremost example of a popular movement for democracy in a time when democracy is under pressure – pressure globally – from authoritarian actors and agendas. 

“They should win the prize for their mass mobilization, the use of nonviolence for democracy and peace, for their contribution to building a broad movement across traditional divides for national unity, for real federal democracy, because it is an inspiration. An example of mass mobilization for democracy at the largest scale internationally. 

“They should win it because they deserve it but they should also win it because it will have political implications and send important signals.”

March 29, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

NATO F-35 Milestone: First F-35A for Denmark Takes Flight

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 28, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Earlier last week, L-001, Denmark’s first F-35 Lightning II production aircraft flew its inaugural flight. Denmark is the fifth European NATO nation to fly and operate an F-35, strengthening NATO’s 5th generation airpower foundation. Denmark is joining four other European nations who already operate the F-35: the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Norway and Italy.

Like the F-16 before it, the F-35 is spearheading NATO’s air power and ensuring strategic integration of allied combat airpower. The vital interoperability of the 5th Generation F-35 binds 13 allies and partners with the United States in air dominance and enabling critical joint capabilities. The F-35 will serve as a force multiplier for Denmark, allowing the Royal Danish Air Force to train and fight alongside NATO allies and create a strong deterrent.

Denmark’s first F-35 takes to the air for its first flight

“Achieving the first flight of Denmark’s first F-35 is major milestone for the Denmark F-35 program and a testament to the outstanding abilities of our dedicated and highly trained joint industry and government team,”  said Bill Brotherton, acting F-35 vice president and general manager. “This team’s focus on delivering the most effective, survivable and connected fighter in the world will ensure the sovereign protection of Denmark and strengthen allies and partners through the NATO F-35 coalition.”

L-001 is scheduled to be delivered to the Royal Danish Air Force in April and will be flown to Luke Air Force Base, Arizona, later this year for pilot and maintainer training. F-35s will arrive in Denmark in 2023 and be based at Royal Danish Air Force’s Fighter Wing Skrydstrup where it will safeguard the skies over Denmark and its NATO allies.

March 28, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Science

Norway ramps up support to combat non-communicable diseases (NCDs)

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 28, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway has signed a two-year agreement with World Health Organization (WHO) for an amount of 220 Million NOK (US$ 26 million) to support activities aiming at reducing mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, respiratory diseases, and mental health conditions in low- and middle-income countries.

The WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health is among the actions that will receive funding. It covers Bangladesh, Jordan, Paraguay, Philippines, the Ukraine, and Zimbabwe. Nepal will join as the seventh Special Initiative country.

The Flagship Initiative includes developing equitable pathways of care for non-communicable disease (NCD) in Ethiopia, Ghana, Myanmar, and Nepal, as well as activities related to NCD risk factor reduction, covering tobacco, alcohol, air pollution, unhealthy diets, and lack of physical activity. The Flagship Initiative supports the WHO Safer initiative on alcohol control, work on health taxes on tobacco, alcohol, and sugar.

“Health conditions in low- and middle-income countries are shifting, with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasing. However greater awareness of the changing burden of disease has not translated into significant shifts in resources globally. With the Flagship Initiative we hope to mitigate that,” Dag-Inge Ulstein, Norwegian Minister of International Development, said.

NCDs disproportionately affect people in low- and middle-income countries, where more than three quarters of global NCD deaths – 32 million – occur annually, including 12 million between the ages of 30 and 70. NCDs threaten progress towards the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which includes a target of reducing premature deaths from NCDs by one-third by 2030. According to WHO, only 17 countries in the world are on track to achieve this target.

“Poverty is closely linked with NCDs. As the world is restarting the global economy —moving from locking down societies to locking down the virus – the rapid rise in NCDs is predicted to impede poverty reduction initiatives in low-income countries, particularly by increasing household costs associated with health care,” Ulstein said.

“Covid-19 has exposed and exacerbated the global burden of NCDs and mental health conditions, and although the pandemic will recede, these leading causes of death will continue to cut short the lives of millions of people each year,” said WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

“Just as we have effective tools to prevent, diagnose and treat Covid-19, we have effective tools for preventing and managing NCDs and mental health conditions, but they need to be scaled up dramatically in all countries. We’re very grateful for Norway’s support, which will help to save lives, prevent needless suffering and generate massive social and economic benefits for countries.”

“Scaling up services that meet the health-care needs of people with NCDs and mental health conditions, and protect people against the spread of NCDs, are driving progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals for an equal future for everyone and for the benefit of everyone,” said Dr Ren Minghui, Assistant Director-General for Universal Health Coverage/Communicable and Noncommunicable Diseases at WHO.

Concerned with the large and rising number of deaths from non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries, Norway launched its strategy “Better health, Better Lives. Combating Non-Communicable Diseases in the Context of Norwegian Development Policy (2020-2024)” in November 2019.

“Norway is the first donor country in the world with an international development strategy on NCDs and mental health. With this strategy I hope Norway can play a leading role in expanding work on NCDs in international health and development policy as well as ensuring practical action in low-income countries,” said Ulstein.

Adding that WHO has a leadership and coordination role in promoting and monitoring global action against non-communicable diseases. “With this Flagship Initiative we seek to strengthen WHO’s work in this field and continue to be a reliable and strong supporter of the WHO.”

March 28, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
NATO and Norway

US Seeks Dialogue With Turkey through NATO

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 27, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The United States will continue discussions with Turkey bilaterally and through NATO on issues related to Ankara’s purchase of Russian-made S-400 air defense systems, US mission to NATO Charge d’Affaires Douglas Jones told reporters on Monday.

“The United States has been very clear about how we view Turkey’s purchase of the S-400. We oppose the purchase of the S-400,” Jones said during an online briefing. “We will continue to discuss with Turkey issues related to the S-400 both through our bilateral contacts with Turkey and here at NATO. And we will continue to work here at NATO together as we plot the way ahead.”

Jones reiterated the United States’ stance that the presence of “a large Russian weapon system such as the S-400” has no place in NATO.

“It also contravenes commitments that allies made to each other that we would wind off the dependency on Russian weapons systems,” he said.

Jones praised Turkey as “a very valued ally” in NATO and a strong supporter of the alliance and a major contributor to its operations.

The purchase of S-400 batteries has been a major flashpoint of tensions in the US-Turkey relations since 2019. The United States demands that Turkey abandon the deal in favor of US-made Patriot systems. It has suspended Turkey’s participation in the F-35 jet program and imposed sanctions on the Turkish Presidency of Defense Industries under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA).

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by Special Briefing via Telephone with Douglas Jones Chargé d’Affaires a.i., U.S. Permanent Representative to the  North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)

Mr. Jones: This week’s meeting of NATO foreign ministers is going to be an important first opportunity for Secretary of State Blinken to meet face to face with his NATO counterparts. President Biden has been very clear about the United States’ commitment to re-energizing and reinvigorating its alliances, starting with NATO. And Secretary Blinken is going to use his first meeting at NATO to do just that.

The foreign ministers will have a full agenda as they prepare for the NATO Summit sometime later this year, at which President Biden will reaffirm the United States’ strong commitment to NATO, to our commitment to consulting with allies, and to our ironclad commitment to NATO’s Article 5 mutual defense clause.

At the foreign ministerial, the ministers will also discuss Afghanistan and consult on the way ahead. While no decisions have been made yet on the ongoing review that the United States is conducting about the Taliban’s compliance with the U.S.-Taliban agreement, the consultations that the United States has had with allies have played an important and critical part of that review and that consultation will continue at the foreign ministerial this week.

Allies will also discuss NATO’s continuing adaptation to meet new security threats. Two items on the agenda that in particular highlight that adaptation are climate change and China.

Climate change, we believe, is one of the most important issues that allies are confronting, and the United States is committed to working also at NATO with our allies to address this crisis. As the world’s leading military alliance, NATO can and should look at the ways in which climate change is affecting the security environment, the ways in which NATO needs to adapt to those changes, and also how NATO can mitigate its own impact on the environment.

On China, NATO foreign ministers will discuss China’s assertive and coercive actions and the way in which they impact on our common security, on our prosperity, and on our values. The United States sees the relationship with China as the most important geopolitical test of the 21st century, and China’s actions also impact on Euro-Atlantic security and NATO.

Russia is also on the agenda. President Biden has been clear that the United States will act firmly when – in response to Russian actions that harm the United States or its allies, and NATO, for its part, is focused on maintaining a strong defense and deterrence against Russian aggression and also on building our resilience against threats such as cyber, hybrid, and others.

Question: Can you confirm that U.S. troops will not be withdrawn by May 1st? Afghan analysts believe Khalilzad’s peace mission failed. How optimistic are you that the Ankara summit could have a positive outcome? Where do you see the role of Afghan women in the peace meetings?

Mr. Jones: Thank you for that question. As you know, Secretary of Defense Austin was just in Afghanistan. As he made clear, the review that I mentioned is ongoing. The United States continues to look at its force posture going forward and the Taliban’s compliance with the agreement. No decisions have been made and all options remain viable; nothing has been taken off the table. And decisions on that review will be made by the President.

Consultations here at NATO with our allies are an important part of this review. We had an opportunity when the defense ministers met earlier this year to discuss this review, and those consultations will happen again during the foreign ministerial today. Allies have stood strongly together and united in Afghanistan for going on two decades, and the United States is committed to our belief that allies went into Afghanistan together; that we will adjust our posture together; and that, when the time is right, we will leave together. And to do that, we need to talk through this process as we make decisions jointly, together.

Allies are strongly supporting this new diplomatic push that the United States is leading, also with the support of other allies such as Turkey, which is hosting the Istanbul Conference. This new diplomatic initiative is critical and we’re urging the parties – the Afghan Government, the Taliban – to engage genuinely in this process, and also urging the Taliban to reduce levels of violence so that we can create a conducive environment for diplomatic progress.

Regarding the progress that had been made in Afghanistan, including the important progress for women and children, the United States and all allies are committed to ensuring that that progress is not lost and that it is maintained, and we are also equally committed to ensuring that Afghanistan never returns to a base for terrorism that can threaten the United States or any of its allies. And so that is also, I think, an important commitment to remember as we come upon the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

Question: How does the United States see the proposal set out by NATO’s secretary general on common funding for defense and deterrence in the eastern flank, including the Black Sea?

Mr. Jones: The NATO 2030 process, which allies will be discussing at the foreign ministerial, is an important process for NATO. This is about how NATO has to continue to adapt to address new and emerging security challenges, and we think NATO 2030 is an important opportunity for that. It’s important that we remember how this started. In 2019, the leaders of NATO asked the secretary general to lead a process to look at ways we could revitalize the political dimension of NATO. We’ve had a report from a group of outside experts that have made a series of recommendations, and the secretary general is taking those recommendations and other inputs and creating recommendations that he will give to NATO leaders at the summit later this year.

An important part of this will be the question of funding. We’ve asked the alliance to do more and more over the years, and it’s important that we resource the alliance adequately to meet the level of ambition that we’re setting for it. So we are still in the process. There are many different proposals out there regarding common funding and others, so I won’t go into the details of the specific proposals, but to say that it is important that NATO’s budgets reflect the – and properly resource this alliance so that it can continue to meet current and future threats.

Question: Does removing Turkey from the F-35 program or getting Russia the S-400 air defense system create a weakness for NATO?

Mr. Jones: First of all, Turkey is a very valued ally in NATO. Turkey is a major contributor to NATO operations and it is a strong supporter of the NATO alliance. The United States has been very clear about how we view Turkey’s purchase of the S-400. We opposed the purchase of the S-400. The presence of a large Russian weapons system such as the S-400 has no place in the NATO alliance, and it also contravenes commitments that allies made to each other that we would wean off of dependency on Russian weapons systems.

But NATO is a unique place where we have conversations every day on topics which we agree on and also difficult topics that we do not agree on, and we discuss even the most difficult issues here. So we will continue to discuss with Turkey issues related to the S-400, both through our bilateral contacts with Turkey and here at NATO, and we will continue to work here at NATO together as we plot a way ahead.

Question: I have a question about Georgia’s prospects for NATO integration and the role the U.S. can play in this process. How committed is the United States to help Georgia join the alliance despite the skepticism from Germany and France? Should Georgians expect any move forward on the NATO integration process out of the ongoing ministerial?

Mr. Jones: Well, the United States is a very strong supporter of NATO’s open-door policy. The open-door policy has been a historic success and achievement of this alliance, and it’s proven its viability in recent years through the admission of new members into the alliance. And so the United States and all NATO allies believe that it is the sovereign right of every nation to decide its own future, to decide which groupings and alliances it wants to join, and we do not accept that any other country has a veto or any say in those sovereign decisions of a nation on what it would join.

Georgia has been a very strong partner of the alliance and a longtime aspirant. It is a contributor to NATO operations, and it is an Enhanced Opportunity partner of the alliance. The alliance continues to look – and the United States continues to look – to Georgia to continue to implement reforms, to strengthen its democratic institutions, to build the rule of law, to increase the interoperability of its forces with NATO, and through that reform process to make itself a stronger candidate for NATO membership.

Question: Will Secretary Blinken hold bilateral meetings with his NATO partners, and if so, with whom?

Mr. Jones: So Secretary Blinken will be holding bilateral meetings, but we have not announced them yet. So those announcements will be forthcoming as part of the – as part of the schedule is released for the NATO Foreign Ministerial.

Question: You recently met with new Deputy Prime Minister of Montenegro Dritan Abazović. What did you talk about and did you get reassurances from Mr. Abazović that the Montenegrin government will fulfill its obligations regarding NATO membership?

Mr. Jones: Well, I did meet with the deputy prime minister last week. It was a pleasure to meet with him. I think it was important that he took the time to come to NATO headquarters so early in his tenure, as did Prime Minister Krivokapić earlier come to visit NATO, and we enjoyed hearing from him and appreciated the update that he gave us of the situation in Montenegro, and we also appreciated that he reiterated Montenegro’s commitment to upholding its commitments as a NATO ally. Montenegro is a valued ally here at NATO; it’s a capable ally that makes important contributions here to this alliance. And so we value its leadership also in the Western Balkans, where it plays an important role. So we’re looking forward to Montenegro’s continued engagement here at NATO, including at the foreign ministerial this week.

Question: How concerned is the United States about the UK’s plans to cut its army by around 10,000 soldiers as part of the defense command paper?

Mr. Jones: Well, it’s important that – to remember the UK remains a – is a leading ally here at NATO, a strong ally, and we appreciate that the UK has recently concluded a comprehensive defense review, which we have supported, and also that the UK has met its 2 percent commitment for defense spending as a percentage of GDP and is committed to increased defense spending out for the next four years. And that has sent an important signal of the UK’s commitment to this alliance and to a strong – and to a strong NATO. So here at NATO, we work out the different defense capacity targets that each ally is expected to meet, and the UK continues to meet their defense capability targets, and we’ll continue to work with the UK as we do with all the allies here to ensure that this increased defense spending and all of our defense spending is going to the most effective capabilities that we need to meet the threats that this alliance protects us from.

Question: Russia has a significant military presence in Libya. Should NATO address this issue, and how?

Mr. Jones: Well, I can say, from the United States’ perspective, the United States has been supporting the UN-led process in Libya. We’ve welcomed the ceasefire agreement that was signed there, and we welcome the creation of the new government there. The – it’s important that the – all the terms of that ceasefire agreement be complied with. That includes the commitment that all foreign fighters and mercenaries will leave Libya, and we call on all parties to comply with that – those terms. NATO keeps a close eye on Libya, naturally – it’s right on NATO’s southern flank – and we discuss the issue regularly, and NATO is going to continue to watch the situation in Libya and do everything that we can as an alliance to support that country as it seeks greater stability and security.

March 27, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Middle East and Norway

Still enormous humanitarian need in Syria 10 years after war began

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 18, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

‘Today marks 10 years since the start of the war in Syria. More than half a million Syrians have been killed. Over 13 million people are dependent on humanitarian aid. Some 12 million have been forced to flee their homes. That is why Norway is maintaining a high level of support and will contribute at least NOK 1.6 billion in 2021 towards alleviating the Syria crisis,’ said Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide.

Norway is one of the largest donors to humanitarian efforts in Syria and its neighbouring countries, and has contributed over NOK 15 billion during the ten years the conflict has lasted. This makes the Syria crisis Norway’s largest ever humanitarian effort.

By providing this support, Norway, in cooperation with its humanitarian partners, will help to save lives, alleviate suffering and protect vulnerable groups. Protecting civilians and aid workers, and ensuring that women’s rights are safeguarded in the humanitarian response are key concerns.

Norway’s support for education has helped to ensure schooling for 1.2 million children and young people in Syria and its neighbouring countries each year.

‘Ten years of war means ten years of limited schooling and lost opportunities for the children and young people of Syria. Norway therefore gives top priority to education and job creation in its efforts. Syria will need an educated population to succeed in rebuilding the country,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide. 

Most of Norway’s humanitarian aid is channelled through the UN, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and Norwegian humanitarian organisations. In addition to education and job creation, priority is given to support for protection and food and nutrition. The latest figures from the World Food Programme show that the number of people currently experiencing food insecurity has increased to 12.4 million, which represents a 40 % increase in a single year.

During its two-year period as an elected member of the UN Security Council, Norway, together with Ireland, has taken on special responsibility for humanitarian issues in the Syria crisis. 

‘In the Security Council, we are working to address the civil population’s need for humanitarian assistance and protection from violence and suffering. It is vital that humanitarian organisations are given full access to all parts of the country. The scale of need is enormous and large parts of the infrastructure for basic services have been destroyed. As much as 40 % of the schools and 50 % of the health institutions have been damaged or completely demolished. For millions of people in the north of Syria, the essential supplies that are brought across the border from Turkey are a lifeline, and it is crucial that this can continue for as long as it is needed,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide.

Norway also supports UN efforts to find an inclusive, political solution to the Syria crisis. 

‘The Syria crisis is one of the great tragedies of our time. The conflict can only be solved through political negotiations and all of the involved parties must be prepared to make difficult compromises. The work being done by UN Special Envoy Geir O. Pedersen to find an inclusive political solution is critical and has our full support,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide. 

March 18, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Media Freedom

Money alone can’t buy the rebuilding of Syria

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 17, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Article by Norway’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide and Simon Coveney, Ireland’s Minister for Foreign Affairs in The National, United Arab Emirates, 14 March.

Ten years after its onset, the war in Syria has become one of the worst humanitarian disasters of the 21st century. The human cost has been beyond measure. Disturbing moments are seared in our collective consciousness, ranging from shocking chemical weapons attacks to images of doctors working in bombed out hospitals, gross human rights violations and desperate civilians forced to flee their homes.

The sheer scale of the tragedy can overwhelm us. More than 13 million people are still in need of humanitarian assistance. Sixty per cent of the population are struggling to get enough food to eat, according to World Food Programme. More than 5 million Syrians are refugees and over 6 million are internally displaced. An entire generation is growing up with no or limited access to education, and has known only conflict. Human suffering will continue to traumatise new generations of Syrians unless the conflict is brought to an end.

The unresolved conflict continues to lead to immense suffering and increasing humanitarian needs. Even if it is in a less-intense phase than before and the situation on the ground is less unstable than it was, it still hinders development and the return of refugees. Syria, meanwhile, is still fertile ground for terrorist groups, such as ISIS.

As members of the UN Security Council and as facilitators for its work on the humanitarian situation in Syria, Norway and Ireland will continue to champion the people of Syria.

They must receive the support necessary to survive and rebuild their lives. The respective responses of Norway and Ireland to the Syrian conflict has been our largest ever to a single crisis. We will once again pledge our support at the upcoming “Brussels V” conference later this month.

Financial support on its own is not enough. We must also provide humanitarian workers with the safe, secure and unimpeded access they need to reach all the people in need. Hundreds of aid workers have been killed in the course of the conflict. Too often, efforts by aid workers to reach those in need have been frustrated by administrative impediments, or the calculus of geopolitical considerations.

We will continue to advocate tirelessly in the Security Council for humanitarian actors to be given full and unimpeded access to all the people in need in all parts of Syria.

While continued provision of humanitarian assistance and access is vital, only an end to conflict and an inclusive political settlement can bring stability to Syria and end the suffering. There is no military solution to the Syrian conflict. Security Council Resolution 2254 on a political settlement in Syria provides the framework for a Syrian-owned and Syrian-led political process, facilitated by UN Special Envoy Geir Pedersen and supported broadly by the international community, including with strong support from Norway and Ireland. The inclusion of women and civil society in the peace process is crucial for the best result for the whole population.

To date, we have seen little progress in the efforts to reach a political settlement. We need joint and intensified efforts to implement UN resolutions, first and foremost from the government in Syria and all the Syrian parties, but also from the international community and the countries involved in the country’s affairs. The people of Syria deserve nothing less. The region needs it, too.

As we face a second decade of instability, conflict and human suffering, we reiterate our appeal for a lasting, nationwide ceasefire and serious engagement in the political process in Syria, in the spirit of compromise and constructive engagement. Humanitarian aid must reach all the people in need. For the sake of this and future generations of Syrians, we call for an end to this catastrophe, and for everyone to work towards peace.

March 17, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Terrorist

U.S. Steps Up Counterterrorism in Mozambique and the DRC

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 16, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

U.S. counterterrorism officials are stepping up their activities in Africa, addressing the expansion of violent extremism on the continent.

Two previously unlisted insurgent groups identified as foreign terrorist organizations operating in Mozambique and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) have been slapped with sanctions along with their leaders.

John T. Godfrey, the acting coordinator for counterterrorism and acting special envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS at a recent teleconference meeting with African journalists, discussed a new State Department designation of the two groups as “Isis-Congo” and “Isis-Mozambique”.

“In addition to naming and shaming, these designations also seek to deny ISIS in the DRC and ISIS in Mozambique as well as their leaders, Seka Musa Baluku and Abu Yasir Hassan, the resources they need to fund their terrorist activities and carry out terrorist attacks.

The designations prevent travel by members to the United States, freeze any U.S.-related assets, ban Americans from doing business with them and make it a crime to provide support or resources to the movements.

Leaders of the groups are Seka Musa Baluku, reputed head of Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) in Congo founded by Uganda rebels, and Abu Yasir Hassan, head of Ahlu Sunnah Wa-Jama (ASWJ) in Mozambique.

Godfrey declined to discuss the classified information used to definitively tie these African groups to the larger Islamic State, which planted its roots in Iraq and Syria. But the evidence is incontrovertible, he insisted. And in Congo, he said the United States is “quite confident” of a link to ISIS headquarters.

Michael Gonzales, deputy assistant secretary of the Bureau of African Affairs, also spoke at the teleconference. He noted that the U.S. already supports the Congolese army against violent extremists by bolstering civil-military operations and capabilities, military engineering, strategic communications and English-language laboratories with the goal of empowering civilian leadership to promote structural reform and professionalization of the military.

“I think these are prime examples of how the United States is really running with the vision of the Biden administration and then the statements of Secretary [of State Antony] Blinken about emphasizing our partnerships with African partners and building local capacity,” Gonzales said.

“There certainly is a keen focus on the terrorist threat in Africa on the part of the Biden-Harris administration, but some of the lines of effort that we’re currently working on there are ones we’ve been formulating for a bit of time now,” he said.

But the new designations have worrying implications, according to the Washington-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies. “While a seemingly straightforward and measured policy response to ASWJ’s brutality and its international terrorist links, it risks impeding humanitarian efforts and hobbling potential disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration activities.

In addition, wrote the authors of a report titled “The Problem with Foreign Terrorist Organization Designations” it is unlikely to significantly advance U.S. counterterrorism and counterinsurgency efforts.”

Anita Powell, writing for the Voice of America, also questioned the open-ended strategy. “How long it might take to go from “naming and shaming” to actually defeating these groups,” she wondered. “That, officials did not say.”

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by Special Briefing via Telephone with John T. Godfrey, Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Acting Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, and Michael C. Gonzales, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of African Affairs.

Mr. Godfrey:  Great.  Secretary of State Blinken designated ISIS-Democratic Republic of the Congo and ISIS-Mozambique as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists, or SDGTs for short.  He also designated Seka Musa Baluku, the leader of ISIS-DRC, and Abu Yasir Hassan, the leader of ISIS-Mozambique, as SDGTs.

Before we dig into the substance and consequences of those designations, I’d first like to take a moment to discuss the larger context at play here, which is the expanded presence of ISIS in Africa.

2019 to 2020 saw an important evolution of the threat posed by ISIS, also known as Daesh.  While the fall of Baghouz in Syria in 2019 marked the end of the physical caliphate – which was a significant milestone and inflection point – it clearly did not signal the fall of ISIS itself.  Shortly after the fall of the caliphate, then-ISIS emir Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi pointed to the ISIS-inspired attacks in Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday in 2019, which killed more than 250 innocent victims, as an example of how ISIS branches and networks outside Iraq and Syria should conduct attacks going forward to be, and I’m quoting here, a “thorn in the chest of the crusaders.”

Baghdadi’s death during a U.S. military operation later that year, and his replacement by Amir Muhammad Sa’id Abdal Rahman Al-Mawla, came in the midst of an internal reorganization of the terrorist group that was designed to delegate decisions and resources to its branches and affiliates around the world.  While al-Mawla may not have Baghdadi’s profile or charisma, he has successfully carried out Baghdadi’s dangerous vision.  

And nowhere has this trend been as alarming as in Africa.  If we are committed to the enduring global defeat of ISIS, or Daesh – and we are – then we have to confront it in Africa.  We are doing so through national actions such as these designations that Secretary Blinken announced yesterday, and through multilateral efforts, of which the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS is a key line of effort.

The 83-member D-ISIS Coalition is one of the most effective multilateral efforts in history and is an excellent example of how the United States can help lead a multilateral counterterrorism platform that leverages the tools and capabilities of countries around the globe against a common enemy.

And the D-ISIS Coalition  is now playing a role in countering ISIS activity and networks globally, including in Africa.  The coalition held its first meeting focused on West Africa and the Sahel in late 2020 to discuss potential lines of capacity-building efforts that could be undertaken there, and we anticipate expanding that focus to include other regions in Africa a bit later this year.

Returning to the terrorist designations announced yesterday, these designations put the international community on notice about these groups and individuals.  In addition to naming and shaming, these designations also seek to deny ISIS in the DRC and ISIS in Mozambique, as well as their leaders Seka Musa Baluku and Abu Yasir Hassan, the resources they need to fund their terrorist activities and carry out terrorist attacks.  Among other consequences of those designations, any property or interests in property of those designated and subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in any transactions with them.  It is a crime to knowingly provide material support or resources to ISIS in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or to ISIS in Mozambique or to attempt or conspire to do so.  Designations are one of the most important tools we have to disrupt the financial and other support networks that terrorist groups need to export violence and carry out attacks.

Today ISIS-DRC and ISIS-Mozambique should be on notice that the United States and our partners will take the steps needed to address security challenges in Africa to advance peace and security.

Question :  How would you assess the state of the cooperation between the U.S. and Africa regarding the fight against terror and money laundering tied to terrorism? 

Mr. Godfrey:  I think that I would say that overall, I would assess the state of cooperation to be very strong, in part because I think our partners in Africa are clearly seized with the fact that the terrorist threat – both ISIS-affiliated groups but also al-Qaida-affiliated groups – has, frankly, continued to grow the past several years, and frankly, the pace of that growth has increased.  So we cooperate with partners across the continent, across a range of counterterrorism activities, including those referenced in the question. 

Question:  Why is the focus on IS-Mozambique and not on the Tanzanian infrastructure that appears central to the command, to the logistics, and to its evolution?  And in addition to your response, can you share any updates on JCET for Mozambique and any linkages that may exist regarding this designation?  

Mr. Godfrey:  Let me take this – the last part of your question first and then I’ll address the other two pieces.  I think the linkage between this activity, the designations that were announced yesterday, and the other lines of effort you mentioned reflects the fact that we are taking a comprehensive approach to the terrorist threat in Mozambique, and that includes countering terrorism finance but also helping build counterterrorism capability on the part of the Mozambican Government.  I will defer to the Department of Defense to address your question about JCET.  That’s really not for me to say.  

I will say that your question – the part of your question that focuses on why the focus on ISIS-Mozambique and not on the Tanzanian infrastructure, I would say we are focused on Mozambique, first, because that is where the most dramatic manifestations of the ISIS threat in that region are, and so that’s reflected in the fact that you’ve had something like 2,000 civilian casualties and up to 670,000 internally displaced people in the Cabo Delgado region.  I would not dispute at all that there is a cross-border linkage to Tanzania, and indeed, I think we saw that reflected in a way in the cross-border attacks from northern Mozambique back into Tanzania in October of 2020.  So, certainly, we’re not ignoring the fact that this is a threat that spans across borders, and that phenomenon, I would note, is very prevalent in other areas of the continent where we’re dealing with both ISIS and al-Qaida terrorist threats.  

Question:  I just wanted to ask you, what do you plan to do, apart from the actions that you announced in your statement today, to counter the insurgency in Mozambique?  I guess it might have been the equivalent person coming to the continent, to Mozambique and announcing some law enforcement cooperation and also border patrol cooperation.  Could you perhaps give a broader picture of what actions you have in mind?  

Mr. Godfrey:  Thank you.  Yeah, indeed, that was my former boss, Coordinator Nathan Sales, who traveled to Mozambique and South Africa late last year.  And indeed, in addition to the designations announced by Secretary Blinken yesterday, we do have other lines of effort either underway or that we hope to soon be underway in Mozambique.  Those include some efforts to bolster the ability of the Mozambican Government to counter terrorism finance, and as I think most of the folks on this call today know, there’s a nexus between terrorism finance and narcotics trafficking in Mozambique that’s particularly problematic.  So we’re also looking at some counternarcotics lines of effort.  Those don’t fall within the remit of the State Department’s Counterterrorism Bureau; they fall under a different bureau in our organization, but there’s definitely a line of effort there.  We are looking at some border security measures, to go back to the earlier question from Pearl.  Some of that is because of the fact that we well understand that there’s a cross-border aspect of the ISIS threat in Cabo Delgado.  And then, finally, we’re also looking at some potential other lines of effort to help build the capacity of the Mozambican Government to interdict terrorist attacks and do crisis response in an effective way.

Question:  What is the evidence of links between ISIS and the insurgents in Mozambique beyond the reported pledges of allegiance made more than 18 months ago?  And a related question is:  What is the evidence that Abu Yasir Hassan is the leader of the group, and what precisely do you mean by leader?

Mr. Godfrey:  So, John, let me take an initial stab at that and then I’ll ask Deputy Assistant Secretary Mike Gonzales to weigh in as well.  One of the sort of truisms of doing counterterrorism work that unfortunately a lot of the information that we rely on to inform our assessments isn’t the kind of thing that we can discuss publicly, but I would say that the evidence of ties between the ISIS branch or network in Mozambique and the so-called ISIS-Core in Iraq and Syria is quite incontrovertible.  It’s something that we’re comfortable in assessing is real, and that is part of why the threat is particularly concerning for us.

Mike, let me turn to you and see if you had anything further you wanted to add.

Mr. Gonzales:  I would just add that beyond this specific designation and the more security-oriented response to the existing threat, U.S. support to Mozambique in responding to this is really representative of a holistic approach.  We recognize that there’s a critical law enforcement capability component related to this as well as impacts on development gains, economic potential of the region, regional stability.  And so our approach not only seeks to address the security side but also addressing the socioeconomic drivers of the threat, countering ISIS messaging, and providing greater economic opportunity and resilience of the community so that the attraction to violent extremism is lessened.

Question :  Some people attribute recurrent killings in Beni to terrorists.  Does the U.S. support the DRC armed forces’ fight against terrorism?

Mr. Godfrey:  So we absolutely support the DRC’s president and his administration’s commitment to countering armed and terrorist groups like ISIS-DRC, and we also are very supportive of efforts to bring peace to the regions of the DRC that have been afflicted with terrorist attacks and other violence.  That’s part of why we’ve been strong supporters of MONUSCO and their efforts to protect civilians and strengthen state institutions.

Mr. Gonzales:  I would echo John’s point of the United States’ strong support for President Tshisekedi and his administration in fighting the terrorist threat and bringing peace to eastern DRC.  We do support the FARDC in terms of their efforts against violent extremists with particularly four lines of effort – bolstering civil-military operations and capabilities; military engineering; strategic communications; and English-language laboratories – with the goal of empowering civilian leadership to promote structural reform and professionalization of the military.  And I think these are prime examples of how the United States is really running with the vision of the Biden administration and the statements of Secretary Blinken about emphasizing our partnerships with African partners and building local capacity, because it’s through that local capacity that there will be sustainable gains that are able to be realized through the future. 

Question :  The State Department has designated the ADF under the moniker ‘ISIS-DRC’ as a foreign terrorist organization, but whatever the relationship between some central members of the group and external ISIS groups, the ADF is a hybrid, locally embedded organization.  How will you decide where exactly ISIS-DRC begins and ends?

Mr. Godfrey:  The U.S. has looked hard at this and using all of our resources including sensitive information, and we’re quite confident about the facts that ADF is ISISDRC in some important aspects.  

ADF established ties with ISIS and was publicly recognized as an affiliate of ISIS in late 2018.  ISIS has claimed responsibility for ADF-attributed attacks since April of 2019 after an attack on an Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Base near Kamango.  And although some original ADF members broke away after the group pledged allegiance to ISIS, many original members – not just leadership but members of the rank and file – continue to be members of ADF as led by Baluku after ISIS publicly recognized the group as an affiliate.  

Question:  It’s no secret that there are private contractors, military contractors operating in Cabo Delgado.  And recently a report from Amnesty International did blame these contractors for some of the killings of civilians.  So my question is, how much concern is this?  And will the presence of these private contractors, be they from South Africa and Russia, affect your ability to have any significant, meaningful impact in your counterterrorism efforts? 

Mr. Godfrey:  We are concerned about the presence in Cabo Delgado of private contractors akin to those that you highlighted.  This is a phenomenon that we have seen in other areas of conflict as well.  And as in those other areas in Cabo Delgado, we assess that the presence of those entities has not demonstrably helped the government of Mozambique in countering the terrorist threat from ISIS-Mozambique that they face.  And indeed, that because those entities operate outside the strictures of normal international partnership, they have historically tended to be less responsible with respect to things like observing human rights and the law of armed conflict as they conduct their efforts.  So we’re mindful of that.  It’s frankly a feature of the landscape in Cabo Delgado that complicates rather than helps efforts to address the terror threat there. 

Question:  When you’re looking at the insurgents in Mozambique and ADF in eastern Congo, how concerned is the U.S. Government about the support networks in Tanzania? 

Mr. Godfrey:  The sort of prominence of ISIS in Mozambique definitely links back to southern Tanzania, and there is a cross-border aspect of this including the fact that we’ve now had – as I mentioned before – attacks from Cabo Delgado back into Tanzania.  I would say that the picture in terms of what that facilitation or ongoing support from one side of the border to the other looks like is not as clear as we would perhaps hope it to be.  That’s something that we continue to work on.  But certainly no question about the fact that there’s a cross-border element of this threat that is quite worrying, and that’s part of the reason that one of the issues we’ve been focused on is border security.  

Question :   ISIS has stopped making claims or statements about Cabo Delgado since November.  What is your opinion on what that means?  And is there any apparent reason for that?

Mr. Godfrey:  So one of the things that I would point to here that’s interesting about ISIS is because it’s a global network, when things happen in one part of the network, it has an impact on what the organization is able to do more broadly.  Without going into too much detail about things I can’t talk about unfortunately in an unclassified format, there’s been quite a lot of pressure on ISIS in the core in Iraq and Syria during the last several months.  And my sense is that the – the media wing of ISIS-Core has frankly been under pressure that has limited their ability to put out the kinds of statements that they normally do about the activities of ISIS-Mozambique and other branches and networks. 

Question :  Several years ago, the U.S. sent military experts to help DRC security forces fight against the LRA in the northern part of the country.  What’s the current U.S. contribution to the DRC’s efforts aimed at restoring peace to the country’s eastern provinces ravaged by illegal armed groups?

Mr. Gonzalez:  Sure, happy to do so.  So like I said earlier, in terms of our support on the security side are – we have four major lines of effort with the FARDC: civil-military operations; military engineering; strategic communications; English-language laboratories to build their capacity.  But beyond that, the United States has a rather robust foreign assistance program with the Government of the Democratic Republic of Congo recognizing the imperative of delivering services: health, education, food security, economic opportunity, as well as humanitarian assistance to the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo – all of this contributing to a comprehensive package of support that helps particularly in the past couple of years since the coming into office of President Tshisekedi to support him and his administration in bringing long-term, sustainable peace to eastern DRC.

Question :  I have a question about Nigeria.  The country has faced a decade-long insurgency in the northeast, but increasingly criminal gangs in the northwest have terrorized communities including kidnapping hundreds of school children.  How do you view this growing issue, and what efforts are being done in partnership with Nigeria to combat this?

Mr. Gonzalez:  Frankly, we’re disgusted by this pattern of mass abductions of school kids.  I can think of nothing more abhorrent.  And our condolences go out to the individuals affected and their families.  But as the questioner poses, this certainly appears by all indications to be a dynamic stemming from criminal gangs motivated by monetary and economic factors.  There’s no indication that terrorists, whether Boko Haram or ISIS-West Africa, are involved in these.  Although I would note that Boko Haram has opportunistically claimed credit for several of these kidnappings in the northwest in the past. 

So the United States is ready to provide appropriate support to the Nigerian government if requested to do so.  Longer term, we seek to help develop the capabilities of the Nigerian security services in order for them to adequately respond to the internal threats that the country faces.  Again, I think the challenges are many in Nigeria.  And we are encouraged by President Buhari’s recent replacement of all of the security-sector chiefs and looking forward to partnering with him and continuing to build the capacity of the Nigerian military in order to be able to better protect and defend their people.

Question:  Can you talk about the results of U.S. counterterrorism efforts on the continent over the last four years?  And would you say the situation in terms of terror threats in each region has gotten better, worse, or stayed the same?  

Mr. Godfrey:  We have been primarily focused over the last four years in West Africa Sahel and then over on the eastern side of the continent in Somalia, with an eye very much to the cross-border threat posed by al-Shabaab against Kenya and other regional neighbors.  I would say that we have actually made some progress in Somalia in blunting the effect of alShabaab to plan and execute attacks against Kenya, or inside Kenya I should say.  There are obviously some notable exceptions to that – the January 2020 attacks against the Manda Bay Air Base were terrible, and certainly that’s a sign that that threat remains persistent.  

On the west side of the continent, in West Africa Sahel space, we’ve partnered very closely with France and other partners and allies in what is a multilateral effort to address the drivers of instability there.  I think foremost among those is the fact that there have been issues with governments’ ability to project security and governance throughout that space, principally in Mali initially.  And obviously we’ve seen how that instability has – has since spilled across borders.  But we have been engaged, as Mike mentioned, with respect to DRC.  

The efforts we’ve made in West Africa Sahel space are certainly not limited to counterterrorism or military efforts, although those are certainly some of what we do.  It’s a more holistic effort than that which encompasses lines of effort under the U.S. Agency for International Development, other bureaus of the Department of State that do capacity building and assistance across a range of civilian lines of effort.  

The one thing I would highlight that the State Department’s Counterterrorism Bureau has done – and this is particularly so for the last couple of years – is an intensified focus on building the judicial capacity of partner countries.  That is the ability to investigate, arrest, prosecute, and incarcerate terrorists, the so-called judicial chain.  We’re quite heavily invested in a number of countries in trying to develop host governments’ abilities to have meaningful capacity at each link in that chain so that they’re able to effect civilian measures to address the terrorist threats in addition to the military efforts that are underway. 

Question :  Amnesty also accuses the Government of Mozambique or war crimes.  Does that have any impact on U.S. support for the Mozambican Government?

Mr. Godfrey:  It’s a good question, and the short answer is that we take seriously allegations of violations of human rights or violations of the law of armed conflict, particularly when they apply to countries with which we’re partnering on counterterrorism and other efforts.  I think as everybody on this call knows, we have a very rigorous process under the Leahy Law – Leahy vetting of units with which we would seek to partner that requires that the individuals and leaders of those units with which we would partner have a clean record with respect to any human rights or law of armed conflict violations.  

We take that very seriously, and there’s rigorous congressional oversight of that, such that if it’s determined that units that we have trained have individuals who don’t meet that standard, we either pause or suspend those lines of effort.  And that’s something we take very seriously.  It’s part of why it takes some time to stand up capacity-building lines of effort because that process of vetting requires time and effort to ensure that we get it right. 

Mr. Gonzalez:  I just appreciate everyone’s interest in this.  I certainly see these designations as the continuation of U.S. focus on addressing terrorism threats across the continent but recognizing that that is done as part of a holistic U.S. Government approach that addresses drivers, response, as well as the humanitarian effects – part of our ongoing commitment to the African continent and our partners there. 

March 16, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Farming

Infections from animals and the environment to humans − a growing problem

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 16, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

People can contract diseases caused by pathogens found in both animals and the environment. Pandemics seem to be getting more frequent. Why? Moreover, can new pandemics be avoided? These were some of the topics that the Norwegian Minister of Agriculture and Food, Olaug Bollestad heard about, and discussed, in a meeting with Carlos das Neves, Director of research and internationalization at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute and President of the Wildlife Disease Association (WDA), at a meeting on March 11th.

“It is important to understand the origin of this coronavirus. Most likely it came from an animal spreading thereafter to humans”, das Neves said. Credit: Ministry of Agriculture and Food

− It is important to be aware that human health is inextricably linked to animal and environmental health. The advance of new diseases often occurs at the interface between humans, animals, and the environment. Carlos das Neves is an international expert in this area, and it is useful to get an overview on the origins of pandemics and what can be done to limit them, says Minister of Agriculture and Food Olaug Bollestad (CDP).

Today, March 12th, one year has passed since Norway was shut-down due to Covid-19. Many people worldwide have died, and the pandemic has had enormous consequences at different levels, including in agriculture and food production. It is therefore worth dwelling on some of the experiences accumulated and how these can help us deal with new pandemics that will come. 

For it is far from the first time in history this has happened. Throughout the ages, people have experienced diseases with origins in animals that have toppled empires, triggered international crises and plunged entire communities into economic hardships. And now it looks as if pandemics are occurring more frequently.

How to limit and prevent pandemics?

It is known that more than 60% of emerging infectious diseases are so-called zoonoses, that is, diseases transmitted from animals to humans. Many of these originate in wild animals. At the same time, we lack an overview of the pathogens (infectious agents) the world should be especially wary of. Carlos das Neves, director of research and internationalization at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, has briefed the Norwegian Minister of Agriculture and Food Olaug Bollestad on the current covid-19 pandemic. Here he presented the ongoing investigation work into the origins of this pandemic, and how the world, through a “one health approach”, can work to predict, prevent, and be better prepared to face pandemics in the future.

Das Neves said that while it was perhaps surprising that the virus, Sars-Cov2-spread so quickly, it was widely known that viruses in the corona family were circulating in wild animals, and that this “species-jump” could happen. Despite this, many countries were not ready to deal with the spread of such a virus. This situation confirms, according to das Neves, how important it is to pay greater attention to biosecurity with good national monitoring of both animal and environmental health – at the same time as we focus on good human health.

On the hunt for the origin of the coronavirus

Das Neves is an international expert in the area of wildlife health and “One health”, and an important advocate for this holistic view, which should help shape future work and interventions. − It is through such a One Health approach that we may be able to better predict pandemic events, and perhaps prevent them from happening, das Neves said during the meeting with Minister Bollestad. 

In addition to his position at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Carlos das Neves holds other international roles. He is currently the president of the Wildlife Disease Association and a member of the Lancet One Health Commission. Das Neves is also a member of the Lancet Covid-19 Commission Task Force, which is a group working to recreate the timeline of the Covid-19 outbreak from as far back as the SARS outbreak in 2003 and up until the WHO’s declaration on the Covid-19 pandemic one year ago.

− It is important to understand the origins of this coronavirus. Most likely, it originated from an animal and spread thereafter to humans. The big question, however, is what happened to this virus in between and how it changed to become dangerous for humans. If we find out more about this, we may be better equipped to deal with similar problems in the future, he said.

Surveillance and international collaboration is important

− Major global changes are taking place in the way we use the land, such as deforestation, expanding and intensive agriculture, urbanization, and increasing trade in wild animals. These changes entail more contacts, and with it, more frequent transmission of pathogens between wild animals, domestic animals, and humans. If we stay on this course, more and more new infectious diseases will emerge, for which we may not have good defenses, said das Neves.

He refers to good animal health, which is often forgotten when it comes to the supply of food to the world’s population. “One Health” is also about how resources and ecosystems are used in the world. Among other things, Das Neves mentioned the importance of keeping food systems free of disease outbreaks, especially during the ongoing pandemic: − The last thing we need now is a major disease outbreak in food-producing animals. It would further complicate the difficult situation we already experience. This is part of One Health and is a priority area for us at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, he said.

The research director at NVI referred also to the fact that the world in general lacks good surveillance of viruses and other pathogens in wildlife species.

− While the next pandemic is unlikely to originate in Norway, we must remember that we are only a few hours’ flight away from what we consider “hot spots for emergence, such as some parts of Africa and Asia”, das Neves said. He also mentioned that Norway has a good animal health monitoring system and active preparedness against a number of health threats.

In addition, Norway has a very close and good cooperation between research, industry and government. Das Neves calling this the “Nordic model”, believes that −time and time again, this model has proved to have great advantages.

This knowledge and expertise are important for Norway to share with the world, because pandemics do not respect national borders. These are global problems that we must work on together, he added. Therefore, he also defends the importance of working with other countries to predict and prevent threats. The new EU Animal Health Regulation is an extremely good step in the right direction, and I hope more examples and initiatives will follow suit, das Neves concluded.

March 16, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

B-1 Bomber Shows ‘The Alliance is Working’

by Nadarajah Sethurupan March 7, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The first-ever deployment of B-1 Lancer bombers to Norway is allowing U.S. airmen to train in Arctic conditions and NATO ally Norway to test its defences, “This is the first time we are generating flights in partnership with our close ally Norway, as well as operating from Norwegian soil,” Lt. Gen. Steven Basham, deputy commander of U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa, said during a telephone press briefing held with the chief of Norwegian Joint Headquarters, Lt. Gen. Yngve Odlo.

Working with the Americans helps Norway, which shares a 122-mile northeastern border with Russia and is a founding member of NATO, to “ensure our defense plans work,” Odlo said.

The U.S. bombers’ presence in Norway is not intended as a threat to Russia, but as a demonstration that “the alliance is working,” he said.

“Being a neighbour to Russia, I think Russia understands quite clearly what we are doing,” he said.

More than 200 Air Force personnel from Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, and four B-1B bombers deployed last month to Orland, a Norwegian air base some 300 miles south of the Arctic Circle out of which Norway operates F-35A Lightning II fighters.

The Americans are getting to know the “unique terrain and environment” of the High North region, Basham said, noting the bombers would remain in the region for several more weeks.

The training was timely, considering the security situation in Europe in recent years, Odlo said, referring to the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula and the invasion of eastern Ukraine by the Russians in 2014.

NATO has strengthened defenses along its eastern flank and stepped up multinational exercises in the past seven years.

Basham said the two NATO allies have been “extremely clear about the training we’re doing” and stressed that “the message we’re communicating is how two very close allies work together to not only learn in the air but learn on the ground.”

The bombers are training with the Norwegian navy, the country’s special forces and joint terminal air controllers, and flying with Norway’s F-35s.

They’ve dropped inert weapons on a training range in Norway, Basham said. They’ve also flown over the North and Baltic seas alongside combat aircraft from Denmark, Poland, Germany and Italy, the Air Force has said.

The bombers have held up well in the north European climate, said Basham, who began his career flying B-1s out of Grand Forks, N.D.

While “the aircraft doesn’t mind the cold,” the Norwegian military is helping the Dyess airmen adapt “to the rigors of the cold,” he said.

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by Special Briefing via Telephone with Lieutenant General Yngve Odlo Chief of the Norwegian Joint Headquarters  And Lieutenant General Steven Basham Deputy Commander, U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa.

Lieutenant General Odlo:  Thank you. It’s a special area, and our main intent is to keep this as stable as possible and also where the activity is regulated by intent and law.  For Norway, the recent defense policy are based on three fundamental rights: the national force structure, the bilateral cooperations, and the NATO membership. 

Norway has been a NATO member since the start in 1949, and for Norway, this alliance is highly important.  Within the alliance, the bilateral agreement and partnership, Norway is able to maintain a stable and robust defense culture and claim sovereign rights in our own territory.  To receive and host allied reinforcement to Norway, we must train to ensure that our defense plans work.  The host nation support concept has proven to be efficient, latest in the large scale at Trident Juncture in 2018, which was a big NATO exercise.  

However, we must continue to refine and maintain the high level to perform as planned when we need it.  The current training with the U.S. Bomber Task Force will increase the level of our own forces to integrate and operate with our nearest allies.  And during this period, we will exercise and train together with the forces from the Norwegian Navy, the Norwegian Air Force, the Norwegian Army, and the Norwegian Special Forces, and also link up with the Iceland Air Policing which we have deployed F-35 during this period. 

It’s natural for our forces to continuously train and exercise within the different warfighting domains.  This is not a new concept – in Afghanistan and Iraq, in which the forces operate closely with U.S. and allied bombers and other forces.  The effects achieved are based on long-term training and exercising, both internationally but also back in Norway with cold-weather climate over several years before. 

After this training period of Norway, the U.S., our allies, and the regional actors in the High North can experience that Norwegian and U.S. forces operate closely and safely together, this under conditions also challenged by COVID-19 virus.  Thank you. 

Lieutenant General Basham:  I’d like to start off by thanking General Odlo for the time he’s provided today as well and remarks, and not only the great support that has been provided to the Bomber Task Force.  This truly is a great opportunity for us to discuss the first-ever deployment of U.S. bombers to Norway as well as how our alliance allows us to jointly project power across not only this region but, as was just touched on, across the globe.  And again, I’d also like to again thank you and the Department of State for hosting this event and all those that have dialed in today. 

This Bomber Task Force rotation is truly historic, as I said.  While we have maintained a constant presence throughout Europe, over the past three years by flying primarily out of the United Kingdom, training really across all of Europe, certainly in the – from the Baltics to the Straits of Gibraltar, this is the first time that we are generating flights in partnership with our close ally, Norway, as well as operating from Norwegian soil.  As more countries are drawn to the Arctic region, some with competing interests, it’s imperative that we maintain free, fair access for all nations.  And we will continue to work diligently with our NATO allies and partners to ensure that stability. 

Our Norwegian friends have been working to maintain a safe and stable environment up in the High North for centuries, and their highly agile, expeditionary force[s] are experts at generating combat power in a short notice.  And it’s with great pride that we are – have an opportunity to learn from them, to familiarize our pilots with the region’s unique terrain as well as environment, our maintainers operating from new locations, new air fields, and certainly work to introduce new technology and capabilities to the collective defense effort. 

By introducing large-scale missions like the Bomber Task Force in Europe, we’ve become more interoperable with our allies and partners, ensuring that we are prepared for competition at any level.  Norway’s recent acquisition of the F-35 is just one more example of how our continued collaboration is allowing us to be more integrated than ever before. 

I’d also like to add that our focus on combined, joint all-domain command-and-control makes this level of integration possible by connecting sensors to shooters and leveraging our vast framework of air and space assets to stay ahead of potential threats, again training and operating with allies and partners, is essential to ensuring we can quickly respond to a variety of challenges.  Yet our main goal is always to preserve peace.  Our forward-deployed airmen stand watch 24/7 to honor our commitment to our friends in Europe, and our commitment is very tangible.  We are here training shoulder to shoulder with our allies to ensure stability and to send a clear message that we are poised and ready to ensure a stable region, to include the Arctic, for generations to come. 

In our current security environment, maybe one of the most diverse and uncertain we have faced in recent memory, during this Bomber Task Force deployment, our joint multinational team is becoming even more flexible, capable, and responsive to the shifting landscape.  Our ironclad commitment will ensure a stable, prosperous future. 

Question:  I just wanted to ask you about the B-1 operating in the cooler climate right now.  Have you had to make any adjustments or modifications to the airframe to sustain it in the cooler weather?  And just in general, how have the airframes been holding up? 

Lieutenant General Basham:  Jennifer, that’s a very good question and I’m a perfect person to ask that, having flown B-1s in my history.  I started out flying B-1s in Grand Forks, North Dakota, probably one of the coldest places in the United States.  These aircraft are actually out of Dyess Air Force Base, which is down in Texas.  So while the aircraft does just fine in the cold weather – as a matter of fact, I gained my greatest number of flying hours flying the B-1 out of North Dakota – the aircraft doesn’t mind.  It’s our great aviators and maintainers and support personnel who might not be as familiar with the rigors of the cold.  Our Norwegian partners are helping us along in that.  But I would offer to you, the aircraft has performed exceptionally well, and we’ve been able to operate in many different environments.  This just adds to the full list for the B-1.  

Question:  Firstly, for General Odlo, I wanted to ask why make the decision to host U.S. bombers now, for the first time?  Have there been any changes to the security situation that Norway faces that made this training more useful now?  And for General Basham, you mentioned the benefit of training and flying out of new locations.  Can you elaborate on that?  What’s the benefit of flying out of Ørland rather than just going to like Fairford again?  

Lieutenant General Odlo:  I think you have to understand, since 2014, the security situation in Europe has changed and NATO has made a decision to redefine the Article 5 and also to work out how do we defend our own territory, being abroad for decades.  So this is a natural part of that, to be able to operate and defend our own territory.  And then it’s, for the Norwegian Army or Norwegian defense forces, important to more regularly exercise and train together with our close allies.  The Bomber Task Force is an important asset to be able to conduct high intensity combined joint operations.  So to do this under Arctic conditions is timely and according to what has happened the last seven or eight years, I think.  Over.

Lieutenant General Basham:  I’ll expand on what I’m confident our aviators are learning right now.  And I’ll start with, of course, again, the ability to operate from a different airfield than you typically operate from.  There’s always something that’s just a little bit different, and under our newest concept of agile combat employment we have got to maintain the level of agility and flexibility to operate from many different places.   

We’re very good at Fairford as well as many other locations.  But operating from Norway gives a very unique opportunity to operate in a cold weather environment.  But I’m going to – and certainly the training that we’re able to conduct on a day-to-day basis with the joint terminal air controllers, the special forces in Norway, integrating probably a little bit more often than we might from other locations with their fighters, their navy.  I would offer that being on the ground with them before we operate and after we operate also creates a unique opportunity to learn from our Norwegian counterparts.  

So while the flying out of UK is great, if we don’t expand our horizon and look for other opportunities to  work with other allies, other partners, then we miss true training opportunities to continue to develop ourselves, and even more so, I would say, to learn from others.  Over. 

Question: What should Russia read into the deployment of B-1 bombers to Norway for the first time?

Lieutenant General Odlo:  I can start with that to give an answer, being a neighbor to Russia.  I think Russia understands quite clearly what we are doing.  What we are doing now and what they should read is that the alliance is working.  We are working quite closely together with our armed forces, and that’s natural, really.  Nation-states do that.  And I think we will make sure that we will not make any unreadable actions.  So I think what Russia will read out of this is a normal military activity between two close allies.  Over. 

Lieutenant General Basham:  No, I’ll just add a couple of comments here, and I think General Odlo said that very well.  There is no doubt that Russia probably looks at this as just what they would do.  As you’re looking to continue to improve your readiness, you want to make sure that you’re pushing to the limits of your capability, and in this particular case, to work so close but alongside an ally.  I think as professional militaries, we fully understand that this is a part of the competition that takes place every single day so that we can all continue to learn from each other.   So I imagine there is no surprise whatsoever.  And again, we appreciate the opportunity. 

Question:  I know Norway has pretty strict rules regulating foreign forces being based in Norway.  Is this the result of a new agreement between the two countries to allow U.S. forces to base in Norway?  And what do you get by basing bombers as opposed to F-16s or other fighter aircraft?

Lieutenant General Odlo:  Yes, we had since the end of World War II, we have always had our national policy, how do we operate being a neighbor to Russia.  And we have a quite good understanding of what we should do and what we not – should not do with regard to the – to being a neighbor to Russia both during the Cold War and also today.  So we try to be transparent, open, and also communicate what we do, and not operate too close to the border, not go into certain limits, but we behave.  And I think the most important part is that we are transparent and communicate whatever we do on a regular basis.  So that’s the most important part and it’s also a part of policy which I will not go into here.

What do we get out of basing the Bomber Task Force?  I think the Bomber Task Force is able, as mentioned by Basham, to operate in the Arctic conditions and also to operate out of Norwegian bases, and it is an important part making sure that both of us are able to do that.  For us, also the host nation support and also the integration because this is a strategic asset and it is highly important to both of us, both the armed forces but also as a joint headquarters, to be able to underwrite processes and to use this as important assets, if needed.  So I think it’s a lot of learning points doing this.  Over.

Lieutenant General Basham:  If I could just add a couple points, but I do think that was extremely well said by General Odlo.  The one thing I might add, and certainly this is – we never from a U.S. standpoint, we certainly never want to look at this as permanent basing.  It’s the ability to be able to operate from many different locations, and you have to be on the ground to understand some of the challenges that you might face.

But I would also offer – and I think that transparency is extremely important – but operating on the ground is really no different than operating in the air, and it’s the transparency that you provide by being respectful of established borders.  And certainly, professional militaries have a way – and we’ve done this for many years – a way to interact with each other, to operate with each other, and that’s on all sides.  In this particular case it gives us the opportunity to explore other areas in the short amount of time that we might be able to fly.  So I think that’s a very good question.  Thank you.

Question:  Norway is imposing certain limitations when the – when foreign forces operate from, or allied forces operate from Norwegian soil.  One of them is that allied planes should not operate east of the 24th longitude, which is in the Hammerfest region.  So I want to ask General Basham how easy it is to impose a clear message, as you said, when you’re not able to fly closer than hundreds of miles away from the Russian border ? 

Lieutenant General Odlo:  This is Lieutenant General Odlo.  Could you please say again the core of the questions?  I read you about the limitations, but it was a sentence which I missed.  Can you please say again?

Question:  How easy or how difficult it is to send a clear message, as General Basham indicated that was part of the purpose with flying in the far north ? how easy is it to send a clear message to Russia when having this limitation which is ,  which prohibits flying hundreds of miles away from the Russian border ?

Lieutenant General Basham:  Actually, I’m confident it doesn’t limit the training or the opportunity that we’ve been able to establish during this particular Bomber Task Force deployment.  The opportunity to be able to fly with Norway as well as, as you’re going to see over several weeks, we’ve flown with many other countries, so there’s – I wouldn’t say that it’s as the – limiting the message that we’re sending because the reality is the message that we’re communicating is how two very close allies work together to not only learn in the air but to learn on the ground.

So we look forward to more opportunities with other allies and partners inside the European theater.  And as was stated earlier, in the level of transparency it’s always important to make sure that we’re very clear about what we’re doing, and I think in this bomber task force we’ve been extremely clear about the training that we’re doing and the integration that’s actually occurring with a close ally.  Thank you.

Lieutenant General Odlo:  As you know, when we invite allies – close allies to operate or to exercise in Norway, it’s always – some reverberations from the political side of the house, which is normal.  And I think the most important part is that we are able to exercise and train together.  Obviously, it’s the perception, they say, it’s also communicated.  We try to be quite open and communicate what we do and our intent when we do it, so I think it’s not a reason to be offensive at all.  I think this is normal activity communicated quite well.  Over.

Question:  How long the deployment of the American bombers will last there in Norway?  And the second question is another follow-up question on Russia, because one of the first reactions when this became announced was that Russia said they could see that deployment could pose a security threat.  And based on your answers, I could say so Russia shouldn’t really see it like that.  What is your opinion? 

Lieutenant General Odlo:  I said before, this is military exercising and training to exercise the cohesion within the alliance and our ability to operate together if that’s needed.  So I think that’s what you should read out of this. 

I think also the communication is quite clear that this is what it is and it’s not an offensive operation at all; it’s normal military activity between two close allies.  The only special thing is that it’s the new asset being deployed to Norway, but it’s also a quite normal and important asset to be able to conduct high-intensity joint, combined operations, which we have done closely also in other areas of operation, like Afghanistan and Iraq.  So I think that’s the basic.  Over.

Lieutenant General Basham:  And this is Lieutenant General Basham.  I think one of the questions also was how long this would last, if I got that question right.  And we still have several weeks that we’re going to be operating in the theater.  It gives us a chance to spend time in other locations working with other allies.  And I would echo General Odlo’s comments to the – there should be no message of threat.  This is, once again, how professional militaries increase their level of expertise, their level of capability, and ultimately for the United States, this is one more opportunity for us to be able to operate from the United States, come into an environment that maybe we’ve not been there before and to be able to integrate with another country, and then ultimately be able to prove that we have the ability to be able to operate from many different environments, many different locations.

And I guess if someone were to take a message that you’re not restricted to one particular location, that would be a good message for them to perceive and we have been very clear about our agile combat employment.  The fact that we are now not just with our smaller aircraft, our fighter-type aircraft, but our bombers as well as our tankers, our airlift aircraft, our intelligence aircraft are going to be able to operate from many different locations just to increase our level of readiness and our understanding of the environments that we’re going to face.  

Question:  Can you specify a little bit more what the exercise program is?  is the plan, for example, to actually drop bombs with these bombers?  With Russia being Norway’s neighbor, what are you observing on the Kola Peninsula, and specifically that gives you pause, and which may or may not be in the back of your minds during this exercise? 

Lieutenant General Odlo:  I think I would leave the questions about the exercise program to Lieutenant General Basham, and I could start with the Russian area.  We are operating in the High North, I mean the North Atlantic, side by side by the Russian forces.  We are neighboring countries and operate in the same environment on a daily basis, and what we see is that they do this quite professionally.  They behave professionally and they do what they have to do and we do what we have to do, and that’s with huge, big respect from both nations. 

So it’s also important, I think, to understand that after 2014, we sanctioned the military operations of Russia and we – that’s quite clear.  At the same time, being a border nation to Russia, we have a quite good cooperation when it comes to the border control, to the search and rescue, and also the coast guard and resource management.  That’s working excellent.  And so – and we also have a bilateral agreement about how do we behave safely, how do we operate safely side by side.  So I think we have – the military cooperation is sanctioned politically, and at the same time we behave professionally as neighboring countries.  Over.

Lieutenant General Basham:  The great thing about the B-1 and our bomber force write large is they bring an opportunity for a large payload and they’re extremely fast in what they’re able to do.  And in this particular case, we did do some training on a range in Norway to drop some – we would call them “inert shapes.”  But it gives us the opportunity to work with joint terminal air controllers or special operations forces that are on the ground, and it allows that sensor on the ground to connect with the shooter and in this case the bombers to be able to practice dropping weapons in different environments.  And I can tell you as a B-1 pilot that not all terrain looks the same; it has a different look on radar.  And working with different individuals, there are always the unique challenges of accent or just the ability to make sure that we understand exactly what we’re doing. 

We recognize – and of course, that goes for working with naval forces as well as working with army or ground forces, as well as airmen.  And I would just offer that anytime you do training like this, the one thing you’re always thinking about if you’re ever required to employ in a location such as this, or the environment such as this, you typically don’t get a first chance to practice and then a second chance to succeed.  You have to succeed on your first opportunity.  And so that’s why it’s so important to exercise every aspect of, in this particular case, what our B-1s can do, and certainly not just with Norway but many other countries so that if ever called upon, our allies are assured that we will be on target, first time.  Over.

Lieutenant General Odlo:  I’d like to start with that.  I think – yes, you’re right about the Cold War ending.  That’s ended about 1989.  At the same time, the security situation has changed quite dramatically after 2014 and I will not try to explain what happened then.  I think everyone understands what happened.  And also NATO recognized that and said that we need to look into ourselves and how do we prepare for defending our own territories?

At the same time, the security perception has to double.  We have the terrorist organization, we have the hybrid warfare.  It’s totally different, so we are not going into a new Cold War, that’s for sure.  This is totally different now.  And I think this is more about the security policy and understanding what’s going on today. 

But for sure, we have some threats against our society and our population which we need to be able to defend our interests and our population against.  But you’re right, it’s not a Cold War; it’s totally different, but still the military force to be able to do that is very important both within the alliance, but also bilaterally.

Lieutenant General Basham:  I’ll just maybe capture a couple of points here.  There is no doubt – and I think I captured in my opening comments – our desire is actually for peace.  And as all professional countries have professional militaries, it’s our responsibility to be, if called on by the nations, to be prepared to defend not only our own nation, our own interests, but those that we have closely allied with.  

And once again, between professional militaries, that is our responsibility.  In the end, the dialogue that occurs between alliance countries and nations in many ways is certainly bolstered by the ability of those nations to work closely together and have a level of assurance that should crisis come, that the militaries will be able to respond.  But let’s make no mistake, the goal is always, always the peace, always peace and the avoidance of any type of crisis or conflict.  Thank you.

Lieutenant General Odlo:  This has been a quite interesting period.  We are looking forward to further operations with the U.S., and we do that on a daily basis both in Norway and other both NATO and coalition nations abroad.  So I think what we are doing now is fitting quite good into the whole perspective of what we are trying to achieve with our efforts.  Thank you. 

Lieutenant General Basham:  Certainly to General Odlo and to everyone that was able to join us today, we value the wonderful partnership we have with Norway and appreciate any opportunity to operate bombers out of Ørland Air Force Station, in this particular case, as well as future opportunities but with maybe other aircraft.

We look forward again to the opportunity to be able to integrate with allies and partners across Europe and allowing us to improve readiness, responsiveness, and to preserve the peace through our shared expertise.  So thank you very much.

March 7, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Science

Norwegian oil rig benefits from voice system to support critical helicopter flights

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 23, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Avinor Air Navigation Services, the Norwegian air navigation service provider will supply the Frequentis IP voice communication system (VCS) for a major oil field in the North Sea. The system allows safe control and coordination of all helicopter flights in the region, supporting the essential and timely provision of critical resources.

The oil rig in question is a vast complex of platforms and structures creating a transportation hub for surrounding oil fields. Frequentis has installed its VCS3020X for seven off-shore controller working positions in its control centre. Two additional remote on-shore positions are located at Stavanger, in Western Norway, connected via an undersea fibre optic cable, more than 100 kilometres away from the main off-shore VCS servers.

“The new VCS from Frequentis will be an important component in our delivery of critical infrastructure in the Norwegian airspace. We chose Frequentis due to their expertise in the VCS technology and we look forward to using their system in our operations,” says Ellen Lystad Executive Vice President of Technology Services in Avinor Air Navigation Services.

The Frequentis VCS3020X is a fully redundant IP VCS, with exceptionally high availability, flexibility, performance, and feature maturity. The system is easy to install, maintain and operate, while having the highest track record for reliability in the market, making it extremely suitable for safety-critical applications and remote locations such as oil rigs.

As well as being Avinor Air Navigation Services long-term partner for VCS systems in area control centres and towers, Frequentis is also a trusted long-term partner of Norwegian Public Safety network Nødnett, supporting all kinds of safety critical sea – land – air communications. A high level of interoperability between Frequentis communication platforms enables timely and efficient coordination of Nødnett blue light forces with Telenor Coastal Radio, ensuring joint rescue coordination missions, as well as safe integration of drones into the airspace. 

“Being the world market-leader in VCS deployments, Frequentis is pleased to support air transportation safety in the energy and oil industry, ensuring safe air traffic control services on an oil platform by enhancing its communication infrastructure.  Despite challenging conditions and COVID-19 restrictions, the system was successfully put into operation as planned.”, says Hannu Juurakko, Frequentis Vice President ATM Civil and Chairman of the ATM Executive team.

February 23, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Royal House

Private celebration for King Harald of Norway on 84th birthday

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 23, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Sunday marked Norwegian King Harald V’s 84th birthday, but no official events were planned for the monarch who is on sick leave after a recent knee operation.

The king will instead be feted in private, the royal palace said.

King of Norway Harald V (R) lights candles in the church of Gjerdrum. Photo: Lise Aaserud/dpa/file photo.

The king and Queen Sonja were at the Royal Lodge, Kongsseteren, on the outskirts of Oslo where Harald is continuing to recover following his January 30 operation on an injured tendon in his right knee. His sick leave is due to run until March 14.

Most public events in Norway have been curtailed due to the coronavirus pandemic. During most of 2020, the king and queen, 83, have had to self-isolate due to the pandemic.

They have both received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine.

During his period of recovery, his son, Crown Prince Haakon, has served as regent.

Haakon has chaired regular state council sessions with the Cabinet, for example.

Harald became king on January 17, 1991, following the death of his father, Olav V. The 30-year anniversary since the king and queen ascended to the throne also took place without official celebrations.

In October, the king took time off to recover after a heart procedure to replace a heart valve, although he did not need open-heart surgery. A probe was introduced through a vein in his groin to access his heart while he was under local anaesthetic.

(foreigner.fi )

February 23, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Norwegian Aid

Norway’s government grants over NOK 120 million compensation for festival sector

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 21, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Many European governments realised how seriously the cultural sector has been affected by the impact of the ongoing pandemic. Norway is part of this group, where The Royal Norwegian Ministry of Culture secured more than NOK 120 million (€11.7 million) as a compensation for festival organisers and subcontractors.

The amount is distributed by Norway’s cultural council (Kulturradet), which has so far paid approximately NOK 1.4 billion to more than 2,000 applicants through various compensation packages for 2020. The latest one covers the period of May to August 2020 for some of the biggest players in Norway’s festival sector. Live Nation Norway has been granted almost the entire amount of compensation they applied for, receiving NOK 24.7 million as an organiser. Nordic live entertainment powerhouse All Things Live will receive NOK 36.4 million for around 20 concerts that had to be cancelled in 2020; while Live Nation-owned Oslo festival Tons of Rock will benefit from NOK 36.1 million. Other applicants received compensation, including Kristiansand beach festival, Palmesus (NOK 27.1 million), organiser of Ålesund Live and Jugendfest, Momentium Live (NOK 8.4 million), and Fredrikstad-based festival, Idyll (NOK 8.7 million).

 Kristin Danielsen, the director of the cultural council said:

“The largest players in the sector are also large employers and an important part of the cultural sector’s business chain. Therefore, I would have liked to have had the application process completed earlier.At the same time, it has been important for us to process the applications thoroughly. These are community funds, and it is our responsibility to manage them in the best possible way.”

The scheme is designed to compensate organisers and subcontractors that were financially impacted by the Norwegian government’s ban on live events which was extended into late 2020, causing the cancellation of the country’s biggest festivals. Following the example of Germany, Belgium, Austria and the Netherlands, Norway’s ministry of culture also announced a NOK 350 million cancellation insurance fund for festivals earlier this month, allowing organisers to plan for this summer without the financial risk posed by a potential COVID-19 outbreak.

Image Credit: Daniel Lilleeng (via Facebook)

February 21, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

Norwegian Army adding 20 CV90s to its fleet

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 20, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

BAE Systems has received an order from the Norwegian Army for 20 additional CV90 Infantry Fighting Vehicles to increase the combat power of its existing fleet.

The Norwegian Defence Materiel Agency awarded the more than $50 million contract that will increase the Army’s fleet to 164 vehicles as part of its effort to grow and modernize in the face of evolving threats.

Norway is one of seven CV90 users and is the latest customer to enhance its fleet of combat-proven CV90s following significant life extension and mid-life upgrade contracts from Switzerland and the Netherlands. The new Norwegian order for 12 engineering and eight multi-carrier CV90 variants is scheduled for delivery in 2023.

“We look forward to fielding another 20 modern CV90 combat support vehicles into the Norwegian Army,” said Brigadier Øyvind Johan Kvalvik, Norwegian Defence Materiel Agency´s Land Systems Division. “These additional vehicles will provide the Norwegian Army with the room for maneuver and combat power that the Army needs to be able to complete its missions using the most modern IFV vehicles in the world.”

BAE Systems Hägglunds, the manufacturer of the CV90 based in Örnsköldsvik, Sweden, will deliver the new vehicles in cooperation with Ritek, an established Norwegian CV90 partner. With Ritek at the center of the local industrial cooperation hub, up to 30 potential Norwegian suppliers will be responsible for upgrading and repairing components, as well as delivering new subsystems and technology solutions as part of future upgrades for the Norwegian CV90 fleet.

“We have a strong track record of delivering on time, at cost, and high quality to the Norwegian Army. This follow-up order demonstrates the importance of successful relationships with in-country industry partners like Ritek,” said Tommy Gustafsson-Rask, managing director of BAE Systems Hägglunds. “As we work to enhance the Norwegian Army’s existing fleet of CV90s, deepening our existing relationships with local industry will naturally benefit our end users.”

BAE Systems has a successful history of industrial cooperation projects in Norway that have strengthened industry partnerships, transferred technical know-how, and exceeded customer expectations and requirements. During the latest CV90 procurement and upgrade contract, BAE Systems Hägglunds delivered 100 percent offset obligation five years ahead of schedule.

BAE Systems and Ritek look forward to strengthening their relationship through the successful execution of this contract. “Our cooperation with the Norwegian Armed Forces and BAE Systems Hägglunds is based on trust and experience between all parties involved. We are very pleased with this new agreement which brings a positive local employment effect for Ritek as we focus on delivering this critical capacity to the Norwegian Army in the form of more combat support vehicles,” said Hilmar Olsen, general manager at Ritek. “We also expect the project to provide long-term opportunities for several other Norwegian suppliers across the country.”

Norway is one of seven European users operating the CV90. The others are Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Switzerland, Sweden and the Netherlands. With close to 1,300 vehicles in service in multiple variants, the vehicle is combat-proven and designed to accommodate future growth to meet evolving missions.

February 20, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Terrorist

Norway arrests boy on suspicion of plotting ISIS terrorist attack

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 19, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

A teenager has been arrested in Norway on suspicion of planning a terrorist attack.

The Syrian youngster, who is believed to have sympathies with ISIS, was arrested in Oslo, Norway’s domestic security agency said on Friday.

The 16-year-old was detained on Thursday.

A person has been arrested in Norway on suspicion of planning a terror attack. Reuters

Head of the security service Hans Sverre Sjoevold told Norwegian broadcaster NRK that the youth was a Syrian national but declined to say whether the attack was planned to take place in Norway.

No details were given as to when the attack was to be carried out.

The boy arrived in Norway through a family reunification scheme.

The security agency said he was expected to appear in court in Oslo on Friday for a custody hearing which would be held behind closed doors.

Earlier on Friday, a 30-year-old Norwegian woman of Pakistani descent, who was repatriated to Norway last year from a refugee camp in north-eastern Syria, was charged with participation in extremist groups.

The woman, who was not identified, had travelled to Syria in June 2013, and is the first woman in Norway to be charged under the offence.

Prosecutor Geir Evanger told NTB that the woman had married three foreign fighters in Syria and had children with two of them.

The woman claimed she was held against her will and later stranded in Syria’s Al Hol, the largest camp housing people who once lived in areas controlled by ISIS in Syria and Iraq.

Terrorist attacks in Norway in recent years have mostly been carried out by right-wing extremists, most notably the 2011 massacre by Anders Behring Breivik, who killed 77 people in a bombing and shooting rampage.

Last year, Philip Manshaus, 22, was jailed for 21 years for killing his Chinese-born stepsister and then opening fire on an Oslo mosque in 2019.

February 19, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

British commandos undergo extreme survival training in Norway

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 19, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

British commandos have been put through their paces as they underwent extreme survival training Norwegian woodland where temperatures can drop to -30C (-22F).

Pilots and aircrew from the Joint Helicopter Command were challenged during Exercise Clockwork, a cold weather warfare course at the Norwegian air base at Bardufoss.

Before taking to the skies over the Arctic Circle, the aviators of the UK’s Joint Helicopter Command must complete the cold weather warfare course – a tradition which has been taking place for 52 years.

The exercise gives them vital insight into surviving and fighting in one of the planet’s most inhospitable environments, where the sun barely rises and temperatures can plummet to around -22F.

Specialist Royal Marines instructors of the Mountain Leader Cadre lead the fliers through this challenging training, which includes jumping into icy water to cope with cold shock and living out of survival shelters. 

The group of military personnel are also challenged to move on skis and snowshoes on long distance marches.

The raw and insightful series of pictures reveal the tough conditions they face during the course in blistering cold and snowy conditions. 

Overcoming some of the harshest weather conditions, the commandos battle with only a few hours of daylight and freezing temperatures as they train to survive in dangerous conditions. 

During the exercise, they take part in the infamous ice breaking drills which sees them stepping into freezing cold waters and submerging themselves.

The military personnel step into the hole cut out of a body of water covered in ice with their backpacks and must climb out unassisted with only ski poles to help them.

They also have to learn survival skills, building shelters in the snow covered woodland and living off the land around them. In the latest series of snaps, they can be seen huddling together around a fire they had made.  

Once completed, the fliers are ready to take to the skies and carry out their own specialist training in Arctic flying, engineering and refuelling and providing aerial support to Royal Marines on the ground – and hunting and destroying enemy targets over the mountainous terrain.

Naval Airman Matt Vickers, an aircraft handler from 845 Naval Air Squadron of the Commando Helicopter Force, is living out of a brushwood shelter in the Arctic wilderness during the cold weather course.

February 19, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Media Freedom

National Control Centre to monitor arrivals into Norway

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 17, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The government has requested that the Norwegian Directorate of Health establish a National Control Centre in order to prevent the import of infections. The control centre will be based at the Norwegian Health Economics Administration (Helfo) in Tønsberg. Its purpose will be to monitor compliance with prevailing quarantine regulations. 

– We are now establishing even better control mechanisms to limit the import of infection. We already have very strict entry criteria for persons entering Norway, including quarantine hotels, mandatory testing at border crossings, requirements for proof of a negative Covid-19 test taken within 24 hours of arrival in Norway, traveller registration and a quarantine scheme. However, we have noted that our quarantine regulations are not always adhered to, says Bent Høie, Minister of Health and Care Services.

It is challenging for municipalities to maintain oversight of travellers and check that they understand their obligations to quarantine in line with the regulations and are able to meet these requirements.

‘The new control centre will offer guidance to persons arriving in Norway and monitor that they comply with the prevailing quarantine regulations. This will relieve municipalities of the burden of checking that arrivals in Norway adhere to quarantine regulations,’ says Høie.

The National Control Centre will commence operations from this coming Monday (15 February) and will be tasked with contacting arrivals by text message and telephone calls. The centre will initially provide travellers with guidance on quarantine provisions and the testing regime. 

As of 1 March, they will also be responsible for reporting any suspected violations of quarantine regulations to chief municipal medical officers and to the Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority so that local measures may be implemented.

Personnel at the centre will carry out checks and provide guidance in a range of languages:

o          Norwegian

o          English

o          Polish

o          Lithuanian

o          Romanian

o          Russian

o          Arabic

o          Urdu

o          Somali

Thanks to the fact that the centre will be able to carry out checks and offer guidance in travellers’ own languages, this will be of great assistance to Norwegian municipalities in their work of monitoring arrivals to the country and carrying out additional checks in relation to suspected violations of the testing and quarantine regulations.

February 17, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

Kongsberg upgrade NASAMS air system for Norway

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 15, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The upgrade of the NASAMS Sentinel radar’s Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) ensures the system operates in accordance with future NATO standards, further improving the already secure identification of friendly aircraft.

“Norway continues to upgrade their ground-based air defense capability by implementing the latest available technology. The modernization will enhance NATO commonality and reinforce the NASAMS capability,” says Kjetil Reiten Myhra, Executive Vice President of Integrated Defence Systems in KONGSBERG.

Raytheon Technologies contractors set up and functions check a National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile launcher in support of Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) Onramp 2 at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, on Aug. 26, 2020. (Picture source U.S. DoD)

(National/Norwegian Advanced Surface to Air Missile System) is a medium to long-range air-defense missile system jointly developed by Norwegian company Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace (KDA) and American company Raytheon for the Royal Norwegian Air Force (RNoAF). It was declared fully operational capable in 1998 but had an initial operational capability as early as in 1994/95. A total of fifteen(15) nations have acquired the KONGSBERG command and control solution adapted to their requirements.

The system integrates US-built MPQ-64 Sentinel air defense radar and AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles with an indigenously developed Battle management C4I system called FDC, short for Fire Distribution Center. The FDC connected to a MPQ-64 radar forms an “Acquisition Radar and Control System” (ARCS). The missile has a horizontal range of up to 25 km. Other sources cite a range of ‘over 15 km but this depends on the missile version used. The most recent capability, demonstrating NASAMS path of evolution, is the AMRAAM Extended Range missile (AMRAAM ER). AMRAAM ER significantly extends the engagement

The radar and launcher elements can be deployed over a large area separated by more than 20 kilometers from the FDC, providing an extended coverage with few elements. Dispersed elements increase its survivability against enemy air and ground attacks. The NASAMS is able to destroy UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle), Helicopters, Cruise Missiles, UCAVs (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles), and  aircraft. It has the capability to engage simultaneously 72 targets and can be linked to an air defense network. 

February 15, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

OPINION: Moving beyond Paris, India steps up its climate ambitions

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 11, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Five years after the Paris Agreement, India is among the few developing countries that are not only meeting their “green” targets but are aspiring to more ambitious climate goals.

At the recent Climate Ambition Summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi articulated the Indian approach. He said that we must set our sights “even higher”, even as we do not lose sight of the past. He added that India would not only achieve its Paris Agreement targets, but would exceed them. 

At the U.N. Climate Action Summit in 2019, Modi said that an ounce of practice is worth more than a ton of preaching. We are taking practical steps across all areas, including energy, industry, transport, agriculture and protection of green spaces, in our whole-of-society journey to become a leader in climate action and climate ambition. 

India recognizes that climate change cannot be fought in silos. It requires an integrated, comprehensive and holistic approach. It requires innovation and adoption of new and sustainable technologies. Conscious of these imperatives, India has mainstreamed climate in its national developmental and industrial strategies. 

Energy is at the center of all climate strategies. We believe India has become a clean energy powerhouse and is a leader in energy transition from carbon dioxide-producing sources to renewables and non-fossil-fuel sources. 

We intend to keep harnessing India’s renewable energy potential. Our renewable energy capacity is the fourth largest in the world and the capacity expansion being undertaken is also one of the largest in the world. The bulk of this will come from the cleanest energy source, the sun. 

We are seeing progress already. We initially committed to 175 GW of renewable energy capacity by 2022. We have gone further and expect to cross 220 GW in the next two years. We have an even more ambitious target of 450 GW by 2030. 

We are working to ensure that 40% of electric power in India is from non-fossil fuel sources by 2030. This clean energy push goes hand-in-hand with a parallel effort to reduce the emissions intensity of our economy by 33-35% (from 2005 levels) by 2030.

The Ujala scheme – a national drive to use LED lamps – is reducing CO2 emissions by 38.5 million tonnes every year. The Ujjwala scheme, under which over 80 million households have been provided access to clean cooking gas, is one of of the largest clean energy initiatives in the world. 

Climate action and sustainability is being brought into government schemes across multiple sectors. Our Smart Cities Mission is working with 100 cities to help them become more sustainable and adaptable to the challenges of climate change. The National Clean Air Programme aims to reduce air pollution (PM2.5 and PM10) by 20-30% in the next four years.

The Jal Jeevan Mission, which aims to provide safe and adequate drinking water through individual household tap connections by 2024 to all households in rural India, has a strong sustainability focus. 

More trees are being planted and degraded land is being reclaimed to create a carbon “sink” that can absorb 2.5-3 billion tonnes of CO2. 

We are also working rapidly to create a green transport network, to offset a sector known for its polluting emissions particularly in our big cities.

India is building next-generation infrastructure such as mass transit systems, green highways and waterways. A national electric mobility plan is creating an e-mobility ecosystem with the aim to have over 30% of all vehicles on India’s roads to be electric. 

These initiatives are for our own good as India is among the countries most vulnerable to the impact of climate change. 

We recognise there is still a long way to go but these efforts are already paying dividends. India’s emission intensity has reduced by 21% over the period 2005-2014. Over the next decade, we are expecting even greater reductions. 

India intends to be a responsible global citizen in the climate space. We are not only going beyond our Paris Agreement commitments. We are adopting innovative instruments to further international cooperation in climate action.

We have created international organisations like the International Solar Alliance and the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure that are working on creating global low-carbon pathways. More than 80 countries have joined the International Solar Alliance, making it one of the fastest-growing international bodies. 

This combination of national action and responsible international citizenship makes India unique amongst developing countries and is placing it on the path to realise its ambitions to be a leader in thought and action on climate.

Harsh Vardhan Shringla is Foreign Secretary of India. Views expressed are personal.

February 11, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Farming

ISA outbreak reported in Norway

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 6, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway has recorded its first major confirmed case of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) for 2021.

The outbreak has been reported at a facility run by the family firm of Emilsen Fisk at Namsos in the Trøndelag region.

The Norwegian Food Safety Authority said suspicions were first raised during clinical tests taken by the company in mid-January. Follow up samples were taken for further testing and, as a result, ISA has been positively confirmed.

In order to limit the spread of the infection, the usual restrictions have been imposed at the site including a ban on the movement of fish without a special permit. The salmon in the infected cages will be slaughtered, a necessary move which always results in a costly legacy for businesses hit by ISA.

Norway’s fish farmers suffered a worryingly high number of ISA outbreaks last year and an investigation into possible causes is currently under way.
The confirmation will be a setback for Emilsen Fisk, one of the lesser known salmon farmers outside Norway, but which prides itself on quality.

The Emilsen family have a strong connection to the sea, hailing from a traditional fishing background. They went into salmon farming in 1975 when the industry globally was still largely in its infancy.

The company says it has the financial strength to cope with the loss, stating: “We at Emilsen Fisk AS have always focused on sensible and future-oriented operations, where excess capital has been invested back into the company. “

“The investments have led to us now being a state-of-the-art company that is well equipped in both ups and downs.”

February 6, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

Intelsat and Telenor Satellite expand 4K UHD TV

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 5, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Intelsat and Norway-based Telenor Satellite are extending their partnership at the 1° West orbital slot to expand 4K UHD channel distribution to Nordic and Central Eastern European countries, and directly into the homes of nearly 18 million Pay TV households in the region.

Intelsat and Telenor Satellite are introducing new 4K/UHD channels, beginning with NASA TV and WOW 4K, with additional channels coming soon, the pair said. The new 4K channels will be broadcast to CEE and Nordic viewers on the Intelsat 10-02 satellite and Telenor Satellite’s Thor 7.

“We are delighted to welcome broadcast channels such as Wow 4K and NASA 4K to be distributed via our 1° West satellite fleet, with 4K content enhancing the viewing experience even more,” said Ole Ledang director of the broadcasting division at Telenor Satellite.

“We know that viewers’ expectations are growing when it comes to user experience. They are looking for a high-quality, high-resolution image, and they also want access to more diversified content. Working with Telenor Satellite, we are making it possible for broadcasters to meet their viewers’ needs in the Nordics, the CEE regions and neighbourhoods that we are already addressing through 1° West,” said Olivier Herson, managing sales director at Intelsat.

February 5, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
NATO and Norway

Plans to Draw Down in Germany on Hold as New Administration Considers Options

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 4, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Plans to significantly reduce the U.S. footprint in Germany are now on hold as the new administration reviews the decision and its impacts, the head of U.S. European Command said Feb. 3.

In July, then-Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper and EUCOM boss Gen. Tod D. Wolters announced that DOD would remove nearly 12,000 troops from Germany, shift F-16s from Spangdahlem (the base’s only flying mission), and halt plans to move tankers and special operations forces from England to Germany, among other changes. 

The announcement came after former President Donald J. Trump repeatedly stated his desire to reduce the U.S. footprint in Germany.

Wolters told reporters in a teleconference that planning for the moves immediately stopped once new Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III took charge. Wolters would not say how far along the changes were in planning.

“There were so many pieces and parts to the plan, we could probably sit here for weeks and guess on the depth and how far along we were,” Wolters said. “But in all those cases, there were branches and sequels with multiple options. So, I will just tell you that the new administration has comfortably stated to us that we need to conduct a thorough review, cradle to grave, in all areas. And then after they’re allowed to conduct that review, we’ll go back to the drawing board.”

Austin has hinted at making changes to the plan. According to a Pentagon summary of a Jan. 28 call with German Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, Austin said Germany is a “great host for U.S. forces” and “expressed his desire for a continued dialogue on U.S. force posture in Germany.”

Wolters said the DOD review will provide a “comprehensive look at all of the options, from A to Z, and [then DOD will] take a strategic and operational examination of each and every one of those impacts.”

When the move was announced, it drew immediate criticism from lawmakers, and the fiscal 2021 National Defense Authorization Act aimed to block funding for the change until the Defense Department provided details on the timeline and justification.

Wolters would not provide a guess on what the decision would ultimately be, saying the White House will “deliver us a decision. 

Don’t know what that will be. … I’m a smart military member, so I want to make sure that I give my senior civilian leadership the appropriate maneuvering space to make the decision that they need to make so that we can collectively go forward in the future.”

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by Special Briefing via Telephone with U.S. Air Force General Tod D. Wolters U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) Commander and NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR).

General Wolters:  Thanks, Let me start by offering our deepest condolences to all those affected by COVID-19.  The pandemic impacts so many aspects of our lives.  Luckily, via smart modifications to all of our military activities with strict adherence to mitigation measures, and the efforts and professionalism of all of our allies and partners, we’ve allowed ourselves the opportunity to continue to effectively deter and generate defensive activities inside of Europe to generate what we think is most important, which is peace.  And at the end of the day, we bear responsibility to ensure that this health crisis does not become a security issue, and we all know that we still have a long ways to go.

As so many of you know, we still face significant challenges in the Euro-Atlantic area: increasing threat capabilities, diffusion of disruptive technologies, and malign activities below the level of armed conflict by adversaries on the periphery.  We must maintain our campaign momentum to strengthen indications and warnings, command and control, and good old-fashioned mission execution.  We’ve strengthened these 21st century warfare pillars as we develop future capabilities, we field new forces, and we improve our operational and strategic alignment.  All of these efforts increase the likelihood of achieving our strategic goals, which are saving lives and preserving the peace.

On land, allies deter aggression as part of NATO’s four multinational battle groups, as does our enhanced forward presence in the Black Sea region.  Allied Land Command coordinates and synchronizes NATO and partner land forces by enabling readiness, interoperability, standardization, and good old-fashioned competency.  

At sea, joint exercises and patrols facilitate NATO’s awareness and security.  Recently, and particularly in the Black Sea region, we have strengthened our maritime posture with superb support from Georgia and Ukraine.  The USS Porter and USS Donald Cook recently conducted multidomain operations with NATO AWACS and P-8s in the Black Sea – a demonstration of how we’ve enhanced our interoperability.  

In the skies above, air-policing missions reinforce collective defense, demonstrating alliance cohesion and resolve to implement deterrence and defense.  Canadian support to enhance air policing and current Spanish air force missions over Romania underscore the transatlantic link.  Another outstanding example is the deployment of MQ-9 aircraft to Camp Turzii in Romania, fortifying regional security and a – and once again enhancing interoperability.

We remain laser-focused in space, a domain whose importance to NATO and the globe cannot be overstated.  In October of 2020, we established a new NATO Space Center at Allied Air Command in Ramstein, Germany, monitoring satellites and collecting data on possible threats.  Currently, experts from the United States, Great Britain, and Germany are assigned to the Space Center, and in the coming months we anticipate receiving additional allied personnel.  We continue to refine this critical initiative.

Cyber-threats to the alliance’s security are active and complex.  We protect networks 24 hours a day from cyberattacks.  NATO’s Cyberspace Operations Center here in Mons, Belgium, is a first and unique theater component for cyberspace, responsible for persistent, centralized, and comprehensive situational awareness and coordination of full – of the full spectrum of NATO military activity.  

These critical efforts and initiatives demonstrate the alliance – these demonstrate how our alliance is actually fortifying its deterrence and defense posture in all of our domains, while conducting vital operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Kosovo.

NATO Mission Iraq continues to provide train-and-advise support to the Iraqi Security Forces focused on developing self-sustaining national security forces to provide stability, prevent the return of ISIS and Daesh, and combat terrorism in all forms.

NATO’s Resolute Support Mission supports the pursuit of peace, preventing Afghanistan from again becoming a safe haven for international terror groups.  Our force adjustments directly support this objective, while we’ve maintained capabilities, enablers, and flexibility to train, advise, and assist Afghan Security Forces.  Throughout, the alliance remains true to its mantra of in together, adjust together, and when the time is right, out together.  

Our NATO Mission Kosovo forces bring stability to Kosovo and the region.  The KFOR Mission is providing support to local communities in the response to COVID-19.  This includes donations and deliveries of critical medical supplies, personal protection equipment, food, and clothing.

Turning to future training and capabilities, Exercise Steadfast Defender is the first in a series of NATO-led exercises to ensure that our forces are trained, interoperable, and ready to respond to threats from any direction.  This is a long-planned defensive exercise focused on reinforcing the Euro-Atlantic area.  It demonstrates the continued importance of North America and Europe working together in a challenging and ever-changing security environment.  For the first time, this involves two new NATO commands: the Joint Support and Enabling Command, based in Ulm, Germany; and the Joint Force Command Norfolk, based in Virginia.  

In November, we recently announced the arrival of the final NATO Alliance Ground Surveillance aircraft in Sigonella, Italy, a significant milestone towards improved sensing of the environment.  

NATO’s commitment to allies remains ironclad.  We endure as the strongest military alliance in history.  Allied command operations and U.S. European Command continue to focus day in and day out on preserving peace. 

Andrea, thanks for allowing me the time to deliver those words, and I look forward to the opportunity of embracing your questions.

Question: What is the status of planning for Exercise DEFENDER-Europe 2021?

General Wolters:  I think the question had to do with DEFENDER-Europe 21 and its status, and I’m pretty certain that’s what it was, and what I’d like to say is planning is ongoing.  We’re very, very excited.  What we anticipate is over 30,000 U.S., allied, and partner forces that will get together, stretching all the way from the Baltics to Africa, and they will represent 26 separate nations, and we will actually have touchpoints in well over 10 nations with respect to embracing the actual exercise activities.  It’s an all-domain exercise.  It’s going to demonstrate our ability to lift and shift large forces over large swaths of territory, and as we speak, planning is ongoing and we’re exciting about – and we’re all very, very excited about embracing the exercise.  

Question:  General, last summer U.S. laid out plans to reposition – reposition around 11,000 troops from Germany, and to partially relocate them inside the NATO European area.  With the new administration in Washington and Congress effectively putting these plans on hold, where do you see them heading, and how much – and how advanced are your plans at this stage?  

General Wolters:  I anticipated that question and as you can well imagine with the change in administrations, there is a lot of consultations ongoing.  The U.S. Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, is at this moment in the process of conducting a very, very thorough review, and he will receive advice of both civilian and military leadership, and once he actually is allowed to collate all that advice he’ll ultimately embrace our U.S. President and the White House and deliver us a decision.  Don’t know what that’ll be, and as you well know, Thomas, I’m a smart military member so I want to make sure that I give my senior civilian leadership the appropriate maneuvering space to make the decision that they need to make so that we can collectively go forward in the future.  

Question: What would you say are the major emerging threats as opposed to ongoing traditional ones like Russia?

General Wolters:  I’m never keen to talk about threats.  I’m really keen to talk about our capability.  But in this particular case, I’ll mention several.  Number one, international terror groups still pose tremendous danger to civilization.  Certainly, those folks here in Europe, those folks on the periphery of Europe, extending all the way across the Atlantic.   I think this audience is very, very familiar with that.  It is – it is something that we are concerned about in 2021, and I suspect it will be a concern years and decades from now.  

The other – the other concern that we have that’s very widespread and known is the growing cooperation between Russia and China, and it really does suggest an emergence of a partnership of convenience so that each one of those can advance their mutual interest, and that advancement could be to the detriment of Europe and corresponding and surrounding nations.  So we are ever so vigilant with respect to that growing cooperation.

And with respect to China, as many know, they’re not an adversary to NATO yet.  China presents a rising influence, and it poses challenges for our security, certainly in terms of value, military modernization, and resilience.  

So our focus and our vigilance is sky-high with respect to China, the relationship between China and Russia, and certainly with respect to international terror groups.  

Question:  Can you talk about how far planning got or how far along the order actually was for these specific movements?  You know better than us, the headquarters movement to Belgium; the Air Force squadron to Italy; the 2nd Cav back to the U.S.  Can you talk at all about how far that got, how far the planning was, has it been stopped?  Can you give us any details on that?  

General Wolters:  The previous planning that was ongoing for the previous initiative has been put on freeze so that – so that our Secretary of Defense and this administration could conduct a thorough review of everything that has transpired up to the point where Secretary Austin took charge.  And there were so many pieces and parts to the plan, we could probably sit here for weeks and guess on the depth and how far along we were.  But in all those cases, there were branches and sequels with multiple options.  

So I will just tell you that the new administration has comfortably stated to us that we need to conduct a thorough review, cradle to grave, in all areas, and then after they’re allowed to conduct that review we’ll go back to the drawing board.  So I know you tried again to dig out a little bit more on that, but that’s where we stand.  Thanks.

Question:  What is the real practical use of the missile shield element in Romania?

General Wolters:  Aegis Ashore in Romania is the system that advances our operational indications and warnings, our ability to see the environment.  It also enhances our command and control.  So in very, very simple terms, it extends our eyes to improve our ability to better deter on NATO soil, yet it also affords us the opportunity to be able to use it as a hub to transmit and receive more information.  So in the areas of deterrence where it’s critical to see the environment and where it’s critical to have command and control so that you can get feedback to the military organizations that need to make decisions about what to do next, this system in Romania is a tremendous contributor in both of those areas.

Question:  I wanted to get your big-picture outlook on it.  Back in July, when this was announced, you had said that the plan to send 2nd Cav and rearrange things in Europe basically would strengthen the military’s ability to deter aggression in Europe, on the continent, and that it was, in a nutshell, superior to the current posture.  Are you still of that view, and if so, could you kind of elaborate on why you thought that plan was sort of advantageous?  

General Wolters:  At the time, based off the guidance given, those options that were addressed in the public domain were the ones that we thought most clearly addressed the advantages.  What I will say that exists at this very moment is that every single one of those options, that they’re all on hold and they will all be re-examined from cradle to grave.  And the purpose in doing so is to make sure that you have a comprehensive look at all of the options, from A to Z, and you take a strategic and operational examination of each and every one of those impacts on the larger deterrence and security picture.  And that’s exactly what’s going to take place, and that’s exactly what our new U.S. Secretary of Defense needs to ensure that we can continue to do the things that we need to do in Europe to generate more peace.

Question:  I’d like to ask you about Russia.  We’ve seen during prior instances of domestic turmoil and unrest that coincide with Russian adventures abroad, notably their invasion in Syria and interference in Ukraine.  And I wonder when you look at the riots last night, the ongoing civil unrest in recent weeks surrounding the Navalny trial, whether you’ve seen so far any evidence that that has had any effect on Russia’s international posture or whether you think that it might in the near future.  

General Wolters:  You hit the mark on where military commanders’ minds should be.  And since that question was so good, I just want you to know we heard your child in the background, and I also want you to know that the United States Air Force Academy is a really good college, so when it’s time to send your little one off to college, you let me know if you need some additional support.

Back to Russia.  You are so right:  We take a holistic review of Russian activity, and I certainly examine everything that they’ve done from 2014 to the present, and this adventures abroad is something that we pay close attention to, and obviously with what is unfolding as we speak with respect to the Navalny case, we’re very concerned about that.  And Russia has a – has some tendencies to be a little adventurous at times like this, and at other times they have tendencies not to.  But what I can tell you right now based off our observations is we see no symptoms of adventurism on behalf of Russia as a result of the turmoil that they’re going through with respect to the Navalny incident.

Question:  How do you explain this reinforcing enhanced presence, military presence, in the Black Sea region?  And an additional question:  Could we see the process of repositioning the U.S. European military presence from Germany going on this year? 

General Wolters:  Ioara, the advertising and the discussions centered around NATO activity and U.S. activity in the vicinity of the Black Sea has to do with NATO advances in their NATO military strategy and the NATO concept for deterrence and defense of the Euro-Atlantic area and what we call comprehensive defense and shared response.  So in NATO, we want to ensure that we comprehensively deter in all geographical quadrants to the greatest degree practical, and we had seen some cases where there might have been a small mismatch of resources to certain regions several years ago, and we wanted to make sure that we took a strategic look at where these resources were so that we could comprehensively deter and defend in the Black Sea region as well as we did in the Arctic, as well as we would in the Eastern Mediterranean, as well as we would in the Baltics, and as well as we would in the central portion of the Atlantic Ocean.  

So all those considerations coming into account, beginning in 2017 and starting in 2018, there was a little bit of a shift with respect to resources to improve our ability to see the environment in the vicinity of the Black Sea, and that actually explains the change that you certainly have witnessed firsthand from Romania.

Question:  I wanted to follow up on DEFENDER-Europe 2021 and just sort of take the idea – you scaled back significantly last year because of COVID-19.  Sort of where do you stand with the ongoing pandemic in discussions of sort of how to maybe change the exercise, and at what point do you decide that plans have to change due to the ongoing pandemic?

General Wolters:  Ashley, we examine that every second of the day, and it starts with approximately 30,000 U.S., allied, and partner forces that come from 26 separate nations, and as we speak, the intent is to touch at least a dozen nations extending geographically all the way from the northern tip of the Baltics down to the Sahel.  And with each and every passing day, we examine the disposition with respect to each one of the participating nations that have troopers, and each one of the nations that are cooperating and allowing us to be on their soil.  And we scrutinize the disposition of COVID-19 in those contributing nations and in those hosting nations, and we scrutinize the disposition of the military forces that represent our allies and partners, and we have branches and sequels.

And our goal, Ashley, is obviously to keep all 31,000 people ready, willing, and able to get all – to touch all 12 separate nations.  And with each passing second, we realize there may come cases where we can’t do that.  And we’ve got cutoff points established in our plans, called Program of Actionable Milestones, and we make decision points all the way leading up to the exercise to get as much as we possibly can out of the exercise when we do ultimately start it.  

And strategically, because we’re part of society and we’re good military members, we don’t forget our number-one charter, which is to make sure that this pandemic does not morph into a security issue.  And if we were to force-feed some actions that wouldn’t be prudent with respect to good order and discipline from a COVID-19 perspective, we would violate the tenets of not allowing the pandemic to turn into a security issue.  

So our discipline will remain in place.  At this moment, we still believe we have a chance of getting all 30,000-plus soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines to all 26 – from all 26 nations to touch all 12 nations, and along the way we may come to some stops as a result of the impact of COVID-19 and not be able to exercise DEFENDER-Europe 21 in its totality.  But at this point we’re still a go with the contributions of 26 nations, about 30,000 folks touching about 12 different countries.  And as soon as we get to a point to where there’s a stop due to challenges with respect to COVID-19, we’ll be keen to make sure we point that out in the media.  

February 4, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

Update: Rafael unveils SPICE 250 ER development

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 4, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Rafael Advanced Defence Systems has disclosed development of a powered, extended range (ER) variant of the SPICE 250 air-to-surface autonomous glide weapon system.

Designated SPICE 250 ER, the new variant incorporates a micro-turbojet engine with an internal JP-8/10 fuel reservoir to deliver what is understood to be a conservatively stated range “of at least 150km”.

Currently in high-volume production for a number of customers, the standard SPICE 250 is an all-up weapon system, unlike the heavier 1000 and 2000 family variants, which are essentially electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) guidance and target acquisition add-on kits for 1000,lb and 2,000 lb general purpose and penetration warheads.

Weighing 250 lb (113 kg) and furnished with a 75 kg class warhead (blast fragmentation/penetration), the unpowered SPICE 250 variant is a lightweight day/night all-weather precision weapon with a stand-off range of 100 km and a stated circular error probable (CEP) of “better than 3 m.” Equipped with a mid-body fold-out wing assembly and rear cruciform tail control fin set, the weapon system features an improved EO/IR guidance package, midcourse INS/GPS navigation, a two-way datalink, and pre-set or cockpit selectable fuze options. 

All current production SPICE variants – 250, 1000, 2000 – are furnished with an Automatic Target Acquisition (ATA) capability: an autonomous electro-optic scene matching technology designed to overcome GPS-jamming, navigation and target location errors in the engagement of fixed targets. On approach to the target, the scene-matching algorithm compares the electro-optical image received in real-time via the weapon seeker with mission reference data stored in the weapon’s computer memory.

February 4, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

India’s Statement on recent comments by foreign individuals and entities on the farmers’ protests

by Nadarajah Sethurupan February 3, 2021
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

“The Parliament of India, after a full debate and discussion, passed reformist legislation relating to the agricultural sector. These reforms give expanded market access and provided greater flexibility to farmers. They also pave the way for economically and ecologically sustainable farming.

A very small section of farmers in parts of India have some reservations about these reforms. Respecting the sentiments of the protestors, the Government of India has initiated a series of talks with their representatives. Union Ministers have been part of the negotiations, and eleven rounds of talks have already been held. The Government has even offered to keep the laws on hold, an offer iterated by no less than the Prime Minister of India. 

Yet, it is unfortunate to see vested interest groups trying to enforce their agenda on these protests, and derail them. This was egregiously witnessed on January 26, India’s Republic Day. A cherished national commemoration, the anniversary of the inauguration of the Constitution of India, was besmirched, and violence and vandalism took place in the Indian capital. 

Some of these vested interest groups have also tried to mobilise international support against India. Instigated by such fringe elements, Mahatma Gandhi statues have been desecrated in parts of the world. This is extremely disturbing for India and for civilised society everywhere.

Indian police forces have handled these protests with utmost restraint. It may be noted that hundreds of men and women serving in the police have been physically attacked, and in some cases stabbed and seriously wounded. 

We would like to emphasise that these protests must be seen in the context of India’s democratic ethos and polity, and the efforts of the Government and the concerned farmer groups to resolve the impasse. 

Before rushing to comment on such matters, we would urge that the facts be ascertained, and a proper understanding of the issues at hand be undertaken. The temptation of sensationalist social media hashtags and comments, especially when resorted to by celebrities and others, is neither accurate nor responsible. “

#IndiaTogether 

#IndiaAgainstPropagandaNew Delhi
February 03, 2021

February 3, 2021 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Norwegian Nobel Prize 2024

101207 The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2024 to Japan’s Hiroshima bomb survivor group Nihon Hidankyo.

Special Interest

  • Africa and Norway
  • Asia and Norway
  • Asylum
  • China and Norway
  • Corruption in Norway
  • Crimes
  • Defence
  • Diplomatic relations
  • Economics
  • Environment
  • Farming
  • Killing
  • Media Freedom
  • Middle East and Norway
  • NATO and Norway
  • Nobel Peace Prize
  • Norwegian Aid
  • Norwegian American
  • Oil & Gas
  • Peace Talks
  • Politics
  • Racism in Norway
  • Religion
  • Russia and Norway
  • Royal House
  • Science
  • Sex scandal
  • Sports
  • Spy War
  • Srilanka and Norway
  • Svalbard
  • Terrorist
  • Taiwan and Norway
  • Video clips

Follow Us

Recent Posts

  • Norway introduces blood test to detect Alzheimer’s brain changes

    December 26, 2025
  • Rafto Foundation calls for rights of Sahrawi people

    December 26, 2025
  • Norway’s data watchdog claims TikTok data transfers to China

    December 22, 2025
  • Norway’s crown princess needs lung transplant, palace says

    December 22, 2025
  • Norway Parliament Probes Telenor for Myanmar Data

    December 19, 2025
  • Machado Is Working Toward a Transition in Venezuela

    December 12, 2025

Social Feed

Social Feed

Editors’ Picks

Norway opens market for Sri Lankan fish exports...

May 13, 2016

Sri Lanka – Nordic Business Council holds discussions...

May 15, 2016

Good governance to Sri Lanka

May 15, 2016

Shock and Joy in Sri Lanka – Erik...

May 15, 2016

Sri Lanka-Norway plenty of new opportunities for business–...

May 15, 2016

NORWAY NEWS is an online news site, written in English, dedicated to Norwegian affairs at home and abroad. Norway News.com is published online. It is a daily online newspaper in existence since May, 2003. The site is run by an Independent Journalist.

Facebook Twitter Youtube

Useful Links

    • Work With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Collaboration
    • Data Collection
    • Workplace
    • Adverstising
    • Privacy Policy
    • International Collab
    • Feedback
    • Terms of Use
    • About Our Ads
    • Help & Support
    • Entertainment
    • News Covering
    • Technology
    • Trending Now

Politics

Syrian, Norway to boost cooperation on mine clearance
Erna to step down as Conservative Party leader in 2026
Norwegian Labour Party on re-election win

Latest Articles

Norway introduces blood test to detect Alzheimer’s brain changes
Rafto Foundation calls for rights of Sahrawi people
Norway’s data watchdog claims TikTok data transfers to China
Norway’s crown princess needs lung transplant, palace says

Norway News 2025 . All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News

  • Home
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us

Editor’s Picks

  • UN concern over Sri Lanka’s cases of enforced disappearances

    October 8, 2025
  • UN Human Rights Council Resolution on Sri Lanka’s Path to Reconciliation

    October 7, 2025
  • International should support Sri Lanka: Solheim

    October 4, 2024
  • Norwegian Meets Sri Lankan’s Challenges

    May 3, 2024
  • Norwegian Ambassador meets JVP in Sri Lanka

    May 2, 2024
  • “The man who didn’t run away” – Eric Solheim

    April 30, 2024

Newsletter

@2025 - All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News