NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Monday, November 10, 2025
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
Copyright 2025- All Right Reserved Norway News
Science

Norwegian university supplying COVID-19 test kits to India, Denmark

by Nadarajah Sethurupan October 2, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

A highly sensitive COVID-19 test, developed by researchers from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), relies on magnetic nanoparticles to extract viral RNA. More than 5 million NTNU COVID-19 tests have already been supplied to the Norwegian health authorities. Now India and Denmark will benefit from the technology.

“Testing and infection tracking are absolutely essential to maintaining control of the infection situation. The fact that NTNU has developed a new test method for detecting the coronavirus means that more people can be tested and that patients can get answers faster. It is very positive that this technology can now also be useful internationally,” says Bent Høie, Norway’s Minister of Health and Care Services.

“We have been contacted by health ministries and private companies from countries in Asia, Africa, North and South America and Europe,” said Tonje Steigedal, from NTNU Technology Transfer, who is part of the NTNU test team and responsible for the commercialization of the technology. “We are delighted to announce that DTU and APS LABS are the first outside of Norway to benefit from the NTNU technology.”

Helene Larsen, Head of Development at DTU’s Centre for Diagnostics, said she had just received her first shipments of test kits and was looking forward to getting the testing up and running. She said DTU is doing tests for a number of Danish hospitals and hopes to increase the lab’s capacity to do as many as 10000 tests a day.

“What we like about the NTNU system is that it can be used with our open robot system,” she said, which means that robot systems can be used with reagents from different vendors, including NTNU’s.

Another big advantage is that the kits are readily available, she said. “The market is still very competitive out there, and the fact that it is possible to get a kit component so readily is sensational.”

Dr. Paritosh Shekhar, director of APS LABS, said his organization had evaluated the NTNU test kits and “found them extraordinary.”

“The performance was at par with top leading brands,” he said. “Quality was the factor for why we chose NTNU. Another reason was to support a research university rather than a commercial company. We strongly feel this association will be complementary for both of us.”

In late March, huge international demand for the reagents used for COVID-19 testing meant that Norway, like other countries, was having a hard time getting enough tests to track the disease among its population.

In response, Magnar Bjørås, a medical researcher from NTNU’s Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, offered colleagues from St. Olavs Hospital help with a made-in-Norway COVID-19 test.

The offer of help was accepted and Bjørås and his network got to work. By mid-April, the NTNU/St. Olavs Hospital team had developed a highly sensitive test. Validation results showed that the NTNU test was at least as good as conventional tests. It was then approved for use by Norwegian health authorities.

Bjarne Foss, Pro-Rector for Research at NTNU, says Norwegian society has high expectations for NTNU as Norway’s largest university.

“We are a multi-disciplinary university with a strong profile in science and technology,” he said. “Multi-disciplinary solutions provide the answer to many societal challenges, and the NTNU COVID-19 test is a perfect example of the strength of this approach. Two strong research groups at NTNU’s faculties for Medicine and Health Sciences and Natural Sciences, respectively, developed this test method together, which by construction depends on a multi-disciplinary approach.”

“At NTNU we are proud of this contribution to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. We will continue to encourage our researchers to pursue research across disciplines both within NTNU and in cooperation with research groups at other institutions,” Foss said.

One key aspect of the NTNU test is a specific combination of polar solvents, buffers, salts and other chemicals that do not damage the viral RNA molecule itself. The solution contains substances that crack the virus open so that its genetic material can be extracted.

NTNU has also developed iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles that strongly bind RNA. Once the magnetic nanoparticles are coated with the viral RNA, they can be removed from the solution using a magnet. PCR technology can then identify the genetic code from the RNA and compare it to the coronavirus.

The newly developed manufacturing process has proved to be very upscalable, which has enabled the NTNU labs to produce these high-quality and high-performance magnetic nanoparticles in very high volumes.  Three laboratories at the Department of Chemical Engineering are currently manufacturing the magnetic nanoparticles, while another laboratory at the Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine is making the solvents and buffers. The process allows the production of up to 1.2 million test kits per week.

“The key behind our success has been the cooperation across departments and with NTNU Technology Transfer and the hospital,” Bjørås said. He said increases in production capacity will allow the groups to produce up to 5 million test kits a week.

At the same time, the test kits are subject to rigorous quality control and validation before shipping to customers. The magnetic nanobeads and buffers, and then the entire test kits are verified against a known COVID-19 positive patient sample.

The process was developed by the teams around Bjørås and Sulalit Bandyopadhyay, a postdoc at the university’s Department of Chemical Engineering, along with Anuvansh Sharma from the university’s Department of Materials Science and Technology and their colleagues.

In the process of gearing up to produce tests for Norway, the researchers improved the efficiency of the production system to the point where the lab is able to make more than enough tests for use in Norway.

Bandyopadhyay, who had previously been studying how a version of the particle can be used to study river water chemistry, has been eager to help ease the test shortages that continue to plague other countries.

“The need out there is very great, and we have the kits that can help with the shortage,” he said.

“Our mission is to provide the NTNU COVID-19 test to health care services across the globe,” Steigedal and her NTNU Technology Transfer colleague Eivind Andersen said.

NTNU Technology Transfer has filed patent applications on the methods and products related to the NTNU COVID-19 test. The motivation is to secure control of the intellectual rights and provide access to the new test in an ethical and justifiable manner.

At the same time, the university hopes to expand the number of countries to which the test will be exported.

“We need to find the right partners in each region/country. In some cases that could be national health authorities, or it could be hospitals or other health care services, Steigedal said. “It could also be life-science companies that have a relevant position in the value chain for test equipment for virus detection.”

October 2, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
China and Norway

China Poses Threat to Democracy – USA

by Nadarajah Sethurupan October 2, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

US Undersecretary of State for Economic Affairs Keith Krach has urged Germany to support NATO by expelling the Chinese tech giant Huawei from its 5G mobile network. The statement comes after German officials said last week that the country’s new rules stipulate an option for senior cabinet members to issue objections based on political risk before Huawei components enter the German 5G network. Earlier, Germany’s Interior Minister Horst Seehofer warned that if Huawei is excluded from the country’s 5G rollout project, it could be stalled for as long as five or even ten years.

Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei, for his part, said in a statement in early September that the company had been forced to change numerous components and algorithms in its devices to cope with restrictions from the United States.

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by Keith Krach Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment.

Under Secretary Krach:  I’m in the midst of a 10-day, eight-country swing through Europe.  And on this trip I’ve met with many EU leaders and discussed a number of issues since I’ve been here – from the pandemic relief to supply chain diversity.  But there is one issue above all the others that forms the purpose of my trip.  And the reality that the transatlantic alliance faces one of an ever-increasing cyber warfare, seemingly ceaseless variations of intense, perhaps even weaponized, economic competition.

The Chinese Communist Party presents a real and urgent threat to democracies and companies here in Europe, and all around the world.  The CCP has exploited the institutions of the free world, such as the WTO, and this is to gain an upper hand over the same free nations that enabled its prosperity.  Rather than open up, the Chinese Government intensified its aggression.  It imposed market restrictions, forced technology transfers, and stole intellectual property.  

We’re free traders, but when someone comes into the market and doesn’t play by the rules, the market is no longer free.  And all along, we thought capitalism would equal democracy.  In China’s case, we were wrong.  As Secretary Pompeo says, it’s time to take off our rose-colored glasses and treat China not how we hope they’d be, but how they really are.  

And now, on both sides of the aisle back in Washington, they truly understand the CCP is playing the long game, and they’re playing for keeps.  They fancy themselves as masters of a four-dimensional game of economic, military, diplomatic, and cultural chess.  Worst of all, they believe they’re above the rules.  In this high-stakes competition, there is nothing static about NATO security – it can vanish in an instant – and there is no substitute for a coalition of freedom.  

A challenge of this magnitude cannot be done alone.  It’s a team sport and it will require the synergistic effects across all our governments as well as our powerful private sectors.  To prevent CCP authoritarianism from winning the day on 5G, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg recently remarked on the China challenge, “We have to make sure that Europe and North America stand together.”

For years, the CCP has been putting pressure on telecommunications companies and countries to buy from Huawei, knowing that its national intelligence law can oblige Huawei to share data from these countries and companies at any time.  CCP’s stated doctrine is to seduce with money and reinforce with intimidation and retaliation.  Untrusted, high-risk vendors like Huawei and ZTE provide the CCP’s authoritarian government the capability to disrupt or weaponize critical applications and infrastructure or provide technological advances to China’s military forces.  And it’s no secret that Huawei stole intellectual property from T-Mobile, the U.S. subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom.  We know that it deploys these same tactics in Europe and wherever it can get a foothold. 

Given these dangers, governments and businesses around the world are increasingly asking: who do we trust carrying our most personal information and intellectual property?  The primary choices are two world-class European vendors on one side, Ericsson and Nokia, and two CCP-controlled companies on the other, Huawei and ZTE.  After this year, there should be no doubt about the answer.  From concealing an outbreak that became a pandemic, to eviscerating Hong Kong’s freedoms, to persisting with a ruthless campaign of repression in Xinjiang, the CCP’s human rights abuses are impossible to ignore.  This behavior is made possible by an Orwellian big brother surveillance state that tracks billions of people worldwide and it extends the great one-way China firewall, where all the data comes in for the CCP’s use but none goes out, and reciprocally, all the propaganda goes out but the truth does not come in. 

UK Foreign Secretary Raab recently remarked that it isn’t just the devastation of COVID-19 that takes the shine off of China, but also the fact that the CCP doesn’t live up to the deals it makes.  The crackdown on Hong Kong is a case in point.  As Foreign Secretary Raab said: “It comes down to an issue of trust.”  And he said, “Why would anyone trust China with other deals they might make?”  

The transatlantic alliance has a responsibility to protect the integrity of our networks for nearly 1 billion citizens living under our security umbrella.  And that’s why the United States has teamed up with likeminded nations to develop the Clean Network, which is a comprehensive approach to address the long-term threats to data privacy, security, human rights, and trusted collaboration.  Its 5G Clean Path initiative complements the work done by the EU member states developing the clean EU 5G Toolbox for designing, constructing, and administering 5G infrastructure. 

The Prime Minister of Poland Morawiecki recently commented: “Poland believes the construction of our 5G Clean Path network is a prerequisite for strategic technological sovereignty.  [And] that is why we are proud to be a 5G Clean Country.”  The Clean Network is rooted in internationally accepted digital trust standards and represents execution of a multi-year, enduring strategy built on a coalition of partners.  The Clean Network encompasses the entire system by incorporating additional Clean Initiatives to safeguard mobile carriers, apps, cloud-based systems, and undersea cables – because a system is only as strong as its weakest link.  The Clean Network has sparked a wave of countries and companies choosing clean vendors for their 5G networks.  Already many EU nations have joined the Clean Network.  

The 5G tide has turned towards clean, trusted vendors as more and more of these countries and companies are using clean providers to build 5G networks.  Huawei deals are evaporating as everyone begins to realize it’s an arm of the CCP surveillance state and a tool for human rights abuse.  The Clean Network now includes over 30 countries around the world.  Many are European, such as the Czech Republic, Norway, Poland, Sweden, Estonia, Romania, Denmark, Greece, Finland, Luxembourg, most recently Serbia and Kosovo, Albania, Latvia, France, the United Kingdom, and Slovenia.  

Most countries’ largest telecommunications companies have also joined the Clean Network, such as Telefonica, Telco Italia, Reliance in India, Telstra in Australia, SK and KT in Korea, and then all telcos in Japan, Singapore, Australia, U.S. and Canada have joined the Clean Network. 

But the transatlantic alliance, too, is only as strong as its weakest link.  Countries may be tempted to auction off 5G contracts to the lowest bidders, but this approach exposes all of us to undue risks.  The transatlantic alliance and other partners must acknowledge the intersection between 5G providers and national security equities, including interoperability, information sharing, and reliance against coercive tactics.  By building safe networks today, governments can ensure the integrity of their systems and prevent costly countermeasures down the road.  

Many European nations have come a long way, transitioning – at great human and economic cost – from an authoritarian regime into a democratic state that we all enjoy today.  They know firsthand how authoritarian regime uses data to exert leverage.  We will stand firm to protect against this.  Modern technology should expand people’s opportunities, not expand a government’s control over them.  

President Reagan’s “Tear Down This Wall” speech combined with Europe’s Solidarity movement was a crucial catalyst in bringing down the Iron Curtain.  And I really think this is emblematic of the unity and solidarity which will be required to never allow ourselves to be intimidated or undermined by China’s Great Firewall.  The Clean Network and the EU 5G toolbox provides strength in numbers for the transatlantic nations and our governments as well as the companies.  

History has taught us, there is power and strength in unity and solidarity and together we can control our 5G destiny and ensure we lead our people down the clean path for a safe and a secure future.  

Another issue that I’ll be talking with Commissioner Thierry Breton later on today about is the PRC’s campaign of environmental destruction.  The PRC is the world’s largest annual greenhouse gas emitter, the world’s largest emitter of mercury, neurotoxins and major public health threat.  The world’s largest consumer of illegal wildlife.  The world’s largest consumer of illegal timber.  One of the largest, if not the largest, emitter of marine plastics.  And one of the world’s worst perpetrators – the world’s worst perpetrator when it comes to illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing.  

As Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said, “Too much of the Chinese Communist Party’s economy is built on willful disregard for air, land, and water quality.  The Chinese people – and the world – deserve better.”  It also exports through these practices abroad through the environmental destruction of the One Belt One Road campaign, which compromises – with all these 600,000 [sic] coal plants in more than 62 countries.  

So I look forward to discussing all of this and much more with Commissioner Breton today, and with many of the other leaders throughout my stay in Brussels and on this trip.  

Question:  Should U.S.-allied countries restrict sales of semiconductors and semiconductor equipment to China, following U.S. policy in this regard?

Under Secretary Krach:  Yes.  So, for example, the restrictions placed on Huawei, the allied nations have been great.  And as a result, I think the implications are pretty clear that Huawei is running out of its chips for its 5G systems, their smartphones, even their servers for their cloud business and data center business.  And it’s hard to estimate how long they have chips, but it’s literally within months.  So I think the important thing is for the telecommunication companies and companies in general who utilize their equipment to take that into account.

Question:  Do you plan to put SMIC on the Department of Commerce’s Entity List?  How do you respond to the argument that U.S. sanctions on Huawei are counterproductive because they are forcing China to boost its own technology and software?

Under Secretary Krach:  So as far as the company SMIC goes, that’s really a state-backed company.  We know that they’re involved with civilian-military fusion.  And the thing to understand is that these semiconductors power that surveillance state which extends that great firewall, which is a tremendous threat to democracies around the world.  So I think, first of all, it’s up to the Commerce Department in this area, but here again I don’t think this is going to change anything that the Chinese Government is doing in terms of their initiative to bring everything in-house.  There’s nothing we’re going to do that’s going to accelerate or decelerate them.  They have their plans.

Question: Handelsblatt reported the German Government has agreed on requirements that would force operators and vendors to certify and authorize 5G components.  Are you happy with this outcome from Berlin?

Under Secretary Krach:  We’ve had some good discussions.  We spent some time in Berlin.  We agree on the North Star, and that is to really protect the 5G systems, not just in Germany, in Europe, the transatlantic alliance.  So they’re making – they’re making great progress.  And I think the German people realize the implications for that surveillance state.  And the thing I talk about in Germany is German basic law, article 1 – German basic law is like the Constitution, and that article 1 is two words; it’s “human dignity,” and human dignity is sacrosanct.  And by German basic law, that’s the responsibilities of government authorities.  So they totally understand that.

Question: Evidence was declassified in 2019, per a Wall Street Journal story, regarding Huawei’s capacity to tap into lawful interception interfaces of the European networks they operate.  Why didn’t you make the evidence public?  What does it consist of?  And has this capacity been used?  If so, where and when?

Under Secretary Krach:  Yeah, this – I mean, this is a perfect example of things that the Chinese Communist Party do.  And I’ve spent my entire career in the private sector.  I was the vice president of General Motors and I spent 30 years in Silicon Valley.  And I didn’t realize when I came into government that the North Star for the federal government is national security.  I mean, that’s true for all our governments.  And what I’ve learned is that you’ve got to fight every single day to preserve the democracies and the freedom we enjoy because it’s against the natural order of things; it’s against all the laws of physics.  The natural state of the order is the bad king, the dictator, the emperor.  And I think when you look at countries like the United States and like the European countries, if it wasn’t for the things that we do, I think there’s a lot of nations around the world that would not be enjoying the freedom that we have today.

Question: How receptive has Germany been toward U.S. warnings about Huawei during your recent talks?  Are there any indications that Germany and Italy are moving closer to taking concrete action on this issue?

Under Secretary Krach:  The German Government as well – I’ve spent a lot of time with German CEOs as well.  They’ve been very receptive and they’re coming out with an IT security act.  So they’re moving in all the right directions from everything that we can see.  Our position is we want to be able to educate them; we want them to learn from our experiences and experiences of other countries.  But at the end of the day, that decision is a German decision and we respect that.

In terms of the Clean Network, we would of course love Germany to join the Clean Network.  And as a matter of fact, they’re a leader in – if you think about it, I mean, as a businessman, they’ve always been a great leader in quality, reliability, data privacy, security.  It’s in their nature.  And the Clean Network would be incomplete without them.  I mean, I – so I’m optimistic.

Question: In your capacity as ombudsperson on the Privacy Shield, can you update us on the current talks between the European Union and the United States on a future data transfer accord, after the European Court of Justice struck down the Privacy Accord in July?

Under Secretary Krach:  Yeah.  Being the ombudsman for the data Privacy Shield, this was obviously something new to me coming into the government.  And I will tell you that – how serious the United States takes that.  In our three branches of government, there’s no authority over me in our Executive Branch – I work with the Judicial Branch on that.  I can say that there’s only been one incident over all these years.  We’ve run it to ground.  Everybody was satisfied.  It actually ended up to be much ado about nothing.  In terms of the latest decision, we’re in discussions about that and I think our position is this: that we want to make sure that it doesn’t harm European businesses, it doesn’t harm U.S. businesses.  We want to make sure whatever new laws are going to be in place by Europe are reciprocal.  A question I always ask is, well, I’m the ombudsman for the U.S.; where’s the ombudsman for Europe?  

And also, to make sure that it takes into account all – all nations.  One of my questions originally on it when I first met with the European team when we had our annual meeting is: tell me about the EU-China data privacy shield?  And I found out there wasn’t one.  And I asked this team of people and they were just – their answer was, well, China will be China.  And I don’t think that’s good enough anymore.  

So I think for the Europeans are – who are putting together that next proposal, I think you’ve got to look at it holistically.

Question:  After Slovenia this summer, and others before it, which European Union countries are closest to signing a joint declaration with the U.S. on 5G security?

Under Secretary Krach:  Well, there’s a number of them.  One of the things that our first stop was in Luxembourg, and what I found out over in Luxembourg is all three of their telcos have decided to go with trusted vendors.  So in essence they just – they joined as well.  I’ll be going over to Albania and they – they’re on the Clean Network.  It’s great.  So I think there’s a number of them that are right on the cusp.  And in some cases, they’re just now putting together their rules and their laws.  But right now, of the 30 NATO countries, 20 are on the Clean Network.  

But here again, my point I emphasize is this: is that we don’t want to end up with a fractured NATO – two NATOs where you have countries that have secure, clean networks and ones that don’t.  Because it will restrict a lot of access to information.  And here again, it’s only as strong as its weakest link.  It’s like a pearl necklace.  You’re weak in one place, it can expose the others.  And I had a great meeting yesterday over there with the NATO folks.  They totally understand that.  They understand the importance of having a clean path like the United States State Department does where any of our domestic facilities or international facilities like our embassies requires a clean path.  So all the network – all the network traffic coming in cannot touch an untrusted vendor’s equipment.  And particularly when you’re talking about security, this is – it’s a must.

Question:  How will the strategy to keep Huawei out of Europe’s next-generation network work if Germany, Europe’s biggest economy and most populous nation, allows Huawei to co-build its 5G network?

Under Secretary Krach:  Well, here again, you’re only as strong as your weakest link.  And here again, I think we’re seeing things moving in the right direction in Germany.  And it’s no secret that the Chinese threatened the Germans with this.  They threatened their automotive business with this.  And it’s kind of similar to when Boris Johnson said, “I think we’re going to reconsider letting Huawei in to 35 percent of our telecommunications system.”  Because immediately what you can see is Beijing threatened the British bank HSBC.  You heard the Chinese ambassador to the UK say, “We’re going to take away that $100 billion investment we made in that rail system in the north of England.”  And that’s when Secretary Pompeo stood up and he said, “We stand with the UK.  We stand with all our allies against that China bully.”  And I think that was highly symbolic.  

And we really do – we really do look at their retaliation.  It’s an 800-pound elephant in the room, of China as a bully.  And I think we’ve all had experiences with bullies in our lives, and if there’s anything I’ve learned: when you confront a bully, they back down.  And they really back down when you confront them and you have your friends by your side.  And that’s exactly what the United States intends to do.  And that’s also the purpose of the Clean Network, because there’s strength in numbers.  There’s strength in solidarity and unity.  And that’s the power of the transatlantic alliance, NATO, the EU.  And I think the EU is really important because it provides cover for all these European nations where China picks the – they’re – picks the gazelle from the herd, and what they want to do is they want to drive a wedge between countries, they want to drive a wedge right between the Atlantic.  

So this is not an issue of U.S. superpower versus China superpower.  This is an issue of freedom versus authoritarianism.  

Question:  How much of the critical U.S. semiconductors did Huawei stockpile, to your knowledge?  What’s your current assessment of their ability to create a fully Chinese alternative?

Under Secretary Krach:  Not enough.  I can tell you that.  You’re already seeing some of the shortage of supplies out there.  The interesting thing is that last February, Huawei announced they had 90 5G contracts, and what we’ve seen is we’ve seen those deals evaporate.  The most we can count outside of China is six.  So they have totally lost the momentum.  The tide has totally turned.  And I think this is something that countries and companies should keep in mind.  There’s really no future with Huawei.

Question:  What should countries do with their preexisting equipment from Huawei?  Or is the concern only for the 5G system?  In other words, can they use other elements of Huawei equipment?

Under Secretary Krach:  Our focus has really been on 5G, but also understand that whether it’s 4G or whether they’re smartphones, it’s a risk.  And the reason is simple, and I didn’t realize this until I was in government.  And I had my intellectual property stolen in Silicon Valley as I built four companies, from the Chinese Communist Party – is that there’s a law in China – it’s called their national intelligence act – and it says this.  It says any Chinese company, state-owned or otherwise, and any Chinese citizen has to turn over any information, proprietary technology, intellectual property, data, and also genetics, upon request to the Chinese Communist Party, the People’s Liberation Army, the PRC Government, and if they don’t, then they have to suffer the consequences. 

Question:  Do you have any closing remarks you’d like to make?

Under Secretary Krach:  I think just the closing remarks to everybody would be thanks so much for your time.  And in this issue with regard to China’s surveillance state, and in this fight for freedom versus authoritarianism – because we look at what China has done, and they’ve really stepped up their aggression since the pandemic – and you can see that at the Indian borders.  You can see it – the Japanese islands, north of Taiwan.  You can see it – their invasion of Hong Kong.  And you’re seeing it all over the world.  It represents a real and urgent threat to democracy.  And really, a key tool that we have in the free world is transparency.  And what the media – the professionals in the media like the ones on the phone right now are such a necessary strategic part of solving this issue, and shining a light on these practices that for so many years they concealed.  And if you look at China’s economic statecraft or on every dimension, a key part of their strategy is deception.  

Well, I think now the genie is out of that bottle and I think people around the world have woken up and see the truth about China’s – we call it the three-pronged strategy of concealment, co-option, and coercion.  And the citizens don’t like it.  And it’s really given the political will to government leaders, corporate CEOs around the world to stand up to that China bully, and that is thanks to the media.  So I – this is just a chance for me to thank everyone.

October 2, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

Norwegian Prime Minister initiates construction of Hywind Tampen

by Nadarajah Sethurupan October 2, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg has initiated construction of the Hywind Tampen floating offshore windfarm. She did so in a ceremony at Kværner Stord, where elements of the windfarm are being manufactured.

Kværner’s scope of work for the project includes building 11 floating concrete hulls for the turbines on Hywind Tampen.

Equinor president and chief executive Eldar Sætre said Hywind Tampen “is a new chapter in Norway’s narrative as an energy nation.

Norweigan Prime Minister Erna Solberg initiated construction of the floating windfarm at a ceremony at Kværner StordNorweigan Prime Minister Erna Solberg initiated construction of the floating windfarm at a ceremony at Kværner Stord

“With support from the Norwegian authorities, we are not only building Norway’s first offshore wind project, we are enhancing floating offshore wind technology along with the Norwegian supplier base.

“80% of the world’s offshore wind resources are located in deep water areas and are available for floating offshore wind projects. If we can use projects like Hywind Tampen to make floating offshore wind competitive with other forms of energy, the technology will be able to deliver renewable power on a large scale. A floating offshore wind market will also open up considerable industrial opportunities for Norwegian industry.”

Hywind Tampen project director Olav-Bernt Haga said, “By using larger turbines, concrete substructures, new technology and a new assembly method, we are well on our way to reducing the cost of floating wind by more than 40% compared with Hywind Scotland. This is an important step to establish floating wind as a sustainable power source.

“If more floating offshore wind projects are realised in the future, it will be possible to reduce costs even further, and we could see a development in cost reduction equivalent to the one we have already seen in fixed-foundation offshore wind.”

In April 2020, the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Industry approved plans for development and operation of the Hywind Tampen windfarm, which will be the first floating offshore wind project to supply renewable power for oil and gas installations. Equinor and the Snorre and Gullfaks partners reached a final investment decision to develop the Hywind Tampen in October 2019.

The windfarm will have a total capacity of 88 MW and is expected to cover about 35% of the annual power needs on the five platforms, Snorre A and B and Gullfaks A, B and C. It will reduce emissions from the Gullfaks and Snorre fields by more than 200,000 tonnes per year.

Development of the Hywind Tampen project involves around 250 full-time equivalent jobs at Kværner. The project will also generate around 800 full-time equivalent jobs in ripple effects for suppliers and the public sector, among others. A study conducted by Multiconsult shows that, in total, the Hywind Tampen project could provide 1,550 to 3,000 full-time equivalent jobs.

October 2, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Media Freedom

50 Ambassadors sign letter supporting LGBT rights in Poland

by Nadarajah Sethurupan October 2, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

50 Ambassadors from around the world, including Norway and representatives of international organisations, have expressed support for LGBT rights in Poland.

50 Ambassadors of countries from all corners of the world and representatives of international organisations have expressed their support for ‘efforts to raise public awareness of the issues affecting the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) community and other communities in Poland facing similar challenges.’

In an open letter, usually published annually on the occasion of Poland’s Equality Parade, signatories recognise ‘the need to jointly work on an environment of non-discrimination, tolerance and mutual acceptance’. They pay tribute to the hard work of LGBTI and other communities, in Poland and around the world, seeking to end discrimination ‘in particular on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.’

As this year’s Equality Parade was cancelled due to the Covid-19 pandemic the letter was released publically on 27 September and will be presented to the organisers of the Equality Parade and a representative of the Polish government on 9 October by the Ambassador of the Kingdom of Belgium in Poland Luc Jacobs, together with Anna Clunes from the British Embassy (as the coordinator of last year’s letter) and the Ambassador of Denmark, Ole Toft (as next year’s coordinator).

The full text of the letter is as follows:

Open letter of the Ambassadors of Albania, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, the Dominican Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Montenegro, the Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, the United States and Venezuela, as well as the General Representative of the Flemish Community and the Flemish Region, the General Delegate of the French Community and the Walloon Region, the Representatives in Poland of the European Commission and of the UNHCR, the First Deputy Director/Director’s alternate of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, the Head of Office of the International Organization for Migration and the Secretary General of the Community of Democracies.

This letter has been coordinated by the Embassy of the Kingdom of Belgium in Poland.

Although due to epidemiological circumstances the 2020 Warsaw Equality Parade could not take place at the foreseen date we express our support for the efforts to raise public awareness of issues affecting the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) community and other communities in Poland facing similar challenges.

We also acknowledge similar efforts in Białystok, Bielsko–Biała, Częstochowa, Gniezno, Kalisz, Katowice, Kielce, Koszalin, Kraków, Lublin, Łódź, Nowy Sącz, Olsztyn, Opole, Płock, Poznań, Rzeszów, Szczecin, Tarnów, Toruń, Trójmiasto, Włocławek, Wrocław and Zielona Góra.

We affirm the inherent dignity of each individual as expressed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Respect for these fundamental rights, which are also enshrined in OSCE commitments and the obligations and standards of the Council of Europe and the European Union as communities of rights and values, obliges governments to protect all citizens from violence and discrimination and to ensure they enjoy equal opportunities.

To this end, and in particular to shield communities in need of protection from verbal and physical abuse and hate speech, we need to jointly work on an environment of non-discrimination, tolerance and mutual acceptance. This includes in particular sectors such as education, health, social affairs, citizenship, public service and public documents.

We pay tribute to the hard work of LGBTI and other communities in Poland and around the world, as well as the work of all those who seek to ensure human rights for LGBTI and other persons belonging to communities facing similar challenges, and to end discrimination in particular on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Human rights are universal and everyone, including LGBTI persons, are entitled to their full enjoyment. This is something that everyone should support.

Signed,

H.E. Shpresa Kureta, Ambassador of the Republic of Albania
H.E. Ana María Ramírez, Ambassador of the Argentine Republic
H.E. Lloyd David Hargreave Brodrick, Ambassador of Australia
H.E. Werner Almhofer, Ambassador of Austria
H.E. Luc Jacobs, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Belgium
H.E. Leslie Scanlon, Ambassador of Canada
H.E. Tomislav Vidošević, Ambassador of the Republic of Croatia
H.E. Petros Kestoras, Ambassador of Republic of Cyprus
H.E. Ivan Jestřáb, Ambassador of the Czech Republic
H.E. Ole Toft, Royal Ambassador of Denmark
H.E. Aníbal de Castro, Ambassador of the Dominican Republic
H.E. Juha Ottman, Ambassador of Finland
H.E. Frédéric Billet, Ambassador of France
H.E. Arndt Freytag von Loringhoven, Ambassador of Germany
H.E. Michael-Efstratios C. Daratzikis, Ambassador of the Hellenic Republic
H.E. María Erla Marelsdóttir, Ambassador of Iceland
H.E. Tsewang Namgyal, Ambassador of India
H.E. Emer O’Connell, Ambassador of Ireland
H.E. Alexander Ben-Zvi, Ambassador of Israel
H.E. Aldo Amati, Ambassador of Italy
H.E. Tsukasa Kawada, Ambassador of Japan
H.E. Edgars Bondars, Ambassador of Latvia
H.E. Eduardas Borisovas, Ambassador of the Republic of Lithuania
H.E. Paul Schmit, Ambassador of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
H.E. John Paul Grech, Ambassador of Malta
H.E. Alejandro Negrín, Ambassador of Mexico
H.E. Budimir Šegrt, Ambassador of Montenegro
H.E. Daphne Bergsma, Ambassador of the Kingdom of the Netherlands
H.E. Mary Thurston, Ambassador of New Zealand
H.E. Vasil Panovski, Ambassador of the Republic of North Macedonia
H.E. Anders Eide, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Norway
H.E. Luís Manuel Ribeiro Cabaço, Ambassador of Portugal
H.E. Dario Galassi, Ambassador of San Marino
H.E. Nikola Zurovac, Ambassador of the Republic of Serbia
H.E. Božena Forštnarič Boroje, Ambassador of Slovenia
Daniel StemmerChargė D’ Affaires a.i., Embassy of South Africa
H.E. Francisco Javier Sanabria Valderrama, Ambassador of Spain
H.E. Stefan Gullgren, Ambassador of Sweden
H.E. Jürg Burri, Ambassador of Switzerland
H.E. Andrii Deshchytsia, Ambassador of Ukraine
H.E. Anna Clunes, Ambassador of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
H.E. Georgette Mosbacher, Ambassador of the United States of America
H.E. Luis Gómez Urdaneta, Ambassador of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
Dries Willems, General Representative of the Flemish Community and the Flemish Region
Anne Defourny, General Delegate of the French Community and the Walloon Region
Katarzyna Gardapkhadze, First Deputy Director/Director’s alternate of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights ODIHR
Marek Prawda, Head of Representation, European Commission in Poland
Christine Goyer, Representative, UNHCR Representation in Poland
Thomas E. Garrett, Secretary General of the Community of Democracies
Hanna Dobrzyńska, Director, International Organization for Migration (IOM)

October 2, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diplomatic relations

Governments, UN, Civil Society Accelerate Efforts to End Sexual and Gender-based Violence

by Nadarajah Sethurupan October 2, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The governments of the United Arab Emirates, Norway, and Somalia, in coordination with the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) today convened nearly 1,000 delegates to assess and expand commitments to end sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in humanitarian settings.

Keynote speakers and Nobel Peace Prize laureates Nadia Murad and Denis Mukwege highlighted the disproportionate concentration of SGBV in conflict and disaster zones, especially in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The high-level event follows from the landmark “EndSGBV” conference in Oslo in May 2019, which raised $366 million for SGBV work and established a set of commitments and reinforced standards to prevent, respond, and protect against SGBV in humanitarian crises, including conflicts. 

As part of the General Assembly event, the independent research organization Humanitarian Outcomes reported that 86% of 2019 financial pledges from Oslo had been disbursed – largely through the United Nations and humanitarian NGOs.

SGBV affects one in three women and girls globally, with research suggesting two in three in some humanitarian settings, with long-lasting social, psychological, and economic impacts for survivors and their communities.  The UN estimates that SGBV costs the world 2% of its annual GDP.

Speakers in the event – a mix of ministers, civil society leaders, agency executives, SGBV survivors, and NGOs – underscored the importance of deliverables on “localization,” the delivery of aid through community-based organizations. 

UN agencies and many international humanitarian actors have committed to disbursing 25% of total funding through local implementing entities. UNFPA announced during the event that it had reached 38%. 

The speakers also emphasized the importance of making protection from SGBV an integral and prioritized element in humanitarian response plans and budgets and highlighted steps to coordinate humanitarian, development and peace efforts and budgets to holistically address SGBV prevention and recovery, alongside immediate operational response. 

The UAE additionally announced a new allocation of $1 million in funding, including $500,000 for the GenCap and ProCap programs, which provide gender and SGBV advisors to UN humanitarian operations, and $500,000 for Nadia’s initiative for the economic empowerment of survivors and returnee women in Sinjar, Iraq.

The co-hosts of the event confirmed that the reporting and monitoring on EndSGBV commitments would be linked with the Call to Action on Protection from Gender-Based Violence in Emergencies, the 5-year strategy of which was launched on Friday 25 September.

QUOTES:

H.E. Reem Al Hashimy, Minister of State for International Cooperation, UAE: “SGBV is a manifestation of choices we as societies make about the value of gender and age. When we choose good policy, education, sufficient funding, empowerment of women and local organizations, we see astounding turnarounds in SGBV rates, as well as meaningful justice and recovery for survivors. Ending SGBV is an investment in our peace, prosperity, and humanity. The UAE is committed to this work.”

H.E. Ine Marie Eriksen Søreide, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Norway: “Protection against sexual and gender-based violence must be given higher priority in humanitarian response and be closely linked to the longer-term efforts of preventing SGBV and fighting impunity.”

UNFPA Executive Director Dr. Natalia Kanem said: “Whether she lives in a house or in a tent in a refugee camp, every woman has a right to peace in the home. COVID-19 has set back progress, and we see a surge in gender-based violence around the world. Stronger collective action is urgently needed to protect the rights of women and girls. UNFPA is leading efforts to prevent and respond to gender-based violence in humanitarian crises and to ensure that every woman and girl gets the essential, life-saving sexual and reproductive health services she needs.”

Robert Mardini, Director-General, ICRC: “It is our ongoing priority to prevent sexual violence from occurring in the first place. We call on States and armed actors to meet the obligations set out by international humanitarian law. Today, at the end of the #EndSGBV event, we have three key asks to States to support victims/survivors. We call on them, firstly, to reconsider any policies that make post-SGBV care contingent on the non-confidential disclosure of victim information. Secondly, to prioritise dignified access to health care for survivors of sexual violence. And thirdly, to ensure that local organisations – led by women and specialised in SGBV – play a key role in the analysis and dialogue on removing barriers to support and care.”

Ramesh Rajasingham, UN deputy humanitarian chief: “The coronavirus pandemic has catapulted gender-based violence to the top of our agenda. We urgently need to increase support to survivors in humanitarian settings, but we have less than 15 per cent of the US$428 million explicitly requested in inter-agency appeals, including the global appeal for COVID-19. We have to do more to prioritize and fund this work. We also need to challenge attitudes that allow this violence to happen, address the root causes and promote women’s participation and leadership in humanitarian decision-making.”

Nadia Murad, Nobel Peace Prize laureate and President and Chairwoman of Nadia’s Initiative: “Survivors know best what they need to heal and recover. Efforts to engage survivors at every level of their recovery will empower them.”

Dr. Denis Mukwege, Nobel Peace Prize laureate and gynecologist: “There can’t be peace without justice, because one can’t build peace on mass graves.”

October 2, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diplomatic relations

Norway and the United Kingdom agree on fisheries cooperation

by Nadarajah Sethurupan October 2, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway and the United Kingdom have today signed a new framework agreement on fisheries cooperation.

It allows the parties to agree to on the exchange fishing quotas as well as mutual access to each other’s areas of fisheries jurisdiction. The agreement will enter into force on 1 January 2021.

– This is a great day! I am pleased that we have reached an agreement with the United Kingdom, which will be an important coastal state and partner from January 2021, says the Norwegian Minister of Fisheries and Seafood Odd Emil Ingebrigtsen.

Arrangements for reciprocal fishing access and the exchange of fishing quotas will be made through annual fishing agreements, as today. Other parts of the fisheries cooperation in the North Sea will, however, need to be regulated by a separate tripartite agreement between the EU, Norway and the United Kingdom.

– I am glad that we now have an agreement that provides a framework for extensive fisheries cooperation with the UK, which is an important country for Norway. The agreement is consistent with our obligations under the law of the sea to cooperate with other coastal states on the joint management of shared fish stocks, in line with modern sustainable management regimes, an ecosystem-based approach and the precautionary principle. We will also maintain our close cooperation with the EU on fisheries in the North Sea. We look forward to putting in place a trilateral agreement between Norway, the UK and the EU on the management of joint fish stocks in the North Sea, once Brexit becomes a reality, said Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide.

The United Kingdom has been part of the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy for nearly 40 years. When the Brexit transition period expires on 31 December 2020, the United Kingdom will act as an independent coastal state.

The new agreement between Norway and the United Kingdom facilitates fisheries cooperation on control, licensing and research. In addition, it gives the parties the opportunity to agree on reciprocal access to each other’s fishing zones and to the exchange of fishing opportunities.

– This agreement facilitates a good and solid fisheries cooperation for the future. The management of shared fish stocks is at its best when the coastal states agree on how this should happen, says the Norwegian Minister of Fisheries and Seafood.

October 2, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Defence

Netherlands and Estonia to acquire seven Milrem Robotics’ THeMIS UGVs

by Nadarajah Sethurupan October 2, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The Estonian Centre for Defence Investment (ECDI) signed a Joint Procurement Agreement with the Dutch authorities to procure a total of seven THeMIS unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) from Milrem Robotics, the leading developer of robotics and autonomous systems in Europe.

Milrem Robotics will deliver four THeMIS vehicles acquired by the Royal Netherlands Army in the coming months. The Estonian Defence Forces (EDF) will receive their three vehicles this month.

According to the contract, Milrem Robotics is the system integrator who, in addition to the supplying the vehicles, also performs all the integration of third-party technologies, including weapons systems, onto the delivered UGVs. Notably these unmanned weapons systems will remain under human control. 

“We are pleased that the unmanned ground vehicles developed by an Estonian company in the course of a defence research and development project supported by the Estonian Ministry of Defence can now be used by our armed forces,” said Ivar Janson, Strategic Category Manager for Armoured Vehicles at the ECDI. “We are especially pleased, that we found a common ground with our Dutch partners to conduct the Joint R&D project and procurement,” he added.

“We are delighted to enhance our cooperation with Milrem Robotics by increasing our fleet to six THeMIS vehicles in joint efforts with the Estonian Ministry of Defence. So far, the THeMIS has successfully been used for research and experiments by operational units of the 13 Light Brigade in Scotland, Germany, The Netherlands and during a live fire exercise in Austria. The addition of four extra THeMIS vehicles with a Remote Controlled Weapon System that is operated by a soldier provides us the opportunity to continue to develop concepts to enhance the combat power and decrease the risk for our soldiers,” said LtCol Martijn Hadicke, Commander of the Robot and Autonomous Systems (RAS) unit.

Milrem Robotics has already delivered two THeMIS UGVs to the RAS Unit of the 13th Light Brigade of the Royal Netherlands in 2019.

The Estonian Defence Forces used the THeMIS for 12 months in Mali during Operation Barkhane. Various EDF units have first-hand experience with the UGV from several military exercises.

Milrem Robotics’ first product, the THeMIS UGV has been delivered to nine countries of which seven are NATO members. The company’s other products are the Type-X Robotic Combat Vehicle, intended to support mechanized units, and the Intelligent Functions Integration Kit, which enables the THeMIS but also other unmanned ground vehicles autonomous functionalities like waypoint navigation and follow-me. Milrem Robotics also performs system integration of capabilities such as sensors, software and sensor based intelligent functions, and weapon systems.

The company also leads iMUGS, an EDIDP funded project. This project develops the European standard architecture for unmanned ground vehicles and their management system, including cyber defence solutions, and demonstrates the advantages of unmanned systems for enhancing defence capabilities.

October 2, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Politics

UN Office of Legal Affairs and Norway support developing countries

by Nadarajah Sethurupan October 2, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, through its Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (Doalos), and Norway, have entered into an agreement to provide support to developing countries, particularly Small Island Developing States (Sids), in building sustainable ocean-based economies through a series of capacity-building trainings to be organized over a four year period.

Globally, more than three billion people depend on the oceans for their livelihoods. Ocean industries contribute USD 1.5 trillion to the global economy every year and are expected to grow. However, the long-term benefits of further developing the ocean economy will depend on the sustainability of activities in the ocean sector. The full and effective implementation of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos) and related instruments is an important key to ensuring the sustainable development of the oceans.

The project, which will be implemented by Doalos, in the context of its capacity-building mandate, will seek to address critical capacity barriers at the regional and national levels for the implementation of Unclos, thereby contributing to the development of sustainable ocean-based economies. Project activities will be tailored to the needs and requests of developing states participating in the project, so as to enable them to better address strategically important and time-sensitive issues related to law of the sea and ocean governance. This will thus lay the foundation for strengthened, sustainable and inclusive ocean-based economies.

Norway's Foreign Minister Ine Eriksen Søreide. Photo: Espen Røst  Bistandsaktuelt
Norway’s Foreign Minister Ine Eriksen Søreide. Credit: Espen Røst Bistandsaktuelt

‘Doalos is an ideal partner for this exciting project. Compliance with and further development of international law, including the Law of the Sea, is a priority for the Norwegian government. Doalos has consistently been recognized for its role in contributing to the wider acceptance and universal and consistent application of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’, says Norway’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ine Eriksen Søreide.

‘We must protect the oceans, but at the same time ensure that the oceans can continue to provide livelihood, food and energy. Responsible management is key to creating long-lasting new jobs and sustainable industries. This project will support Small Island Developing States and other developing coastal states in strengthening their legal frameworks for a sustainable ocean economy, thereby helping to achieve several of the Sustainable Development Goals’, says Norway’s Minister of International Development, Dag-Inge Ulstein.

Norway’s Minister of International Development, Dag-Inge Ulstein (middle), with colleagues from Small Island Developing States in Oslo at the Our Ocean conference in 2019. From the right: Louis Straker, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Simon Stiell, Grenada, Dag-Inge Ulstein, Reagan Aliklik, Republic of Nauru and Duncan Humphrey, Barbados. Photo: Espen Røst
Norway’s Minister of International Development, Dag-Inge Ulstein (middle), with colleagues from Small Island Developing States in Oslo at the Our Ocean conference in 2019. From the right: Louis Straker, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Simon Stiell, Grenada, Dag-Inge Ulstein, Reagan Aliklik, Republic of Nauru and Duncan Humphrey, Barbados. Credit: Espen Røst

Norway has provided 2.2 million USD in financial support to the project, which is expected to train about 280 participants from developing countries over its four-year duration. The support is part of Norway’s newly established Oceans for Development programme which is managed by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad).

The United Nations takes very seriously its role in promoting capacity-building in the field of international law, including the law of the sea, with a view to ensuring that all States are able to effectively participate in the international legal order. The oceans can contribute significantly to achieving the Goals set out in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. However, it is important to recall that the health and resilience of our oceans depends on the capacity of all States to chart a sustainable path for the development of the oceans, says the Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs and United Nations Legal Counsel, Miguel de Serpa Soares.

Programme Activities

The project will comprise a number of capacity building activities for selected developing countries, including the delivery of regional training courses; and the analysis of frameworks for ocean governance at the national level in selected beneficiary States.

For 2020, the programme of assistance will consist of three activities; two regional customized short-courses which will be implemented for (1) approximately 20 States from the wider Caribbean region, and (2) 14 States in Pacific region, focusing on Sids; (3) consultations with African States, the African Union, and relevant regional Intergovernmental Organisations (IGOs) with a view to identifying specific capacity building activities that would reinforce national and regional ocean governance programmes of work. The programme will also commence the analyses of frameworks for ocean governance for selected beneficiary States. Should the Covid-19 situation impede in-person training, initially, these analyses will be prioritized and the programme will also develop needs-based foundation courses to be delivered virtually and to complement eventual in-person trainings.

Participation in the training programmes will be based on the nomination of participants by States. The nomination of female candidates will be strongly encouraged with a view to promoting gender balance in ocean affairs and the law of the sea.

October 2, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Human Rights cannot be an excuse for defying the law of the land

by Nadarajah Sethurupan October 2, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The stand taken and the statements made by Amnesty International are unfortunate, exaggerated and far from the truth.

The facts of the matter are as follows:

Amnesty International had received permission under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) only once and that too twenty years ago (19.12.2000). Since then Amnesty International, despite its repeated applications, has been denied FCRA approval by successive governments since as per law it is not eligible to get such an approval.

However, in order to circumvent the FCRA regulations, Amnesty UK remitted large amounts of money to four entities registered in India, by classifying it as Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). A significant amount of foreign money was also remitted to Amnesty (India) without MHA’s approval under FCRA. This mala fide rerouting of money was in contravention of extant legal provisions.

Owing to these illegal practices of Amnesty, the previous government had also rejected the repeated applications of Amnesty to receive funds from overseas. This had led Amnesty to suspend its India operations once during that period as well. This bipartisan and purely legal approach towards Amnesty, under different governments, makes it clear that the entire fault lies in the dubious processes adopted by Amnesty to secure funds for its operations.

All the glossy statements about humanitarian work and speaking truth to power are nothing but a ploy to divert attention from their activities which were in clear contravention of laid down Indian laws. Such statements are also an attempt to extraneously influence the course of investigations by multiple agencies into the irregularities and illegalities carried out over the last few years.

Amnesty is free to continue humanitarian work in India, as is being done by many other organizations. However, India, by settled law, does not allow interference in domestic political debates by entities funded by foreign donations. This law applies equally to all and it shall apply to Amnesty International as well.

India has a rich and pluralistic democratic culture with a free press, independent judiciary and tradition of vibrant domestic debate. The people of India have placed unprecedented trust in the current government. Amnesty’s failure to comply with local regulations does not entitle them to make comments on the democratic and plural character of India.

( By Press Information Bureau, Government of India, New Delhi )

October 2, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

Sweden and Norway agree end to electricity certificate scheme

by Nadarajah Sethurupan October 1, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The Swedish and Norwegian wind industry argue that proposals for an end to the countries’ shared electricity certificate system could create uncertainty and reduce profitability for developers and investors.

Both countries’ governments have agreed that wind farms commissioned beyond the end of 2021 will not be eligible to receive electricity certificates under the two countries’ shared system.

However, if there is not enough Swedish and Norwegian wind capacity to produce the 46.4TWh defined under the system by the end of 2021, this deadline could be extended for two years.

Both countries can also agree another date for ending the certificate system in Sweden under a loophole in the agreement, a spokesman for the Swedish infrastructure ministry advised.

Under the system, the Swedish and Norwegian governments issue electricity producers certificates for each megawatt-hour produced.

October 1, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

New Norway-Germany power cable to face constraints until 2026

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 30, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway will have access to just a fraction of the 1.4 gigawatt (GW) export capacity of a subsea power cable connecting it with Germany once it starts operating in early 2021, with limitations to last until 2026, Norwegian grid operator Statnett said on Tuesday.

“There are constraints in the power grid on the Germany side which result in a lower capacity for the first years of operation,” Statnett said in a statement, adding that it was “fundamentally disappointed” by the low initial level.

The minimum guaranteed capacity for the Nord Link interconnector, which is costing 1.5 billion and 2 billion euros ($1.8 billion-$2.4 billion) to build, will stand at just 11.7 per cent for 2021, the first year of commercial operation.

In 2022, it will rise to 23.3 per cent and then to 35 per cent in 2023, 46.7 per cent in 2024 and 58.3 per cent in 2025. From 2026 it will reach an EU-mandated minimum capacity of 70 per cent, Statnett said.

Germany faces delays in expanding its congested domestic power grid, with new lines to transport wind power produced in the north to consumers in the south running around five years behind schedule.

Still, Statnett expected capacity available to the market to often exceed the minimum.

Statnett and Tennet, the transmission system operator on the German side, confirmed they will start testing IT and trading systems for Nord Link this month, with all systems to be ready for trial runs from December.

The date for the start of trial operation and market availability for Nord Link will be announced at a later date, Statnett executive vice president Gunnar Loevas said in a statement.

Norway seeks to export its plentiful hydro and wind power production to Germany, with the latter seeking to export surplus wind and solar output north.

September 30, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

The Government launches ‘Longship’ for carbon capture and storage in Norway

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 29, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

In a Government White Paper to the Norwegian parliament submitted today, the Government proposes to launch a carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in Norway. The project has been named ‘Longship’, in Norwegian ‘Langskip’.

– Longship is a milestone in the Government’s industry and climate efforts. The project will lead to emission cuts, and facilitate development of new technology and thus new jobs, says Prime Minister Erna Solberg.

Credit: Gassnova

Others must follow
The Government proposes to first implement carbon capture at Norcem’s cement factory in Brevik. In addition, the Government also intends to fund Fortum Oslo Varme’s waste incineration facility in Oslo, providing that the project secures sufficient own funding as well as funding from the EU or other sources.

– For Longship to be a successful climate project for the future, other countries also have to start using this technology. This is one of the reasons why our funding is conditional on others contributing financially as well, says Solberg.

Longship also comprises funding for the transport and storage project Northern Lights, a joint project between Equinor, Shell and Total. Northern Lights will transport liquid CO2 from capture facilities to a terminal at Øygarden in Vestland County. From there, CO2 will be pumped through pipelines to a reservoir beneath the sea bottom.

Bit by bit
For many years, various Norwegian governments have supported technology development, test and pilot projects, and underscored the importance of carbon capture and storage as an important climate tool internationally. The present Government has followed up this work and made targeted efforts on CCS since 2013.

– Building bit by bit in collaboration with the industry has been important to us in order to be confident that the project is feasible. This approach has worked well, and we now have a decision basis. Longship involves building new infrastructure, and we are preparing the ground for connecting other carbon capture facilities to a carbon storage facility in Norway. This approach is a climate policy that works, says Minister of Petroleum and Energy, Tina Bru.

– Longship is the greatest climate project in Norwegian industry ever. We will cut emissions, not progress, Bru adds.

According to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, CCS will be necessary to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions in line with the climate targets at the lowest possible cost. There are currently few facilities in operation on a global basis. We therefore need more projects that bring learning and technological development. In turn, they will help  reduce costs. If CCS is to become an efficient climate policy instrument, new facilities must be established in Europe and globally.

A necessary climate measure
Norway has committed itself to cutting domestic emissions by 50-55 precent by 2030.

– For the world to achieve the goals that we have committed ourselves to in the Paris Agreement, we need large-scale carbon capture and storage. Not all emissions can be cut by applying renewable energy. In several industrial processes, such as production of cement, CCS is the only technology that can cut emissions. With Longship, Norway will support development of climate solutions for the future, says Minister of Climate and Environment, Sveinung Rotevatn.

Norway is in a good position to contribute to the development of CCS. The country has a strong technological community in the field of carbon capture, transport and storage. For decades, the development and operation of the CO2 storage projects on the Sleipner and Snøhvit fields have demonstrated safe carbon storage on the Norwegian continental shelf.

– Effective climate policies must be positive industrial policies. Through Longship, the Government will strengthen Norwegian industry by enabling enterprises to meet the climate requirements of the future. The project is an important cup90 contribution to green growth and will secure and create new jobs in the industry, says Minister of Children and Families, Kjell Ingolf Ropstad.

Longship facilitates the further development of CCS both in Norway and Europe. The project has been matured to a level required for an investment decision, and the decision basis shows that all parts of the project are feasible. 

The project also involves risks. For Longship to have the desired effect, an ambitious development of climate policies in Europe is needed.  The risks are primarily connected to the economy of the project, such as the technical integration of the different parts of the project, the scope of following projects and necessary support schemes for such projects from the EU and individual countries. What is not at risk is the safety and integrity of the storage solution for CO2. 

25 billion NOK
The total investments in Longship are estimated at NOK 17.1 billion. This includes both Norcem, Fortum Oslo Varme as well as  Northern Lights. The operating costs for ten years of operation are estimated at NOK 8 billion. The total cost estimate is thus NOK 25.1 billion. Longship will receive state aid in accordance with negotiated agreements. The state’s part of these costs are estimated at NOK 16.8 billion.

September 29, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economics

Long-term and responsible management of the Government Pension Fund

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 28, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The government today presents the annual white paper on the management of the Government Pension Fund. The paper reports on results in the management of the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) and the Government Pension Fund Norway (GPFN), and discusses development of the investment strategy and framework for responsible investment.

– The GPFG provides Norway with considerable fiscal space. Due to the coronavirus outbreak, comprehensive economic measures have been adopted in 2020. Once the situation in the economy normalises, the spending of petroleum revenue will be reduced. This is important in order to ensure that also future generations will benefit from the Norwegian petroleum wealth, says Minister of Finance Jan Tore Sanner. 

Good results

2019 was a year with strong development in the equity markets, both in Norway and internationally. This contributed to high return on our savings in the Government Pension Fund. The return on the GPFG was 19.9 percent in 2019, whilst the return on the GPFN was 12.4 percent. At yearend, the market values of the two funds were NOK 10,084 billion and NOK 269 billion, respectively. This implies an increase of NOK 1,832 billion and NOK 30 billion. In 2019, the return on the GPFG was 0.23 percentage points higher than the benchmark return, whilst the GPFN outperformed its benchmark by 0.40 percentage points.

The coronavirus pandemic and related restrictions on economic activity in many countries led to significant movements in the equity markets in 2020. The return on the GPFG in the first six months of the year was -3.4 percent. During this period, substantial transfers between the fund and the national budget were made. The market value of the Fund still increased to NOK 10,398 billion, following the weakening of the Norwegian Krone. The return on the GPFN was -4.4 percent in the first half of 2020, and the market value decreased to NOK 257 billion.

– The recent market turbulence demonstrates that we need to be prepared for sudden and large movements in the financial markets. We have a long-term perspective and a robust investment strategy. This will serve us well in the long run, says Minister of Finance Jan Tore Sanner.  

Changes to the geographical distribution of the GPFG equity benchmark

The Ministry of Finance is proposing to adjust the geographical distribution of the GPFG equity benchmark. The share of developed markets in Europe in the benchmark is to be somewhat reduced, whilst the share of the United States and Canada is to be increased correspondingly. This adjustment is in line with advice received from Norges Bank.

– The changes we are proposing will ensure the investments better represent the distribution of value creation in listed companies globally, says the Minister of Finance.

Emerging equity market investments may contribute to enhanced diversification and bring opportunities for higher expected returns. At the same time, emerging markets are typically characterised by weaker institutions, less transparency and weaker protection of minority shareholders. Such country-specific issues make maintaining the role as a responsible investor more challenging.

The Ministry will continue reviewing the composition of the emerging market sub-benchmark and present its assessment in the white paper in the spring of 2021. The report from the committee that has reviewed the ethically motivated guidelines for the GPFG, together with analysis and assessments from Norges Bank, will form part of the decision basis. New markets will not be included in the GPFG equity benchmark until the Ministry has concluded on its composition.

The Ministry to consider framework for withdrawal from the GPFN

The GPFN ownership shares in companies listed on Oslo Stock Exchange have reached a level where there is considerable risk of breaching the 15 percent ownership share limit for individual companies.

Folketrygdfondet has recommended to reduce the share invested in Norway and correspondingly increase the allocation to Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Folketrygdfondet also discussed alternative solutions, including expanding the scope for investment in unlisted companies pursuing listing, and withdrawals.

The Ministry of Finance proposes to keep the allocation to Denmark, Finland and Sweden unchanged at 15 percent. The Government Pension Fund also has a presence in the Nordics through the GPFG, and having two funds in the same market is in isolation not efficient. Increasing the GPFN allocation to the Nordics would magnify this issue. The challenge of high ownership shares in companies listed on Oslo Stock Exchange should in the Ministry’s view be resolved, fully or in part, through withdrawals from the GPFN.

– A withdrawal from the GPFN will require further assessment. We will continue working on establishing the scope and framework for such withdrawals, in order to resolve the issue Folketrygdfondet has raised in a sound and appropriate manner, says the Minister of Finance.

The Ministry will at the same time review whether the scope for investing the GPFN in unlisted companies seeking listing may to some degree be expanded.

The GPFG work on climate risk

As a large, long-term investor with ownership stakes in thousands of companies worldwide, the Fund risk and return will be affected by climate change, climate policy and new technology. This is a complex and multifaceted risk factor, and there is limited knowledge on how investors can best manage the risk arising from climate change. The white paper describes Norges Bank’s efforts on climate risk.

– Climate risk forms an integrated part of risk management, investment decisions and active ownership at Norges Bank. There is every reason to believe the future importance of climate will be significant. In my opinion, Norges Bank should therefore further strengthen its work on this issue, says Minister of Finance Jan Tore Sanner.

September 28, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Norwegian Aid

Norway to send medical team to Greece

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 27, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway is providing assistance to Greece after the devastating fire in the migrant camp Moria on Lesbos. An emergency medical team from Norway will now be sent to the region.

‘Greece needs our help. Norway has resources and can mobilise a medical team quickly,’ said Minister of Health and Care Services Bent Høie.

Evening in Santorini – Thira town and Aegean sea at sundown, Greece – Landscape

On 9 September, the Greek authorities requested aid in the form of emergency medical help following the fire in the migrant camp Moria on Lesbos. Norway is now offering to send an emergency medical team (EMT) to the region. This team will be similar to the ones Norway deployed to northern Italy last spring, to Samoa during the measles epidemic in December 2019, and to the Democratic Republic of the Congo during the Ebola outbreak last year.

‘The refugees and migrants in Greece need humanitarian assistance immediately. Our offer to send an emergency medical team is part of the effort to meet the acute need for medical help over the next few weeks,’ said Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide.

The Norwegian health service will not be compromised

The decision to send the Norwegian EMT to Lesbos is a response to a concrete request for help, and reflects the Norwegian health authorities’ evaluation of the coronavirus pandemic situation in Norway, which they currently perceive as manageable, also in the longer term.

‘A condition of our assistance to Greece is that the intensive care capacity of Norwegian hospitals must not be compromised as a result. We will provide up to 25 nurses, doctors and logistics personnel from hospitals all over the country, so that the burden placed on each individual hospital is small, while the value of the medical team on Lesbos will be significant,’ said Mr Høie.

‘The coronavirus pandemic has exacerbated an already challenging humanitarian situation for the refugees and migrants in Greece. I am glad that we have such good cooperation with other European countries for dealing with emergencies like this one. Norway’s effort is linked to the EU Civil Protection Mechanism, which is now helping to finance and coordinate medical efforts,’ said Ms Eriksen Søreide.

The medical team will support the local health service in the area. The medical personnel will be under the command of the Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection, in cooperation with the Norwegian Directorate of Health. Initially, it is planned that the team will be on Lesbos for two weeks. However, this may be extended depending on how the situation develops.

The European Medical Corps provides cross-sectoral emergency responses, such as mobilising EMTs, to help deal with international crises. It is a part of the EU Civil Protection Mechanism. Norway is one of the countries that is certified to send EMTs through this arrangement, in cooperation with the EU and the World Health Organization (WHO). The Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection and the Norwegian Directorate of Health have joint responsibility for Norwegian EMTs. The medical personnel are provided by the regional health authorities and come from hospitals all over Norway.

September 27, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Media Freedom

Normalisation will increase space for dialogue and cooperation

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 26, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

‘The normalisation of Israel’s bilateral relations with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain will increase the space for dialogue and cooperation between Israel and the Arab world. It is positive if this can contribute to increased political stability in the Middle East,’ said Foreign Minister Ine Eriksen Søreide on the signing of the agreements between the United Arab Emirates and Israel and Bahrain and Israel in Washington DC.

‘The normalisation agreements do not solve outstanding questions in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Nonetheless, I hope that increased contact across the region also will support the efforts to secure a peaceful solution to the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. Only a negotiated and viable two-state solution, in accordance with international law, can create a lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians’, the Foreign Minister said.

September 26, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Norwegian Aid

Norway provides contribution for field hospital for treatment of Covid-19 patients in Yemen

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 25, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

‘According to the UN, Yemen is the world’s worst humanitarian crisis. Dealing with the coronavirus pandemic is proving extremely difficult. There are reports of increased infection rates and there is probably a very large number of unregistered cases. I am therefore very pleased that Norway, with the help of the Norwegian Red Cross, is able to provide a contribution for the establishment of a field hospital for the treatment of Covid-19 patients in Aden, in the south of Yemen. The hospital will help to save lives and prevent an increase in infections in the long run,’ said Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Søreide.

Det er den internasjonale Røde Kors-komiteen (ICRC) som skal drive feltsykehuset som har blitt sendt fra Norge, med utstyr og personell både fra Røde Kors i Norge og Finland. I tillegg har behandlingssenteret også over 100 lokalt ansatte. Feltsykehuset er satt opp ved Al Joumhouriya-sykehuset i Aden. Feltsykehuset har 60 sengeplasser og er gjort i stand for å kunne gi behandling og pleie til koronasmittede pasienter, og består blant annet av akuttmottak, sengeposter, røntgenavdeling og laboratorium. (Foto: ICRC)

Norway has provided a total of NOK 215 million in humanitarian aid to Yemen so far this year. This funding has been divided between the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the UN and Norwegian NGOs. Of this total, NOK 34 million has been allocated to support the activities of the Norwegian Red Cross in Yemen. A large proportion of this funding is being used by the Norwegian Red Cross to establish the field hospital, with the assistance of technical and health personnel from Norway.

Preparations for opening the field hospital were carried out in close cooperation with the Finnish Red Cross and the Yemen Red Crescent Society. The hospital will be run by the ICRC. It has been erected near a local hospital in Aden. It has a bed capacity of 60 and will provide treatment and care to Covid-19 patients. The hospital consists of an emergency department, wards, a radiology department and a laboratory.

The situation for the civil population of Yemen has never been more critical. According to UN estimates, 80 % of the population – some 24 million people – are in need of humanitarian aid and protection. The coronavirus pandemic has further exacerbated the crisis. In addition, there is now major flooding in many parts of the country, and many people have been forced to leave their homes.

‘The humanitarian crisis in Yemen is man-made, a result of the civil war. It is therefore vital to make headway with political talks, and to secure agreement on a ceasefire. Norway is providing both political and financial support to the UN Special Envoy for Yemen, Martin Griffiths,’ Ms Eriksen Søreide said.

September 25, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Indian PM Modi’s Speech At 75th UN General Assembly

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 24, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Tuesday that the original aim with which the United Nations was built still remains incomplete as it needs ‘reformed multilateralism’ to address today’s challenges. He was addressing the High-Level meeting of the United Nations General Assembly to mark 75 years of the global body.

‘The declaration acknowledges the need for reform in the United Nation itself. You cannot fight today’s challenges with outdated structures,” the Prime Minister said.

Speaking on the occasion, the Prime Minister said seventy-five years ago an institution was created for the entire world for the first time in human history and a new hope arose from the horrors of war. He added being a founding signatory of the UN Charter, India was part of that noble vision which reflected India’s own philosophy of ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’ – which sees all creation as a family.

Paying tributes to those who advanced the cause of peace and development including the UN peacekeeping Missions, the Prime Minister said our world today is a better place because of the United Nations. About the UN declaration adopted today, the Prime Minister said while much has been achieved, the original Mission remains unfulfilled. And the far-reaching declaration that we are adopting today acknowledges that work still needs to be done: in preventing conflict, in ensuring development, in addressing climate change, in reducing inequalities, and in leveraging digital technologies. The declaration also acknowledges the need for reform of the United Nations itself.

The Prime Minister said without comprehensive reforms, the UN faces a crisis of confidence and today’s challenges cannot be fought with outdated structures. He added that for today’s interconnected world, we need a reformed multilateralism: that reflects today’s realities; gives voice to all stakeholders; addresses contemporary challenges; and focuses on human welfare. India looks forward to working with all other nations towards this end.

September 24, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
NATO and Norway

US trains for attack in central Europe

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 24, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

U.S. and other NATO forces are practicing how to fend off an attack in central Europe, bringing together B-52 bombers, fighters and missile defenses for a drill simulating a large-scale battle.

“It’s about putting the right force to defend against the right threat, in the right place at the right time,” France said in Wednesday in a call with reporters. “If we do that, our operators will hit home runs all day long.”

The exercise, slated to end Friday, also features the U.S.’ Patriot air defense system, which U.S. Army Europe brought to a military base in Szymany, Poland. The Patriots, along with Polish ground systems and allied airpower, are focused on defending and protecting urban centers and other priorities from attack, Polish Air Force Maj. Gen. Ireneusz Starzynski said.

U.S. Air Force aircraft involved include F-16s, F-15s, the KC-135 Stratotanker, KC-10 Extender and the B-52 Stratofortress. Polish F-16 fighters, SU-22 ground attack jets and Mi-17 helicopters also are part of the exercise.

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by U.S. Air Forces Maj. Gen. Derek France, U.S. Army Europe Brig. Gen. Gregory Brady, Polish Air Force Maj. Gen. Ireneusz Starzynski, And Polish Air Force Maj. Gen. Dariusz Malinowski.

Maj. Gen. France:  I would like to start off just by thanking our Polish partners sitting here with me for being such gracious hosts today, for a tour of their facilities, and for the contributions they have made to ensure the success of this exercise.  Bringing together multiple nations for an exercise of this size, scope, and complexity contributes to the strength of our partnership of our two great countries and all of the countries involved.  And it is these partnerships that allow us to seamlessly execute Astral Knight and be ready and ready in combat. 

This year we’re building on the lessons learned from Astral Knight ’19, enhancing our ability to build a resilient, integrated air and missile defense enterprise.  We will be putting our combined airmen and soldiers through a demanding set of scenarios over the course of this week using both live fly and computer-based scenarios.  Our goal at the end of this week is to enhance command and control integration, improve coordination interoperability, land and air capabilities, and successfully overlap operations into an integrated air and missile defense architecture. 

Astral Knight incorporates a variety of U.S. Air Force and Polish Air Force aircraft, including elements of our current bomber task force in theater as well as Army Patriot missile systems and Polish ground-based missile systems.  Additionally, most importantly will be integrating our air operations centers, on the U.S. side at Ramstein, and the Polish air operations center in Warsaw to give us a greater combined awareness of the air defense picture. 

So bringing these assets together allows us to demonstrate, to test, to refine, and to learn our ability to execute integrated air and missile defense that incorporates both offensive and predominately defensive measures.  This creates a comprehensive joint and combined force capable of preventing any enemy from effectively employing offensive air and missile weapons on this soil. 

This exercise is also an avenue to enhance our partnerships across the Baltic region between U.S. joint partners and other nations such as Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, as mentioned, and Sweden as we share common interests in maintaining a Europe that is safe and secure and prosperous.  By training together in the region, we’re able to enhance our flexibility, our interoperability in the interests of strengthening combined response capabilities and demonstrating international resolve.  Our partners fly a variety of different weapons systems, and it’s important and crucial that we expand those capabilities by integrating with one another. 

The ever-evolving security situation in this theater requires precise focus and dedication, and Astral Knight is one of the key measures that ensures our nations are able to respond to any situation with speed and agility.  Enhancing our readiness through demanding and challenging exercises such as Astral Knight ’20 allows our joint and multinational team to be ready for any challenge we may face in the future. 

And the bottom line is this: that no nation can confront today’s challenges alone.  But because of the relationships we have built in these AOCs and through this exercise, they become the bedrock for us to undertake Astral Knight and present a ready and capable defense that is able to defend this area. 

I look forward to your questions, and I would like to turn it over to my good friend, Gen. Starzynski, who has some opening comments as well. 

Maj. Gen. Starzynski:  Thank you.  So from Polish side, from my point of view and my colleagues’, my commanders and subordinates, it’s a great time.  It’s great time for all of us to make exercise and practice with U.S. ally.  It allows us to build capability and interoperability, and ensure our strong bonds. 

So it is five days in the air, as well as on the ground.  Things, magic things, happens, I am sure.  So I would say one other point, very good point, that we can do it even if we are in the pandemic time.  So to ensure us to good cooperate, to do a great, great thing for U.S. and Polish air forces. 

Question:  What have been the U.S. Air Force’s biggest lessons learned from the operation thus far?

Maj. Gen. France:  I would say our biggest lessons learned has been just the challenges of networks.  When we look at networking individual aircraft, individual systems, with controls and reporting centers, and air operations centers, that’s not easy to do.  And so we rely on a small subset of experts that understand how those networks work so that we can communicate timely and effectively and accurately. 

We have found that even over the course of this week we’ve learned a tremendous amount of lessons, and the hope is and the plan is that as we capture those lessons at the end of the week, that translates into long-range plans both for future exercises and for some of the equipment and capabilities that we need to maintain in the theater moving forward. 

Maj. Gen. Starzynski:  Maj. Gen. Starzynski.  So it’s the first point is the same as for our allies, as Maj. Gen. France said, that the network established a good network to cooperate is the first point to achieve, and it is achieved so far.  

But so there are some other benefits for the Polish side.  As you know, we are in time of waiting for the fifth generation in the Patriot system.  So we can train, we can learn some – a lot from American colleagues how to integrate the system into one system. 

Question:  What kind of threats will be included in the exercise?  UAVs, stealth cruise missiles, hypersonic weapons?

Maj. Gen. France:  The scenarios we’ve developed over the course of the week involve a variety of threats.  We have forces that are capable of engaging each of those, and when we talk about command and control, which is one of the focus areas of this, it’s about putting the right force to defend against the right threat and the right place at the right time.  If we do that, our operators will hit homeruns all day long.  But it’s the understanding of how to posture those correctly.  And so it is a variety of threats, everything from ballistic missiles to aircraft to cruise missiles to unmanned aerial things.  And some of them are live fly, some of them are simulated, and some of them are injects that go into the planning system so that we plan against them.

Question: Could you comment on the capabilities that they bring to this exercise?

Brig. Gen. Brady:  This is Brig. Gen. Greg Brady.  As the Commander for the 10th Army Air and Missile Defense Command, we focus exclusively on ground based air defense for this.  And we have a strong relationship with Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia.  One of the exercises we just executed previous and it gives you an understanding of the relationships we have built.  This was in Latvia.  We conducted a live-fire exercise with all of our capabilities.  And it was primarily our short-range air defense capabilities.  But what is important, in every country, while they do have different capabilities, it provides a multi-layered approach.  There isn’t one interceptor that can defeat all threats.  And so being able to synchronize the capabilities, understand what our allies have, and then building this architecture really leads to readiness matters.  

Question:  How is Sweden contributing to this exercise?  That’s my first question.  Can someone please answer that? how is communications doing?  How will that be arranged, for example, so that Sweden could get early warning, for example, for a missile threat?  Do you have any ideas or plans for that?

Brig. Gen. Brady:  Mikael, this is Brig. Gen. Greg Brady from the 10th AAMDC.  For the first part of your question, we actually have a very strong relationship for ground-based air defense forces.  As you know, Sweden will be receiving Patriots soon.  You have the RBS-98.  And they are actually here from a ground-based air defense as observers.  And it was yesterday I was able to sit down – or not I was.  My commander for the Patriot force was able to meet with them.  As you know, they will be receiving Patriots next year.  For the early warning for missile defense, I would have to defer to the Swedish defense ministry on how that is going to work.  

Question:  How concerned are you about Russia’s A2/AD efforts in the Nordic-Baltic region?  And have you seen any recent buildup of Russian forces in Kaliningrad or elsewhere to strengthen its position on NATO’s northeastern flank?

Maj. Gen. France:  I would say for the A2/AD scenario, because of the scenario of this exercise, this is largely defensive in nature there.  So for this particular force scenario that we looked at, the A2/AD was not as big a player as maybe other plans and other scenarios might focus on.  So it is a concern, broadly speaking.  It is not one of the tactical problems that we are putting out our forces for this one.  And, again, I won’t comment to specific force buildup we have seen, again because it was not part of this scenario.  So, broadly speaking, it is a concern, but for AK-20, again, we were much more integrated, much more focused on and integrated and capable, robust defense and the cooperation that needs to happen to make that happen across our nations.

Question:  I was wondering if it’s the first time Sweden is involved in an exercise like this, with an air defense exercise like this, with NATO countries ? I guess it has been touched upon, but Poland and Sweden are both going to buy Patriots.  So, I mean, is it being envisaged in the future that you would have, like, an integrated Patriot – well, let’s say the U.S. deploying Patriots and the Swedes and the Poles and maybe, for that matter, even going further south to Romania, where you would have this, like, integrated Patriot network stretching along the eastern flank. How are the Lithuanians already learning things from this exercise?  And I guess there have been past exercises in the Baltics for their acquisition of NASAMS.  And then, finally, is there any new equipment which has never been deployed involved in this exercise? 

Brig. Gen. Brady:  Greg Brady for the 10th AAMDC.  I would add for – with Sweden, for Astral Knight ’20, they are here in an observer status.  But to your point about Patriot and with them receiving I believe in the next year, so we are working with them and sharing our tactics and procedures.  

And for the network question, that is one of the objectives for this exercise.  And it’s focused on interoperability.  And it’s important, even as observers here, because when you look at the three aspects of interoperability, you have the human piece.  So we do have a bilateral relationship with Sweden, but in the technical aspects, that’s what the focus of Astral Knight ’20 is.  It’s about building the readiness through our networks and ensuring that we’re able to share data, whether it’s ground-based air defense systems or all the way to the air operations center.  So, really, it’s a combined and joint environment.  

Simultaneously right now, we have the Tobruq Legacy exercise happening in Lithuania.  I do not know if – I do not think Sweden is there with equipment.  Actually, I know they’re not there with equipment.  And I would have to return back to you if there’s observers there as well.  But that exercise, similar in the aspects of establishing datalink architecture of utilizing different systems to understand the capacity and capability.  But when you build these different systems together, you can have four or five different physical languages, different mission command elements, different interceptors, but your goal is to establish one single integrated air picture to understand early warning and building that situational awareness from a command and control perspective.

To your last point, I think you asked about if there was any new equipment in this exercise.  And so while there is no specific new hardware, there are all kinds of new ways of connecting that hardware.  So this is very much a learning environment as we move along.  And that’s really the goal that is happening here, is new ways to connect, both technically and on the human element.  And so that part is certainly a learning piece of this exercise.

Question:  Let me understand this scenario because, as far as I understand it, it was in the pre-Article 5 situation.  And is it that the first salvo of the missiles from the east triggered the active air defense?  how did you actually achieve this integrated air picture?  And what was the main platform for data sharing? 

Maj. Gen. Starzynski:  Okay.  Maj. Gen. Starzynski speaking.  So this is actually a pre-Article 5 situation scenario, as you said.  So we are in some exercise, some middle of the scenario.  So things are happening right now and we’re actually – it’s doing by the U.S. and Polish forces.  So the aircraft – fighters, tankers, E-3, GBAD forces that are involved in the mostly defense posture.  So we are trying to defend our key terrain objects, like – maybe like towns, cities, and so on, and try to respond with fighters in the air.  So, basically, it’s the basic scenario, so for the first question.

Maj. Gen. Starzynski:  I can’t say what is the platform because we use U.S. systems and Polish systems, and we integrate them together.  So it is the main point to achieve.  And we achieved that point that we can communicate, share information, send data from U.S., from Polish for all players in U.S., Europe, and Poland.  So it is the main point of this exercise.  And we achieved this goal.

Maj. Gen. France:  I just want to thank the media team for being here and for asking these questions.  I just will close by saying that, you know, at the end of this exercise compared to five days ago, when we started it, we are a stronger and more combat-ready combined force.  And so going out the doors as that happens, that is part of it.  And it is part based on the lessons we learned on the technical side of how to link these networks together and do command and control.  But the bedrock of that and the most important thing of that is the relationships and professional understanding we have between the nations involved and that really becomes the basis of that capability.  

And so, again, thanks for your time, and thanks for our Polish hosts.  And that’s all we have from here.

Maj. Gen. Starzynski:  I agree with Gen. France 100 percent.  So what I can to add, when we started one year, one and a half years ago to plan this exercise, it is U.S. partners to look to us, it’s almost impossible to do that thing, just to make the systems connected – that model, what we did, actually, during the last two days.  So I – but from my perspective, from the Polish and U.S., I’m sure, side, it is successful and very beneficial.  We are stronger.  We learn of each other, even personally.  It is very beneficial for us.  That’s it. 

September 24, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
NATO and Norway

U.S. preparing UN sanctions on Iran

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 24, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The United States plans to impose sanctions on those who violate a UN arms embargo on Iran, which Washington says will now stay in place instead of expiring in October as agreed under a 2015 nuclear deal.

US Special Representative for Venezuela and Iran Elliott Abrams said Washington could deny access to the US market to anyone who trades in weapons with Iran, which President Donald Trump’s administration accuses of seeking to develop nuclear weapons.

“It’s like pulling a trigger and no bullet comes out,” a senior UN Security Council diplomat said on condition of anonymity. “There will be no snapback, the sanctions will remain suspended, the JCPOA (nuclear deal) will remain in place.”

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by Elliott Abrams, U.S. Special Representative for Venezuela.

Special Representative Abrams:  Thank you.  Today under the leadership of President Trump the White House and the Departments of State, Treasury, and Commerce took significant action to counter Iranian nuclear threats, as well as missile and conventional arms proliferation.  Across each of these areas, the Islamic Republic of Iran poses a unique threat to the world.  

The regime uses its nuclear program to extort the international community and threaten regional and international security.  Iran possesses the largest ballistic missiles force in the Middle East, and it has exported both missiles and missile production technology to violent, non-state actors such as the Houthi militias in Yemen and Hizballah terrorists in Lebanon and Syria.  The U.S. and partner forces have repeatedly interdicted Iranian weapons en route to the Houthis in the last year, demonstrating that the regime continues to use its arsenal of conventional weapons to destabilize the Middle East and foment sectarian violence and terrorism across the region.   

These actions underscore that the U.S. will not hesitate to counter Iranian nuclear, missile, and conventional arms threats that led the Security Council to unanimously impose sanctions on Iran in the first place beginning in 2006.  These measures are now again in force against Iran thanks to the return of sanctions pursuant to UN Security Council Resolution 2231.  

The actions we’ve taken include the following:  First, a new executive order by President Trump targeting conventional arms transfers, and one of my colleagues will comment on that; designation by the Department of State of MODAFL, the Iranian Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics, and Iran’s Defense Industries Organization and its director, as well as Nicolas Maduro, the illegitimate dictator of Venezuela, for conventional arms-related activities pursuant to the new Iran conventional arms executive order. 

State and Treasury have also designated six individuals and three entities associated with the AEOI, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, pursuant to Executive Order 13382, that deals with weapons of mass destruction proliferators.  Five more individuals who are affiliated with AEOI have been designated by Commerce today and put on the entity list which will impose export control restrictions on them.  

Treasury today designated three individuals and four entities associated with Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group, SHIG, which is the organization that deals with Iran’s liquid propellant ballistic missiles.  This is also pursuant to Executive Order 13382 and updates some existing sanctions. 

The administration is dedicated to keeping Americans and citizens across the Middle East and in Europe safe by taking these actions against the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism and anti-Semitism.  We will continue and we will expand our sanctions until Iran is willing to conclude a comprehensive negotiation that addresses the regime’s malign behavior.  We’re always open to diplomacy with Iran, but Iran must respond with diplomacy, not with more violence, bloodshed, and nuclear extortion.  And until then, maximum pressure will continue.   

Question:  Javad Zarif was just on CFR and basically shrugged off the sanctions, but also said that Iran is still very much looking for retribution for the killing of Qasem Soleimani.  So how seriously do you take that threat in terms of the security of your officials overseas?  Are there active plots against them? 

Special Representative Abrams:  As you can understand, I’m not going to reveal classified information about what we may or may not know.  What we do know is that Iran is the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism, and we do know that there have been Iranian plots, well, literally, for decades, including in recent years in the U.S., in Europe, and in the Middle East.  So Iranian threats of acts of terrorism need to be taken seriously.  It is a little bit surprising that such threats of acts of terrorism come from a foreign minister, but I gather from what you said that it was he who delivered those threats.  We are concerned every day to protect Americans overseas, including of course, the American official family:  our diplomats and their families, our service members and their families.  And should Iran commit acts of terrorism against Americans, you can be sure that they will pay a very heavy price. 

Question:  How will the new leader introduce U.S. sanctions that affect the European partners?  Will they be sanctioned by the U.S. if they continue working with Iran? 

Mr. Abrams:  These are sanctions against, potentially, individuals, companies, banks, that assist Iran in the violation of these very wide UN sanctions.  In some cases there are actually additional European sanctions still in place.  But really, the answer to your question is the answer we gave in 2018:  People who violate these sanctions will be investigated by the United States, and if we have the facts, then the provisions of all of these sanctions will be put into effect.  

Just to give you an example, if a European bank were to finance an arms sale to Iran or by Iran, absolutely it would be sanctioned.  That is what’s called for by the U.N. arms embargo on Iran. 

Question:  This are these executive orders mean that we are back before the nuclear agreement, which is what about the Section 7 from the – from the existive orders?  I need more elaboration on that ?

Mr. Abrams:  Well, as to what the executive order says, maybe I will call upon my colleague, another senior official, to talk about what the president said today. 

Senior Administration Official:  The action today is the broadest interagency action with regard to counter–proliferation that we have taken so far.  On the conventional arms executive order, the president signed it today.  It is the first major new Iran-specific counterproliferation authority since 2012.  It targets proliferators of conventional weapons to and from Iran and their supporters.  The executive order authorizes the State Department and the Treasury Department to impose financial blocking sanctions on certain persons involved in transfers to and from Iran of conventional weapons, which we define broadly as any item with a military end use.  

In this sense, it’s more expansive than the U.N. arms restriction, which only applies to arms or items listed on the U.N. register of conventional arms or are considered arms and related materiel.  For example, the authority would allow us to target speedboats that the IRGC buys and retrofits into attack crafts or harass vessels in international shipping lanes, or circuit boards that missile organizations incorporate into ballistic missile guidance and control systems.  

And, just to follow up with what Special Representative Abrams said, our intent with this rollout is to demonstrate our seriousness with implementing the reimposed U.N. restrictions and convince foreign governments, and even more significantly, private sector companies, to take action under the U.N. Security Council resolution to counter Iran.  We expect that even if countries do not agree, that they will adhere to snapback and that both governments and the private sector will not seek to expose themselves to U.S. sanctions. 

Question:  They cited a U.S. official saying Iran could have enough fissile materials for a nuclear weapon by the end of this year.  Could you elaborate a little bit on this?  And can you tell what’s the evidence for it?  Have you also seen Iran and North Korea resuming cooperation on the long-range missile project? 

Mr. Abrams:  As the exact views of the U.S. intelligence community of timelines for various pieces of Iran’s nuclear program, fissile material is one aspect but not the only aspect.  But, you know, this is really what the JCPOA ultimately allows and it is why the United States decided to pull away from the JCPOA.  The JCPOA is a path to a nuclear weapon for Iran.  

It gives you the years as markers, “Here is what Iran can do after five years.  Here is what Iran can do after eight and a half years.  Here is what it can do at the 10-year mark.”  Of course, we are already at the five-year mark.  

“And here is what it can do at the 15-year mark.”  So Iran is under the JCPOA, would be moving in that direction, and it would be doing so to begin with $70 billion that our sanctions in the last couple of years have deprived the government of Iran from having.  So I won’t get into detail about the timelines, but that is clearly the direction in which Iran wishes to move and in which under the JCPOA, it would have been able to move.   

We are very concerned about Iran’s cooperation with North Korea, again not too much I can really say about it here.  Maybe there are colleagues on the line who would like to add, but the Iranian ballistic missile development is really a dangerous thing for the region.  And we have seen, for example, the Houthis using those missiles to attack Saudi Arabia.  We will be watching the cooperation with North Korea very carefully and doing what we can to prevent it. 

Question:  I want to ask about Iran said that it is ready to exchange prisoners with the U.S., how the U.S. will deal with this?  And the Iranian regime says that it will continue to export its oil products to Venezuela and other countries.  How the U.S. will deal with that? 

Mr. Abrams:  let me just say that the United States has managed in the last two years to reduce by something like 90 percent Iran’s oil exports, and they continue to fall.  And most countries have gotten out of the Iran-Venezuela trade.  Most recently, Greek ship owners have gotten out of that trade.  

It may be relegated, it looks as if it will be relegated, just to a few Iranian-owned ships that can make that voyage maybe a couple of times a year.  But we will continue to pursue these sanctions, and they have been extremely effective in getting countries around the world out of that trade.  

And, just to give you an example, there are many, many countries because demand is low now for gasoline, that have gasoline.  Why aren’t they selling it to Venezuela?  And the answer is they don’t want to have to deal with U.S. sanctions.  So the ships, the insurers, the banks, the ship captains, the ship owners are all saying, “We don’t want to have anything to do with that trade.” 

Question:  I wanted to ask you a question on the policy options that are left to the U.S. in light of the rejection of a lot of other countries of the legal interpretation about Resolution 2231.  So what can the U.S. do to persuade other countries to adhere to its own interpretation of the resolution? 

Mr. Abrams:  First, there are a number of countries who certainly agree that Iran is extremely dangerous.  Many countries, including European countries, have said to us that they were seeking some way to extend the U.N. arms embargo on Iran.  What can the United States do?  Precisely what we have done.  

First, 30 days ago this past Saturday, we gave notice to the Security Council in exact compliance with Resolution 2231.  Thirty days later, snapback occurred.  That was this past Saturday 8:00 p.m. Washington time.  Today, we have announced what we mean by the return of U.N. sanctions and our enforcement of those sanctions. 

 I remember the debate two years ago about how, “Oh, U.S. unilateral sanctions will really not have an impact.  What’s the point?”  We have seen it.  

I would just point out one thing to you, which is, obviously, we knew last week that snapback was coming.  And it came on Saturday.  And the Iranian rial has fallen to its lowest position ever.  So people in business in Iran know that snapback will have an enormous effect.  And through the announcements today, I believe we are telling governments and we are telling businesses, individuals, banks, companies that it has occurred and that if they do not abide by these sanctions, there will be penalties to pay. 

Question: Could you expand a little bit, please, on your comments regarding the designation of the Iranian Ministry of Defense I think it was – I am afraid the line was not very good at my end – and its director and Mr. Maduro of Venezuela for conventional arms-related activity?  Can you just expand on what that means in practice, please? 

Mr. Abrams:  It should mean to people who are contemplating arms sales to Iran or contemplating dealing with in this case MDAFL, the Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics, and its director, that there can be sanctions, there can be penalties to pay for those agreements.  

And, by the way, we are under the executive order not required to wait until, let’s say, combat jets or tanks or speedboats are actually physically shipped.  The agreements themselves can lead to sanctions of the individuals involved.  So the message to people who are contemplating deals with that ministry is think twice, penalties are right around the corner. 

Question:  One question on the arms embargo and then another on Iranian uranium stockpiles.  One, I wondered if, you know, have European allies identified any areas in which they can cooperate to impede arms sales by Iran, notwithstanding the dispute over the U.N. Security Council?  And do you have a sense of what prospective customers the Iranians have in mind for arms sales and whether your sanctions can deter those deals?  And then a little more big picture, Iran deal proponents have long argued that the deal postpones the day when, as the saying goes, Western governments would have to choose between bombing Iran or an Iranian bomb.  The most recent IAEA report, if I am not mistaken, pegged the Iranian low enriched uranium stockpile north of 3,100 kilograms, which drew up some of the breakout time estimates of three and a half months.  So I wonder, has that day moved up?  Does the snapback decision diminish Iran’s incentive to abide by those terms of the deal that they are still abiding by?  And if process disputes, such as what we have seen over the arms embargo, can impede U.S.-European cooperation on security matters, you know, in conventional arms terms, how worried are you about whether the U.S. and Europe would be able to be on the same page in a potential breakout scenario to enforce deterring Iran’s development of nuclear weapons?

Mr. Abrams: I feel like saying thank you for your twelve questions. On the first part, there is an EU arms embargo. You know, the EU imposed an eight year arms embargo five years ago. There remains an EU arms embargo on Iran.  And I would hope not only will the EU maintain and enforce that arms embargo.  

Obviously we hope they would extend it, and we hope for very good cooperation from the EU in preventing anyone else from engaging in arms trade with Iran.  We certainly look forward to good cooperation on that. Who are Iran’s customers?  Well, one obvious customer potentially is Venezuela.  That’s one of the reasons why Venezuela and its illegitimate former President Maduro is included here.  The Houthis we know, and Hizballah and other terrorist groups, for example in Iraq, are customers as well.   

One of the things we’re doing here is saying to countries around the world who might be approached by Iran to say, look.  We have the following on our list that we would be prepared to sell you.  And the economic situation in Iran being as poor as it is, the regime probably will be thinking about trying to raise revenue by selling arms.  

Our message to anybody who’s considering buying is, again, don’t do it because the price you will pay will be quite elevated. Does – you asked about a diminished incentive for Iran to abide by strictures of the JCPOA or 2231.  They’re not abiding.  

There is a UN arms embargo for the last five years on Iran that we have now extended, which would have – would have disappeared on October 18th.  

In those five years, does anybody actually think Iran abided by that UN arms embargo, that it did not, for example, ship arms to the Houthis?  We have proved that they have shipped arms to the Houthis.  We have interdicted shipments of arms to the Houthis.  

We have seen in the archive that the Israelis recovered that while it was negotiating and while it was theoretically abiding by the JCPOA, Iran was hiding information from the IAEA.  

And Iran was keeping this archive of material about building a nuclear weapon, and it was maintaining the teams that have engaged in that project intact, preparing for the day that – in which they could start again. 

So I don’t accept the notion that Iran was abiding by the letter and spirit, and now won’t abide.  You may remember that the 2231 calls upon Iran to stop its missile program.  Does anybody believe they stopped the missile program?  So I don’t accept that Iran was abiding, and that there will now be a diminished incentive.  The only thing that is going to lead Iran to keep those commitments is, in our view, more pressure.  

You’re right that we had a process dispute with the EU.  Final point.  We were a little surprised by it.  We were certainly disappointed by it, that EU countries would say, “We want the UN arms embargo extended,” but then not really take any action to extend it.  

And it is their failure to take action to get the UN arms embargo extended that was a main contributor to our decision that the only way to do it was to snap back, in accordance with 2231, all the UN sanctions. 

September 24, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Environment

Norway seeks collaboration with EU on offshore renewables and floating wind

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 24, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norway’s Minister of Petroleum and Energy Tina Bru has written to EU Energy Commissioner Kadri Simson noting common ground in the way the European bloc and the Norwegian Government see the potential of offshore wind, highlighting Norway’s offshore expertise and how it might be applied to help Europe realise its goals.

Norway is not part of the EU but is associated with it through its membership of the European Economic Area. It was also a founding member of the European Free Trade Association, which was originally set up as an alternative to the European Economic Community, the main predecessor of the EU.

Tina Bru: “Norway has a competent and eager industry that is ready to contribute its offshore expertise

“Norway firmly believes the challenges associated with deploying sufficient renewable energy to combat climate change are best solved through close co-operation and exchange of best practices between countries,” said Ms Bru.

“We share the objective of the EU to identify a strategic direction for offshore renewable energy towards 2050. The instruments for a green recovery from the Covid-19 crisis outlined in the European Green Deal are similar to the way Norway has approached those challenges, with a Nkr3.6Bn stimulus package for a green transition.

“Norway has a competent and eager industry that is ready to contribute with its offshore expertise. It also has excellent wind resources both onshore and offshore. I hope the coming strategy will describe a future where we can contribute towards a renewable energy system in Europe.”

With regard to the public consultation on the EU’s strategy for offshore renewables (about which coverage can be found here, here, here, here and here), Ms Bru said, “Offshore wind has an important role to play in the global development of power systems in the years to come. Europe has a strong starting position. However, it is necessary that the coming developments succeed in further bringing down costs, facilitating the renewable energy transition.

“We believe that market-based solutions are a precondition for succeeding in deploying renewable energy, while at the same time pursuing the goal of affordable energy to all consumers. The development in offshore wind should thus take place within the framework of an effective electricity market and secure a cost-effective development.

“Norway would also like to stress the importance of further technology development and innovation. We believe floating wind will play a significant role in the development of offshore renewables.

“Floating technology allows for power production in deep waters, utilising renewable resources as well as providing greater flexibility regarding the localisation of power production. This makes floating wind well suited for meeting concerns regarding biodiversity and other interests at sea, like fisheries. Offshore wind could also play a role in the future development of production and use of green hydrogen.”

Ms Bru highlighted the Hywind Tampen project, the 88-MW floating wind power project that will provide electricity to two oil and gas fields on the Norwegian continental shelf. “The aim is, in addition to reducing emissions, to help bring down costs for floating offshore wind,” she concluded.

(rivieramm)

September 24, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diplomatic relations

Norway’s main priorities for the 75th session of the UN General Assembly

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 22, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

The 75th session of the UN General Assembly opened on 15 September 2020 at the UN Headquarters in New York.  This year, delegates from capitals around the world will not be physically present for the week of high-level meetings . Attendance in the General Assembly Hall will be kept to a minimum, and Norway will be represented by its Permanent Mission to the UN in New York. Heads of state and government and other leaders from all countries of the world will participate virtually. Addresses and statements will largely be delivered in the form of pre-recorded videos. Norway’s participation will be led by Prime Minister Erna Solberg.

Prime Minister Erna Solberg will lead the Norwegian delegation to the UN General Assembly’s general debate. Credit: UN Photo

Background

The UN General Assembly is the world’s most representative multilateral forum for dialogue and policy development. As such, it provides a unique arena for promoting Norwegian interests, for international cooperation, and for finding solutions to issues of key importance to Norway. The overall guidelines for Norwegian multilateral policy are set out in the white paper Norway’s Role and Interests in Multilateral Cooperation (Meld. St. 27 (2018-2019)).

The 75th session of the UN General Assembly opened on 15 September 2020 at the UN Headquarters in New York, and will begin with the inauguration of the new President, Mr Volkan Bozkir of Turkey. Mr Bozkir has chosen the following theme for the General Debate this year: ‘The future we want, the United Nations we need: reaffirming our collective commitment to multilateralism – confronting Covid-19 through effective multilateral action’.  This year, delegates from capitals around the world will not be physically present for the week of high-level meetings held in connection with the General Debate from 22-29 September. Attendance in the General Assembly Hall will be kept to a minimum, and Norway will be represented by its Permanent Mission to the UN in New York. Heads of state and government and other leaders from all countries of the world will participate virtually. Addresses and statements will largely be delivered in the form of pre-recorded videos. Norway’s participation will be led by Prime Minister Erna Solberg. The Norwegian delegation will participate virtually in the General Debate, and in high-level meetings and side events. Because of the special circumstances this year, the delegation will not include observers from the Storting or representatives of Norwegian civil society organisations. Many of the virtual meetings will be streamed online and will be accessible to everyone. Bilateral talks with other countries and organisations are not a priority for Norway during the high-level week this year due to the current situation.

The 75th session of the UN General Assembly lasts until September 2021. The negotiations in the General Assembly and its six main committees will continue throughout the session, and Norway will be represented by its Permanent Mission to the UN in New York and officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other relevant ministries in Oslo, who will participate virtually as far as is possible. Work in the committees will have to be carried out in accordance with any Covid-19 restrictions. Formal physical meetings are expected to be reduced to a minimum. Negotiations will primarily have to be conducted in a virtual format, as will interactive dialogues with mandate holders. Resolutions and decisions that are not put to a vote will be adopted under the silence procedure. Resolutions and decisions that require a vote will be put to a vote in physical meetings, where Norway will be represented by its Permanent Mission to the UN.   

In addition to these instructions, a number of other documents are being drawn up that will set out detailed priorities and goals for the negotiations in the General Assembly’s various committees.

In parallel with the work in the General Assembly, Norway will participate in the UN Economic and Social Council (Ecosoc). Ecosoc is the UN’s main body for the formulation of development policy. Norway held the presidency of Ecosoc from July 2019 to July 2020. Norway will follow up its presidency of the Council and will seek to strengthen this key part of the multilateral system, which is so crucial for the UN’s work at country level.   

The Covid-19 pandemic has raised awareness of the importance of digital solutions in all sectors. Norway participated in the UN Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation, whose work will be followed up by the Secretary-General’s office during the General Assembly. Norway, as champion of the Digital Public Goods Alliance, is expected to promote digital cooperation, with a view to reducing the digital gap between developed and developing countries, in line with the white paper Digital transformation and development policy (Meld. St. 11 (2019-2020)). 

1. Lay the groundwork for Norway’s membership of the UN Security Council 

Norway has been elected as a member of the UN Security Council for the period 2021-2022. The Security Council is the only body with responsibility for international peace and security that has a mandate to adopt binding resolutions. Through its work in the General Assembly and the Security Council, Norway will seek to safeguard its national and global interests by:

  • strengthening the UN, international law and the multilateral order;
  • helping to prevent, de-escalate and resolve wars and conflicts;
  • shouldering responsibility and strengthening relations with other countries, both within and outside the Security Council.

In this work, Norway will focus in particular on four thematic areas:

  • Peace diplomacy. Norway will use the knowledge it has gained from its engagement in peace processes to strengthen the UN’s conflict prevention and resolution efforts.
  • Gender equality. Norway will work to ensure that women’s participation and rights are safeguarded in UN peace and security efforts.
  • Protection of civilians. Norway will work to strengthen the protection of civilians, including children, and will use international humanitarian and human rights law as a basis for these efforts. Norway will give special priority to efforts to prevent and combat sexual and gender-based violence in conflict.
  • Climate change and security. Norway will work to ensure that the UN discusses climate-related security threats and the impact of climate change on other issues on the UN’s agenda.

2. Be at the forefront of efforts to promote disarmament

The General Assembly is a key arena for the work on disarmament. Norway is working actively to promote disarmament and processes that can bring countries closer together on this issue and deliver results. Nuclear disarmament verification is essential for achieving and maintaining a world without nuclear weapons. The development of a credible multilateral verification regime is therefore vital for promoting disarmament. The delegation will ensure that Norway continues to play a leading role in the work to promote disarmament verification within the framework of the UN, in line with the Norwegian-sponsored resolution on nuclear disarmament verification adopted during the 74th session of the UN General Assembly. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) will continue to be the cornerstone of the international disarmament and non-proliferation regime, and the UN General Assembly should seek to strengthen the NPT.  

3. Promote binding international cooperation and safeguard the multilateral system

International cooperation is vital for Norway’s security, economy and welfare. We are seeing a tendency to move away from using multilateral organisations to address common challenges through compromise and cooperation. At the same time, the world is facing major global challenges that no country can solve alone. The UN must adapt to this situation. A key goal of the Government’s foreign policy is therefore to promote binding international cooperation and safeguard the multilateral system, so that we can improve our ability to deal with common challenges, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, and defend Norwegian and global interests.

  • Norway will support the implementation of the resolutions adopted by the General Assembly on the reform of UN management, the reform of the UN peace and security pillar, and the reform of the UN development system. Norway will work to secure better financing for the UN, and the Norwegian delegation will work to promote system-wide coherence and ensure that the UN works effectively across its three pillars: peace and security, human rights, and development. Priority will therefore be given to the negotiations to be held in autumn 2020 on the General Assembly resolution on the quadrennial comprehensive policy review of UN operational activities for development (QCPR). These negotiations take place once every four years.
  • The Norwegian delegation will work to promote results-based management in UN institutions, and to ensure that the UN has the funding and flexibility it needs to fulfil its mandates. The delegation will also promote sound and effective management of UN resources.
  • The delegation will promote effective cooperation across the traditional and regional divides of the General Assembly. It will seek to build bridges, listen, and use constructive diplomacy to facilitate solutions for the common good.
  • The delegation will work to strengthen the relationship between the General Assembly, Ecosoc and the Security Council, and will actively promote Security Council reform and greater transparency in the work of the Council.
  • The UN marks its 75th anniversary in 2020. The delegation will play its part in ensuring a fitting celebration of the anniversary.

4. Strengthen the UN’s capacity to prevent and resolve conflicts

Norway will seek to strengthen the UN’s capacity to prevent and resolve conflicts, with a view to promoting peaceful and sustainable development. In Norway’s view, the UN should focus its efforts on countries and areas with high levels of fragility. It is crucial that UN efforts are coordinated and coherent. Cooperation between the UN and other multilateral organisations, such as the World Bank and the regional development banks, is essential in order to achieve the best possible results. Regional organisations have an important role to play in maintaining international peace and security, as the UN Charter makes clear. The partnership between the UN and the African Union (AU) is particularly important. The Norwegian delegation will work actively to strengthen this partnership, especially in the field of peace and security.

  • Norway’s broad involvement in peace and reconciliation efforts has given us important experience and a unique position in this area. The delegation will seek to foster dialogue between parties to conflict and other relevant actors.
  • The delegation will participate actively in UN efforts to combat international terrorism and violent extremism. Priority will be given to following up the work of the Group of Friends on Preventing Violent Extremism, which was established by Norway in partnership with Jordan. A gender-sensitive approach is essential. Norway will give priority to securing the inclusion of women peacebuilders in peace processes in cooperation with i.a. the Women’s Alliance for Security Leadership (WASL).
  • Transnational organised crime is both a development policy and a security policy challenge. The activities of criminal networks are often a driving force behind – and an important source of funding in – conflicts and crises. The Norwegian delegation will promote the implementation of targeted measures to identify and combat these networks.
  • Norway chairs the international donor group for Palestine (AHLC), whose main task is to develop the foundation for a future Palestinian state. The UN is a key partner in this work. The AHLC is the only international forum that brings together the parties to the conflict and the donors for regular meetings to discuss measures that could enhance the prospects of reaching a negotiated two-state solution. The Norwegian delegation will seek to ensure that this work is continued and strengthened.
  • Norway gives high priority to efforts to promote the women, peace and security agenda. The delegation will work to increase the proportion of women participating at all levels of UN peace operations, as both civilian and military personnel. The delegation will work to strengthen women’s participation in peace processes and to ensure that the gender perspective is integrated into peace and security efforts, and will encourage countries to commit to concrete action in this area.
  • The delegation will work, in particular in cooperation with small island states, to raise awareness of the significance of issues relating to the oceans and climate change for international peace and security.
  • Norway is working to improve the effectiveness and coordination of UN peace operations. The Secretary-General’s Action for Peacekeeping initiative (A4P) is giving renewed impetus to efforts to implement the recommendations made by the High-level Independent Panel on Peace Operations in 2015. This year, too, the Norwegian delegation will actively support the initiative, including through the Group of Friends on UN Peace Operations.
  • The delegation will seek to maintain the consensus reached that the reports issued by the relevant UN Group of Governmental Experts provide the framework for what can be considered to be responsible state behaviour in cyberspace. This framework is based on the application of existing international law in cyberspace, compliance with agreed voluntary norms, and confidence-building and capacity-building measures. Both current and future processes must adhere to this framework and must be based on consensus.

5. Promote the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, with a particular focus on supporting an integrated pandemic response, and on the areas of education, health, gender equality, the oceans, climate change, and financing for sustainable development

The 2030 Agenda and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted by the UN member states in 2015. The 2030 Agenda is a global roadmap for sustainable development designed to benefit all people, and the next decade will be critical. The 2030 Agenda is grounded in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and it commits states to leave no one behind. Priority must therefore be given to development that benefits vulnerable and marginalised groups. The Covid-19 pandemic has caused serious setbacks in the efforts to reach the SDGs, including access to financing. Vulnerable and marginalised groups have been hit hard by both the pandemic and its socio-economic ramifications.

Norway is an important partner for the UN and for developing countries in the efforts to implement the 2030 Agenda. The UN Secretary-General has given Prime Minister Erna Solberg a leading international role in this area as co-chair of the group of SDG Advocates. Norway is following up the Agenda by providing strong political support for UN development efforts, financial contributions to UN funds, programmes and specialised agencies, and core funding for multilateral development banks’ funds for the poorest countries, as well as by engaging in bilateral cooperation.

If we are to succeed in achieving all 17 SDGs, we must further develop global partnerships and strengthen cooperation with the private sector in order to mobilise more private capital for these efforts, particularly in developing countries. We must also enhance cooperation with civil society, and forge new partnerships with countries and other actors that we have not worked so closely with before. It will be essential to exploit the potential of digital technology and close the digital gap if we are to meet the SDGs.

  • The delegation will work to ensure that the response to the Covid-19 pandemic is integrated into the UN’s work and contributes to the achievement of the SDGs as effectively as possible.
  • Again this year, the delegation will work to ensure that human rights are integrated into efforts to implement the 2030 Agenda, with a focus on the overall objectives of leaving no one behind and promoting women’s rights and participation. Priority will be given to addressing the needs of vulnerable groups, such as children, religious minorities, indigenous peoples, people with disabilities and sexual minorities.
  • The delegation will seek to inject new momentum into the efforts to implement the SDGs, by promoting political commitments, strategic priorities and constructive partnerships.

In particular, the delegation will work to secure good results in the following areas:

a) Education – which is essential for social and economic development

Norway will highlight the fundamental importance of high-quality, relevant education for all social and economic development. Priority is being given to promoting high-quality education, girls’ education, education in situations of crisis and conflict, vocational training, and investment in the education sector. Norway is playing a prominent role in promoting innovation and the use of technology as part of the efforts to ensure education for all. Norway is also co-chair of the Group of Friends for Education and Lifelong Learning. UN funds, programmes and organisations are important channels and partners for Norwegian aid to the education sector. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on education has been devastating.

  • The Norwegian delegation will promote coordination between organisations, funds and programmes, with a view to maximising the effectiveness of aid for education.
  • The delegation will work to ensure that education remains high on the UN agenda and that member states fulfil their commitments in this area. These include promoting access to education for all and domestic resource mobilisation for education.
  • The delegation will work to improve coordination between humanitarian aid and long-term development efforts in the field of education. The delegation will highlight the importance of education in situations of crisis and conflict.
  • The delegation will give priority to inclusive education, including education for children and young people with disabilities.  
  • The delegation will work to ensure that education efforts address the digital divide (access and expertise).
  • The delegation will work to ensure that the negative impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on the education sector are given adequate consideration when measures are planned and implemented.

b) Good health – which is vital for sustainable development

The Covid-19 pandemic is having far-reaching social and economic ramifications and a major impact on security and development, and has highlighted the fact that health cannot be viewed in isolation from other sectors. Norway’s work to promote digital solutions in the field of health is now more relevant than ever. The UN’s normative role in this area is vital, and UN funds, programmes and specialised agencies are important channels and partners for Norwegian aid to the health sector. Other sectors have a key role to play in promoting good nutrition and food security. Marine resource management is an area where there is huge potential in this regard.   

  • The delegation will work to strengthen the multilateral response to the Covid-19 pandemic and improve health security and preparedness for future pandemics. There will be a particular focus on the needs of vulnerable groups in this context.
  • The delegation will promote universal access to health services and equitable distribution of vaccines.
  • The delegation will give priority to efforts to ensure that children and young people have access to health services, and measures that can reduce sexual violence and sexual harassment, particularly in humanitarian crises and conflict situations.
  • The delegation will work across regional groups of countries to help establish international norms and standards, mobilise funding and protect global public goods.

c) Gender equality – which leads to greater freedom, welfare and democracy

For Norway, strengthening the rights of women and girls is a goal in itself. At the same time, Norway is working to enhance understanding of the ways in which promoting women’s and girls’ empowerment and influence benefits society. Norway will work to eliminate harmful practices such as child marriage, forced labour and all forms of violence and discrimination against women and girls, as well as attempts to disempower women and girls and limit their self-determination. We must tap into the enormous potential that women and girls represent and promote their social and economic participation. At the international level, work to promote gender equality is increasingly regarded as one of the keys to addressing several of the greatest challenges the world is facing, including those relating to climate change, the economy and global health. At the same time, efforts to promote gender equality are meeting strong opposition in some countries, particularly when it comes to women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights. Targeted efforts and proactive alliance building are therefore essential. Girls and women in poor countries have less access to what they need to participate successfully in the digital world. One of the SDGs is devoted to gender quality, and promoting gender equality is a priority for Norway.

  • The delegation will seek to prevent women’s rights from being undermined. It is particularly important to protect women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights.
  • A high-level meeting will be convened to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the Beijing Women’s Conference. Our aim will be to promote Norwegian priorities, support the implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action and strengthen alliances in the field of gender equality. The Norwegian delegation will contribute to these efforts.
  • The delegation will work to improve women’s and girls’ access to education and health services, including sexual and reproductive health services, and to enhance protection against violence and harmful practices, including in areas affected by crisis and conflict.
  • Norway’s delegation will give priority to the efforts to promote women’s participation in the labour market and in business, as well as in politics and governance.

d) Climate change – which is threatening our efforts to reduce poverty and build peaceful societies

The Climate Change Convention in 1992, and the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda in 2015 were all the result of international cooperation. Norway must make active use of the international framework provided by these agreements to promote global climate cooperation. Climate change affects the most vulnerable groups most severely, and is posing a threat to our efforts to reduce poverty. There is also growing recognition of the fact that climate change is a global security challenge and an underlying cause of conflict. A Biodiversity Summit will be held during the high-level week. The aim is to promote the development of a global biodiversity framework that can support the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and help make it possible to realise the 2050 vision for biodiversity of ‘living in harmony with nature.’

  • The delegation will work to put climate change adaptation and prevention of climate-related and natural disasters on the international agenda.
  • The delegation will support the UN Secretary-General’s leadership on climate change.
  • The delegation will work to strengthen efforts to end hunger, achieve food security, improve nutrition and promote sustainable food production.

e) Clean and healthy oceans – which are crucial to human survival

Promoting clean, healthy and productive oceans and sustainable management of marine resources is of vital importance to Norway. The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea provides the framework for international cooperation on conservation and sustainable use of the oceans and marine resources. Pressures on the oceans include climate change, overexploitation of resources, loss of biodiversity and pollution, including from marine litter and in particular plastics. Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU fishing) and certain forms of fisheries subsidies are resulting in overfishing. The negotiations on a new agreement, under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction are a high priority for Norway. The same applies to the work to promote a global framework for combating marine litter. A sustainable ocean economy is vital for achieving a number of the SDGs, not only SDG 14 on life below water, and Norway considers it important to highlight the significance of the ocean economy for development.   

  • Norway’s delegation will seek to ensure that the recommendations of the High-level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy are successfully integrated into the UN’s agenda. The High-level Panel will present its recommendations at the beginning of December.
  • The delegation will seek to increase international recognition of the economic importance of the oceans, and of the need to promote sustainable use of marine resources and clean and healthy oceans as a source of value creation. It is important to ensure that women are given the same opportunities as men to contribute to, and to benefit from, the development of new industries.
  • The delegation will seek to strengthen and further develop the Law of the Sea as the basis for sound ocean management and the sustainable use of resources.

f) Financing for sustainable development, in particular domestic resource mobilisation

There has been a sharp decline in financing for sustainable development as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. This applies to all countries, but developing countries are most severely affected. There is a need to think along new lines and take critical decisions. It is estimated that close to 90 % of the financing needed to reach several of the key SDGs will have to come from domestic sources. If used wisely to promote domestic resource mobilisation, aid can dramatically increase domestic revenues, promote a greater sense of ownership at the national level and lead to more sustainable public financing. Norway is giving priority to cooperation that seeks to exploit the potential of digital technology to increase financing for development (for example in the context of national tax and procurement systems, and monitoring of cross-border financial flows).  

If we are to succeed in fighting corruption and illicit financial flows, as well as in increasing tax revenues in poor countries, a coordinated global effort is needed to improve tax systems, combat money laundering and ensure that corruption cases are properly investigated and prosecuted. Norway will do its part to achieve this, for example by participating in the discussions on financing for development during the General Assembly. 

  • Norway’s delegation will promote the implementation of the Addis Ababa Action Agenda on financing for development, and will give priority to important issues such as illicit financial flows and the fight against corruption.
  • The delegation will follow up the work of the The High Level Panel on International Financial Accountability, Transparency and Integrity for Achieving the 2030 Agenda (FACTI Panel), which was established by Norway and Nigeria in 2019 in their respective roles as President of Ecosoc and UN General Assembly President.
  • The delegation will emphasise the need for responsible borrowing and lending practices to prevent the risk of new debt problems undermining progress towards the SDGs.
  • The delegation will also highlight women’s role in and contribution to delivering economic growth.

6. Strengthen human rights and the international legal order

The international legal order provides a clear and predictable framework for ensuring compliance with human rights obligations. The UN’s mandate and unique position in the world mean that it has a special responsibility to work to ensure that several decades of progress in the areas of democracy, human rights, development and multilateral cooperation are not reversed.

The Covid-19 pandemic has led many countries to introduce restrictions that undermine human rights and the rule of law. The situation for civil society representatives, journalists and human rights defenders is becoming increasingly difficult. As the pandemic continues, this is particularly affecting those who are working to safeguard people’s rights to health, freedom of expression and access to information. 

Norway considers it vital to safeguard fundamental rights and freedoms, legal protection and the rule of law, particularly in times of crisis. It is essential that any restrictions on fundamental freedoms imposed as part of the response to the Covid-19 pandemic are necessary, proportionate, time-limited, non-discriminatory and set out in legislation. Human rights must be respected and integrated into the pandemic response and recovery efforts.   

  • The delegation will ensure that Norway continues to play a key role in UN efforts to further develop the normative framework for the protection and promotion of human rights.
  • The delegation will continue Norway’s efforts to support and protect human rights defenders, promote women’s rights and gender equality as a cross-cutting issue, and combat discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, religion or belief or other minority status. The delegation will continue Norway’s efforts to protect and promote freedom of expression.  
  • Norway will be at the forefront of efforts to ensure that civil society actors are able to participate meaningfully in UN efforts and processes.
  • The delegation will continue Norway’s efforts to ensure respect for international law, including international humanitarian and human rights law, and promote the international legal order. It will support efforts to promote a world order based on international law, including the principles set out in the UN Charter. In particular, the delegation will
  • work to combat impunity, and as in previous years, Norway will express its readiness to participate in discussions on a new convention on the criminal accountability of UN officials and experts on mission;
  • continue efforts towards completion of the work on a comprehensive convention on international terrorism;
  • participate actively in the discussions on universal jurisdiction, with a view to preventing the debate from being derailed or undermining our capacity to prevent and respond to the most serious crimes;
  • support the International Law Commission’s work on crimes against humanity, as in previous years.
  • The delegation will participate actively in discussions on issues relating to international humanitarian law (IHL), with a view to countering attempts to weaken or undermine existing IHL obligations.

7. Strengthen the UN’s capacity to prevent and respond to humanitarian crises, and promote international cooperation on refugees and migrants

Norway will promote compliance with the humanitarian principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality and independence in its efforts to help and protect people affected by humanitarian crises.

  • The delegation will work to strengthen humanitarian efforts in the light of the dramatic increase in humanitarian needs as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.
  • The delegation will work to strengthen protection for people affected by crisis and conflict, with a particular focus on protection of children, on efforts to prevent and combat sexual and gender-based violence, on protection of refugees and internally displaced people, and on protection against mines and other explosives.
  • The delegation will promote efforts to strengthen the UN humanitarian system, in line with the commitments made in the Grand Bargain, which was launched at the World Humanitarian Summit in 2016.
  • The delegation will advocate closer cooperation between the UN and other multilateral institutions in order to improve coordination between humanitarian action, peacebuilding and long-term development efforts.
  • The delegation will work to achieve a more effective and better coordinated refugee response, in line with the Refugee Convention and the Global Compact on Refugees, and will contribute to processes that seek to address the underlying causes of migration.
  • The delegation will work to promote safe, orderly and regular migration and counter irregular migration, within the framework of the Global Compact for Migration.
  • Norway will be a strong advocate in the UN of the need to improve protection for internally displaced people, and will do its part to find lasting solutions in this area. A High-level Panel on Internal Displacement has been established following an initiative from Norway. The delegation will follow up this work.
  • The delegation will promote humanitarian innovation and new working methods that lead to a more effective response and better results for people affected by crisis. This includes efforts to increase the use of digital technology in situations where this can strengthen the humanitarian response.
September 22, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asia and Norway

Multilateralism is at greater risk since Cold War, Kazakh President says at UN

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 21, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

“Multilateralism now faces greater risk than at any point since the end of the Cold War,” said President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev of Kazakhstan, addressing the High-Level Meeting to commemorate the 75th Anniversary of the United Nations“

The history of the United Nations has been a period of intense collective efforts and rich learning: from decolonization to development, from child protection to climate change, from health to human rights, from peacekeeping to peacemaking… When we look around us today, many new challenges – and some old recurring ones – threaten to drag us back in time. Multilateralism now faces greater risk than at any point since the end of the Cold War. COVID-19 has proven surprisingly difficult to be overcome. A second arms race looms. Our strategic development goals are suffering setbacks,” he said.

Kazakhstan’s President Kasym-Jomart Tokayev

However, the President questioned the position that the ideals enshrined in the UN Charter are no longer realistic. “As President of my country and a former senior official of the UN, I strongly disagree. More than ever, we must give rein to the horse of our hopes, not pull back out of fear. We must galvanize efforts in pursuit of those shared ideals, not abandon them. We must continue to build a rules-based community, not return to lawlessness”.

President Tokayev commended strong leadership by Secretary-General António Guterres and supported his work to boost the effectiveness, transparency, and accountability of the UN.

Over the last three decades since independence,  Kazakhstan has participated in endeavors of every major UN body – including the Security Council – in pursuit of a range of priorities including conflict resolution, non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament, combatting terrorism, interfaith and interethnic dialogue, as well as promoting the interests of Land Locked Developing Countries.

September 21, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Oil & Gas

DNO decarbonisation project in Iraq begins

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 21, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Norwegian oil and gas operator DNO has said the Peshkabir Gas Capture and Injection Project in its Tawke license in the Kurdistan region of Iraq is onstream and has reached the 1 billion cu ft of gas injection milestone. The $110-million project is expected to reduce annual emissions from the company’s operated production by over 300,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent, offsetting the emissions from some 150,000 automobiles. 

Engineering and construction were launched in mid-2018 and commissioning completed in mid-2020 in what is the first gas capture and storage project in Kurdistan. Some 20 million cu ft a day of previously flared gas at the Peshkabir field is gathered, treated and transported 80 km by pipeline to the Tawke field where it is injected for storage and reservoir pressure recharging. 

Effective June 2020, the project halves the average carbon intensity of the company’s operated production from 14 kg CO2 equivalent for each barrel of oil equivalent produced (kg CO2e/boe) to an average of 7 kg CO2e/boe. This compares to the target set by a group of 12 of the world’s largest oil companies comprising the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative (OGCI) to reduce the average carbon intensity of their aggregated upstream oil and gas operations to between 20-21 kg CO2e/boe by 2025 from a collective baseline of 23 kg CO2e/boe in 2017. 

“Gas injection and the associated carbon capture and storage is proven, practical and potentially profitable,” said Bijan Mossavar-Rahmani, DNO’s Executive Chairman. “Our project was completed on schedule and on budget notwithstanding the challenges of working in what is still a frontier oil and gas operating environment and the obstacles posed in the late stages by the Covid-19 pandemic,” he added. 

Gas flaring at the Peshkabir field has been reduced by over 75 per cent, with work underway to reduce it further.

Any Peshkabir field injected gas produced at the Tawke field will be recovered and recycled into the latter or used as fuel to displace diesel. Reservoir models suggest gas injection will increase gross Tawke field recoverable volume by 15 to 80 million barrels of oil, of which 23 million barrels are included in the gross proven and probable (2P) Tawke field reserves in the DNO 2019 Annual Statement of Reserves and Resources. 

DNO’s greenhouse gas emissions increased following commencement of production from the Peshkabir field in 2017 as the oil contains a relatively high associated gas content.

Flaring from the Peshkabir field was the largest single contributor to DNO’s total 2019 greenhouse gas emissions of 639,200 tonnes of CO2e. Mossavar-Rahmani announced the launch of a new initiative to more actively measure, monitor and mitigate methane leakages at DNO’s operated sites, noting that while CO2 emissions from oil and gas operations receive the greatest attention, methane emissions are a significant but underreported source of greenhouse gas with an impact 25 times greater than CO2 on a 100-year horizon. 

DNO operates the Tawke license containing the Tawke and Peshkabir fields with a 75 per cent interest; partner Genel Energy plc holds the remaining 25 percent. The company will publish its corporate social responsibility report, which covers greenhouse gas emissions developments and strategies, in the coming days. 

–Traderabia News Service

September 21, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Terrorist

Hezbollah of storing ammonium nitrate in Europe – USA

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 20, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Militant group Hezbollah has stored chemicals that can be used to make explosives in several European countries, a senior US State Department official said Thursday as he appealed to countries in Europe and elsewhere to impose bans on the organization.

Hezbollah operatives have moved ammonium nitrate from Belgium to France, Greece, Italy, Spain and Switzerland in recent years and are suspected to still be storing the material throughout Europe, said Nathan Sales, the State Department coordinator for counter-terrorism.

Ammonium nitrate is a chemical compound commonly used as a fertiliser, but it can be used to make explosives. It can also be dangerous in storage, as demonstrated by the huge explosion last month in the Lebanese capital of Beirut.

“Why would Hezbollah stockpile ammonium nitrate on European soil?” he said. “The answer is clear: Hezbollah put these weapons in place so it could conduct major terrorist attacks whenever it or its masters in Tehran deemed necessary.”

Sales called on more countries to do the same.

Hezbollah is a “unitary organization that cannot be subdivided into a military and so-called political wing,” he said. Without a full ban, the group can still raise money and recruit operatives.

“Hezbollah is one organization,” he said. “It is a terrorist organization.”

Below is a full rush transcript of the press conference by Ambassador-at-Large Nathan A. Sales State Department Coordinator for Counterterrorism.

Ambassador Sales:  Thanks very much, I’ll speak very briefly.  I just came from a panel discussion hosted by the American Jewish Committee about the Hizballah threat to Europe, and I wanted to share with you some of the key points that came up during this conference. 

The United States has long designated Hizballah as a terrorist organization in its entirety.  That goes back to 1997.  And we encourage more countries around the world to do the same, that is to say, to reject the false notion that there is a distinction between a so-called political wing of Hizballah and Hizballah’s terrorist enterprises.  Our ask is for more countries to designate Hizballah in its entirety. 

We’re seeing really incredible moments on that front as more and more countries around the world recognize reality and designate or ban the group in its entirety.  In 2019, the United Kingdom did so.  Germany this year banned Hizballah in its entirety.  And just within the past several months we’ve seen similar announcements from Lithuania, Kosovo, and Serbia.  Closer to home, here in the Western Hemisphere we’ve seen incredible momentum with countries like Argentina, Paraguay, Colombia, and Honduras designating or banning Hizballah in its entirety within the past 18 months. 

Part of the reason why these countries are designating Hizballah is because they recognize the threat that Hizballah poses to the world and to them.  Earlier today I revealed new information about the threat that Hizballah poses to Europe and its presence in Europe, and I’d like to share that previously sensitive information with you now. 

Since 2012, Hizballah has established caches of ammonium nitrate throughout Europe by transporting first aid kits whose cold packs contain the substance.  And as we all saw in the Port of Beirut explosion, ammonium nitrate is a truly dangerous substance. 

To continue, I can reveal that such caches have been moved through Belgium to France, Greece, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland.  I can also reveal that significant ammonium nitrate caches have been discovered or destroyed in France, Greece, and Italy.  We have reason to believe that this activity is still underway.  As of 2018, ammonium nitrate caches were still suspected throughout Europe, possibly in Greece, Italy, and Spain. 

And that is why we continue to regard Hizballah as a threat, not just to the United States but to our European allies as well.  And that is why we renew our call for more countries to designate Hizballah in its entirety, and for the European Union to expand its 2013 designation of the so-called military wing to reach the entire organization. 

Question:  What’s your assessment of the reality that Hizballah represent in Lebanon and the region? 

Ambassador Sales:  Well, we think that Hizballah is not a force for stability in Lebanon.  To the contrary, we think that Hizballah is a force for instability in Lebanon.  Hizballah is not a solution to Lebanon’s problems.  Hizballah is the cause of Lebanon’s problems.  It has helped foster a culture of corruption and impunity.  It has enriched itself at the expense of the Lebanese people.  And the solution is for us to recognize the reality that Hizballah is not a political organization.   It’s not a legitimate representative of the Lebanese people.  What it is, is a terrorist organization that exists to shed blood around the world, act at the behest of its masters in Tehran.  The way to address this problem is to call it for what it is, and marginalize and isolate Hizballah as the terrorist group that it is.  Thank you. 

Question:  I see that most European countries consider that Hizballah is a completely terrorist organization.  This was well-received by the United States.  But the question is, why France is dealing with flexibility with Hizballah in Lebanon? 

Ambassador Sales:  I think a number of European countries, like the UK and Germany, share our view that Hizballah is a terrorist organization through and through.  We’d like to see more join the club, as it were.  When it comes to France and our objectives in Lebanon, I think France and the United States share the same goal; we all want to see a Lebanon that is sovereign, that is prosperous, and that is stable.  At the same time, I think we have to recognize that we have some pretty substantial disagreements about how best to accomplish that goal. 

We do not think that it is helpful to engage with Hizballah as though it were a legitimate political actor.  In our view, those sorts of engagements only serve to legitimize what is in fact a terrorist organization.  Instead, the U.S. approach is to engage with the legitimate organs of the Lebanese state, including providing extensive assistance to those entities in the hopes that the Lebanese state can stand up strong and prosper without Hizballah’s interference. 

Since 2006, the United States has invested billions of dollars in Lebanon.  We’ve devoted more than $2 billion to improve the capabilities of Lebanon security services.  We’ve also devoted more than a billion dollars of economic assistance to Lebanon.  So we all want the same thing for Lebanon, but the way to get there does not run through Hizballah, in our view. 

Question:  First, what’s the importance of the sanctions today on Hizballah?  And second, what’s the effect of the U.S. sanctions on the party, especially that it’s still able to provide money, salaries, and its followers’ needs? 

Question:  Are you seeing any signs from Lebanon that these sanctions are perhaps driving a wedge between Hizballah and its ally?  And I know it’s one question, but I’m going to just throw that in.  There is a sectarian, now, battle over the formation of the next government.  Does the U.S. object to having a Shia finance minister, I mean, if we can be blunt about it? 

Ambassador Sales:  Thanks for the question.  So these are sort of inside baseball questions about the behind-the-scenes developments in Lebanon as it – as it struggles with some very significant crises:  the financial crisis brought on by decades of corruption and mismanagement, aided and abetted, of course, by Hizballah, as well as the more immediate humanitarian catastrophe in the wake of the Beirut port explosion. 

I don’t have a whole lot to say about what’s going on behind the scenes other than to reiterate what the United States’ goal is in this situation.  We want to see a Lebanon that is sovereign and independent and prosperous and stable.  And we want to see it emerge from the current crises in a way that allows it to reach that goal.  And we think the best way to reach that outcome is not to legitimize Hizballah as a political player, but to marginalize and isolate it and rely on other legitimate organs of Lebanese society and the Lebanese state.  Thanks. 

Question:   Today new sanctions will be issued against Lebanese officials that are linked to Hizballah.  Will the U.S. sanctions be similar to European sanctions?  What will the repercussions be on the struggling Lebanese government?  Will you be able to separate the military and political part?

Ambassador Sales:  Our sanctions do not distinguish between a military part of Hizballah or a political part of Hizballah.  Our sanctions are premised on the reality that Hizballah is a single organization, and it’s a terrorist organization, root and branch.  And you don’t need to take the U.S.’s word for that.  Hizballah itself has been perfectly clear that they do not themselves recognize a distinction between their terrorist operations and a so-called political branch.  So our sanctions against Hizballah are and always have been directed at the entirety of the organization, and that will continue to be the case. 

As far as the effects of our sanctions are concerned, and this is true regardless of whether we’re talking about sanctions on Hizballah or al-Qaeda or ISIS or any other terrorist organization, the effect is to exclude the named individuals and entities from the U.S. financial system, and to drive up their costs of doing business.  We want to make it harder for them to raise money.  We want to make it harder for them to transfer money.  We want to make it harder for them to run front companies because by starving these organizations of resources, you prevent them from committing acts of mass murder. 

Question:  Are you trying to link the incident that took place in our port here in Beirut with what’s happening in Europe and, like, So are you trying to say that these ammonium nitrates belonged to Hizballah at the port?  Is that what you’re trying to picture here, Ambassador Sales?


Ambassador Sales:  We know that Hizballah has stored massive amounts of ammonium nitrate across Europe.  According to the information I revealed today, those sorts of caches have been found in a number of countries, including the UK, Greece, France, Italy, and a number of others.  We also know from what we saw in Beirut the truly destructive power of ammonium nitrate.  It’s capable of inflicting mass destruction when used as an explosive.  That is why the United States has called for a full, open, and transparent and thorough investigation of the explosion in Beirut, and we hope to see the results of that shortly.

Question:  My question was that Mr. David Schenker mentioned that the sanctions on former ministers Finyanus and Ali Hassan Khalil were a message to other Lebanese politicians who failed to fight corruption.  On what grounds would the U.S. administration take this kind of sanctions leaning towards – in – for targeting corruption, or those who didn’t fight corruption?


Ambassador Sales:  Well, we think that the sanctions send a clear signal that business as usual in Lebanon is not going to work for the Lebanese people.  I don’t have much more to add beyond what Assistant Secretary Schenker has said.  But the United States stands firmly on the side of the Lebanese people whose aspiration is for a stable state in which the government is responsive to their needs and not beholden to a terrorist organization.

Question:  I would like to ask you, are there any comments on the Hizballah in the GCC?  As you mentioned on the cache of the ammonium nitrate, do you see a risk of these in this region?  What’s your comment on that?  


Ambassador Sales:  I don’t have any more sensitive information to reveal today.  But what I can tell you more broadly is in the Gulf region, we are grateful to the Gulf Cooperation Council as well as the Arab League for the actions they have taken to counter Hizballah.  Both organizations have joined the United States in designating Hizballah in its entirety, and we commend them for that.  More broadly, we have seen a range of Iran-backed terrorist organizations – not just Hizballah but others backed by Iran – that are active in the region and that seek to promote violence, whether it’s Kata’ib Hizballah in Iraq, Al-Ashtar Brigades in Bahrain, or various other groups with links to Iran.  The story is very similar.  The story is the same.  These groups take money, weapons, and resources from their masters in Tehran, use those resources to commit acts of violence, and the United States will do everything in our power using our sanctions tools to dry up those resources so that our partners in the Gulf don’t have to face this threat.

Question:  You specifically mentioned that sanctions have had an impact on Hizballah specifically.  Do you see the sanctions having a positive impact on the U.S. will to drive a wedge between Hizballah and its allies inside Lebanon?


Ambassador Sales:  If you’ve been sanctioned by the United States and by Britain and by Germany, that is a pretty good sign that you’re not a legitimate political organization.  It’s a pretty good sign that you’re a terrorist organization.  So we think there is an obvious practical effect to our sanctions, which is to dry up resources, and those are having a demonstrable effect.  Hassan Nasrallah not so long ago was publicly requesting donations because our sanctions have had a significant enough bite that he is not able to count on the same level of support that he previously enjoyed.  But in addition to those practical consequences, there’s also a very strong messaging value to our sanctions, and that is to say by branding you a terrorist organization, by recognizing the reality that you’re a terrorist organization, it helps to marginalize and isolate that group.

Question:  You label Hizballah at a whole as a terrorist group; on the other hand, your – as far as I know, your ambassador is in Beirut and is dealing with Hizballah members of government and the U.S. does it too, the whole administration.  So isn’t that consequent – inconsequent, because is the U.S. dealing with terrorists, negotiating?  I mean, that can’t be.


Ambassador Sales:  I guess I’d reject the premise of your question, which is that the United States is engaging with Hizballah.  That’s simply not the case.  Our policy has never been to engage Hizballah, and that is a policy that has stretched back for 23 years and has been shared by presidents and administrations of very different political parties and very different overall views.  But the one thing that has united U.S. policy towards Hizballah since 1997 is to call it for what it is: a terrorist organization.  

Now, we are engaged in very robust diplomacy with Lebanon and we are engaged in very robust foreign assistance to Lebanon.  But make no mistake, that is engagement with the legitimate organs of the Lebanese state, and the purpose of that engagement is precisely to strengthen them against Hizballah’s malign influence.  So we see no double standard whatsoever in marginalizing and sanctioning Hizballah on the one hand, and dealing with non-Hizballah elements of the Lebanese state on the other.  Thank you.

Question:  I want to ask about Ismail Haniyeh’s visit to Lebanon.  he’s living in Lebanon for two weeks.  How does the United States look for this visit, especially since he was in Turkey and he met President Erdogan, knowing that Turkey is a member of NATO?


Ambassador Sales:  It’s not helpful for a designated terrorist like Ismail Haniyeh to be able to travel freely throughout the Middle East or throughout the world.  Our position is very clear.  Hamas is a designated terrorist organization.  Like Hizballah, it was one of the first groups ever to be designated by the United States.  And Haniyeh himself has been additionally singled out as a specially designated global terrorist.  We do not regard him as a legitimate political actor.  He is a person who has blood on his hands and we would encourage the rest of the world to recognize him for what he is and treat him accordingly, as a terrorist, not a statesman.

September 20, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Russia and Norway

More NATO jets are being scrambled from Norway

by Nadarajah Sethurupan September 20, 2020
written by Nadarajah Sethurupan

Two NATO F-16s scrambled into the air on Monday to identify Russian military planes, as the number of such QRAs (Quick Reaction Alerts) in the High North has already surpassed the 2019 count.

“We can confirm NATO QRA from Bodø on mission today,” spokesperson Major Brynjar Stordal told the Barents Observer.

A Norwegian F-16 flies alongside a Russian Il-38 aircraft. (Norwegian Air Force via The Independent Barents Observer)

Also this weekend, Stordal said, two Russian Tu-142 anti-submarine warfare planes from the Northern Fleet were identified outside Norwegian air space. The planes continued south to the north of England before returning home. Two weeks ago, the U.S. Navy submarine Seawolf surfaced outside Tromsø in northern Norway for crew replacement.

By September 14, Norwegian fighter jets on NATO alert have been scrambled 41 times. In 2019, 38 QRA take-offs took place. The number of Russian aircraft identified last year was 83, one less than so far in 2020, which still has more than 3 months left.

The Norwegian Joint Headquarters underlines that it has several means to identify Russian military planes, so scrambles itself do not necessarily paint the whole picture.

In the first 15 years after the end of the first Cold War, there were very few scrambles. In 2007, Russian long-range bombers (Tu-95 and Tu-160) again started to fly west of the Barents Sea into international airspace in the North Atlantic.

The number of scrambles from the airbase in Bodø increased until 2014. In 2015-2016 the Russian military flight activity in the High North was substantially lower again, which the Norwegian military attributed to activities other places, and maintenance challenges with the planes. From 2018, when Norway hosted the Trident Juncture exercise, Russia’s long-distance flights increased again.

Last week, Norwegian, British, American and Danish maritime surveillance aircraft were daily met by Russian fighter jets over international airspace in the Barents Sea as the four-nation NATO naval group were exercising navigation in the area.

September 20, 2020 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Norwegian Nobel Prize 2024

101207 The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2024 to Japan’s Hiroshima bomb survivor group Nihon Hidankyo.

Special Interest

  • Africa and Norway
  • Asia and Norway
  • Asylum
  • China and Norway
  • Corruption in Norway
  • Crimes
  • Defence
  • Diplomatic relations
  • Economics
  • Environment
  • Farming
  • Killing
  • Media Freedom
  • Middle East and Norway
  • NATO and Norway
  • Nobel Peace Prize
  • Norwegian Aid
  • Norwegian American
  • Oil & Gas
  • Peace Talks
  • Politics
  • Racism in Norway
  • Religion
  • Russia and Norway
  • Royal House
  • Science
  • Sex scandal
  • Sports
  • Spy War
  • Srilanka and Norway
  • Svalbard
  • Terrorist
  • Taiwan and Norway
  • Video clips

Follow Us

Recent Posts

  • Indonesia’s Emission Reduction Efforts A Success

    November 9, 2025
  • Oslo hosts Azerbaijan’s Victory Day anniversary

    November 8, 2025
  • Norway lifts arms embargo against Cyprus

    November 8, 2025
  • Norwegian Foreign Minister visit China

    November 8, 2025
  • Chinese Buses Can Be Turned Off Remotely in Norway

    November 6, 2025
  • Russia’s Embassy in Norway Honors the 80th Anniversary of Victory

    November 1, 2025

Social Feed

Social Feed

Editors’ Picks

Norway opens market for Sri Lankan fish exports...

May 13, 2016

Sri Lanka – Nordic Business Council holds discussions...

May 15, 2016

Good governance to Sri Lanka

May 15, 2016

Shock and Joy in Sri Lanka – Erik...

May 15, 2016

Sri Lanka-Norway plenty of new opportunities for business–...

May 15, 2016

NORWAY NEWS is an online news site, written in English, dedicated to Norwegian affairs at home and abroad. Norway News.com is published online. It is a daily online newspaper in existence since May, 2003. The site is run by an Independent Journalist.

Facebook Twitter Youtube

Useful Links

    • Work With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Collaboration
    • Data Collection
    • Workplace
    • Adverstising
    • Privacy Policy
    • International Collab
    • Feedback
    • Terms of Use
    • About Our Ads
    • Help & Support
    • Entertainment
    • News Covering
    • Technology
    • Trending Now

Politics

Syrian, Norway to boost cooperation on mine clearance
Erna to step down as Conservative Party leader in 2026
Norwegian Labour Party on re-election win

Latest Articles

Indonesia’s Emission Reduction Efforts A Success
Oslo hosts Azerbaijan’s Victory Day anniversary
Norway lifts arms embargo against Cyprus
Norwegian Foreign Minister visit China

Norway News 2025 . All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News

  • Home
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
NORWAY NEWS – latest news, breaking stories and comment – NORWAY NEWS
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Other News
    • Africa and Norway
    • Asia and Norway
    • Asylum
    • Breaking News
    • China and Norway
    • Corruption in Norway
    • Crimes
    • Defence
    • Diplomatic relations
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Farming
    • Featured
    • Health
    • Killing
    • Media Freedom
    • Middle East and Norway
    • NATO and Norway
    • Nobel Peace Prize
    • Norwegian Aid
    • Norwegian American
    • Oil & Gas
    • Peace Talks
    • Politics
    • Racism in Norway
    • Religion
    • Royal House
    • Russia and Norway
    • Science
    • Sex scandal
    • Sports
    • Spy War
    • Srilanka and Norway
    • Svalbard
    • Taiwan and Norway
    • Terrorist
    • Travel
    • Video clips
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us

Editor’s Picks

  • UN concern over Sri Lanka’s cases of enforced disappearances

    October 8, 2025
  • UN Human Rights Council Resolution on Sri Lanka’s Path to Reconciliation

    October 7, 2025
  • International should support Sri Lanka: Solheim

    October 4, 2024
  • Norwegian Meets Sri Lankan’s Challenges

    May 3, 2024
  • Norwegian Ambassador meets JVP in Sri Lanka

    May 2, 2024
  • “The man who didn’t run away” – Eric Solheim

    April 30, 2024

Newsletter

@2025 - All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Norway News